Elsevier

Pattern Recognition

Volume 42, Issue 11, November 2009, Pages 2797-2806
Pattern Recognition

A survey of biometric technology based on hand shape

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2009.02.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Automated biometric systems have emerged as a more reliable alternative to the traditional personal identification solutions. One of the most popular biometrics is hand shape due to its ease of use, non-intrusiveness and public acceptance. This paper presents a survey of the technology used in hand shape-based biometric systems. We first review the component modules including the algorithms they employ. Next we discuss system taxonomies, performance evaluation methodologies, testing issues and US government evaluations. A summary of the accuracy results reported in the literature is also provided. We next describe some of the commercial hand shape biometric systems as well as some recent successful deployments. Finally, we mention a few limitations of the hand shape biometric and give some directions for future research.

Introduction

Automatic human identification has become an important issue in today's global information society. Due to increasing security concerns, a large number of systems currently require positive identification before allowing an individual to use their services. During the last decade, there has been a steady research effort1 towards providing user-friendly and reliable methodologies for access to facilities, resources, services or computer systems. Biometric systems are already employed in domains that require some sort of user verification. It is generally accepted that physical traits like iris, fingerprints and, as more recently debated, hand shape and palmprints can uniquely define each member of a large population which makes them suitable for large-scale identification (establishing a subject's identity) [10], [22], [50]. On the other hand, in many small-population applications, because of privacy or limited resources, we only need to verify a person (confirm or deny the person's claimed identity). In these situations, one can also use behavioral traits2 which have less discriminating power such as voice, face, signature and human–computer interaction (HCI) derived patterns.

Comprehensive reviews have been recently published on fingerprint [31], palmprint [50], face [49] and behavioral HCI [46] biometric technologies. In this paper, we survey the state of the art in hand shape-based biometric technology and complement the information provided in [10], [36]. We also describe some of the commercially deployed systems and analyze the practical issues concerning enrollment, training and performance evaluation to consider when designing such systems.

Hand shape biometrics is the ensemble of techniques employed in establishing the identity of a person using person's hand silhouette and/or geometric features (e.g. finger lengths, widths, areas, ratios, etc) derived from it. In the biometric literature, hand shape systems usually include all systems using information extracted from a hand silhouette, while hand geometry refers to only those systems which use sparse geometric features. A typical hand shape biometric system uses a camera or scanner-based device to capture the hand image of a person and compares this against the information stored in a database to establish identity. Besides person identification, hand imaging has also been used for deriving statistical models of biological shapes [14] and for guiding gesture-based HCI tasks [43].

As often noted in the literature, hand shape biometrics is attractive due to the following reasons:

  • 1.

    Hand shape can be captured in a relatively user convenient, non-intrusive manner by using inexpensive sensors [2], [25], [30].

  • 2.

    Extracting the hand shape information requires only low resolution images and the user templates can be efficiently stored (nine-byte templates are used by some commercial hand recognition systems [35]).

  • 3.

    This biometric modality is more acceptable to the public mainly because it lacks criminal connotation [16], [24].

  • 4.

    Additional biometric features such as palmprints and fingerprints can be easily integrated to an existing hand shape-based biometric system [10], [25], [30].

Section snippets

Operation of a hand shape-based biometric system

A hand shape-based biometric system operates according to Fig. 1. In the enrollment stage, hand shape data are acquired from the registered users, feature sets are extracted from the acquired data, and one or multiple templates per individual are computed and stored in a database. In the deployment stage, one snapshot of the user's hand is captured, a feature set is computed and then compared to the templates in the database. Based on the comparison result, the claimed identity is accepted or

System taxonomies

A biometric taxonomy is usually based on partitions which classify the usage of biometrics within a given application. The following taxonomies have been mentioned in the literature (biometric systems are considered to perform best when employed in the first five conditions of the left column) [32], [39]:

  • Cooperative vs. non-cooperative user. (Are users willingly participating?)

  • Overt vs. covert biometric system. (Are users knowingly participating?)

  • Habituated vs. non-habituated user. (Are users

Deployment history

Hand geometry appears to be the oldest automatically employed biometric modality as hand geometry-based systems have been commercialized for almost four decades [27], [36], [52]. These systems accounted for 4.7% (141 million US dollars) of the world revenues generated by all biometric modalities and were the fourth leading biometric technology in 2007 [18]. The technology has evolved from stand-alone electro-mechanical devices in the early 1970's to today's electronic scanners attached to

Hand shape uniqueness

The issue of hand shape uniqueness within a large population is currently somewhat controversial. Some researchers and designers of commercial biometric systems consider hand shape to have a medium-to-high discrimination power [30], [32]. On the other hand, the authors of some recent research systems [10], [47], [48] have shown high verification/identification rates which are comparable to fingerprint-based systems. However, their datasets appear to be collected offline and have, arguably,

Future directions

Hand shaped-based authentication systems have been widely used for applications in access control, attendance tracking and personal identity verification for almost 40 years. However, this is still an active area of research which focuses on:

  • (i)

    Designing an unconstrained hand image acquisition setup, in which no guiding pins or even a platform are needed. That can be achieved by using different illumination [29], multi-modal sensors (e.g. combined 2-D and 3-D range [41]), sophisticate silhouette

About the Author—NICOLAE DUTA received the B.S. degree in applied mathematics from the University of Bucharest (Romania) in 1991, the D.E.A. degree in statistics from the University of Paris-Sud (France) in 1992, the M.S. degree in computer science from the University of Iowa in 1996 and the Ph.D. degree in computer science and engineering from Michigan State University in 2000. He is currently a scientist in the Natural Language Understanding group at Nuance Communications, Burlington, MA.

References (52)

  • H. Chen, H. Valizadegan, C. Jackson, S. Soltysiak, A.K. Jain, Fake hands: spoofing hand geometry systems, Biometric...
  • N. Covavisaruch et al.

    Personal verification and identification using hand geometry

    ECTI Transactions on Computer and Information Technology

    (2005)
  • N. Duta, Learning-based detection, segmentation and matching of objects, Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University,...
  • H. Dutağacı et al.

    A comparative analysis of global hand appearance-based person recognition

    Journal of Electronic Imaging

    (2008)
  • G. Doddington et al.

    Sheep, goats, lambs and woves: a statistical analysis of speaker performance in the NIST 1998 speaker recognition evaluation

  • R.H. Ernst, Hand ID system, U.S. Patent no. 3576537,...
  • M. Golfarelli et al.

    On the error-reject trade-off in biometric verification systems

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

    (1997)
  • U. Grenander et al.

    HANDS: A Pattern-Theoretic Study of Biological Shapes

    (1991)
  • P. Grother et al.

    Models of large population recognition performance

  • J. Holmes, L. Wright, R. Maxwell, A performance evaluation of biometric identification devices, Sandia National...
  • INSPASS program, available at:...
  • International Biometric Group (IBG) 2007 Report, 2007, available at:...
  • ISO/IEC 19794-10, available at:...
  • A.K. Jain et al.

    Deformable matching of hand shapes for user verification

  • A.K. Jain et al.

    A prototype hand geometry-based verification system

  • A.K. Jain et al.

    Introduction to biometrics

  • Cited by (150)

    • Biometric security performance: Analysis methods and tools for evaluation and assessment

      2023, Artificial Intelligence for Biometrics and Cybersecurity: Technology and applications
    • PalmEcho: Multimodal Authentication for Smartwatch via Beating Gestures

      2023, Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    About the Author—NICOLAE DUTA received the B.S. degree in applied mathematics from the University of Bucharest (Romania) in 1991, the D.E.A. degree in statistics from the University of Paris-Sud (France) in 1992, the M.S. degree in computer science from the University of Iowa in 1996 and the Ph.D. degree in computer science and engineering from Michigan State University in 2000. He is currently a scientist in the Natural Language Understanding group at Nuance Communications, Burlington, MA. From 2000 to 2005 he was a scientist in the Speech and Language Processing department at BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA. He also held temporary research positions at INRIA-Rocquecourt (France) in 1993 and Siemens Corporate Research (Princeton, NJ) from 1997 to 1999. He is a member of IEEE and his current research interests include computer vision, pattern recognition, language understanding, automatic translation, machine and biological learning.

    View full text