Contributions of microstructural features to the integrated hardness of TA15 titanium alloy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2014.12.087Get rights and content

Abstract

Analysis of the contributions of microstructural features to integrated property of TA15 titanium alloy is a crucial issue for microstructure design and obtaining desired material properties. To this end, various microstructural features, such as equiaxed primary α phase (αp) and its boundary (αGB), transformed β matrix (βt) consisting of α plate and residual β phase (βbase) as well as the interface between them (βGB) were obtained by different isothermal compression and heat treatment conditions. Nanoindentation and Vickers hardness tests were then performed on these features to investigate their contributions to the integrated property. It is found that the hardness of αp varies slightly with the compression and heat treatment temperatures. The hardness of βt decreases while the hardness of integrated microstructure increases with increasing compression temperature. Moreover, the hardness values of βt and integrated microstructure are larger when the heat treatment temperatures are higher. By considering the hardness and volume fraction of each microstructural feature, it is also found that the contributions of microstructural features to the integrated hardness increase in the order of αGB, αp, βGB, βbase. The contributions of αp and αGB decrease while those of βbase and βGB increase with increasing compression temperature. In addition, the contributions of βbase and βGB to the integrated hardness can be further adjusted by heat treatment under different temperatures.

Introduction

Titanium alloys are widely used in the aviation and aerospace industries due to their exceptional properties [1], [2]. The properties of titanium alloys depend on their microstructural features, such as equiaxed primary α, α colony and α plate within transformed β matrix. In general, high volume fraction of equiaxed α phase increases the ductility but decreases the yield strength of titanium alloys [3]. In contrast, a high volume fraction of lamellar microstructure increases the tensile strength of titanium alloys [4]. In addition, small equiaxed α and α colony as well as thin lamellar α increase the ductility and tensile strength of titanium alloys [4], [5], [6], [7].

Because of the strong influence of microstructural features on the mechanical properties of titanium alloy, a large number of attempts were made to establish relation between them. Zhang [8] investigated the effect of β grain size, α colony size, and lamellar α thickness on the mechanical properties of TA15 titanium alloy, and established a quantitative relationship between them. Sun [9] and Searles [10] quantitatively characterized the microstructural features, such as volume fraction of α phase, thickness of α phase and developed some relational models between these parameters and mechanical properties of titanium alloy. However, the microstructure–property relations created in these studies are based on the morphological parameters of microstructural features without considering the properties of the microstructural features.

In reality, the properties of the microstructual features also have a significantly influence on the integrated property of titanium alloy. Lütjering [5] pointed that element partitioning effect decreases the basic strength of the transformed β matrix in bi-modal structures, which results in lower fatigue and creep strength of the integrated microstructure. Besides, precipitates and dislocations strengthen the α phase and thus lead to an increase in strength of titanium alloys [11], [12]. Therefore, the morphological parameters together with the properties of microstructual features should be concurrently examined to establish the relation between microstructual features and integrated property of titanium alloy, and thus to control the microstructure for obtaining desired properties.

There have been some researches on this issue [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. Picu [12] deduced the yield strength of α and β phases in Ti–6Al–4V from the yield strength of single phase α titanium alloy and Ti–6Al–4V. The integrated yield strength of the alloy was then predicted using the yield strength and volume fraction of α and β phases. Semiatin [13] and Kim [14] predicted the integrated properties of Ti–6Al–4V by using the properties and volume fractions of its constituent phases (α and β phases). The properties of α and β phases were determined by the properties of single phase α titanium alloys or β titanium alloys which have the same composition as the corresponding phase in the alloy. However, the properties of single phase α titanium alloys or β titanium alloys may not exactly represent the properties of different phases in a two-phase titanium alloy. Therefore, a direct and accurate measurement of the property of the individual phase is more attractive. Luo [15], [16] studied the microstructure and strengthening mechanisms in pure titanium and found that the correlation between the equiaxed α grain sizes and yield strengths follows the well-known Hall–Petch relationship. Thus, the contributions of the matrix and the boundary to the integrated strength of the pure titanium were determined. However, apart from the equiaxed α, lamellar α also presents in a two-phase titanium alloy. The coexistence of the equiaxed α boundary and lamellar α interface makes the determination of boundary strengthening effect more difficult, which needs further investigation.

In this study, nanoindentation tests were used to examine the properties of microstructural features in TA15 titanium alloy. Vickers hardness tests were used to determine the integrated hardness of the alloy. The measured hardness was used to analyze the contributions of microstructural features to the integrated property of the alloy. It will provide a basis to optimize the microstructure for obtaining desired property.

Section snippets

Microstructures preparation

The experimental material in the current study is a near-α TA15 titanium alloy with the chemical composition (wt%) of 6.69 Al, 2.26 Zr, 1.77 Mo, 2.25 V, 0.14 Fe, and balance Ti. The microstructure of the as-received hot forged plate is shown in Fig. 1. It consists of approximately 50% equiaxed primary α (αp) within the transformed β matrix (βt). The measured β-transus temperature of the alloy is about 985 °C.

Since near-β compression combined with subsequent heat treatment provides a feasible way

Microstructures analysis

The obtained microstructures are shown in Fig. 3. In these micrographs, the blacker and the whiter phase correspond to the α phase and the β phase, respectively. Fig. 3(a–c) shows the bi-modal microstructures containing αp and βt with αs and βr. Fig. 3(d–f) shows the tri-modal microstructures consisting of αp, αs, αt and βr. The integrated structure of αs, αt, and βr in the tri-modal microstructure is also treated as βt in the present study.

The quantitatively measured microstructural parameters

Strengthening by α plates-residual β interface

Grain boundaries in titanium alloy serve as strong barriers for dislocation transmission, since its hexagonal crystal structure has limited number of independent slip modes. Hence, titanium alloy exhibits a very strong grain boundary strengthening. For the bi-modal and tri-modal microstructures of TA15 titanium alloy, such boundaries consist of αGB and the α plates-residual β interface (βGB) within βt. The strengthening effect of βGB can be obtained by analyzing the nanoindentation hardness of β

Conclusions

Based on the nanoindentation and Vickers hardness tests, the following conclusions are drawn with respect to the contributions of microstructural features to integrated hardness:

  • (1)

    The hardness of αp varies slightly with the compression and heat treatment temperatures. The hardness of βt decreases while the hardness of integrated microstructure increases with increasing compression temperature. Besides, the hardness values of βt and integrated microstructure are larger for tri-modal

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51175428) and 111 Project (B08040).

References (34)

  • J.C. Williams et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2003)
  • L.J. Huang et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2008)
  • M.T. Jovanović et al.

    Mater. Des.

    (2006)
  • G. Lütjering

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (1998)
  • P.W. Peng et al.

    J. Alloy. Compd.

    (2010)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2011)
  • R.C. Picu et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2002)
  • P. Luo et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2012)
  • P. Luo et al.

    Scr. Mater.

    (2012)
  • X.G. Fan et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng A.

    (2012)
  • P.F. Gao et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2012)
  • G.B. Viswanathan et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2005)
  • W.D. Nix et al.

    J. Mech. Phys. Solids

    (1998)
  • I. Manika et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2006)
  • E. Harvey et al.

    Mech. Mater.

    (2012)
  • D. Goldbaum et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2011)
  • M. Delincé et al.

    Acta. Mater.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (26)

    • Reprint: Boron modified titanium alloys

      2021, Progress in Materials Science
    • Multi-laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6.5Al-2Zr-Mo-V alloy powder: Defect formation mechanism and microstructural evolution

      2021, Powder Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A direct correlation between the hardness and the laser beam number can be seen. The very fine martensite α' in this work is regarded as the α boundary, the kH is taken to be 122.4 Hv·μm0.5 [60]. The calculated Hall-Petch relationship based on Eq. (4) is presented in Fig. 15.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text