Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge☆
Section snippets
Membership change
Group membership change occurs when newcomers join a group or one or more original members leave the group (Ziller, 1965). Membership change may occur as a result of turnover, promotions, reassignments as part of larger restructuring efforts, or changes to project tasks or scope. Such events profoundly affect the social relationships in a group, the structure and content of the group’s knowledge, and consequently, group performance (Levine, Choi, & Moreland, 2003). Membership change can have
TMSs and membership change: Theory and hypotheses
TMSs develop as group members learn about what other members know and come to rely on one another to be responsible for expertise, defined here as skill or knowledge in different aspects of the task, such that collectively they possess all of the information needed for their task. TMSs are thought to facilitate quick and coordinated access to deep, specialized knowledge, so that a greater amount of task-relevant expertise can be efficiently brought to bear on group tasks. Empirical research in
Participants
We recruited study participants from an undergraduate business course at a large southwestern U.S. university. Students earned extra credit toward their course grade by taking part in the two-session study. Of the 315 students who agreed to participate, 17 participants were lost to attrition, and 28 were excused because a member of their group did not show up to one of the two sessions. Excused students received full credit for participating. Ninety (90) three-person groups (270 participants)
Results
Means, standard deviations, and intercorrelations among all group-level variables appear in Table 1. Consistent with our predictions, TMS process efficiency during the assembly task is significantly related to operational performance (r = 0.30, p < .01). TMS structure stability is not significantly correlated with operational performance, providing initial evidence that it is the efficiency of TMS processes, more so than TMS structure, that is critical to group performance. None of the group-level
Supplemental study and analyses
Our findings showing inefficient TMS processes and lower performance in partially-intact groups raise important questions about how organizations might mitigate these adverse effects and obtain the benefits of group-level knowledge. We theorize that relying on their familiar TMS structure prevented oldtimers in partially-intact groups from consciously thinking about the ways in which the TMS structure was, and was not, relevant to the new group context. Evidence from the original study supports
Discussion
The purpose of this paper was to examine the effects of group membership change on group cognition and performance. We examined the two components of a TMS—the TMS structure and TMS processes—to reveal the mechanisms by which membership change affects group functioning and performance. Several key findings emerged from our research. First, we found that partially-intact groups from the original study relied on the TMS structure that oldtimers developed when they worked together in the past.
References (58)
- et al.
Minority influence in work teams: the impact of newcomers
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2004) - et al.
Old wine in a new bottle: impact of membership change on group creativity
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(2005) Who’s socializing whom?: The impact of socializing newcomers on insiders, work groups, and organizations
Human Resource Management Review
(1994)- et al.
Habitual routines in task-performing groups
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(1990) - et al.
What do groups learn from their worldliest members? Direct and indirect influence in dynamic teams
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(2000) - et al.
Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
(2007) - et al.
Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: a review and proposed integration
Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(1998)- et al.
Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2003) - et al.
Team mental model: construct or metaphor?
Journal of Management
(1994)
Exploring the performance benefits of group training: transactive memory or improved communication?
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Diverse groups and information sharing: the effects of congruent ties
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge
Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance
Journal of Applied Psychology
Transactive memory systems in organizations: matching tasks, expertise, and people
Organization Science
Coordinating expertise in software development teams
Management Science
Familiarity and group productivity
Journal of Applied Psychology
What newcomers see and what oldtimers say: discontinuities in knowledge exchange
Using relative confidence judgments to evaluate group effectiveness
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: effects of social identity and knowledge quality
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality
Journal of Applied Psychology
Impact of personnel turnover on team performance and cognition
Newcomer innovation in work teams
Innovation and socialization in small groups
Knowledge transmission in work groups: helping newcomers to succeed
Group socialization and newcomer innovation
Cited by (242)
Managing large-scale projects: Unpacking the role of project memory
2024, International Journal of Project ManagementSocial perception in Human-AI teams: Warmth and competence predict receptivity to AI teammates
2023, Computers in Human BehaviorThe ambiguity of “we”: Perceptions of teaming in dynamic environments and their implications
2023, Social Science and MedicineCognitive versatility and adaptation to fluid participation in hospital emergency department teams
2024, Frontiers in PsychologyFrom a Spark to a Sweeping Fire: An Integrative Conceptual Review of Group Turnover and a Theoretical Exploration of Its Development
2024, Journal of Applied PsychologyThe influence of new collaborators on the innovation performance of focal inventors: the moderating role of network embeddedness
2024, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
- ☆
The authors thank Linda Argote, Caroline Bartel, Ethan Burris, Janet Dukerich, Terri Griffith, Martin Kilduff, Jeffrey Loewenstein, Paul Martorana, Violina Rindova, Margaret Neale, and three anonymous reviewers for their insights and helpful comments on this research.