Effect of microstructural features on the hot ductility of 2.25Cr–1Mo steel

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.047Get rights and content

Abstract

Some factors contributing to the hot ductility losses of a 2.25Cr–1Mo steel were identified over the temperature range 750–950 °C, after the specimens were austenitized at 1000 °C, furnace cooled to different temperatures, and held there for sufficient periods of time, followed by tensile testing. There were two types of ferrite present in the microstructure, namely, pro-eutectoid ferrite and deformation-induced ferrite. The pro-eutectoid ferrite was only formed below Ar3 (∼825 °C), which was nucleated on the inclusions and distributed uniformly. Nevertheless, the deformation-induced ferrite was formed in a much wider temperature range. It was distributed mainly along austenite grain boundaries above Ar3, and around the pro-eutectoid ferrite below Ar3. The deformation-induced ferrite had a primary effect on the hot ductility, which was mainly responsible for a hot ductility trough. There was a peak in the quantity of deformation-induced ferrite between 800 and 900 °C, which was just corresponding to the hot ductility trough. The morphology of ferrite was also essential. The net-like structure of ferrite formed along austenite grain boundaries was the most deleterious to the hot ductility.

Introduction

Transverse cracking on the surface of continuously cast products is still a serious problem which causes ductility losses in the austenite–ferrite region for low alloy low carbon steels. Cracks can nucleate and propagate during the straightening operation which is carried out normally in the range 700–950 °C. Previous studies [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] have indicated that hot ductility deterioration in the austenite–ferrite region is caused by the following factors: (1) formation of a thin pro-eutectoid ferrite layer along austenite grain boundaries; (2) segregation of undesirable elements, such as S, Sb, Sn, As, P, Cu and others, at ferrite/austenite interfaces or at austenite grain boundaries; and (3) intergranular precipitation of carbides, carbonitrides, or nitrides.

Mintz et al. [1] suggested that the hot ductility trough is controlled by the austenite–ferrite transformation. It was confirmed [2] that the hot ductility trough in austenite–ferrite region depends primarily on the thickness of pro-eutectoid ferrite formed along austenite grain boundaries. Nachtrab and Chou [3] put forward that grain boundary segregation of Sn, Cu and Sb can seriously reduce the hot ductility of C–Mn steel and deformation at high temperatures can enhance the grain boundary segregation. Harada et al. [4] pointed out that the origin of surface transverse cracks is the micro-segregation, particularly of phosphorus. A study by Guo et al. [5] demonstrated that a 2.25Cr–1Mo steel containing 0.06 wt.%P has a lower hot ductility than the steel containing 0.01 wt.%P at temperatures between 750 and 1000 °C. However, as reviewed by Mintz [6], phosphorus is likely to improve the hot ductility and reduce transverse cracking during straightening if the segregation to grain boundary is controlled.

Until the present time, there have been few studies that have distinguished the effects of deformation-induced ferrite and pro-eutectoid ferrite on the hot ductility. It was the aim of the present work to investigate the effects of the morphology and magnitude of these two different ferrites on the hot ductility of a 2.25Cr–1Mo steel. Dynamic recrystallization and non-equilibrium segregation of phosphorus during high temperature deformation were also addressed.

Section snippets

Experimental procedures

The experimental steel was prepared by vacuum induction melting with an ingot of 50 kg. The chemical composition of the steel (wt.%) was 0.13C, 0.40Si, 0.53Mn, 0.028P, 0.0097S, 0.023Cu, 2.45Cr and 0.97Mo. Obviously, the steel was doped with P. The resulting ingot was hot rolled in the range 900–1000 °C into a plate 20 mm in thickness. The tensile specimens were machined from the plate with their axes perpendicular to the rolling direction. The specimens had a gauge length of 50 mm with a gauge

Results and discussion

The hot ductility values at different temperatures between 750 and 950 °C are presented in Fig. 1. Since there were no data points between 750 and 800 °C and between 850 and 900 °C, a dashed line was used to link the data points from 750 to 800 °C and from 850 to 900 °C. As seen, there is an evident ductility trough in the range 750–900 °C and the minimum ductility with an RA value of 63.3% occurs at 825 °C. Fig. 2 shows typical microstructures after hot tensile testing at different temperatures.

Conclusions

The ferrite concerned in the present work is divided into pro-eutectoid ferrite and deformation-induced ferrite. The pro-eutectoid ferrite is formed below Ar3 (∼825 °C) and distributed uniformly throughout the microstructure. The deformation-induced thin ferrite layer is formed along austenite grain boundaries above Ar3, while it is nucleated on the pro-eutectoid ferrite below Ar3, resulting in an isolated distribution. The quantity of deformation-induced ferrite has a primary effect on the hot

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. 50671033.

References (35)

  • S.-H. Song et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2008)
  • H. Erhart et al.

    Scr. Metall.

    (1983)
  • S.C. Hong et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2003)
  • D.V. Shtansky et al.

    Acta. Mater.

    (1997)
  • M.P. Seah

    Acta Metall.

    (1980)
  • S.-H. Song et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2008)
  • M. Militzer et al.

    Acta Metall. Mater.

    (1994)
  • S.C. Hong et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2003)
  • B. Mintz et al.

    Mater. Sci. Technol.

    (1993)
  • C. Ouchi et al.

    Trans. ISIJ

    (1982)
  • W.T. Nachtrab et al.

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (1984)
  • S. Harada et al.

    ISIJ Int.

    (1990)
  • A.-M. Guo et al.

    Mater. Sci. Technol.

    (2003)
  • B. Mintz

    ISIJ Int.

    (1999)
  • D. McLean

    Grain Boundaries in Metals

    (1957)
  • M. Gojic et al.

    ISIJ Int.

    (1997)
  • K. Yasumoto et al.

    Mater. Sci. Technol.

    (1985)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text