Tensile and fatigue properties of gravity casting aluminum alloys for engine cylinder heads
Introduction
In recent years, Al–Si–Cu alloys are extensively applied in the automotive industry owing to their high cast-ability, high specific strength and low shrink rate [1]. Conventional casting technologies proposed up to date for Al alloy include die casting (DC) and gravity casting (GC). Compared with the high pressure die casting (HPDC) method, which is the most commonly employed casting method in Al–Si–Cu alloy [2], the GC method, for high-volume production, has the advantage of a low production cost. Moreover, GC alloy can satisfy the demands of critical automobile components with complex geometries especially for thick wall parts, such as cylinder heads. GC alloy can also provide excellent mechanical properties through heat treatment after casting. In order to employ Al–Si–Cu alloys for automobile applications, information about their mechanical properties would be required, such as their tensile and fatigue properties.
The tensile properties of Al–Si–Cu alloys have been investigated in previous research. Ceschinia et al. found that the tensile strength (yield strength YS and ultimate tensile stress UTS) of AlSi10Cu2 alloy increased with the decreasing of the average secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS) [3]. In addition, Elhadari et al. [4] indicated that both monotonic and cyclic yield strengths increased with the addition of alloying elements Ti/Zr/V. It was also reported that the tiny eutectic structures and fine round α-Al phases are favorable for better tensile strength [1], [5], and other microstructural features, such as morphology and composition of the Copper-rich phases, as well as Fe-rich intermetallic compounds, can play an important role in tensile behavior [6], [7], [8]. These fundamental studies have proven that the tensile properties of Al–Si–Cu alloys depend very strongly on the microstructure feature. However, a link to strain hardening is often not made, particularly under both monotonic and cyclic loading conditions. For example, one study has outlined the relationship between tensile behavior and strain hardening under monotonic loading [4], but such information is not available for fatigue loading conditions in cast AlSi9Cu3 (333) alloy. On the other hand, for applications as load-bearing automobile components, it is essential to evaluate the fatigue properties of the material to be utilized.
Strain-controlled low-cycle fatigue (LCF) can be a primary consideration in the design of products for industrial purposes [9]. However, ongoing work [3], [5], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] has mainly focused on high-cycle fatigue (HCF) behavior in Al–Si–Cu alloys. Only limited studies on low-cycle fatigue behavior have been reported [4], [16], [17], [18]. Elhadari et al. [4] and Chen et al. [16] reported the degree of cyclic hardening increased with increasing total strain amplitudes, and the fatigue lives determined under strain control could be nicely described by well-known Basquin's equation and Coffin–Manson relationship. Ovono et al. [17] observed that fatigue cracks always nucleated from larger pores and intermetallic compounds of cast 333 aluminum alloys. They also found that the fatigue life of Al–Si–Cu alloys was essentially controlled by the volume fraction of pores and the density of intermetallic compounds. Despite several researchers have examined the LCF properties of Al–Si–Cu alloys, there is very little consistency in the available data for the design of automobile applications. To the authors' knowledge, no study has been performed investigating in the literature for the LCF behavior of GC 333 aluminum alloy.
The aim of this study is, therefore, to investigate experimentally the room temperature mechanical properties of GC 333-T6 aluminum alloy under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions. A thorough investigation on the fatigue mechanism related to various strain amplitudes under LCF condition was also analyzed.
Section snippets
Material and experimental procedure
Specimens used for the microstructure analysis, as well as for the tensile and LCF tests, were made of Al–Si–Cu alloy. The nominal composition of this material is 9.15% Si, 3.23% Cu, 0.37% Fe, 0.36% Zn, 0.30% Mg, 0.26% Ni, 0.16% Mn, 0.038% Sr, and the balance Al.
Specimens were machined from the bolt boss of commercial automobile engineer cylinder heads with loading axis along the ZC direction, as shown in Fig. 1 (marked with red rectangular box). The heads were made of the GC 333 aluminum
Microstructural evaluation
The following constituent phases of GC 333-T6 alloy were identified in the XRD spectra (Fig. 2). It is mainly composed of Al, Si, θ-Al2Cu and α-Al15(FeMn)3Si2 (α-Fe) phases. The presence of β-Al5FeSi (β-Fe) or β-Mg2Si could not be detected in the present XRD patterns. This indicates that either this phase does not form or the precipitates are of nanometric size and therefore cannot be detected by XRD.
In Fig. 3, representative SEM micrographs (BSE mode) obtained in the GC 333-T6 are presented.
Conclusions
The tensile and fatigue properties of GC 333-T6 aluminum alloys, machined from the bolt boss of commercial automobile engineer cylinder heads, have been studied experimentally. The following conclusions can be drawn.
- (1)
The GC 333-T6 alloy exhibited higher yield strength (YS), ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and quality Index, but lower hardening capacity than GC 333 aluminum alloy without heat treatment. This may be attributed to the different microstructural feature of the GC 333-T6 aluminum
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express sincere thanks to B. Liu for his assistance in the experiments. The authors also thank Dr. J.Q. Ren for the helpful discussion and continuous encouragement while performing this investigation.
References (40)
- et al.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
(2012) - et al.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
(2011) - et al.
Mater Des.
(2012) - et al.
Mater. Des.
(2011) - et al.
Int. J. Fatigue
(2003) - et al.
Mater. Des.
(2011) - et al.
J. Alloys Compd.
(2008) - et al.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
(2009) - et al.
Scr. Mater.
(2007) - et al.
Mater. Sci. Eng.
(1977)
Int. J. Fatigue
Eng. Fract. Mech.
Acta Mater.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Cited by (64)
Effect of anodizing on high cycle fatigue behaviour of cast AlSi8Mg-T6 alloy
2023, International Journal of FatigueLow cycle fatigue behavior and fatigue life prediction of 2195 Al-Li alloy at warm temperatures
2023, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China (English Edition)High temperature effect on short crack behaviour in hypoeutectic Al-Si alloys and its modelling
2023, Theoretical and Applied Fracture MechanicsHigh cycle fatigue analysis and modelling of cast Al–Si alloys extracted from cylinder heads considering microstructure characteristics
2022, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyMicrostructure related analysis of tensile and fatigue properties for sand casting aluminum alloy cylinder head
2022, Engineering Failure AnalysisAn investigation on tensile and fatigue properties of cast Al-7Si-1.5Cu alloy applied in cylinder head considering size effect phenomenon
2022, Materials Today CommunicationsCitation Excerpt :To truly reflect the mechanical properties of the cylinder head, it is necessary to conduct sampling, testing, and analyzing work in addition to the study of casting materials. Fan et al [11]. cut specimens from the bolt boss of the Al-Si-Cu alloy cylinder head and tested tensile properties and found that both YS and UTS of the specimens improved after T6 heat treatment.