Elsevier

Pedobiologia

Volume 53, Issue 3, 10 May 2010, Pages 197-201
Pedobiologia

Plant pathogen protection by arbuscular mycorrhizas: A role for fungal diversity?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2009.10.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi can confer protection to host plants against some root pathogens, and several mechanisms for these phenomena have been proposed. If AM fungal taxa vary in the ways that they limit the negative effects of pathogens on host plants, additive and/or synergistic interactions among members of diverse AM fungal assemblages and communities may result in a greater pathogen protection than is currently predicted. However, in a review of the literature on interactions between AM and pathogenic fungi, we found few examples that compared the effectiveness of single- and multi-species AM fungal assemblages. Here, we briefly recount the generally recognized mechanisms of pathogen protection by AM fungi and present evidence, where appropriate, for functional diversity among AM fungal taxa with regard to these mechanisms. We propose that functional complementarity of AM fungal taxa in interactions with pathogens could mimic, or even be the cause of, previously observed relationships between AM fungal diversity and plant productivity.

Section snippets

Why consider diversity?

The role of below-ground soil organisms interacting with plant roots has gained increased attention in recent years (e.g. Reynolds et al. 2003; van der Putten 2003; Callaway et al. 2004), and the interactions between beneficial and pathogenic organisms have been identified as being particularly relevant due to their important implications for plant fitness (e.g.Schippers et al. 1987; Fitter and Garbaye 1994; Bever 2003). Most studies, however, focus on interactions between a single pair of

Improved nutrient status of the host plant

It is well known that AM fungi can improve the nutrient status of their host plants (Smith and Read 2008). Several mineral nutrients, especially P, are allocated through the symbiosis to the plant in exchange for carbon (e.g. Pearson and Jakobsen 1993). There is evidence that plants that took up larger amounts of nutrients through their AM fungal symbiont (e.g. Glomus intraradices and Glomus mosseae) have an increased tolerance for pathogenic infections (e.g. Bodker et al. 1998; Karagiannidis

Competitive interactions with pathogenic fungi

Direct (via interference competition, including chemical interactions) and indirect (via exploitation competition) interactions have been suggested as mechanisms by which AM fungi can reduce the abundance of pathogenic fungi in roots. These have generally been proposed in response to observations of negative correlations in the abundance of AM fungal structures and pathogenic microorganisms in roots and soil (St-Arnaud et al. 1994; Bodker et al. 2002; Filion et al. 2003) or on growth medium (

Anatomical or architectural changes in the root system

AM fungal colonization influences root architecture of the host plant in most studies by causing a more profusely branched root system (Price et al. 1989; Yanoet al. 1996; Paszkowski et al. 2002; Olah et al. 2005; Gutjahr et al. 2009).

Interactions between changes in the root system and protection of plant roots from pathogen attack have been demonstrated for several AM species. Matsubara et al. (1995) have shown that eggplants colonized by Glomus etunicatum or Gigaspora margarita contained

Microbial community changes in the rhizosphere

Different factors (e.g. altered exudation patterns, putative direct AM fungal effects, different root size and architecture, altered physiology) may contribute to quantitative and qualitative microbial community changes in the mycorrhizosphere caused by AM fungi (Andrade et al. 1998; Hodge 2000; Artursson et al. 2006; Toljanderet al. 2007; Finlay 2008). Changes due to the influence of single AM fungi on mycorrhizosphere microbial communities may in turn lead directly to the reduction of fungal

Activation of plant defense mechanisms

The recognition dialogue established between the host plant and AM fungi even before physical contact, results in specific shifts in the host's gene regulation (Genre et al. 2009; Oldroyd et al. 2009) with the consequent production of specific multifunctional compounds (i.e. both involved in transduction pathways and capable to confer disease resistance) (Pozo and Azcón-Aguilar 2007; Liu et al. 2007; van Wees et al. 2008). It is possible that the processes of AM fungal establishment rather than

Conclusions

Our discussion above suggests that different AM fungal species may confer protection of host plants from root pathogenic fungi via different mechanisms, although there is sparse evidence to either support or disprove this. Most studies do not only focus on single isolates but only on a few Glomus species (mostly G. intraradices and G. mosseae); this is likely not representative of the whole range of interactions between AM fungi and pathogens. There is presently only one report (Maherali and

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding through the Dahlem Center of Plant Sciences at Freie Universität Berlin during the preparation of this paper. P.M.A. acknowledges funding through the EU Marie-Curie IRG program.

References (73)

  • G. Andrade et al.

    Bacterial associations with the mycorrhizosphere and hyphosphere of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae

    Plant and Soil

    (1998)
  • V. Artursson et al.

    Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria and their potential for stimulating plant growth

    Environmental Microbiology

    (2006)
  • C. Azcón-Aguilar et al.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizas and biological control of soil-borne plant pathogens – An overview of the mechanisms involved

    Mycorrhiza

    (1996)
  • L.G. Barrett et al.

    Continua of specificity and virulence in plant host-pathogen interactions: causes and consequences

    New Phytologist

    (2009)
  • J.D. Bever

    Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests

    New Phytologist

    (2003)
  • L. Bodker et al.

    Effect of phosphate and the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices on disease severity of root rot of peas (Pisum sativum) caused by Aphanomyces euteiches

    Mycorrhiza

    (1998)
  • L. Bodker et al.

    Interactions between indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Aphanomyces euteiches in field-grown pea

    Mycorrhiza

    (2002)
  • V.A. Borowicz

    Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant-pathogen relations?

    Ecology

    (2001)
  • R.M. Callaway et al.

    Soil fungi alter interactions between the invader Centaurea maculosa and North American natives

    Ecology

    (2004)
  • A.S. Citernesi et al.

    The occurrence of antagonistic bacteria in Glomus mosseae pot cultures

    Agronomie

    (1996)
  • Y. Dalpé

    Mycorrhizae: a potential tool for plant protection but not a panacea

    Phytoprotection

    (2005)
  • R.M. Davis et al.

    Phytophthora parasitica inoculation and intensity of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in citrus

    New Phytologist

    (1981)
  • M. Filion et al.

    Direct interaction between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices and different rhizosphere microorganisms

    New Phytologist

    (1999)
  • M. Filion et al.

    Quantification of Fusarium solani f. sp phaseoli in mycorrhizal bean plants and surrounding mycorrhizosphere soil using real-time polymerase chain reaction and direct isolations on selective media

    Phytopathology

    (2003)
  • R.D. Finlay

    Ecological aspects of mycorrhizal symbiosis: with special emphasis on the functional diversity of interactions involving the extraradical mycelium

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (2008)
  • A. Fitter et al.

    Interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and other soil organisms

    Plant and Soil

    (1994)
  • M. Fritz et al.

    Arbuscular mycorrhiza reduces susceptibility of tomato to Alternaria solani

    Mycorrhiza

    (2006)
  • A. Genre et al.

    Biotic and abiotic stimulation of root epidermal cells reveals common and specific responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

    Plant Physiology

    (2009)
  • C. Guillon et al.

    Differential and systemic alteration of defence-related gene transcript levels in mycorrhizal bean plants infected with Rhizoctonia solani

    Canadian Journal of Botany

    (2002)
  • J.H. Graham

    What do root pathogens see in mycorrhizas?

    New Phytologist

    (2001)
  • C. Gutjahr et al.

    Glomus intraradices induces changes in root system architecture of rice independently of common symbiosis signaling

    New Phytologist

    (2009)
  • M.M. Hart et al.

    Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

    New Phytologist

    (2002)
  • I. Jakobsen et al.

    External hyphae of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Trifolium subterraneum L. I: spread of hyphae and phosphorus inflow into roots

    New Phytologist

    (1992)
  • J. Jansa et al.

    Phosphorus acquisition strategies within arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community of a single field site

    Plant and Soil

    (2005)
  • J. Jansa et al.

    Are there benefits of simultaneous root colonization by different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi?

    New Phytologist

    (2008)
  • J.N. Klironomos

    Host-specificity and functional diversity among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text