A 2-approximation algorithm for interval data minmax regret sequencing problems with the total flow time criterion
Section snippets
Preliminaries
We are given a set of jobs to be processed on a single machine. For the sake of simplicity, we will identify every job with its index . A schedule is a permutation of jobs. The set of jobs may be partially ordered by some precedence constraints, namely if , then job must be processed after job . A schedule is feasible if it satisfies all the precedence constraints. We denote by the set of all feasible schedules. Consider the case in which the processing
The main result
Let us denote by the position occupying by job in schedule . For any two schedules , and scenario the following equality is true: Using (2) and the definition of the maximal regret (1) one can easily prove that for any two feasible schedules and the following inequality holds: We now show that any feasible schedules and satisfy the inequality:
References (9)
- et al.
An approximation algorithm for interval data minmax regret combinatorial optimization problems
Inform. Process. Lett.
(2006) Sequencing jobs to minimize total weighted completion time subject to precedence constraints
Ann. Discrete Math.
(1978)- et al.
Complexity of minimizing the total flow time with interval data and minmax regret criterion
Discrete. Appl. Math.
(2006) Scheduling Algorithms
(1998)
Cited by (50)
Robust permutation flow shop total weighted completion time problem: Solution and application to the oil and gas industry
2023, Computers and Operations ResearchInvestigating the recoverable robust single machine scheduling problem under interval uncertainty
2022, Discrete Applied MathematicsRobust (min–max regret) single machine scheduling with interval processing times and total tardiness criterion
2020, Computers and Industrial EngineeringCitation Excerpt :The interval data min–max regret (IDMR) versions of the classical combinatorial optimization and machine scheduling problems have been studied widely in the literature. In general, the min–max regret versions of classical combinatorial optimization problems are harder than their classical counterparts, since uncertainty increases the search space to find an optimal solution (c.f. Aissi et al., 2005; Averbakh, 2001; Feizollahi & Averbakh, 2014; Kasperski & ZielińSki, 2008; Montemanni et al., 2007). It is relatively easy to determine the worst-case scenario for a feasible solution for many combinatorial optimization problems with interval data such as the 0-1 knapsack problem (Aissi et al., 2009; Furini et al., 2015) whose worst-case scenario of a solution has the lower bound profits for the selected items, and the upper bound profits for the non-selected items, and the traveling salesman problem (Montemanni et al., 2007) whose worst-case scenario of a solution has the upper bound costs for the selected arcs, and the lower bound costs for the non-selected arcs.
Robust minmax regret combinatorial optimization problems with a resource–dependent uncertainty polyhedron of scenarios
2019, Computers and Operations ResearchScheduling under linear constraints
2016, European Journal of Operational ResearchMin-max regret version of a scheduling problem with outsourcing decisions under processing time uncertainty
2016, European Journal of Operational ResearchCitation Excerpt :Combinatorial optimization problems under scenario-based uncertainty have been extensively studied in Aissi, Bazgan, and Vanderpooten (2007); 2009); Kasperski and Zielinski (2006); Kouvelis and Yu (1997). In Daniels and Kouvelis (1995); Kasperski and Zielinski (2008); Kouvelis, Daniels, and Vairaktarakis (2000); Lebedev and Averbakh (2006), the approaches developed above have been applied to machine scheduling problems. Daniels and Kouvelis (1995), Lebedev and Averbakh (2006), and Kasperski and Zielinski (2008) considered the min-max regret version of a single-machine scheduling problem to minimize the total completion time with uncertain processing times.