Strong anticipation: Sensitivity to long-range correlations in synchronization behavior

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.05.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Strong anticipation has emerged as a new framework for studying prospective control. According to earlier theories of prediction, anticipatory behavior rests on temporally local predictions from internal models. Strong anticipation eschews internal models and draws on the embedding of an organism in its environment. In this formulation, behavior is sensitive to the non-local temporal structure of the environment. We present initial evidence for strong anticipation in a synchronization task with tapping as the behavior. Participants were instructed to synchronize, to the best of their abilities, with a (unpredictable) chaotic signal. Our data suggest a close relationship between the long-range correlations of the chaotic signal and the long-range correlations of the synchronization behavior.

Introduction

Explanations of anticipation in cognitive science and neuroscience typically attribute internal predictive models to organisms. Dubois [1] labels anticipation of a model-dependent kind as weak and contrasts it with strong anticipation that arises from lawful regularities embedded in the ordinary mode of functioning of a system and its environment. A prominent example of model-independent strong anticipation is anticipating synchronization [2], [3], a temporal relation that emerges from time delays in appropriately coupled “master” and “slave” dynamical systems. The slave system anticipates the master system by synchronizing with a state that lies in the future of the master system. Anticipating synchronization may be very general. It can be demonstrated empirically in both physical, e.g., Ref. [4], and biological, e.g., Ref. [5], systems and has been shown through modeling to accommodate defining characteristics of proactive regulation in physiological and neural systems [6], [7]. Importantly, the fact of anticipating synchronization renders the notion of strong anticipation as neither impossible nor mysterious.

Most broadly construed, strong anticipation is an assertion of non-local dependence of an organism’s current behavior on the global temporal structure within its environment. An organism and its environment together make up a single system with temporal structure that extends far beyond the short range. On the one hand, current states of the organism-environment system depend on initial conditions. On the other hand, they depend on the possibilities for future events. In anticipation, the organism acts at once on its past history and on the potential outcomes afforded by its fit with the environment. (For a discussion of perceiving possibilities for action, and ontological hypotheses for prospective control of behavior, see Ref. [8].) The broad construal of strong anticipation is elaborated in Section 3. It is prefaced by a synopsis of an anticipatory phenomenon in a widely used and simple experimental procedure. The phenomenon and procedure are points of departure for the experiment reported in the present article.

Section snippets

Negative mean asynchrony

The notion of anticipation is prominent in studies of person-to-metronome synchronization. Radil, Mates, Ilmberger, and Pöppel [9], for example, reported a mean asynchrony, an “anticipation tendency” [10, p. 973], of −30 ms between taps and onsets of metronome beats. However, there are questions about the usefulness of negative mean asynchrony (NMA) as a marker of anticipation in general [10]. Participants in synchronization experiments exhibit strong individual differences in NMA [11], [12].

A role for long-range correlations in strong anticipation

The case of synchrony with a chaotic signal brings synchronization research beyond its familiar frontiers. It is a research problem not unlike beat perception in music psychology [19]. Music is not limited to metronomic regularity. The baseline for simplicity would be a single tone repeated at regular intervals. Music can vary both in ordinal complexity and temporal complexity [20]. Ordinal complexity involves a variety of notes along the octave. Temporal complexity involves an irregularity of

Chaos and anticipation

There is an extensive literature in cognitive science on the human ability to anticipate chaotic signals. In a vigilance task [30], a target moved along a horizontal line in a trajectory defined by the chaotic regime of the logistic map. Participants were instructed, at each time point, to anticipate the next location of a target on the screen. Error decreased as participants continued, and their responses converged on a parabolic lag 1 autocorrelation, characteristic of the logistic map. Later

Method

The chaotic signals were produced by a C program using Eq. (1) and parameters α=1 and β=20 [44]. For each Ikeda [36], [37] metronome signal, the map began at randomly selected initial conditions and continued with one of three settings of delay: τ=2, 5, or 10. The values of the resulting Ikeda map were normalized to range from 1 to 1.5, and these values became the inter-onset intervals (in seconds) of the chaotic signal. Each chaotic signal consisted of 1000 onsets. With each new onset, the

Results

A key premise of this experiment is that the chaotic signal presented to participants is unpredictable by linear standards. The linear redundancy of the Ikeda signals may be used to evaluate the signals’ linear predictability. Linear redundancy is an information-theoretic statistic indexing the linear dependence across time, varying inversely with entropy [45], [46], [47], [48]. For any observable y(t), the linear redundancy is computed over a set of n lagged copies y(t+i), i=1,n. Over n time

Conclusion

In this paper, we have presented a finding consonant with the hypothesis, advanced by Anderson and Schooler [25], [26], that learning and memory reflect near-optimal statistical inference about the patterning of environmental events. In their view, adaptation of behavior to the environment’s statistical structure requires neither explicit statistical inference nor explicit prediction. Using Dubois’s [1] terminology, the adaptation is a necessary consequence of a strongly anticipatory system.

As

Acknowledgement

Partial support was provided by NSF grant BCS-0643271.

References (51)

  • R. Toral et al.

    Physica A

    (2003)
  • G. Aschersleben

    Brain Cognition

    (2002)
  • K. Ikeda et al.

    Physica D

    (1987)
  • D. Delignières et al.

    Hum. Movement. Sci.

    (2004)
  • M. Smithson

    Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.

    (1997)
  • A. Dionisio et al.

    Physica A

    (2004)
  • M. Palus

    Physica D

    (1995)
  • J.W. Kantelhardt et al.

    Physica A

    (2002)
  • D.M. Dubois
  • H.U. Voss

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2001)
  • H.U. Voss

    Internat. J. Bifur. Chaos

    (2002)
  • S. Sivaprakasam et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2001)
  • N. Stepp, M.T. Turvey, in: M. Sasaki, N. Furuyama, H. Mishima (Eds.), Proc. 14th Intl. Conf. Perc. and Action,...
  • N. Stepp et al.

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (2008)
  • M.T. Turvey

    Eco. Psyc.

    (1992)
  • T. Radil et al.

    Experientia

    (1990)
  • B.H. Repp

    Psychon. B. Rev.

    (2005)
  • G. Aschersleben et al.

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (1995)
  • B.H. Repp et al.

    J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform.

    (2002)
  • G. Aschersleben et al.

    J. Motor. Behav.

    (1997)
  • J. Mates et al.

    J. Cognitive. Neurosci.

    (1994)
  • M. Peters

    Psychiat. Res.

    (1989)
  • B.H. Repp

    J. Motor. Behav.

    (2003)
  • G. Aschersleben et al.

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2001)
  • E.W. Large

    J. New Music Res.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text