Hot deformation characteristic and processing map of superaustenitic stainless steel S32654

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.027Get rights and content

Abstract

The hot deformation behavior of superaustenitic stainless steel S32654 was studied in the temperature range of 950–1200 °C and strain rate range of 0.001–10 s−1 employing hot compression tests. The results show that peak stress increases with decreasing of temperature and increasing of strain rate. The apparent activation energy of this alloy is about 469 kJ/mol. The processing maps for hot working were developed on the basis of flow stress data and the dynamic materials model. It is found that the features of the maps obtained in the strain range of 0.2–1.0 are fundamentally similar, indicating that the strain does not have a significant influence on processing map. The maps exhibited two domains. The first domain occurs in the strain rate range of 0.01–0.4 s−1 and temperature range of 1030–1150 °C with a peak efficiency of about 49%, which is considered as the optimum window for hot working. The microstructure observations of the specimens deformed in this domain showed the full dynamic recrystallization (DRX) structure with finer and more homogeneous grain sizes. The second domain occurs at the temperatures higher than 1160 °C and strain rates lower than 0.1 s−1 with a peak efficiency of about 41%, the microstructure observations in this domain also indicated the typical DRX structure accompanied with grain growth. A instability domain occurs at temperatures below 1175 °C and strain rate above 0.1 s−1.

Introduction

Superaustenitic stainless steel S32654 possessing outstanding combination of corrosion resistance and high strength is widely used in very hostile environments such as chemical processing equipment, pharmaceutical plant, flue gas desulphurization, waste incineration plants, equipment for recovery of chlorinated hydrocarbons, sea water piping, and nuclear power plant condenser tubes [1]. However, comparing to conventional austenitic stainless steel, S32654 has poorer hot plasticity and higher high-temperature strength because of its high contents of Cr, Mo, and N elements. The steel is susceptible to hot crack, especially to the edge crack due to its poor hot workability [2]. Recently, many investigations on S32654 which have been reported were mainly focused on precipitation behaviour and corrosion-resistant properties [3], [4], while the study of hot deformation behaviour has received much less attention. Therefore, it is useful to study the hot deformation behaviour of this alloy for the design and optimization of hot working processes and for microstructural control. It has been widely accepted that a “processing map’’ is effective to optimize the hot deformation processes and control microstructure without resorting to expensive and time-consuming trial and error methods [5].

Processing map was developed by Prasad et al. on the grounds of dynamic materials model (DMM), theoretical basises of which have been elucidated in detail in the earlier literature [6]. According to the DMM, the work-piece under hot working conditions plays a role of a power dissipator. The power dissipated through microstructural changes is represented by a dimensionless parameter (η) termed the efficiency of power dissipation, which is a function of strain rate sensitivity:η=2mm+1where m is strain rate sensitivity, the definition of which is given in the following:m=(lnσlnε̇)T,εwhere σ and ε̇ are the flow stress and strain rate, respectively.

The variation of η with deformation temperature and strain rate constitutes power dissipation map. The various domains in the map represent the specific microstructural process. A continuum criterion that is applicable to large plastic flow is used to delineate the domains of flow instability and given byξ(ε̇)=ln[m/(m+1)]lnε̇+m<0where ξ(ε̇) is the instability parameter. The flow instability is expected to occur when ξ(ε̇) becomes negative [7]. The variation of ξ(ε̇) with deformation temperature and strain rate constitutes instability map. The processing map can be constructed by the superimposition of instability map on power dissipation map, in which certain specific microstructural mechanisms and together with regimes of flow instabilities can be exhibited.

The purpose of the present investigation is to evaluate the hot deformation behaviour of S32654, with a view to obtaining optimum hot working parameters and understanding the constitutive behaviour by employing the processing map.

Section snippets

Experimental procedure

The material used in this investigation is superaustenitic stainless steel S32654 whose chemical composition (wt%) is 0.013C, 0.48Si, 2.81Mn, 24.77Cr, 22.12Ni, 0.30Cu, 7.05Mo, 0.41N, 0.0063P, 0.010S and Fe (balance). The experimental alloy was vacuum induction melted. And then the ingot was hot forged and rolled at 1180 °C into a sheet with a thickness of 12 mm. As indicated in Fig. 1, the initial microstructure after hot rolling consists of fine-equiaxed grains with average grain size of about

Flow stress–strain behaviour

Fig. 2 shows the representative true stress–true strain curves of superaustenitic stainless steel S32654 compressed at temperatures of (a) 1000 °C and (b) 1150 °C under different strain rates, and at strain rates of (c) 0.1 s−1 and (d) 10 s−1 under different temperatures. It can be observed from the figures that the peak stress which shows relatively remarkable dependence on deformation temperature and strain rate, increases with increasing of strain rate and decreasing of temperature.

The flow

Conclusions

The hot deformation behaviour of superaustenitic stainless steel S32654 has been studied by hot compression tests in the temperature range of 950–1200 °C and strain rate range of 0.001–10 s−1. The processing maps for hot working were developed on the basis of flow stress data and the dynamic materials model. The following conclusions are drawn from this investigation.

  • 1.

    The flow stresses increase to a peak followed by a continuous strain softening at strain rate higher than 0.1 s−1, while those at

References (29)

  • Y.V.R.K. Prasad et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (1998)
  • H. Mirzadeh et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2011)
  • M. Aghaie-Khafri et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2010)
  • Sung-ll Kim et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2001)
  • S. Venugopal et al.

    J. Mater. Process. Technol.

    (1996)
  • Akihiko Chiba et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2009)
  • N. Srinivasan et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2008)
  • G. Ganesan et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2004)
  • Yongquan Ning et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2010)
  • Dayong Cai et al.

    Mater. Charact.

    (2007)
  • Shengli Guo et al.

    J. Nucl. Mater.

    (2011)
  • R Ding et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2001)
  • V.M. Sample et al.

    Acta Metall.

    (1987)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2008)
  • Cited by (127)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text