An agent based multi-optional model for the diffusion of innovations
Introduction
The process of diffusion of innovations motivated ample academic interest in the sixties, extending until today. A pioneering work has been the one developed by Bass [1]. Originally this model was fitted, with enough precision, to the observational data of adoption rates corresponding to many consumer durable goods, obtaining the cumulative S-curves for the number of adopters, in which fast growth is generated by word of mouth between early and late adopters [2]. Later, the Bass model was extended in its use to other products, for example those related to the telecommunications sector [3]. Many of the innovation diffusion models were inspired by models initially developed for application in different disciplines. The Bass model was not the exception; in that case the analogy was made with epidemic models [4].
The Bass model performs an aggregate description of the behavior of potential decision makers in relation with the adoption or not of an innovation (or technology). In this formulation the set of deciders is assumed to be homogeneous and totally connected, or equivalently, we suppose that each individual is influenced by all remaining decision makers. The basic assumption of the model is that at each point in time, potential buyers are exposed to two kinds of influences: an external influence, in the shape of advertising campaigns carried out by the companies via the mass media; and an internal influence coming from “word-of-mouth” interactions with adopters [5].
The Bass model has the general advantage of its simple application, constituting a description on a macro level that shows the observed global behavior [6]. However, the lack of detail at a microscopic level turns it into a weak prediction instrument, restricting its application to analogies with similar known products [3].
On the other hand, the study of diffusion models at the micro level has recently intensified, with special focusing on agent based models (ABMs), as is shown, for example, in the review paper by [7]. In general, ABMs involve two complementary causes for innovation adoption: (a) the individual evaluation of the advantages related to the adoption of the new product (or technology) and (b) the imitation of behavior of close contacts which are considered as examples to follow by the decision maker. ABMs have the advantage, compared to macro models, that the introduction of the social networks is possible. Those social networks are the routes for interaction between the elements of the system [8].
In the case of the diffusion of only one new product in a potential market, individuals in ABMs must choose between two alternatives: to adopt or not to adopt. It was found that the social system described before can be obtained by using the analogy with the well-known Ising statistic model [9], which was originally developed in the field of physics to describe the phase transition in ferromagnetic materials [10]. In the physical model the agents represent spins in a regular lattice. Those spins can be in two positions: one in the direction of an external field and the other in the opposite direction. In that model, each agent (ion in the metallic lattice) can be influenced by its neighbors, which generate a local field that induces the orientation of the spin. There are examples in scientific literature in which the Ising model is adapted to modeling the social process of opinion formation [11], [12] and others in which the diffusion of technology is studied [13].
In the Ising model, the interaction is limited to the nearest neighbors in a regular array. However, a social process of communication does not necessarily correspond to an interaction with the geographic proximity, so it is necessary to modify the formalism in order to include irregular networks where the notion of nearness is diffuse. Such is the case of the family of networks known as “small world networks” (SWN) described by Watts and Strogatz [14]. The different networks in the family of SWN are obtained by the variation of only one parameter called rewiring probability. The idea is to re-connect the agents, starting from a regular network with a probability which is the parameter mentioned before. A rewiring probability of zero corresponds to a regular network, and a probability of one to a totally random network. For values of probability in the interval [0.003, 0.02], the SWN for a two dimensional network are obtained [15]. SWN have been strongly studied in the scientific literature, observing that they have suitable properties for applications in social communications and other natural phenomena [16].
At this point we have an Ising-like model equipped with a SWN which lets us study the technology diffusion process corresponding to only one product, as was applied in the previous work [13]. However the generalization of this model to more products, whose physical analogy is the Potts model, has been used in a few cases of the social field [17]. The idea of the present work is the exploration of the possibilities of the Potts-like formulation for the analysis of the diffusion process associated to the launching of “” products in a common market.
The case in which two brands compete for a unique market is analyzed in Ref. [18], by using an agent-based cascade model. Following Refs. [19], [20], we can identify two mayor categories of agent-based diffusion models: (a) threshold models, in which agents adopt when a specified minimum number of neighbors have adopted, and (b) cascade models, where the probability of adoption increases with the number of adopters in the neighborhood, with an exponential mathematical dependency.
One contribution of our proposal, considering the two categories given before, is that this formalism could be thought of as a threshold model, but applicable to “” options, and particularly applied in this paper to systems of three and four options. In the algorithm we propose, adapted from statistical mechanics applications, agents have an implicit threshold that relates to the perceived effective utility of each of the potential choices. This threshold is a function of the differences of utility of the available options, as is shown in Ref. [13]. Moreover, this model can also generate a more stochastic decision process, slightly moving away from the “threshold” category, when uncertainty is considered by varying the temperature parameter.
Yet another contribution of this paper lies in the way agents decide between the available choices, which is embedded in the model. That means that the probability of adoption is dynamically modified in time for each agent, depending of the consumption choices of their particular set of neighbors. This methodology is different from, for example, the ones used by Refs. [21], [22], where diffusion is described as a two stage process; first, the units adopt, and then, at each point in time, adopters can decide whether to disadopt, or switch, according to a separate “coin-flip”.
The work is organized as follows: Section 2 gives the formalism for “” options, showing also how the Ising-like and the studied cases ( and ) can be deduced from it. Section 3 describes the variables of the model, such as: rewiring probability, the utility of each product, the spatial and temporal distribution of early adopters, and the temperature as a measure of uncertainty in the decision. Section 4 gives the details about the implementation of the agent based model. Section 5 shows and performs the analysis of the results obtained. Section 6 summarizes the main conclusions.
Section snippets
Formalism for “” options (Potts-like)
Let us consider a population of agents, which are identified by Greek indexes, and M possible states, which are identified by Latin indexes, for all the agents. The set of states is written as: with . For simplicity we choose a canonical basis, then .
Introducing the scalar product between a pair of states, we have where the term on the r.h.s. is the Kronecker delta.
Because the agent will be in some of the states of the
Variables of the model
The microscopic variables introduced in the diffusion model are related essentially with: the way in which the agents are in communication (mainly by means of the kind of social network), the individual evaluation about the adoption of a new product (personal perception), the initial rate of innovators (mainly influenced by campaigns of advertising) and finally the introduction of an additional parameter (temperature) for the quantification of the uncertainty in the decision process.
Agent model implementation
Initially we will consider a regular square grid of 200×200, i.e. 40,000 agents. We are not assuming periodic conditions in the boundaries.
Agents will be initially connected in a regular lattice, and through Watts and Strogatz’s [14] method of rewiring we will replicate small world networks. For the implementation of the model we will use the software known as Anylogic [29].
In all the cases the decision algorithm is coming from Eq. (7).
Results
By means of numerical experiments we will study how the penetration, in a common market, of products in competition is influenced by the variation of the following microscopic variables: the probability of rewiring , the difference of utilities between adopting and not adopting , the initial rate of innovators and the temperature as a measure of the uncertainty in the decision process.
Also we will analyze the effects, in terms of market penetration, of improving a product, but delaying
Conclusions
A formalism has been developed that allows the study of systems formed by individuals that must decide among several options. This formalism is sufficiently versatile for it to include heterogeneous populations of decision makers deciding between many different options. In our work, that methodology is applied to a problem of three options; the adoption of a product , a product , or the non-adoption. It is also applied to a four options problem where the possibilities are: adoption of product
Acknowledgments
This investigation has been enriched by comments and suggestions of an anonymous reviewer. This research was supported partially by two US National Science Foundation (NSF) Coupled Natural and Human Systems grants (0410348 and 0709681) and by the University of Buenos Aires (UBACyT 00080).
References (30)
Models of technology diffusion
Research Policy
(2000)- et al.
Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: a critical review and research directions
International Journal of Research in Marketing
(2010) - et al.
Impact of social neighborhood on diffusion of innovation S-curve
Decision Support Systems
(2010) - et al.
Ising-based model of opinion formation in a complex network of interpersonal interactions
Physica A
(2006) Rational group decision making: a random field Ising model at
Physica A
(1997)- et al.
Ising-like agent-based technology diffusion model: adoption patterns vs. seeding strategies
Physica A
(2011) - et al.
The role of seeding in multi-market entry
International Journal of Research in Marketing
(2005) - et al.
Exploring associations between micro-level models of innovation diffusion and emerging macro-level adoption patterns
Physica A
(2013) A new product growth for model consumer durables
Management Science
(1969)Diffusion of Innovations
(2003)
Comments on “A new product growth for model consumer durables”
Management Science
New product diffusion models in marketing: a review and directions for research
Journal of Marketing
Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review
Central European Journal of Operation Research (CEJOR)
Cognitive Economics: An Interdisciplinary Approach
Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus
Zeitschrift für Physik
Cited by (20)
Modelling sociocognitive aspects of students’ learning
2017, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :Here we model the teaching–learning task (see Appendix for more details) and the corresponding explanatory schemes as an epistemic landscape [16,17], which is an abstract representation of the knowledge required to solve the task and which provide the background for designing the task. We describe the cognitive dynamics as the agent’s exploration of the cognitive landscape as a probabilistic selection of an explanatory scheme [11,18] guided by the agent’s proficiency in using explanatory models as well as their memory of success and failure in providing explanations [14,15]. Social interactions, on the other hand, are described by an agent-based model of how agents’ proficiencies develop solely through their mutual comparisons of their proficiencies and mutual appraisals.
Exploring policy impacts for servicising in product-based markets: A generic agent-based model
2017, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Although many academics have studied artificial markets, most of the developed models concentrate on a limited number of aspects of artificial markets. For instance, such studies may focus on consumer choice processes (e.g., Eppstein et al. (2011); Mueller and De Haan (2009); Zhang and Zhang (2007)), or on the role of social networks in the diffusion of innovations (e.g., Kiesling et al. (2012); Laciana and Oteiza-Aguirre (2014); Neri (2007)). While providing important insight in key market mechanisms, such approaches do not allow for an exploration of dynamic interaction between sellers and buyers.
Context, drivers, and future potential for wood-frame multi-story construction in Europe
2015, Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeCitation Excerpt :Consequently, given sufficient data, further research directions could include quantitative approaches to innovation diffusion and to the sustainability imperatives of the built environment. For example, the WMC adoption could be explored with agent-based modeling and other threshold models based on dichotomic decisions of balancing benefits and costs (e.g., Laciana and Oteiza-Aguirre, 2014). However, it would require extensive studies on the perceptions on different alternatives throughout the fragmented matrix of stakeholders, in order to characterize the behavior of the agent classes in quantitative terms.
Assessment of the gap and (non-)Internet users evolution based on population biology dynamics
2015, Telecommunications PolicyCitation Excerpt :The impact of network externalities on the diffusion of innovations and new technologies is an open issue in the literature (Goldenberg, Libai, & Muller, 2010; Peres, Muller, & Mahajan, 2010; Rust, 2010; Tellis, 2010). New models dealing with specific issues of innovations and new technologies diffusion were also derived by (a) incorporating several adjustments into the existing models such as incorporation of secondary market (Cho & Koo, 2012) and seasonality (Guidolin & Guseo, 2014) or (b) using advanced techniques and theories such as real options (Kumbaroğlu, Madlener, & Demirel, 2008), multi-optional modeling (Laciana & Oteiza-Aguirre, 2014) and fuzzy time series (Cheng, Chen, & Wu, 2009). In the mid 1990s, the term “digital divide” was introduced by former Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information of the U.S. Department of Commerce, and director of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), Larry Irving Jr. (Dragulanescu, 2002).
Diffusion of two brands in competition: Cross-brand effect
2014, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications