Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 151, 1 November 2015, Pages 426-440
Physiology & Behavior

Investigation of gender difference in human response to temperature step changes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.07.037Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Women lowered oral temperatures more intensively than men after up-step of S15.

  • Men witnessed a more remarkable decrease in RMSSD after up-step of S15 than women.

  • Men regulated skin temperatures more robustly and swiftly than women.

  • Women felt lower temperature cooler and higher temperature warmer than men.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine gender difference in human response to temperature step changes. A total of three step-change conditions (S5: 32 °C–37 °C–32 °C, S11: 26 °C–37 °C–26 °C, and S15: 22 °C–37 °C–22 °C) were designed and a laboratory experiment with 12 males and 12 females was performed. Results of this study support our hypothesis that females differ from males in human response to sudden temperature changes from the perspectives of psychology, physiology and biomarkers. Females are more prone to show thermal dissatisfaction to cool environments while males are more likely to feel thermal discomfort in warm environments. It is logical that men have a stronger thermoregulation ability than women as male skin temperature change amplitude is smaller while the time to be stable for skin temperature is shorter than that of females after both up-steps and down-steps. In S15, males witnessed a more intensive decrease in RMSSD while females underwent a remarkable instant reduce in oral temperatures after the up-step. Marginal significance was observed in male IL-6 before and after the up-step in S15 while female IL-6 prominently increased after the down-step in S15.

Introduction

Human beings are often likely to expose themselves to sudden temperature changes in daily life. For example, people will encounter temperature steps when entering or exiting air-conditioned buildings and getting on or off planes. Many studies have been carried out to examine human subjective and objective responses to transient thermal environments. However, most of them did not consider gender difference as some studies only enrolled males in their experiments [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and some even did not give subjects' gender information [7], [8]. Moreover, although some dynamic thermal environment research did recruit both males and females as subjects [9], [10], [11], [12], only Chen discussed gender difference from the aspect of thermal sensation and skin physiology [12], followed by Zhai presenting a simple gender comparison in thermal sensation and dissatisfaction [13]. No circumstantial analysis on gender difference in human response to temperature step changes has been published.

As far as thermal perceptions are concerned, Karjalainen conducted a detailed review comprising chamber studies and field surveys, and gave a synopsis of thermal comfort experienced by men and women, which concluded that females were more likely than males to express thermal dissatisfaction; however, no significant gender difference was found in neutral temperatures in most studies; females are more sensitive than males to a deviation from an optimal temperature and express more dissatisfaction, especially in cooler conditions [14]. Nevertheless, as the review shows, most studies focus on human thermal comfort under steady environments rather than transient environments and could not reflect human dynamic response. In addition, objective measures like physiological parameters and biomarkers are applied more and more widely in thermal environment studies [15], [16], [17], [18], but few gender difference analyses were delivered and even much less studies on the bodily reaction to temperature steps between different gender groups were performed.

The purpose of this study was to investigate gender difference in human response to the alteration in thermal environment. We hypothesized that females are different from males in their responses to different temperature steps from the perspectives of psychology, physiology and biomarkers.

Section snippets

Subjects

Twenty four healthy undergraduate students (half males and half females) with an average age of 22 ± 1 years were recruited in the study. Preliminary evaluation of applicants was conducted to exclude those who might suffer cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease and skin disease which might interfere with the physiological and biochemical measures used in this experiment. Table 1 is the summary of their anthropometric information. Every subject's body mass index rates in the normal range [19].

Health symptoms

The change of self-reported symptoms over time in response to temperature steps for males and females is displayed in Fig. 3. In S5, when returning to 32 °C from 37 °C, fewer males reported the perspiration symptom and the percentage of males ended at about 10% while that of females was 50%. The chi-square test demonstrates significant gender difference at the end of phase 3 (P < 0.05). In general, the percentage of self-reported eyestrain for females is higher than that for males. Particularly,

Subjective perceptions

Our results show that significantly more females reported perspiration at the end of the down-step adaptive process of S5. One possible reason is that heat convection between males and the environment is more intensive than that of females because male skin temperature is lower than its female counterpart in S5. So, males may gain thermal balance just through heat convection while females may have to exert heat dissipation through convection and sweat evaporation. Women being more sensitive to

Conclusions

Gender difference in human response to the alteration in thermal environment was investigated from the aspect of psychology, physiology and biomarkers. It can be concluded that:

  • 1.

    When encountering the up-step in S15, both males and females significantly lowered their oral temperatures to protect the core part of the body. However, female instant change of oral temperature after the up-step in S15 is profoundly more intensive than that of males.

  • 2.

    It is logical that males have a stronger

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51238005).

References (35)

  • P. Mehnert et al.

    Gender-related difference in sweat loss and its impact on exposure limits to heat stress

    Int. J. Ind. Ergon.

    (2002)
  • J. Waugh et al.

    Differences in capnography and pulse oximetry measurements related to gender

    Chest

    (2012)
  • M.D. Witting et al.

    Diagnostic room-air pulse oximetry: effects of smoking, race, and sex

    Am. J. Emerg. Med.

    (2008)
  • J. Zhang

    Effect of age and sex on heart rate variability in healthy subjects

    J. Manip. Physiol. Ther.

    (2007)
  • Gagge AP, Stolwijk J, Hardy J. Comfort and thermal sensations and associated physiological responses at various ambient...
  • R. Dear et al.

    Thermal sensations resulting from sudden ambient temperature changes

    Indoor Air

    (1993)
  • K. Nagano et al.

    Effects of ambient temperature steps on thermal comfort requirements

    Int. J. Biometeorol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (60)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text