Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.005Get rights and content

Abstract

This study analyzes the effects of group membership change on group cognition and performance to determine how groups can simultaneously leverage oldtimers’ collective knowledge and a newcomer’s expertise. Our analysis focuses specifically on the interrelated effects of the two components of a transactive memory system (TMS)—TMS structure and TMS processes—to explain the cognitive mechanisms through which membership change affects group performance. Results from a laboratory study show that groups that experience partial membership change tend to rely on the TMS structure that oldtimers developed in their original group, and that doing so is ultimately detrimental to performance because it creates inefficient TMS processes. Results from a supplemental study indicate that these TMS process inefficiencies can be avoided when oldtimers are instructed to reflect upon their collective knowledge prior to task execution. We discuss the implications for managing group cognition in organizations where membership change is prevalent.

Section snippets

Membership change

Group membership change occurs when newcomers join a group or one or more original members leave the group (Ziller, 1965). Membership change may occur as a result of turnover, promotions, reassignments as part of larger restructuring efforts, or changes to project tasks or scope. Such events profoundly affect the social relationships in a group, the structure and content of the group’s knowledge, and consequently, group performance (Levine, Choi, & Moreland, 2003). Membership change can have

TMSs and membership change: Theory and hypotheses

TMSs develop as group members learn about what other members know and come to rely on one another to be responsible for expertise, defined here as skill or knowledge in different aspects of the task, such that collectively they possess all of the information needed for their task. TMSs are thought to facilitate quick and coordinated access to deep, specialized knowledge, so that a greater amount of task-relevant expertise can be efficiently brought to bear on group tasks. Empirical research in

Participants

We recruited study participants from an undergraduate business course at a large southwestern U.S. university. Students earned extra credit toward their course grade by taking part in the two-session study. Of the 315 students who agreed to participate, 17 participants were lost to attrition, and 28 were excused because a member of their group did not show up to one of the two sessions. Excused students received full credit for participating. Ninety (90) three-person groups (270 participants)

Results

Means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations among all group-level variables appear in Table 1. Consistent with our predictions, TMS process efficiency during the assembly task is significantly related to operational performance (r = 0.30, p < .01). TMS structure stability is not significantly correlated with operational performance, providing initial evidence that it is the efficiency of TMS processes, more so than TMS structure, that is critical to group performance. None of the group-level

Supplemental study and analyses

Our findings showing inefficient TMS processes and lower performance in partially-intact groups raise important questions about how organizations might mitigate these adverse effects and obtain the benefits of group-level knowledge. We theorize that relying on their familiar TMS structure prevented oldtimers in partially-intact groups from consciously thinking about the ways in which the TMS structure was, and was not, relevant to the new group context. Evidence from the original study supports

Discussion

The purpose of this paper was to examine the effects of group membership change on group cognition and performance. We examined the two components of a TMS—the TMS structure and TMS processes—to reveal the mechanisms by which membership change affects group functioning and performance. Several key findings emerged from our research. First, we found that partially-intact groups from the original study relied on the TMS structure that oldtimers developed when they worked together in the past.

References (58)

  • R.L. Moreland et al.

    Exploring the performance benefits of group training: transactive memory or improved communication?

    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

    (2000)
  • K.W. Phillips et al.

    Diverse groups and information sharing: the effects of congruent ties

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (2004)
  • L. Argote

    Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge

    (1999)
  • J.R. Austin

    Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2003)
  • Baumann, M. R. (2001). The effects of manipulating salience of expertise and membership change on transactive memory....
  • D. Brandon et al.

    Transactive memory systems in organizations: matching tasks, expertise, and people

    Organization Science

    (2004)
  • S. Faraj et al.

    Coordinating expertise in software development teams

    Management Science

    (2000)
  • P.S. Goodman et al.

    Familiarity and group productivity

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (1991)
  • D.H. Gruenfeld et al.

    What newcomers see and what oldtimers say: discontinuities in knowledge exchange

  • R.A. Henry

    Using relative confidence judgments to evaluate group effectiveness

    Basic and Applied Social Psychology

    (1995)
  • A.B. Hollingshead

    Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1998)
  • A.B. Hollingshead

    Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (2001)
  • A. Kane et al.

    Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: effects of social identity and knowledge quality

    Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

    (2005)
  • J.A. LePine

    Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality

    Journal of Applied Psychology

    (2003)
  • J.M. Levine et al.

    Impact of personnel turnover on team performance and cognition

  • J.M. Levine et al.

    Newcomer innovation in work teams

  • J.M. Levine et al.

    Innovation and socialization in small groups

  • J.M. Levine et al.

    Knowledge transmission in work groups: helping newcomers to succeed

  • J.M. Levine et al.

    Group socialization and newcomer innovation

  • Cited by (242)

    • Managing large-scale projects: Unpacking the role of project memory

      2024, International Journal of Project Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The authors thank Linda Argote, Caroline Bartel, Ethan Burris, Janet Dukerich, Terri Griffith, Martin Kilduff, Jeffrey Loewenstein, Paul Martorana, Violina Rindova, Margaret Neale, and three anonymous reviewers for their insights and helpful comments on this research.

    View full text