Elsevier

Materials Science and Engineering: C

Volume 67, 1 October 2016, Pages 792-806
Materials Science and Engineering: C

Review
Effect of nanofillers on the physico-mechanical properties of load bearing bone implants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.037Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Bone is a composite made up of inorganic minerals mainly calcium phosphates and organic proteins

  • Nanofiller loading and preparation techniques influence the nanocomposite physico-mechanical properties

  • Biocompatibility of the nanocomposite depends on the nanofiller morphology and interaction within the polymer matrix

  • Effective nanofiller loading (wt%) is MWNTs (0.1-2), SWNTs (0.5-5), HA (5-20), nanoclay (0.5-4) and bioactive glass (20-50)

  • Nanocomposite application as load bearing implants is limited due to degradation and fatigue under complex stresses

Abstract

Bones are nanocomposites consisting of a collagenous fibre network, embedded with calcium phosphates mainly hydroxyapatite (HA) nanocrystallites. As bones are subjected to continuous loading and unloading process every day, they often tend to become prone to fatigue and breakdown. Therefore, this review addresses the use of nanocomposites particularly polymers reinforced with nanoceramics that can be used as load bearing bone implants. Further, nanocomposite preparation and dispersion modification techniques have been highlighted along with thorough discussion on the influence that various nanofillers have on the physico-mechanical properties of nanocomposites in relation to that of natural bone properties. This review updates the nanocomposites that meet the physico-mechanical properties (strength and elasticity) as well as biocompatibility requirement of a load bearing bone implant and also attempts to highlight the gaps in the reported studies to address the fatigue and creep properties of the nanocomposites.

Abbreviations

PLA
polylactic acid
PGA
polyglycolic acid
PLGA
polylactic-co-glycolic acid
PLLA
poly l-lactic acid
PPF
polypropylene fumarate
PE
polyethylene
PEEK
polyether ether ketone
PSU
polysulphone
UHMWPE
ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
PS
polystyrene
PMMA
polymethyl methacrylate
PCL
polycaprolactone
EVA
ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer
MAPP
maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene
PA-6
polyamide-6
HDPE
high density polyethylene
HDPE-HDMA
high density polyethylene – hexamethylene diamine
PVC
polyvinyl chloride
PVA
polyvinyl alcohol
PP
polypropylene
PLA-g-AA
(polylactic acid grafted acrylic acid)
PU
polyurethane
CNTs
carbon nanotubes
MWNTs
multi walled carbon nanotubes
SWNTs
single walled carbon nanotubes
HA
hydroxyapatite
nHA
nanohydroxyapatite
Sr-HA
strontium-hydroxyapatite
CP
calcium phosphates
DCPD
dicalcium phosphate dehydrate
TCP
tricalcium phosphate
TTCP
tetracalcium phosphate
OCP
octacalcium phosphate
TAIC
triallyl isocyanurate
Ti-6Al-4V
titanium alloy with 6% aluminium, 4% vanadium, 0.25% iron, 0.2% oxygen, and remainder titanium
Ti-6Al-7Nb
titanium alloy with 6% aluminium and 7% niobium
SiO2
silicon dioxide
CaO
calcium oxide
Na2O
sodium oxide
P2O5
phosphorus pentoxide
β-TCP
tricalcium phosphate
MMT
montmorillonite clay
DGEBA
bisphenol A diglycidyl ether
PI
propidium iodide
HNO3
nitric acid
DMF
dimethylformamide
ESPA
3-triethoxysilylpropylamine
ECM
extracellular matrix
MW
molecular weight
CVD
chemical vapour deposition
MFI
melt flow index
TGA
thermogravimetric analysis
DSC
differential scanning calorimetry
SEM
scanning electron microscope
OD
optical density

Keywords

Bioactive
Nanocomposite
Nanofillers
Physico-mechanical properties
Load bearing bone implants

Cited by (0)

View Abstract