A 2-approximation algorithm for interval data minmax regret sequencing problems with the total flow time criterion

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2007.11.004Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we discuss a minmax regret version of the single-machine scheduling problem with the total flow time criterion. Uncertain processing times are modeled by closed intervals. We show that if the deterministic problem is polynomially solvable, then its minmax regret version is approximable within 2.

Section snippets

Preliminaries

We are given a set of jobs J={J1,,Jn} to be processed on a single machine. For the sake of simplicity, we will identify every job Ji with its index i. A schedule is a permutation π=(π(1),,π(n)) of jobs. The set of jobs may be partially ordered by some precedence constraints, namely if ij, then job j must be processed after job i. A schedule π is feasible if it satisfies all the precedence constraints. We denote by Π the set of all feasible schedules. Consider the case in which the processing

The main result

Let us denote by iπ the position occupying by job i in schedule π. For any two schedules π, σ and scenario SΓ the following equality is true: F(π,S)F(σ,S)=iJ(iσiπ)piS. Using (2) and the definition of the maximal regret (1) one can easily prove that for any two feasible schedules π and σ the following inequality holds: Z(π){i:iσ>iπ}(iσiπ)p¯i+{i:iσ<iπ}(iσiπ)p¯i. We now show that any feasible schedules π and σ satisfy the inequality: Z(σ)Z(π)+{i:iπ>iσ}(iπiσ)p¯i+{i:iπ<iσ}(iπiσ)p¯i.

References (9)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (50)

  • Robust (min–max regret) single machine scheduling with interval processing times and total tardiness criterion

    2020, Computers and Industrial Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    The interval data min–max regret (IDMR) versions of the classical combinatorial optimization and machine scheduling problems have been studied widely in the literature. In general, the min–max regret versions of classical combinatorial optimization problems are harder than their classical counterparts, since uncertainty increases the search space to find an optimal solution (c.f. Aissi et al., 2005; Averbakh, 2001; Feizollahi & Averbakh, 2014; Kasperski & ZielińSki, 2008; Montemanni et al., 2007). It is relatively easy to determine the worst-case scenario for a feasible solution for many combinatorial optimization problems with interval data such as the 0-1 knapsack problem (Aissi et al., 2009; Furini et al., 2015) whose worst-case scenario of a solution has the lower bound profits for the selected items, and the upper bound profits for the non-selected items, and the traveling salesman problem (Montemanni et al., 2007) whose worst-case scenario of a solution has the upper bound costs for the selected arcs, and the lower bound costs for the non-selected arcs.

  • Scheduling under linear constraints

    2016, European Journal of Operational Research
  • Min-max regret version of a scheduling problem with outsourcing decisions under processing time uncertainty

    2016, European Journal of Operational Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    Combinatorial optimization problems under scenario-based uncertainty have been extensively studied in Aissi, Bazgan, and Vanderpooten (2007); 2009); Kasperski and Zielinski (2006); Kouvelis and Yu (1997). In Daniels and Kouvelis (1995); Kasperski and Zielinski (2008); Kouvelis, Daniels, and Vairaktarakis (2000); Lebedev and Averbakh (2006), the approaches developed above have been applied to machine scheduling problems. Daniels and Kouvelis (1995), Lebedev and Averbakh (2006), and Kasperski and Zielinski (2008) considered the min-max regret version of a single-machine scheduling problem to minimize the total completion time with uncertain processing times.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text