Elsevier

NDT & E International

Volume 44, Issue 7, November 2011, Pages 655-667
NDT & E International

A comparison of the pulsed, lock-in and frequency modulated thermography nondestructive evaluation techniques

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.06.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Pulsed, lock-in and frequency modulated thermography are three alternative nondestructive evaluation techniques. The defect imaging performance of these techniques are compared using: matched excitation energy; the same carbon fiber composite test piece and infrared camera system. The lock-in technique suffers from “blind frequencies” at which phase images for some defects disappear. It is shown that this problem can be overcome by using frequency modulated (chirp) excitation and an image fusion algorithm is presented that enhance phase imaging of defects. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of defect images obtained by the three techniques are presented. For the shallowest defects (depths 0.25 and 0.5 mm, 6 mm diameter), the pulsed technique exhibits the highest SNRs. For deeper defects the SNRs of the three techniques are similar in magnitude under matched excitation energy condition.

Highlights

► Three thermographic techniques are compared under matched excitation energy. ► For shallow defects, pulsed technique produces the best result, based on SNR. ► For deeper defects, lock-in and FMTWI performances are comparable to that of pulsed. ► Blind frequency effect in lock-in thermography is overcome using FMTWI. ► Image fusion algorithm of multiple phase images is proposed and implemented.

Introduction

Pulsed [1], [2] and lock-in [3] thermography are the most commonly used thermographic nondestructive evaluation techniques. The two techniques are distinctly different but are deployed in the inspection of similar components/structures. In general these techniques are suitable for the detection of shallow planer defects, e.g. delamination in composites or adhesion defect in surface coatings.

In pulsed thermography, the sample surface is instantaneously heated using an optical flash. Over time the surface heat penetrates into the material producing asymptotic cooling. If sub-surface faults are present, heat-flow is obstructed. These result in relatively slower cooling of the defective regions than their sound counterparts. Consequently relative hot spots appear on the surface above the defects. The hot-spots thus obtained in pulsed thermography eventually fade away to achieve thermal equilibrium.

By contrast, in lock-in thermography the sample surface is heated by periodically modulated lamps and thermograms are captured under the periodic sinusoidal heating. The analysis of these thermograms mainly considers the phase shift of the thermal response of the defective regions with respect to the sound regions of the material [3]. Fourier transformation is extensively used for this purpose. The phase and magnitude information, thus obtained for each of the pixels in the thermogram, are stored in the form of 2D-matrices and subsequently converted into a gray scale images known as the phase image and magnitude image. Since in this technique, the images are extracted at the same frequency as used in the excitation, it is called lock-in thermography with an analogy to the working principle of lock-in amplifier. The excitation frequency is chosen based on the diffusion length of the thermal signal. The thermal diffusion length is the distance over which the signal strength falls to 1/e of that at the surface. Since the material acts as a low-pass filter, lower frequency signals propagate further into the material. However, if the defect lies beyond the diffusion length, it is not likely to be seen.

Since, pulsed and lock-in thermography are intrinsically different, their comparison is problematic. An objective comparison between them, based on the estimation of the signal-to-noise ratio between the defective regions and the background noise under matched excitation energy condition on a carbon fiber composite, was reported earlier [4]. It showed the superiority of the pulsed technique over lock-in for shallower defects. However, for deeper defects the performances of the techniques were similar. In the comparison, lock-in phase images were chosen over magnitude images as they are least affected by the variation of surface emissivity and illumination. However, the presence of blind frequencies [4], [5], [6] poses a major problem in the utilization of phase images in lock-in thermography. These are the frequencies at which the defect does not exhibit any phase shift with respect to the sound region although the thermal diffusion length is longer than the depth of the defect. This effect is primarily a 3-dimensional heat-flow phenomenon which cannot be accounted for using a traditional 1-dimensional heat-flow model. Thus if lock-in thermography is performed at only one frequency, there is always a chance of overlooking some of the defects in the phase image. Of course the inspection can be repeated over multiple frequencies to avoid the short-coming but certainly this increases its duration.

This paper proposes an application of a relatively new thermographic technique, named frequency modulated thermal wave imaging (FMTWI) [7], [8], as a means of overcoming the problem of blind frequencies. The excitation, presently used in FMTWI, comprises a linear up-chirp whose bandwidth spans over the frequencies necessary to produce thermal diffusion lengths to cover the range of defect depths in question. As per Fourier theorem, such a signal may be viewed as a superposition of multiple sinusoidal signals having frequencies which are integral multiples of the fundamental. Thus FMTWI, in essence, can be termed as superposed lock-in thermography which facilitates extraction of multiple phase and magnitude images from a single run without lengthening its duration.

In contrast to pulsed excitation, where a large number of frequencies constructively interfere at an instance in time, in FM excitation, the constructive interference is absent due to the nature of phase distribution over the constituent frequencies. However, using signal processing, it is possible to make them interfere to generate a pulse-like response. This technique is known as pulse compression, and was mentioned as a major advantage of FMTWI over lock-in technique [7]. Matched filtering is used to achieve this. In the matched filter, individual constituent frequencies are delayed in such a way that they produce constructive interference at the output of the filter.

This paper compares the image quality obtained from FMTWI to that obtained from pulsed and lock-in techniques. Finally, as a measure to overcome the problem of blind frequencies, an image fusion algorithm is proposed and demonstrated.

Section snippets

Test piece

Fig. 1 is a drawing of the test piece employed in all tests described in this paper. It is an approximately 7 mm thick carbon fiber composite board containing artificial defects formed by sets of 2, 4 and 6 mm diameter flat-bottomed holes at depths from the surface ranging from 0.25 to 2.5 mm in 0.25 mm increments. The four 12 mm diameter holes at the edge of the sample are at depths of 2, 2.5, 3 and 3.5 mm. The test piece was painted with acetone soluble black acrylic paint to provide a greater

Choice of frequencies in lock-in and FMTWI

Both in lock-in thermography and FMTWI, the target is periodically heated using external heat sources, which produce highly attenuated thermal waves inside the material. The possibility that a defect can be detected by such a wave depends on its depth being less or similar to the thermal diffusion length. The thermal diffusion length (μ), the distance over which the wave's amplitude falls to 1/e of that at the surface, is a measure of its attenuation. μ is related to the excitation frequency

Energy matching

In order to make an objective comparison of pulsed, lock-in and FMTWI techniques, the effective excitation energies for each of the techniques have to be made identical. In pulsed thermography, the energy is fixed by the flash lamp and its driver electronics while in lock-in and FMTWI, the test piece is periodically heated using tungsten–halogen flood lamps whose power and time of exposure can be readily adjusted. Since these lamps cannot take away any energy from the test piece, their periodic

Calculation of phase and amplitude images in lock-in and FMTWI

There are two steps in the process—(a) offset trend removal and (b) Fourier transformation. The former is essential because of the presence of DC heating which gradually ramps up the average temperature of the test piece. The Fourier transformation is erroneous under such a condition. To remove the trend, straight lines are fitted to the time varying temperature data pixel by pixel using a least square fit algorithm and then the fitted trend is subtracted from the original data. Once the offset

Experimental setup

For all the pulsed, lock-in and FMTWI testing a TWI Thermoscope system [9] with an Indigo Merlin camera was used. The ThermoScope system is an integrated pulsed thermographic system employing a medium wavelength infrared camera and an integrated flash heating system outputting a heating pulse of approximately 2 kJ for 2 ms. The Indigo Merlin is an electrically cooled InSb focal plane array (FPA) camera with a 12-bit digital output and a resolution of 320×256 (width×height). The camera has a

Pulsed thermography

The raw frames from the pulsed thermography experiment are shown in Fig. 5. It is found that the signal-to-noise ratio exhibits time variation as both the noise floor and the signal magnitude change with frames. The plots of the SNRs vs time for the 6 mm defects are shown in Fig. 6. It clearly shows that for each defect, there exists a frame where its signal-to-noise ratio becomes maximum. These best SNRs, which are listed in Table 4, are chosen for comparison with the data obtained from lock-in

Comparison with TSR

It may be considered unfair to compare the raw pulsed images with mathematically processed amplitude and phase images obtained from the lock-in and FMTWI experiments. Thus, to make a fair comparison, the pulsed images were enhanced with the time series reconstruction (TSR) algorithm [12]. Steps followed are summarized below:

  • The average of pre-flash frames was subtracted from the rest of the pulsed experiment video.

  • Polynomials of the form y=a0+a1x+a2x2+a3x3+a4x4 were fitted to the logarithmic

FMTWI image fusion

The presence of blind frequencies imposes a risk of overlooking defects by the lock-in technique, if the frequency is not chosen correctly. Thus in lock-in tests, a set of frequencies have to be tried out to confirm that no such anomalies have occurred. This obviously would increase the duration of the test. However in FMTWI, it is possible to extract all the phase images from a single run. Hence it is considerably faster.

In principle, in FMTWI, it should be possible to obtain a fused image

Conclusion

In this paper, three thermographic techniques (viz pulsed, lock-in and FMTWI) are compared based on effective excitation energy matching in time domain. It is shown that while for shallow defects in CFRP sample, the pulsed technique provides the best signal-to-noise ratio, its performance decreases for deeper defects. However, first derivative images obtained from TSR processed pulsed data show significant improvement in the detectability of the deeper features. Also, for these defects, lock-in

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (156)

View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was supported by British Council under its UKIERI programme. It also formed part of a Naval Research Board, DRDO India supported project and the core research programme of the UK Research Centre in NDE funded by the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council.

View full text