Elsevier

Ocean Engineering

Volume 66, 1 July 2013, Pages 32-43
Ocean Engineering

Dynamic behaviour of a flexible yacht sail plan

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.03.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dynamic Fluid–Structure Interaction of a sail plan is modelled in harmonic pitching.

  • Aerodynamic forces oscillations show hysteresis phenomena.

  • Neglecting the structural deformation underestimates the forces oscillations.

  • Both aerodynamic and structure inertia affect loads in the rig.

Abstract

A numerical investigation of the dynamic Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) of a yacht sail plan submitted to harmonic pitching is presented to address both issues of aerodynamic unsteadiness and structural deformation. The FSI model – Vortex Lattice Method fluid model and Finite Element structure model – have been validated with full-scale measurements. It is shown that the dynamic behaviour of a sail plan subject to yacht motion clearly deviates from the quasi-steady theory. The aerodynamic forces presented as a function of the instantaneous apparent wind angle show hysteresis loops, suggesting that some energy is exchanged by the system. The area included in the hysteresis loop increases with the motion reduced frequency and amplitude. Comparison of rigid versus soft structures shows that FSI increases the energy exchanged by the system and that the oscillations of aerodynamic forces are underestimated when the structure deformation is not considered. Dynamic loads in the fore and aft rigging wires are dominated by structural and inertial effects. This FSI model and the obtained results may be useful firstly for yacht design, and also in the field of auxiliary wind assisted ship propulsion, or to investigate other marine soft structures.

Introduction

It is now well-known that deformations actively or passively endured by aerodynamic and hydrodynamic lifting bodies have a significant effect on the flow dynamics and the performance of the system. A huge amount of work has been devoted to insects' and birds' flight, (Mountcastle and Daniel, 2009) or to fishes swim (Fish, 1999, Schouveiler et al., 2005), for example for applications in Micro Air Vehicles (MAV) and more generally in the bio-mimetic field (for a review, see Shyy et al., 2010). From this abundant literature, it has been shown that the dynamic behaviour of the flow and the structural deformation must be considered to better understand the mechanisms involved in lifting and propulsive performances (Combes and Daniel, 2001). For example in the field of insect flight, Shyy et al. (2010) have underlined the necessity to consider the dynamic phenomena to properly estimate aerodynamic coefficients.

Fluid–Structure Interaction is also of interest for some compliant marine structures, such as wave attenuation systems (Lan and Lee, 2010) or in the field of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) where soft ducts made of a membrane and stiffeners may be interesting for the cold water pipe (Yeh et al., 2005, Griffin, 1981). To reduce fuel consumption and emissions in maritime transport, wind assisted propulsion is more and more considered for ships (Wellicome, 1985, Low et al., 1991, Dadd et al., 2011).

When analysing the behaviour of yacht sails, an important difficulty comes from the Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) of the air flow and the sails and rig (Marchaj, 1996, Garrett, 1996, Fossati, 2010). Yacht sails are soft structures whose shapes change according to the aerodynamic loading. The resulting modified shape affects the air flow and thus, the aerodynamic loading applied to the structure. This Fluid–Structure Interaction is strong and non-linear, because sails are soft and light membranes which experience large displacements and accelerations, even for small stresses. As a consequence, the actual sail's shape while sailing – the so-called flying shape – is different from the design shape defined by the sail maker and is generally not known. Recently, several authors have focused on the Fluid–Structure Interaction (FSI) problem to address the issue of the impact of the structural deformation on the flow and hence the aerodynamic forces generated (Chapin and Heppel, 2010, Renzsh and Graf, 2010).

Another challenging task in modelling racing yachts is to consider the yacht behaviour in a realistic environment (Charvet et al., 1996, Marchaj, 1996, Garrett, 1996, Fossati, 2010). Traditional Velocity Prediction Programs (VPPs) used by yacht designers consider a static equilibrium between hydrodynamic and aerodynamic forces. Hence, the force models classically used are estimated in a steady state. However, in realistic sailing conditions, the flow around the sails is most often largely unsteady because of wind variations, actions of the crew and more importantly because of yacht motion due to waves. To account for this dynamic behaviour, several Dynamic Velocity Prediction Programs (DVPPs) have been developed, e.g. by Masuyama et al. (1993), Masuyama and Fukasawa (1997), Richardt et al. (2005), and Keuning et al. (2005) which need models of dynamic aerodynamic and hydrodynamic forces. While the dynamic effects on hydrodynamic forces have been largely studied, the unsteady aerodynamic behaviour of the sails has received much less attention. Schoop and Bessert (2001) first developed an unsteady aeroelastic model in potential flow dedicated to flexible membranes but neglected the inertia. In a quasi-static approach, a first step is to add the velocity induced by the yacht's motion to the steady apparent wind to build an instantaneous apparent wind (see Richardt et al., 2005, Keuning et al., 2005) and to consider the aerodynamic forces corresponding to this instantaneous apparent wind using force models obtained in the steady state. In a recent study, Gerhardt et al. (2011) developed an analytical model to predict the unsteady aerodynamics of interacting yacht sails in 2D potential flow and performed 2D wind tunnel oscillation tests with a motion range typical of a 90-foot (26 m) racing yacht (International America's Cup Class 33). Recently, Fossati and Muggiasca, 2009, Fossati and Muggiasca, 2010, Fossati and Muggiasca, 2011 studied the aerodynamics of model-scale rigid sails in a wind tunnel, and showed that a pitching motion has a strong and non-trivial effect on aerodynamic forces. They showed that the relationship between instantaneous forces and apparent wind deviates – phase shifts, hysteresis – from the equivalent relationship obtained in a steady state, which one could have thought to apply in a quasi-static approach. They also investigated soft sails in the same conditions to highlight the effects of the structural deformation (Fossati and Muggiasca, 2012).

To better understand the aeroelastic behaviour, a numerical investigation is achieved with a simple harmonic motion to analyse the dynamic phenomena in a well-controlled situation. This paper addresses both issues of the effects of unsteadiness and structural deformation on a yacht sail plan with typical parameters of a 28-foot (8 m, J80 class) cruiser-racer in moderate sea. An unsteady FSI model has been developed and validated with experiments in real sailing conditions (Augier et al., 2010, Augier et al., 2011, Augier et al., 2012). Calculations are made on a J80 class yacht numerical model with her standard rigging and sails designed by the sail maker DeltaVoiles. The dynamic results are compared with the quasi-steady assumption and the dynamic force coefficients are also compared with the experimental results obtained by Fossati and Muggiasca (2011) for a rigid sail plan of a 48-foot (14.6 m) cruiser-racer model. The FSI model is presented in Section 2, and the experimental validation is presented in Section 3. The methodology of the dynamic investigation is given in Section 4. The core of the paper (Section 5) presents and analyses the simulation results regarding variation of force coefficients and loads in the rig due to pitching. In the last section, some conclusions of this study are given, with ideas for future work.

Section snippets

Numerical model

To numerically investigate aero-elastic problems which can be found with sails, the company K-Epsilon and the Naval Academy Research Institute have developed the unsteady fluid-structure model ARAVANTI made by coupling the inviscid flow solver AVANTI with the structural solver ARA. The ARAVANTI code is able to model a complete sail boat rig in order to predict forces, tensile, and shape of sails according to the loading in dynamic conditions. The numerical models and coupling are briefly

Experimental validation

Numerical and experimental comparisons with the model ARAVANTI are based on measurements at full scale on an instrumented 28-foot yacht (J80 class, 8 m). The time-resolved sails' flying shape, loads in the rig, yacht's motion, and apparent wind have been measured in both sailing conditions of flat sea and moderate head waves. The comparisons are limited to upwind sailing conditions, as the flow model validity is limited to mostly attached flows. At first, the computed sail flying shape and loads

Simulation procedure

The yacht motion in waves induces unsteady effects in the sails' aerodynamics. In this paper we will study separately one degree of freedom, by applying simple harmonic pitching. The reference frame and the coordinate system attached to the yacht are illustrated in Fig. 5.

Results

From the unsteady FSI simulations, the aerodynamic forces and loads in the rig are determined and their dynamic evolution is analysed with respect to the instantaneous effective wind angle βeff(t) and pitching velocity θ̇(t). Fig. 8 shows an example of the computed results, with snapshots of the pressure distribution and the particles modelling the wake for a pitching oscillation amplitude A=5° and a period T=3 s. The unsteady behaviour is illustrated by the evolution of the pressure

Conclusions

The unsteady Fluid–Structure Interaction of the sails and rig of a 28-foot (8 m) yacht under harmonic pitching motion has been investigated in order to highlight both contributions of the dynamic behaviour and the Fluid–Structure Interaction on a sail plan in realistic conditions. The ARAVANTI model is based on an implicit unsteady coupling between a vortex lattice fluid model and a finite element structural model, and has been validated with full-scale experiments in upwind real conditions (

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Professor Fossati of Politecnico di Milano for valuable discussions. His pioneering work on the subject strongly inspired the present study and analysis. The authors are grateful to the K-Epsilon company for continuous collaboration. This work was supported by the French Naval Academy.

References (38)

  • R.H. Yeh et al.

    Maximum output of an Otec power plant

    Ocean Eng.

    (2005)
  • Augier, B., Bot, P., Hauville, F., 2011. Experimental full scale study on yacht sails and rig under unsteady sailing...
  • Augier, B., Bot, P., Hauville, F., Durand, M., 2010. Experimental validation of unsteady models for wind/sails/rigging...
  • Chapin, V., Heppel, P., 2010. Performance optimization of interacting sails through fluid–structure coupling. In: 2nd...
  • S. Combes et al.

    Shape, flapping and flexionwing and fin design for forward flight

    J. Exp. Biol.

    (2001)
  • Fish, F., 1999. Performance constraints on the maneuverability of flexible and rigid biological systems. In:...
  • F. Fossati

    Aero-Hydrodynamics and the Performance of Sailing YachtsThe Science Behind Sailing Yachts and their Design

    (2010)
  • Fossati, F., Muggiasca, S., 2009. Sails aerodynamic behavior in dynamic condition. In: The 19th Chesapeake Sailing...
  • Fossati, F., Muggiasca, S., 2010. Numerical modelling of sail aerodynamic behavior in dynamic conditions. In: 2nd...
  • Cited by (21)

    • Course-keeping assessment of yachts’ upwind sailing in waves

      2021, Journal of Fluids and Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      A study that addressed the analysis of wrinkling behavior via a robust non-linear shell element was presented in Trimarchi et al. (2013). Augier et al. (2013, 2014) coupled a VLM to a FEM solver and conducted numerical experiments for sails that were subjected to pitching and surging motions, with intention to understand the forces’ hysteresis loop and the connection of the dissipated energy to the exciting motions. Aubin et al. (2016) presented a comparison of the results from a coupled VLM-FEM (for membranes) solver versus measurements and images on a full scale flying shape to identify the solver’s applicability limit prior to flow separation.

    • Experimental and numerical wind tunnel investigation of the aerodynamics of upwind soft sails

      2019, Ocean Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      This represents the main philosophy of the present work, which aims at providing unprecedented comparison between advanced experiments and different numerical approaches, to reach a comprehensive powerful engineering tool when bound together by effective 3D shapes of the sails. Other relevant works in this topic can be found in (Augier et al., 2012a, 2012b, 2013) and (Aubin et al., 2016). For this work a complete 1:10 scale model of a 48’ cruiser/racer was adopted: it is composed of yacht hull body (above the waterline) with deck, mast, rigging and sails.

    • Experimental analysis of a strong fluid–structure interaction on a soft membrane—Application to the flapping of a yacht downwind sail

      2018, Journal of Fluids and Structures
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another configuration is to measure the forces separately in the rigging line as developed by Augier et al. (2012) in upwind condition and Deparday et al. (2014) for downwind condition with spinnakers. External load sensors can be coupled to other sensors in order to measure the sail shapes with camera recognition (Augier et al., 2012, 2013), the forces and the directions on the three corners of spinnakers (Le Pelley et al., 2015), pressures on sails for upwind and downwind sails (Viola and Flay, 2010; Le Pelley et al., 2012; Lozej et al., 2012; Motta et al., 2014; Deparday et al., 2014). In the present study, an instrumented J/80 class sailing yacht, an 8-m one-design cruiser racer is used.

    • CFD prediction of steady and unsteady upwind sail aerodynamics

      2017, Ocean Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      The loads in standing and running rigging are computed, but no sail force validation is done. Augier et al. (2014) present continued research using the same methods as in the previous study (Augier et al., 2013), further investigating the hysteresis phenomenon and what physical effects may be causing it. The effects of rig tension adjustment is also studied.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text