Impact of informal networks on opinion dynamics in hierarchically formal organization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.05.051Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The fact that organization consists of formally hierarchical network and informal network is emphasized.

  • The impact of informal network to formal organization is studied with opinion dynamics.

  • Three main impact factors are agents’ tolerances, informal network scale and number of links.

Abstract

Traditional opinion dynamics model focused mainly on the conditions under which a group of agents would reach a consensus. Conclusion has been gained that continuous opinion dynamics are subject to the constraint that convergent opinion adjustment only proceeds when opinion difference is below a given tolerance. This conclusion is useful but neglected the fact that an organization often consists of overlapped networks including formally hierarchical network and small-world/scale-free informal networks. To study the impact of different types of informal networks on converging speed or the number of opinion clusters, four typical types of informal networks (small-world, scale-free, tree and fully connected) are modeled and proposed as complements to formal communications. Experiments to compare formal network and hybrid networks are then carried out. It is observed that opinion dynamics with supplemented communications of informal networks can benefit convergence speed and reduce opinion clusters. More importantly, it is revealed that three key factors of informal networks affect their impact on formal network. These factors of informal network in descending orders are: agents’ tolerances, scale and number of links.

Introduction

Agreement is one of the most important aspects of social group dynamics  [1]. It is essential for an organization to reach shared decisions in many situations. Opinion dynamics is aimed at defining the opinion states of a population, and the elementary processes that determine transitions between such states. In the context of numerous information exchanges before decision-making, modeling adoption dynamics through methods inspired from information contagion is more appropriate than game theory in economics  [2]. Research on public opinion dynamics has been gaining favor for several years, and many mathematical opinion dynamics models have been developed in social and political domains  [3], [4], [5], [6].

Opinion dynamics models can be classified as discrete and continuous, relying on the representation of opinion with discrete or continuous values. Well-known discrete models include Voter model  [7], Sznajd model  [8], Social Impact model  [9], Axelrod Culture model  [10], and Rumors model  [11], [12]. Continuous opinion dynamics models include Deffuant model  [13], Hegselmann–Krause model  [14], and CODA model  [15]. The first two continuous models are bounded-confidence models  [5], but they differ in the updating rule of opinions  [1]. The CODA model is a hybrid approach, where agents hold continuous opinions, but make binary decisions. These classic models and their modified versions have been widely applied in exploring public opinion formation and social contagious behaviors.

Hierarchically formal organization is a structure where each entity in the organization is often subordinate to another entity  [16]. This is the dominant mode of organization among large organizations like corporations, governments, military systems, organized religions etc.  [17]. It is also typically visualized as a pyramid and depicted with a tree. Formal communications are those sanctioned by the organization itself and are organizationally oriented. Meanwhile, informal communications are socially sanctioned, and are oriented to the individual members.

Opinion exchange is ubiquitous among different units of any organization, both in formal and informal structure  [18]. As an example, it is observed that direction of communication structures in military systems differentiates as formal and informal patterns  [19]. Although the influence of informal network on formal organizations has been researched in the field of social science, it has not been researched with respect to quantified opinion dynamics in the form of hybrid network yet. For instance, Song et al.  [20], [31] built a military network to study the hierarchical relationships among agents, but the impact of informal network on the formal tree network was neglected. Weisbuch et al.  [21] presented a model of opinion dynamics in which agents adjust continuous opinions as a result of random binary encounters whenever their difference in opinion is below a given threshold. This work did not take into account the communications of agents’ informal network either. Therefore we propose to study communication impact of informal organization on hierarchically formal network in the domain of opinion dynamics. In this paper, the organizational structure will be modeled as a network consists of both formal and informal interactions and their interplay is modeled as round by round communications.

The remainder of this paper is divided into the following sections. Basic opinion dynamics model is built in Section  2. In Section  3, formal organization is modeled using an example network of armored division. Informal organization is modeled as four typical network types. Then interactions of the two networks are modeled as sequential communication rounds. Section  4 illustrates experiment results of opinion dynamics and corresponding analysis is given. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section  5.

Section snippets

Basic opinion dynamics model

In organizations, agents are assumed to interact with their connected agents whose opinions do not differ too much from their own opinions. The difference is called tolerance in Ref.  [20], or threshold in Ref.  [21].

Core aspect of opinion dynamics model is tolerance and influence of agents  [20], [21]. Each agent has its own initial opinion. As prerequisite, we set floating initial opinion value for each agent, distributed uniformly between 0 and 1. Suppose that at time t, the opinion value of

Formal network model and its opinion dynamics

As known, hierarchical organization is a typical formal network widely applied in corporations, governments, military systems and organized religions  [22], [32], [33].

Normally, the definition of formal organization is based on the concept of process organization and comprises vertical and horizontal structural aspects  [16]. With respect to network organizations, Baker  [23] suggests that formal network structures are based on two key principles of organizational design: (1) vertical and

Opinion dynamics in hierarchical organization with impact of informal network

Generally, for fully connected networks, Eq. (2) based model leads to similar results as Deffuant et al.  [3]. That is, large tolerance values (d0.25) lead to consensus and low tolerance values (d<0.25) lead to fragmented clusters. As such, to illustrate the two key factors’ impact on formal network opinion dynamics, comparison tests were carried out with different levels of tolerance of nodes.

In Table 5, parameter setting 1 has higher tolerance value than setting 2. Thus tests of setting 1

Conclusion

Based on hierarchically formal organizations, 4 types of informal networks (small-world, scale-free, tree and fully connected) are constructed to study their impact on opinion dynamics of formal networks. Experiments show that existence of informal networks has greatly beneficial effects to reduce opinion clusters and can speed agents’ opinions to become stable. Besides, several important conclusions are drawn as follows.

  • (1)

    For any organization networks, tolerance is the most important factor to

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grant 61473013 from National Natural Science Foundation of China. Authors thank reviewers for their comments.

References (33)

  • C. Castellano et al.

    Statistical physics of social dynamics

    Rev. Modern Phys.

    (2009)
  • G. Weisbuch et al.

    Meet, discuss, and segregate!

    Complexity

    (2002)
  • G. Deffuant et al.

    How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model

    J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.

    (2002)
  • E. Kurmyshev et al.

    Dynamics of bounded confidence opinion in heterogeneous social networks: concord against partial antagonism

    Physica A

    (2011)
  • J. Lorenz

    Heterogeneous bounds of confidence: Meet, discuss and find consensus!

    Complexity

    (2010)
  • A.C.R. Martins

    Bayesian updating rules in continuous opinion dynamics models

    J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp.

    (2009)
  • M.J. de Oliveira

    Isotropic majority-vote model on a square lattice

    J. Stat. Phys.

    (1992)
  • K. Sznajd-Weron et al.

    Opinion evolution in closed community

    Internat. J. Modern Phys. C

    (2000)
  • A. Nowak et al.

    From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1990)
  • R. Axelrod

    The dissemination of culture a model with local convergence and global polarization

    J. Confl. Resolut.

    (1997)
  • S. Galam

    Minority opinion spreading in random geometry

    Eur. Phys. J. B

    (2002)
  • S. Galam

    Modeling rumors: the no plane Pentagon French hoax case

    Physica A

    (2003)
  • G. Deffuant et al.

    Mixing beliefs among interacting agents

    Adv. Complex Syst.

    (2000)
  • R. Hegselmann et al.

    Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation

    J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.

    (2002)
  • A.C.R. Martins

    Continuous opinions and discrete actions in opinion dynamics problems

    Internat. J. Modern Phys. C

    (2008)
  • O.N. Rank

    Formal structures and informal networks: Structural analysis in organizations

    Scand. J. Manag.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (37)

    • An opinion dynamics model for unrelated discrete opinions

      2022, Knowledge-Based Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this view, random [19], scale-free [20], small-world [21,22], and some real-world networks [23,24] are considered to be the interaction environment of opinions among agents. Song et al. [25] discovered that the converging speed of opinion dynamics simulations based on the scale-free and small-world informal networks tends to be similar when their scales are the same. Second direction is proposing more fusion mechanisms.

    • Game-based crowdsourcing to support collaborative customization of the definition of sustainability

      2018, Advanced Engineering Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is globally accepted that the public opinion is shaping-up the attributes and definition of products and services they use [8]. The impact of sub-networks’ discussions on the opinion dynamics of decision makers is studied in different cases, such as military Command and Control systems with single and multi-level threshold opinion dynamic models [40]; and hierarchical formal organizations of different constructs [39]). By studying different types of bottom-up informal networks, Song et al. identified three main attributes of the informal sub-networks (namely: agents’ tolerances, scale and number of links) to have the highest level of impact on the officials’ opinion.

    • Study on information transmission model of enterprise informal organizations based on the hypernetwork

      2018, Chinese Journal of Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Table 1 shows the relationships between the enterprise staffs and the informal organizations. There are prior studies [30–32] addressing the analysis of informal organizational networks. However, we map the informal organization as a hypernetwork also.

    • Characteristic time based social force model improvement and exit assignment strategy for pedestrian evacuation

      2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      The main issues of these works include how to evacuate people more quickly under different conditions, such as various disaster locations, different geometry structures, invisibility caused by power failure etc. Meantime, although many evacuation strategies [1,2,4,5,12–25] have been devised to evacuate the crowd more efficiently, we find that one common problem of existing works is the imprecise computation of exit capacity (EC), or flow through crowded exit, partially because of unrealistic SFM. This inaccurate computation often assumes the exit flow is linear to the door width neglecting other important factors such as emergency level and pedestrians’ physical strength.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text