Gurney flap—Lift enhancement, mechanisms and applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Since its invention by a race car driver Dan Gurney in 1960s, the Gurney flap has been used to enhance the aerodynamics performance of subsonic and supercritical airfoils, high-lift devices and delta wings. In order to take stock of recent research and development of Gurney flap, we have carried out a review of the characteristics and mechanisms of lift enhancement by the Gurney flap and its applications. Optimum design of the Gurney flap is also summarized in this paper. For the Gurney flap to be effective, it should be mounted at the trailing edge perpendicular to the chord line of airfoil or wing. The flap height must be of the order of local boundary layer thickness. For subsonic airfoils, an additional Gurney flap increases the pressure on the upstream surface of the Gurney flap, which increases the total pressure of the lower surface. At the same time, a long wake downstream of the flap containing a pair of counter-rotating vortices can delay or eliminate the flow separation near the trailing edge on the upper surface. Correspondingly, the total suction on the airfoil is increased. For supercritical airfoils, the lift enhancement of the Gurney flap mainly comes from its ability to shift the shock on the upper surface in the downstream. Applications of the Gurney flap to modern aircraft design are also discussed in this review.

Introduction

Over the years, high-lift devices have attracted attention of aircraft designers and engineers as they can improve takeoff and landing performance of aircraft through aerodynamic enhancement. Flaps are such aircraft devices for lift enhancement, where leading-edge slotted flaps and trailing-edge flaps are commonly found in many aircrafts (see Fig. 1). Flow over flaps is very complicated, as it involves boundary layers, main wing wakes, potential flow outside the boundary layer and flow in the flap slot, which result in recirculating boundary layer on the flap surface. This makes the design of high-lift device very difficult. Due to the design complexity, manufacturing difficulty and maintenance cost, high performance airfoils can not be easily adopted in both commercial and military aircraft. Even if this could be done, high-lift devices cannot meet the expected performance quite often [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Therefore, it is a common practice to add a simple device such as the Gurney flap (GF) to improve the aerodynamic performance of airfoils. The GF is simply a short flat plate attached to the trailing edge perpendicular to the chord line on the pressure side of the airfoil (Fig. 2). Race car driver Dan Gurney used this flap on an inverted wing to increase the downward force, therefore increasing the traction during acceleration, braking and cornering. The GFs have attracted much attention over decades due to its effectiveness from a simple configuration [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].

Section snippets

Low-speed airfoils

An experimental study of the GF was first conducted by Liebeck [6] on a Newman airfoil. He found that the GF with only a 1.25% chord length gave high-lift coefficient by increasing lift but reducing drag at the same time. Liebeck also found that the flap height should be kept between 1%C and 2%C in order to maximize the aerodynamic benefits from this simple high-lift device.

Fig. 3 shows the lift and drag coefficients of NACA0012 airfoil with the GFs obtained by Li et al. [16]. The effect of the

Delta wings

A cropped, nonslender delta wing with a 40° leading edge (see Fig. 25) was used by Li et al. [15] to investigate the aerodynamic effect of the GF with four different heights h=1.0%C, 2.0%C, 3.0%C and 5.0%C (indicated by G1, G2, G3 and G5, respectively).

Fig. 26 shows the aerodynamic load for wings with plain GFs. The effect of the GF is to substantially increase the maximum lift coefficient as shown in Fig. 26(a), which is roughly proportional to the flap height. Compared to a clean wing, the

Effects of the GF height

The aircraft model [47] reviewed here consists of four parts: fuselage, forward-swept wing, canard wing and the GF (see Fig. 29). The fuselage was modeled by a circular cylinder of 47 mm diameter with a head cone, while the forward-swept main wing was constructed with a flat plate with 15° sweep angle behind a flat canard wing. The mounting angle of the forward-swept wing and the canard wing was zero. The GFs were made of rectangular flat plates 1 mm thick, 200 mm long with height ranging from 1.2

Mechanisms of lift enhancement

It has been confirmed by many studies that the GF is a very efficient and effective passive device in improving the lift characteristics of airfoils, wings and aircraft models. However, it is fair to say that the mechanisms responsible for the lift enhancement of the GF have not been fully understood. As a part of effort to shed some light on this issue, pressure and velocity measurements over the airfoil surface as well as PIV measurement and dye-injection visualization around the trailing

Other applications

As mentioned by Brown and Filippone [53], a 0.5%C full-span GF mounted on the wind tunnel model of DC-10 can give a 20% increase in total aircraft lift with no increase in total drag during the second segment climb configuration, which is a spectacular result. The GF is also installed on the horizontally inverted wing of helicopters (for example, Boeing AH-64 Apache) to improve aerodynamic performance during high-powered climb. Moreover, the GF is used on helicopter vertical tail (for example,

Conclusions

The GF can increase the lift coefficient of airfoils, wings and aircrafts both at subsonic and transonic speeds, and hence their aerodynamic performance can be significantly improved. Therefore, the use of GF is especially useful during takeoff and landing of aircraft. Due to its simplicity of structure and efficiency in improving aerodynamic performance, the GF has many engineering applications.

For optimum aerodynamic performance, the GF should be mounted at the trailing edge perpendicular to

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grant no. 10425207.

References (64)

  • C.S. Jang et al.

    Numerical investigation of an airfoil with a Gurney flap

    Aircr Des

    (1998)
  • Y.C. Li et al.

    Experimental investigations on the effects of divergent trailing edge and Gurney flaps on a supercritical airfoil

    Aerosp Sci Technol

    (2007)
  • M.S. Seling et al.

    High-lift low Reynolds number airfoil design

    J Aircr

    (1997)
  • Tinoco EN, Ball DN, Rice FA. Pan air analysis of a transport high-lift configuration. AIAA paper...
  • Foch RJ, Ailinger KG. Low Reynolds number, long endurance aircraft design. AIAA paper...
  • Henne PA, Gregg RD. New airfoil design concept. AIAA paper...
  • Giguere P, Lemay JM, Dumas G. Gurney flap effects and scaling for low-speed airfoils. AIAA paper...
  • R.H. Liebeck

    Design of subsonic airfoils for high lift

    J Aircr

    (1978)
  • D.H. Neuhart et al.

    A water tunnel study of Gurney flaps

    (1988)
  • B.L. Storms et al.

    Lift enhancement of an airfoil using a Gurney flap and vortex generators

    J Aircr

    (1994)
  • Myose R, Heron I, Papadakis M. Effects of Gurney flaps on a NACA 0011 airfoil. AIAA paper...
  • Myose R, Papadakis M, Heron I. A parametric study on the effect of Gurney flaps on single and multi-element airfoils,...
  • R. Myose et al.

    Gurney flap experiments on airfoils, wings, and reflection plane model

    J Aircr

    (1998)
  • D.R. Jeffrey et al.

    Aerodynamics of Gurney flaps on a single-element high-lift wing

    J Aircr

    (2000)
  • Papadakis M, Myose R, Heron I, Johnson BL. An experimental investigation of Gurney flaps on a GA(W)-2 airfoil with 25%...
  • Y.C. Li et al.

    Effects of Gurney flaps on the lift enhancement of a cropped nonslender delta wing

    Exp Fluids

    (2002)
  • Y.C. Li et al.

    Effect of Gurney flaps on a NACA0012 airfoil

    Flow Turbul Combust

    (2002)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Experimental investigations on the application of lift enhancement devices to forward-swept aircraft model

    Aeronaut J

    (2006)
  • Y.C. Li et al.

    Influences of mounting angles and locations on the effects of gurney flaps

    J Aircr

    (2003)
  • D.R. Troolin et al.

    Time resolved PIV analysis of flow over a NACA0015 airfoil with Gurney flap

    Exp Fluids

    (2006)
  • R. Meyer et al.

    Drag reduction on Gurney flaps by three-dimensional modifications

    J Aircr

    (2006)
  • Jang CS, Ross JC, Cummings RM. Computational evaluation of an airfoil with a Gurney flap. AIAA paper...
  • Myose R, Heron I, Papadakis M. The post-stall effect of Gurney flaps on a NACA0011 airfoil. SAE paper...
  • Jeffrey DR. An investigation into the aerodynamics of Gurney flaps. PhD thesis, Department of Aeronautics and...
  • J. Katz et al.

    Effect of 90 degree flap on the aerodynamics of a two-element airfoil

    J Fluids Eng

    (1989)
  • P. Giguere et al.

    Gurney flap scaling for optimum lift-to-drag ratio

    AIAA J

    (1997)
  • Storms BL, Jang CS. Lift enhancement of an airfoil using a Gurney flap and vortex generator. AIAA paper...
  • Selig MS, Monovan JF, Fraser DB. Airfoil at low speeds. Virginia Beach, VA, 23451: SoarTech 8, SoarTech Publications,...
  • Yen DT, van Dam CP, Brauchle F, Smith RL, Collins SD. Active load control and lift enhancement using mem translational...
  • R.A. McD Galbraith

    The aerodynamic characteristics of a GU25-5(11)-8 airfoil for low Reynolds numbers

    Exp Fluids

    (1985)
  • A.W. Bloy et al.

    Aerodynamic characteristics of an aerofoil with small trailing edge flaps

    Wind Eng

    (1995)
  • A.W. Bloy et al.

    Free-stream turbulence effect on Gurney-type flaps

    Wind Eng

    (1998)
  • Cited by (217)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text