Elsevier

Materials Science and Engineering: A

Volume 556, 30 October 2012, Pages 175-183
Materials Science and Engineering: A

Friction-stir dissimilar welding of aluminium alloy to high strength steels: Mechanical properties and their relation to microstructure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.06.076Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of light-weight materials for industrial applications is a driving force for the development of joining techniques. Friction stir welding (FSW) inspired joints of dissimilar materials because it does not involve bulk melting of the basic components. Here, two different grades of high strength steel (HSS), with different microstructures and strengths, were joined to AA6181-T4 Al alloy by FSW. The purpose of this study is to clarify the influence of the distinct HSS base material on the joint efficiency. The joints were produced using the same welding parameter/setup and characterised regarding microstructure and mechanical properties. Both joints could be produced without any defects. Microstructure investigations reveal similar microstructure developments in both joints, although there are differences e.g. in the size and amount of detached steel particles in the aluminium alloy (heat and thermomechanical affected zone). The weld strengths are similar, showing that the joint efficiency depends foremost on the mechanical properties of the heat and the thermomechanical affected zone of the aluminium alloy.

Introduction

Energy and environmental issues in transportation systems have a strong impact on material selection and on the development of joining techniques [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. The incorporation of light-weight materials in many structures (e.g. automotive, shipbuilding and aerospace) allow a reduction of weight and consequently fuel consumption. In this regard, dissimilar joints between light-weight materials such as aluminium alloys (Al alloy) and steels are receiving increased interest both in science and industrial application [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. However, the substitution of one material for another is not straightforward and highly efficient products require appropriate joining processes.

Dissimilar fusion welding between Al alloy and steels is a challenge in welding control because of the large differences in melting temperature and physical and mechanical properties of the alloys involved. The process often results in complex weld pool shapes, inhomogeneous solidification microstructures and segregations in addition, the extremely low solubility of Fe in Al leads to the formation of brittle and excessive Al-rich FexAly intermetallic phases [21], [22] which are detrimental for the mechanical properties of the joint [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [20], [22].

Friction stir welding (FSW) is based on extreme plastic deformation in the solid-state where no associated bulk melting is involved [23], [24], [25], [26]. At early stages of the process development, FSW appears especially attractive for joining Al alloys and other light-weight materials like Mg alloys [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. This is connected with two main reasons:

  • (1)

    the process prevents melting and solidification, minimising residual stresses, cracking, porosity and loss of volatile solutes;

  • (2)

    the plastic deformation (stirring) of such light-weight materials (e.g. Al and Mg alloys) can be realized using relatively simple welding tools (e.g. made of tool steel).

For an application of the FSW process on steels and titanium, an optimisation of tool material and geometry is needed; continuing attempts can be found in the literature [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. However, FSW application for these materials is still limited by the cost of effective available tools [37].

In the case of dissimilar joints, FSW appears as a suitable and promising process to minimise problems related to materials incompatible with respect to melting temperatures and the formation of brittle intermetallic phases [27], [38]. Recent studies have shown that welds between dissimilar materials such as Mg alloys to Al alloys [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], Mg alloys to steels [45], [46], [47], Al alloys to Titanium [48] and Al alloys to steels [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20] can be produced by FSW. The high quality of dissimilar welds produced between Al or Mg alloys to steels or titanium in a butt-joint configuration is associated to the smart idea of positioning the tool pin centre shifted towards the Al or Mg alloys (fixed on the retreating side) [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [48] or fixing Al or Mg alloys on the top side in the case of lap joints [13], [45], [46], [47]. Thus, the tool barely makes contact with the steel and minimum tool wear occurs, improving the cost efficiency of the process.

In the present study, two grades of high strength steel (HSS) with significantly different microstructure, and strengths were selected to be joined to AA6181-T4 Al alloy by FSW. In order to access the influence of the distinct HSS base material on joint efficiency, the joints were produced by applying the same welding parameters and by shifting the tool pin centre towards the Al alloy. Early investigations were conducted in one of these joints and presented elsewhere [14]. Those studies [14] were focussed on the analysis of the complex material flow based on microstructural observations applying SEM-EBSD technique. Here, we discuss the influence of distinct HSS base material on the joint efficiency and microstructure formation. We show that independent of the HSS chosen the joint efficiency is determined by the heat-affected zone of the Al alloy, which controls the mechanical properties of the joints.

Section snippets

Materials

Commercially available materials that are suitable for automotive structures and reinforcement parts were selected for this study. DP600 and HC260LA HSS plates were chosen to be joined to AA6181-T4 Al alloy by FSW. The chemical composition and the mechanical properties of the steels and the Al alloy are presented in Table 1, Table 2, respectively. It can be seen that the Al alloy tensile strength is substantially less than those of the HSSs.

The microstructure of the base materials (BMs) is

Microstructure of the joints

On the macroscopic scale, the as-welded joints revealed a good weld surface quality containing neither macro voids/cracks nor imperfections regarding the weld alignment (Fig. 2b).

Through the weld cross section, both analysed joints revealed the same microstructure features showing no evidence of mixing between the Al alloy and the HSS. In both cases, a small amount of detached particles of HSS transported into the Al alloy was observed (Fig. 3). However, comparing both joints, it is evident

Discussion

In this study, dissimilar joints between Al alloy and two grades of HSS were investigated in terms of microstructure and mechanical properties. The purpose of the study is to clarify the influence of distinct HSS BMs on the joint efficiency. The results have shown that both investigated samples show the same microstructure and properties since a very similar microstructure evolution occurred during the welding process. The welding parameter chosen (tool offset position) meant that severe

Conclusions

In the present study, friction-stir dissimilar joints between two grades of HSS (DP600 and HC260LA) and AA6181-T4 Al alloy were produced applying the same welding parameters and setup (tool offset position). The studies focussed on the influence of distinct HSS BMs on the joint efficiency. The conducted analysis can be summarised as follows:

  • (a)

    Due to the tool offset position, the complex material flow in the stir zone mainly involves the Al alloy. Crossing all weld regions in the Al alloy side

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres for financial support via the virtual institute ‘Improving Performance and Productivity of Integral Structures through Fundamental Understanding of Metallurgical Reactions in Metallic Joints’ (VI-IPSUS). The authors also would like to thank Mr. Martin Preilowski for help in sample preparation during his undergraduate studies at MPIE.

References (50)

  • T.A. Barnes et al.

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2000)
  • T.A. Barnes et al.

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2000)
  • G. Michalos et al.

    CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol.

    (2010)
  • N.S. Ermolaeva et al.

    Mater. Des.

    (2004)
  • R. Borrisutthekul et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2007)
  • A. Mathieu et al.

    Opt. Laser Technol.

    (2007)
  • P. Peyre et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2007)
  • T. Tanaka et al.

    Scr. Mater.

    (2009)
  • T. Watanabe et al.

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (2006)
  • C.M. Chen et al.

    Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.

    (2004)
  • H. Uzun et al.

    Mater. Des.

    (2005)
  • W.-B. Lee et al.

    Scr. Mater.

    (2006)
  • H. Springer et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2011)
  • H. Springer et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2011)
  • R.S. Mishra et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. R

    (2005)
  • R. Nandan et al.

    Prog. Mater. Sci.

    (2008)
  • C. Leitão et al.

    Mater. Des.

    (2009)
  • N.T. Kumbhar et al.

    Mater. Des.

    (2011)
  • U.F.H.R. Suhuddin et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2009)
  • W. Xunhong et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2006)
  • T. Saeid et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2010)
  • M. Ghosh et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2011)
  • S. Mironov et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2009)
  • A. Kostka et al.

    Scr. Mater.

    (2009)
  • M.A. Mofid et al.

    Mater. Des.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (155)

    • Dissimilar welding of aluminium to steel: A review

      2024, Journal of Manufacturing Processes
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text