Elsevier

New Biotechnology

Volume 30, Issue 6, 25 September 2013, Pages 614-622
New Biotechnology

Research paper
Metaproteome analysis of the microbial communities in agricultural biogas plants

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2013.01.002Get rights and content

In biogas plants agricultural waste and energy crops are converted by complex microbial communities to methane for the production of renewable energy. In Germany, this process is widely applied namely in context of agricultural production systems. However, process disturbances, are one of the major causes for economic losses. In addition, the conversion of biomass, in particular of cellulose, is in most cases incomplete and, hence, insufficient. Besides technical aspects, a more profound characterization concerning the functionality of the microbial communities involved would strongly support the improvement of yield and stability in biogas production. To monitor these communities on the functional level, metaproteome analysis was applied in this study to full-scale agricultural biogas plants. Proteins were extracted directly from sludge for separation by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and subsequent identification with mass spectrometry. Protein profiles obtained with SDS–PAGE were specific for different biogas plants and often stable for several months. Differences of protein profiles were visualized by clustering, which allowed not only the discrimination between mesophilic and thermophilic operated biogas plants but also the detection of process disturbances such as acidification. In particular, acidification of a biogas plant was detected in advance by disappearance of major bands in SDS–PAGE. Identification of proteins from SDS–PAGE gels revealed that methyl CoM reductase, which is responsible for the release of methane during methanogenesis, from the order Methanosarcinales was significantly decreased.

Hence, it is assumed that this enzyme might be a promising candidate to serve as a predictive biomarker for acidification.

Introduction

Methane can be produced from organic waste and agricultural biomass by anaerobic digestion. More than 7000 biogas plants (BGP) contribute to the production of methane containing biogas in Germany.

Although this process is widely applied at an industrial scale it suffers from several problems. Because of persistence of cellulose and lignin, the biomass is not completely converted to methane [1]. Furthermore, anaerobic digestion can be disturbed by sudden changes in feedstock, lack of essential nutrients or intoxication by herbicides or mycotoxins causing problems such as foaming or acidification [2]. As a consequence, the methane production is decreased which results in economic losses. Better insight into functional interactions of involved microbial communities might allow overcoming parts of these problems. Not only process stability but also biogas yield could be increased. Furthermore, those findings should support identification of process failures, leading to an optimized anaerobic digestion process.

The conversion of biomass into methane is catalyzed by a complex microbial community comprising a huge number of varying Bacteria and Archaea. Several species involved in this conversion process were already characterized in detail using cultivation-dependent approaches. However, a major fraction of microbes remains uncultivable as pure cultures in laboratory [3]. Reasons might be unknown growth conditions or syntrophic interactions. Sequencing of 16S rRNA genes [4], [5], [6] of microbial communities in BGP revealed that noncultivable species are a substantial part of the community and appear to contribute to its performance. To estimate the genetic potential of noncultivable species in BGP pyro-sequencing of metagenomes [7], [8] was applied. However, it remains unresolved which genes leading to distinct metabolic activities are actually expressed.

To improve the characterization of the community's functioning, methods for the analysis and monitoring of the microbial metaproteome were established recently [9], [10]. A major challenge is in particular the extraction of proteins from matrices, which are often enriched by humic acids and other residues from microbial digestion of biomass. Thus, many studies focused on less contaminated ecosystems [11], [12] or circumvented this problem by analyzing enrichment cultures [13], [14].

Metaproteome analysis has already been applied successfully to anaerobic digestion in lab-scale reactors [15], [16]. In particular, the study of Hanreich et al. [16] reflects the analytical problems caused by the specific conditions prevalent in biogas reactors, namely the high content of interfering substances. Their protocol for purification of microbial proteins was based on sonication of cells and subsequent extraction of proteins with liquid phenol. Subsequently, proteins were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) [17], [18]. As a result, several enzymes involved in methanogenesis could be identified by nanoflow high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (nanoHPLC–MS/MS) methods.

The aim of the present study was to establish a protocol that is less time-consuming than 2D-PAGE and which can be easily applied to a larger number of samples from BGP. Therefore protein extraction was carried out in a ball mill and proteins were only separated by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) [19]. The resulting protein profiles were clustered for further analysis [20]. Afterwards, the lanes of SDS–PAGE gels were cut in slices and submitted to nanoHPLC–MS/MS for protein identification. As a first application of this newly developed approach, six industrial-scale BGP were sampled and monitored for up to nine months. Obtained proteins were analyzed with respect to the established chemical parameters for the process efficiency to determine microbiological indicators for process imbalances.

Section snippets

Biogas plant sampling

Samples of the main fermenters from six different agricultural BGP were taken in two sampling periods. The first sampling was performed in July 2011, while the second sampling period started in February 2012. The samples were frozen at −20°C until needed for further treatment. Specifications and process parameters are summarized in Supplementary_Table 1. The volume of biogas production was measured continuously. Samples for the determination of the ratio between total volatile fatty acids to

Results and discussion

Increasing both the methane yield and the economic efficiency of BGP requires a better understanding of the microbial communities involved. In the following, results of the newly established workflow for biomarker discovery on protein level are presented. Its performance was demonstrated for the monitoring of six operational large-scale agricultural BGP.

Conclusion

In this study, a workflow for monitoring agricultural BGP on the level of protein profiles obtained by SDS–PAGE and by MS was developed. Whereas MS methods require expensive instruments and at least two days for sample preparation and analysis, the approach based on protein gel electrophoresis and cluster analysis can be carried out in less than one day. For routine application, the time for analysis might eventually be shortened further down to several hours if capillary electrophoresis is

Acknowledgements

R. Heyer was supported by the German Environmental Foundation (DBU), grant number 20011/136. F. Kohrs and R. Kausmann were supported by a grant of the Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) communicated by the Agency for Renewable Resources (FNR), grant number 22028811 (Biogas Biocoenosis) and 22027707 (BiogasEnzyme), respectively. The authors would like to thank not only C. Venzke, M. Hoffman and C. Wollner for their valuable technical support, but also A. Behne

References (41)

  • S. Uthayakumaran et al.

    On-the-spot identification of grain variety and wheat-quality type by Lab-on-a-chip capillary electrophoresis

    Journal of Cereal Science

    (2005)
  • P. Weiland

    Biomass digestion in agriculture: a successful pathway for the energy production and waste treatment in Germany

    Engineering in Life Sciences

    (2006)
  • R.I. Amann et al.

    Phylogenetic identification and in-situ detection of individual microbial-cells without cultivation

    Microbiological Reviews

    (1995)
  • A. Weiss et al.

    Diversity of the resident microbiota in a thermophilic municipal biogas plant

    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

    (2008)
  • A. Rademacher et al.

    Characterization of microbial biofilms in a thermophilic biogas system by high-throughput metagenome sequencing

    FEMS Microbiology Ecology

    (2012)
  • T. Schneider et al.

    Who is who in litter decomposition? Metaproteomics reveals major microbial players and their biogeochemical functions

    The ISME Journal

    (2012)
  • J. Kan et al.

    Metaproteomic analysis of Chesapeake Bay microbial communities

    Saline Systems

    (2005)
  • R.J. Ram et al.

    Community proteomics of a natural microbial biofilm

    Science

    (2005)
  • D. Benndorf et al.

    Functional metaproteome analysis of protein extracts from contaminated soil and groundwater

    The ISME Journal

    (2007)
  • D. Benndorf et al.

    Improving protein extraction and separation methods for investigating the metaproteome of anaerobic benzene communities within sediments

    Biodegradation

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    5

    Equal authorship.

    View full text