Control rod drop analysis by finite element method using fluid–structure interaction for a pressurized water reactor power plant
Introduction
The fuel system consists of guide tubes (or thimbles); fuel rods with fuel pellets, claddings, springs; top and bottom end pieces; spacer grids and springs; assembly end fittings; and the reactivity control assembly. In the case of the control rods, the reactivity control elements extend from the coupling interface of the control rod drive mechanism (CEDM) as in Chang (1993). The control rod contains poison material over the entire active fuel length and have, as a principal function, major reactivity control including reactor shutdown. The mechanical design description of the fuel system should include the following aspects: (1) mechanical design limits such as those for allowable stresses, a deflection, a cycling, and fatigue, (2) capacity for a fuel fission gas inventory and pressure, (3) a list of material properties, and (4) considerations for radiation damage, cladding collapse time, materials cross-section, and a normal operational vibration. In this document, in-house code for the control rod drop analysis was validated with experimental measurement.
Fluid–structure interaction (FSI) have been made for resolving the problem of a blood flow in carotid arteries with stenoses (Tang et al., 1999, Tang et al., 2004a, Tang et al., 2004b), the fluid–structure interaction problem of a reactor vessel (Andersson and Andersson, 1997, Andersson et al., 2003), and the thermo-fluid analysis of a fusion reactor (Kurihara, 2002). All of these works were executed using the FSI code, ADINA (Zhang et al., 2003).
In the structural components of a fuel assembly for a pressurized water reactor power plant, guide tubes serve as the main lateral and axial load carrying members of a fuel assembly. And they provide a guide path for the control element assembly (CEA), neutron sources and in-core instrumentation. Among the guide tubes, the outer guide tubes comprise four units that are fabricated from tube material of zirconium-based alloy. On the other hand, the control rod is made from the Inconel 625. These guide tubes form a basic structural member of a fuel assembly by supporting the spacer grids and by their direct attachment to the lower and upper end fittings. Fig. 1 is a schematic drawing showing the expanded region of a guide tube and its corresponding interfaces as in Yoon (1996).
For the reactivity control or safe shutdown of a core, the control rod assembly has to be inserted into the guide tubes. In the case of the safe shutdown, it is dropped into the guide tube by its own weight. Under conditions I and II of the design criteria the drop time is limited to be 3.5 s from a safety aspect. In a conventional analysis for this, the Navier–Stokes equation has to be solved under actual core conditions. The present analysis model and procedure developed by using the FSI algorithm are simple because the previous methods (i.e. in-house code analysis) need various data such as the fuel mechanical, thermal/hydraulic and nuclear design data. It is very difficult to conduct a control rod drop analysis and some error is likely to arise (Khan et al., 1996).
Present analysis method simulates a fluid–structure interaction phenomenon during a control rod insertion into the guide tubes: the solid structural part is in contact with the fluid inside the guide tubes, an interaction between a control rod assembly (the solid structural part) and the fluid inside the guide tubes is inserted into a guide tube, it push out the coolant to the outside of the guide tube. The contact surfaces between the outer surfaces of a control rod and the fluid surfaces are defined as the fluid–structure interfaces. So, the displacements of the fluids and structures are exactly the same during the full analysis time domain. Simultaneously, a fluid–structure interaction takes place between the coolant and a control rod in a guide tube. Therefore, the displacement and traction at every increment time have to be the same at the boundary of the control rod and coolant. The aim of this paper is to propose an analysis model for a control rod drop analysis. The fluid–structure interaction problem is solved by using a commercial finite element program, ADINA (2007).
This paper deals with two topics: a simplified analysis method is studied for a control rod drop analysis. Both the previous and the present methods are compared to check on the validity of the simulation. The discrepancies between the two methods will be discussed. Second, a finite element analysis is carried out to verify the simulation capability of the FSI problem. In the finite element analysis, a half region of the guide tube in the axial direction are identified and modeled. This approach is found to be a useful tool for investigating the behavior of a control rod in actual core conditions.
Section snippets
Theoretical description
A fluid–structure interaction analysis of one single program is necessary for a solution to the problems where fluids are fully coupled to general structures that undergo a highly nonlinear response due to large deformations, an in-elasticity, a contact and a temperature-dependency. A fully coupled fluid–structure interaction means that the response of the solid is strongly affected by the response of the fluid, and vice versa.
From a fluid's point of view, the Navier–Stokes flow can be
FEM model
The finite element model should be accurately created as an actual fuel configuration. A control rod is dropped into a guide tube by gravity. The retarding forces against the gravity fall of the CEA include the hydraulic pressure forces resulting from forcing the coolant out of the fuel assembly guide tubes, the hydraulic suction effects as the coolant rushes into the CEDM hydraulic shear and the drag forces on various components, as well as the mechanical friction and external forces resulting
The analysis results
The drop time of a control rod was obtained by the FSI analysis. And the analysis results were compared with those of the in-house code, a licensed in-house code. Unfortunately, the analysis results could not be compared with the experimental results. However, the previous method using the in-house code was validated by the comparing with the experimental results (Chang, 1993). All data for this study were nearly the same of that test loop.
The results are summarized in Table 3. The difference
Concluding remarks
A control rod drop analysis was executed with the commercial FE code, ADINA. An analysis model for simulating the drop behavior of a control rod assembly was studied with the aim of satisfying the design criterion of drop time. It was found that the present method can simulate the fluid–structure interaction between the control rod and the fluid by using a fluid–structure coupled algorithm under the core conditions at an operating temperature. The results showed a good agreement with those of
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by Nuclear Research & Development Program of the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (grant code: M20706020005-08M0602-00510).
References (11)
- et al.
On the validation and application of fluid–structure interaction analysis of reactor vessel internals at loss of coolants accidents
Computers & Structures
(2003) - et al.
Some experiences in the use of ADINA in the Swedish nuclear industry
Computers & Structures
(1997) Thermo-fluid analysis of free surface liquid divertor in Tokamak fusion reactor
Fusion Engineering and Design
(2002)- et al.
Wall stress and strain analysis using a three-dimensional thick-wall model with fluid–structure interactions for blood flow in carotid arteries with stenoses
Computers & Structures
(1999) - et al.
Recent development of fluid–structure interaction capabilities in the ADINA system
Computers & Structures
(2003)
Cited by (33)
Eccentric drop of a control rod in the guide tube with annular gap flow
2023, Nuclear Engineering and DesignUncertainty analysis of the control rod drop based on the adaptive collocation stochastic perturbation method
2023, Annals of Nuclear EnergyNonlinear state equation and adaptive symplectic algorithm for the control rod drop
2022, Annals of Nuclear EnergyCitation Excerpt :In Bulín et al. (2021), an original combination of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation and the classical finite element method is used to analyze the influence of guide thimbles vibration on the control rod drop. Rabiee and Atf (2016) and Yoon et al. (2009) conducted the control rod drop analysis by the CFD commercial software ADINA and FLUENT. Scholars have also researched the control rod drop in fourth-generation nuclear reactors such as sodium-cooled fast reactors.
Cylinder-lamina system fluid–structure interaction problem solved with an original OpenFOAM code
2021, Journal of Computational ScienceCitation Excerpt :In this paper, a further solver improvement in terms of coupling nature is presented. In fact, in the present work ModsFsiFoam solver outputs are compared with a system the results of which are known for both fluid-dynamics and structural fields, in terms of characteristic time-dependent quantities and corresponding plots [15–18]. The FSI system is made of a flow able, in the laminar regime, to deform the elastic compressible polypropylene structure.
Experimental and numerical study on the critical working condition of control rod in liquid-suspended shutdown device
2021, Annals of Nuclear Energy