Personality aspects of entrepreneurship: A look at five meta-analyses
Introduction
During the past two decades entrepreneurship has become a very active field of research in various social science disciplines and a prominent concern of economic policy. Adaptation of economic systems to changing conditions, innovation of products and services, creation of jobs, and economic growth is assumed to be very much dependent on the readiness and willingness of people to start an independent privately owned business and on the founders’ skills and efforts to run it successfully (cf. Böheim et al., 2009, Erken et al., 2008, Van Praag and Versloot, 2007). This is particularly true in the field of new technology where entrepreneurial activities demand a high level of knowledge in applying research and development (R & D) and high creativity in taking advantage of market niches.
Decades after Schumpeter (1912/1988) convincingly pointed to the importance of the entrepreneur for economic development, looking for personality traits uniquely characteristic of entrepreneurs was occasionally the topic of research, albeit one with rather modest success. Consequently, in the 1970s and 1980s the personality approach to studying entrepreneurial behaviour was discredited (e.g., Gartner, 1989). However, it gained new momentum in the 1990s, which according to Zhao and Seibert (2006) probably reflected the increasing acceptance of the unifying five-factor model (FFM) of personality and meta-analysis as technique for aggregating and generalizing the results of many single studies. Concurrently, the interest in, and appreciation of, the psychological sub-discipline of personality research has very much changed for the better.
Most of the studies published during the past two decades have already been reviewed in previous meta-analyses (Rauch and Frese, 2007, Stewart and Roth, 2001, Zhao and Seibert, 2006, Zhao et al., 2010, on personality including risk propensity; Collins et al., 2004, Stewart and Roth, 2007, on achievement motivation). Thus, the present paper focuses on these meta-analyses in a form of intuitive meta-synthesis (Sipe & Curlette, 1997) as an attempt to integrate their results in the light of the FFM as reference system for personality traits. Single studies will be reviewed only when their design or their results are of special interest – this will be because they reveal mediator and/or moderator effects in the influence of personality traits on entrepreneurial behaviour that are not frequently enough encountered and are, therefore, not reported as average effects in meta-analyses.
Meta-analyses are commonly designed not to test hypotheses but to explore a field of research for congruence or heterogeneity of the results of many single studies reported in the literature. Therefore, it seems neither necessary nor reasonable to explicate in advance theoretical expectations about the effects of personality traits on entrepreneurial behaviour. Theoretical implications and interpretations of the results of the meta-analyses will be discussed later.
That personality has some influence at all should be evident from basic characteristics of the entrepreneurial role: initiating a life of self-determination and independence (Emotional Stability), finding new opportunities and ways of structuring and developing the enterprise (Openness to experience), hard working and persistent in goal striving (achievement motivation component of Conscientiousness), establishing a social network (Extraversion), and taking the risk of failure (risk propensity, possibly a combination of Emotional Stability, Openness, and Extraversion).
After clarifying definitions of entrepreneurship and personality traits each of five meta-analyses are reported with their main results, summarized, integrated, and complemented by exemplary studies of mediating and moderating effects. This should contribute to a base of knowledge from which future research can start thinking about unresolved problems, necessary changes in research strategies, and promising theoretical and methodological approaches.
Section snippets
The concept of entrepreneurship
Eckhardt and Shane (2003, p. 336) define entrepreneurship “… as the discovery, evaluation, and exploitation of future goods and services … [by] … creation or identification of new ends and means previously undetected or unutilized by market participants”. In this perspective, entrepreneurship could be an attribute of managers as well as of business founders, and founding a small private enterprise may not be an entrepreneurial activity per se, but only if it is clearly characterized by novelty
Risk propensity of entrepreneurs and managers (Stewart & Roth, 2001)
The first in the series of meta-analyses on entrepreneurs’ personality traits performed during the last 10 years is that of Stewart and Roth (2001), which included 12 studies (six using the risk scale of the Jackson Personality Inventory, four the Choice Dilemmas Questionnaire, two some other scales). They compared risk propensity between entrepreneurs and managers. Contrasting entrepreneurs with managers makes sense if other conditions such as gender, education level, professional experience,
Summarizing and integrating the results of the five meta-analyses
Most attention has been attracted by temperament traits (or personality traits in the narrow sense), as represented by the five-factor model, or by traits that can be located within the FFM-system as equivalent to one of the five factors (Zhao and Seibert, 2006, Zhao et al., 2010), or as equivalent to a weighted composite of several FFM-dimensions. Examples of the latter are proactive personality and innovativeness among the traits dealt with in the meta-analysis of Rauch and Frese (2007).
Variables mediating the personality trait effects
Whereas the meta-analysis approach is quite efficient in detecting, summarizing, and reporting personality main effects, it is less apt in dealing with mediating and moderating effects, mainly because the number of studies reporting such effects is often not large enough to allow a reliable estimation of means and error variances of the effects across studies. It seems, therefore, advisable to pay special attention to some single studies that report theoretically interesting and practically
Conclusions
Analyzing the tasks of entrepreneurs is an indispensable first step in entrepreneurial research. These tasks vary with circumstances such as the type of industry (providing service or material goods, based on new technology or conventional techniques), region, competitors, social networks, founding a business as a matter of necessity or opportunity, financial resources, developmental stage of the business. But techniques for systematic analyses of entrepreneurial tasks under various
References (64)
- et al.
Personality and achievement motivation: Relationship among Big Five domain and facet scales, achievement goals, and intelligence
Personality and Individual Differences
(2008) - et al.
On the persistence of job creation in old and new firms
Economic Letters
(2009) - et al.
Opportunities and entrepreneurship
Journal of Management
(2003) - et al.
The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between entrepreneur leadership behavior and new venture performance
Journal of Business Venturing
(2006) - et al.
Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature
Journal of Vocational Behavior
(2009) - et al.
Individual differences in trait motivation: Development of the motivational trait questionnaire
International Journal of Educational Research
(2000) - et al.
Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process
Industrial Marketing Management
(2009) - et al.
The role of SME entrepreneurs’ innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations
Research Policy
(2008) - et al.
Can genetic factors influence the likelihood of engaging in entrepreneurial activity?
Journal of Business Venturing
(2009) - et al.
Personality traits and personal values: A conceptual and empirical integration
Personality and Individual Differences
(2003)
To start or not to start: Outcome and ability expectations in the decision to start a new venture
Journal of Business Venturing
A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Implicit and explicit motives
Does self-efficacy affect entrepreneurial investment?
Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal
The scientific analysis of personality
The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: A meta-analysis
Human Performance
Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Professional manual
The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions
Journal of Small Business Management
Personality structure: Emergence of the five factor model
Annual Review of Psychology
From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: The importance of person–situation learning match
Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice
Overconfidence in investment decisions: An experimental approach
The European Journal of Finance
Total factor productivity and the role of entrepreneurship
Jena Economic Research Papers
The moderator effect of cognitive ability on the relationship between planning strategies and business success of small scale business owners in South Africa: A longitudinal study
Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship
Toward a structure- and process-integrated view of personality traits as density distributions of states
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Towards a psychology of entrepreneurship: An action theory perspective
Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship
Goal orientation and planfulness: Action styles as personality concepts
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach
‘‘Who is an entrepreneur?’’ is the wrong question
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Persönlichkeit, Strategien und Erfolg bei Kleinunternehmern
An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (531)
A longitudinal analysis of judgement approaches to sustainability paradoxes
2024, Tourism ManagementGetting to know someone in ten seconds: Social role theory and perceived personality in entrepreneurial pitch videos
2024, Journal of Business ResearchGaps in diversity representation and data insufficiencies in the U.S. forest sector workforce analysis
2024, Trees, Forests and PeopleThe influence of the Big Five and Dark Triad personality constructs on knowledge sharing: A meta-analysis
2023, Personality and Individual DifferencesPlanned Happenstance and Entrepreneurship Development: The Case of Japanese Undergraduate Students
2024, Administrative Sciences