Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 117, 15 August 2015, Pages 124-140
NeuroImage

Robust and efficient linear registration of white-matter fascicles in the space of streamlines

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Automatic registration of pre-dissected bundles directly in the space of streamlines

  • Robust to shape, length, density, noise and missing tracts across subjects

  • Efficient construction of bundle-specific atlases

Abstract

The neuroscientific community today is very much interested in analyzing specific white matter bundles like the arcuate fasciculus, the corticospinal tract, or the recently discovered Aslant tract to study sex differences, lateralization and many other connectivity applications. For this reason, experts spend time manually segmenting these fascicles and bundles using streamlines obtained from diffusion MRI tractography. However, to date, there are very few computational tools available to register these fascicles directly so that they can be analyzed and their differences quantified across populations. In this paper, we introduce a novel, robust and efficient framework to align bundles of streamlines directly in the space of streamlines. We call this framework Streamline-based Linear Registration. We first show that this method can be used successfully to align individual bundles as well as whole brain streamlines. Additionally, if used as a piecewise linear registration across many bundles, we show that our novel method systematically provides higher overlap (Jaccard indices) than state-of-the-art nonlinear image-based registration in the white matter. We also show how our novel method can be used to create bundle-specific atlases in a straightforward manner and we give an example of a probabilistic atlas construction of the optic radiation. In summary, Streamline-based Linear Registration provides a solid registration framework for creating new methods to study the white matter and perform group-level tractometry analysis.

Introduction

The neuroscientific community today is very much interested in analyzing specific white matter fascicles like the arcuate fasciculus and the language pathways (Catani et al., 2005, Wakana et al., 2007, Catani and Thiebaut de Schotten, 2008), the corticospinal tract, the optic radiations or the recently discovered Aslant tract (Catani et al., 2013) to study sex differences, lateralization and many other connectivity applications. Hence, experts have been manually segmenting and more recently automatically segmenting or clustering white matter bundles from diffusion MRI (dMRI) tractography (Wassermann et al., 2013, Garyfallidis et al., 2012, O'Donnell and Westin, 2007, Guevara et al., 2012, Jin et al., 2014). Once bundles are extracted, the white matter anatomy can be studied. This domain is also known as virtual in vivo dissection of white-matter tracts (Catani et al., 2002a), where an expert will use regions of interest (ROIs) to filter out unnecessary streamlines and dissect a bundle of interest. After the bundles of interest have been obtained from different subjects, neuroscientists need to calculate statistics and do connectivity studies (Hagmann et al., 2003, Griffa et al., 2013). However, to date, there are very few computational tools available to analyze and quantify these white matter bundles in the space of streamlines.

Existing white matter analysis techniques often map FA values or diffusion kurtosis indices or other macrostructure and microstructure indices (Assaf et al., 2013) on the streamlines of specific bundles. This is usually called tractometry (Bells et al., 2011). In tractometry, an average index value is calculated for every streamline in the bundle. Others project their indices into an average streamline (Corouge et al., 2006, Goodlett et al., 2009, Yeatman et al., 2012). These techniques are applied to individual bundles of individual subjects but most scientists are interested to study those for group comparisons. This is where registration of bundles becomes crucial and a challenging problem.

Registration is critical even though we may work with pre-segmented bundles because the correspondence problem is still not solved across subjects even for the same type of bundle. For example, as previously shown in Catani et al. (2007), notice the difference in shape and density for 5 arcuate fasciculi from 5 subjects shown in Fig. 1A. From our investigations, this is very common with real datasets.

Currently, when neuroscientists want to do group analysis of specific bundles of interest they still have to rely on full-brain image-based methods for registration (Groeschel et al., 2014). In particular, this is being used in a tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) (Smith et al., 2006) and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) style analysis (Ashburner and Friston, 2000). In contrast, it is known that if landmarks have been extracted (in our case, the dissected bundles of interest), a landmark-based registration is more appropriate, as long as the landmarks correspond accurately across subjects (Sotiras et al., 2013).

Furthermore, some problems are truly challenging for volumetric methods such as used in VBM and TBSS. For example, there is an increase of lateralization studies (Lebel and Beaulieu, 2009, De Schotten et al., 2011), where several groups look at differences between left and right bundles of the same subject. For these studies, methods are needed which can register left and right structures of the same subject to study their differences in shape and integrity. Another example is with severely injured or diseased brains, where we can see large areas in the images with low intensity and contrast, e.g., because of a large tumor or inflammation. In these cases, the classical image-based registration techniques can fail because they use the entire extent of the brain (with the affected areas included) to drive the registration. However, if individual landmarks can be identified there is still the possibility for a successful registration of these landmarks.

In this paper, we show that using Streamline-based Linear Registration (SLR), we can efficiently and robustly register bundles of interest of the same subject for lateralization studies or from different subjects for population comparisons (see Fig. 1).

Going from a voxel-based registration to a streamline-based registration has some important advantages: a) Streamlines integrate information across many voxels. This is a property that can improve the alignment of the white matter as the points of the cortical mesh can improve the alignment of the gray matter in T1 images. b) Streamlines are defined in physical space coordinates (floating point coordinates) in contrast with standard MR images which are discretized on a grid with integer coordinates and need the application of interpolation when transformed. This can be advantageous for streamlines which do not require interpolation when transformed. However, such a representation raises computational challenges, illustrated in Fig. 2, which we summarize here:

  • The streamlines in the bundles are often noisy and spurious.

  • Even homologous bundles have locally large shape and density differences.

  • The neighborhood of a streamline is not well defined.

  • Comparing streamlines is a computationally expensive process.

To the best our knowledge, there has not been a simple, robust and efficient method to solve these problems. Our proposal consists on minimizing a cost function that takes into account both, local and global properties of the bundles, which can be computed robustly and efficiently directly in the native space of streamlines, even in the presence of missing data, noise and important shape differences.

Section snippets

Background

Many different approaches have been published during the last decades that can be used for registering dMRI datasets. We can divide these into three large categories: a) voxel-based, b) point-based and c) streamline-based.

Streamline-based Linear Registration

Streamline-based Linear Registration (SLR) is a method which given two sets of streamlines (fixed and moving) and a streamline-based cost function, will minimize the cost function and transform the moving set of streamlines (target) to the fixed (reference), so that they maximally overlap under the condition that the transform stays linear.

We denote a single streamline with s and a set of streamlines with S. A streamline s is an ordered sequence of line segments connecting 3D vector points xk  3

Experiments and results

We first validate that our novel technique and the BMD optimization is robust to missing and noisy data in simulated experiments from manually segmented bundles. Then, we show that SLR is robust and efficient at aligning bundles from real datasets with spurious tracts, noise and large shape and density differences. Next, combined in a piecewise linear registration of bundles, we compare with state-of-the-art nonlinear image-based registration based on FA. Furthermore, SLR allows us to then

Discussion

The Streamline-based Linear Registration (SLR) method introduced in this paper uses streamlines to directly register bundles of interest or whole brain streamlines directly in the space of streamlines. We have showed that SLR is robust to shape, length, density, noise and missing tracts when aligning bundles from the same subject (left–right association bundles) and across multiple subjects. We have also shown that SLR can be used to efficiently construct bundle-specific atlases, as shown in

Conclusion

We introduced an original and powerful method, the Streamline-based Linear Registration (SLR), which provides direct solutions to the challenge of aligning fiber tracking datasets. The SLR is remarkably robust in registering sets of noisy and spurious streamlines. It can be used to reliably study homologous bundles in the same subject for lateralization studies or different subjects for group comparisons or used to create accurate bundle-specific atlases.

Furthermore, it can be used for whole

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Établissement Nouveau Chercheur FQNRT program, the University–Industry NSERC CREATE Medical Image Analysis program and the Samuel de Champlain France–Québec program for funding this research. We would also like to thank Emmanuelle Renaud for the optic radiation datasets and Jean-Christophe Houde and Kevin Whittingstall for the USherbrooke data. Finally, we thank Alfred Anwander and Thomas Knösche of the Leipzig Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences,

References (88)

  • S. Durrleman et al.

    Morphometry of anatomical shape complexes with dense deformations and sparse parameters

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • B. Fischl

    FreeSurfer

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • A.W. Fitzgibbon

    Robust registration of 2D and 3D point sets

    British Machine Vision, Computing 2001

    Image Vis. Comput.

    (2003)
  • G. Girard et al.

    Towards quantitative connectivity analysis: reducing tractography biases

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • C.B. Goodlett et al.

    Group analysis of DTI fiber tract statistics with application to neurodevelopment

    NeuroImage

    (2009)
  • A. Griffa et al.

    Structural connectomics in brain diseases

    NeuroImage

    (2013)
  • S. Groeschel et al.

    Identification and interpretation of microstructural abnormalities in motor pathways in adolescents born preterm

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • P. Guevara et al.

    Automatic fiber bundle segmentation in massive tractography datasets using a multi-subject bundle atlas

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • P. Hagmann et al.

    DTI mapping of human brain connectivity: statistical fiber tracking and virtual dissection

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • S. Hofer et al.

    Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited-comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • M. Jenkinson et al.

    FSL

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • Y. Jin et al.

    Automatic clustering of white matter fibers in brain diffusion MRI with an application to genetics

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • A. Klein et al.

    Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration

    NeuroImage

    (2009)
  • D. Raffelt et al.

    Symmetric diffeomorphic registration of fibre orientation distributions

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • D. Raffelt et al.

    Apparent fibre density: a novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • M. Reisert et al.

    Global fiber reconstruction becomes practical

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • C.G. Schwarz et al.

    Improved dti registration allows voxel-based analysis that outperforms tract-based spatial statistics

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • T.J. Simon et al.

    Volumetric, connective, and morphologic changes in the brains of children with chromosome 22q11. 2 deletion syndrome: an integrative study

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • S.M. Smith et al.

    Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • S.M. Smith et al.

    Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • R.E. Smith et al.

    Anatomically-constrained tractography: Improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • J.D. Tournier et al.

    Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • B. Tunç et al.

    Automated tract extraction via atlas based adaptive clustering

    NeuroImage

    (2014)
  • E. Visser et al.

    Partition-based mass clustering of tractography streamlines

    NeuroImage

    (2011)
  • P.A. Yushkevich et al.

    Structure-specific statistical mapping of white matter tracts

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • L. Zöllei et al.

    Improved tractography alignment using combined volumetric and surface registration

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • A. Anwander et al.

    Connectivity-based parcellation of Broca's area

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2007)
  • V. Arsigny et al.

    A fast and log-Euclidean polyaffine framework for locally linear registration

    J. Math. Imaging Vision

    (2009)
  • S. Bells et al.

    Tractometry — comprehensive multi-modal quantitative assessment of white matter along specific tracts

  • P.J. Besl et al.

    Method for registration of 3-D shapes

  • R.H. Byrd et al.

    A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization

    SIAM J. Sci. Comput.

    (1995)
  • M. Catani et al.

    Atlas of Human Brain Connections

    (2012)
  • M. Catani et al.

    Perisylvian language networks of the human brain

    Ann. Neurol.

    (2005)
  • M. Catani et al.

    Symmetries in human brain language pathways correlate with verbal recall

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (59)

    • Image registration: Maximum likelihood, minimum entropy and deep learning

      2021, Medical Image Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      Typically, the estimated fiber tracts are represented as curves (sequences of points) in 3D. These curves, often called “fibers,” have been used as image features for many proposed tractography-based registration methods (Garyfallidis et al., 2015; Leemans et al., 2006; Mayer et al., 2010; Ziyan et al., 2007), including the groupwise registration approach that we will discuss below. First, to illustrate the concept of groupwise tractography registration, we take as an example a recent work by Zhang et al. (2018), where groupwise tractography registration was employed as an initial step in creating a white matter fiber atlas (Fig. 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text