Elsevier

Poetics

Volume 37, Issue 1, February 2009, Pages 1-23
Poetics

Highbrow omnivorousness on the small screen?: Cultural industry systems and patterns of cultural choice in Europe

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2008.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

To date, Peterson and Kern's (1996) “highbrow omnivorousness” hypothesis has been examined mainly for the case of musical taste. In this paper we attempt to extend this framework to a relatively unexplored cultural domain, that of television consumption. Using data from the 2001 Eurobarometer we hypothesize that highbrows will be more likely to consume a wide variety of other forms of popular culture, namely television programming. The results fail to unambiguously confirm the highbrow omnivorousness hypothesis: in some EU countries, highbrows consume a wider variety of television programming than non-highbrows, in other countries, highbrows are indistinguishable from non-highbrows, while in a third group of countries, highbrows are snobbier than non-highbrows in their television consumption choices. We attempt to explain this cross-national heterogeneity in the highbrow/non-highbrow difference in television consumption using DiMaggio's (1977) organizational theory of culture production. In our “contingent highbrow omnivorousness” framework, we propose that in commercialized, profit-oriented cultural industry systems, highbrow snobbery rather than omnivorousness will be the norm. In relatively less commercialized, profit-oriented contexts, highbrow the snobbery effect will be weaker. Classifying countries by the degree of market orientation of the television production field yields results that are consistent with this hypothesis.

Section snippets

Omar Lizardo is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at University of Notre Dame. His primary research interests are cultural sociology, the sociology of media and the arts and cultural globalization. He is currently working on research that deals with the relationship between cultural capital and the instrumental use of social ties and with Stephen Vaisey, research that examines the effect of cultural worldviews on the composition of social networks of American

References (75)

  • Richard A. Peterson

    Understanding audience segmentation: from elite and popular to omnivore and univore

    Poetics

    (1992)
  • Richard A. Peterson

    The rise and fall of highbrow snobbery as a status marker

    Poetics

    (1997)
  • Richard A. Peterson

    Problems in comparative research: the example of omnivorousness

    Poetics

    (2005)
  • John Sonnett

    Musical boundaries: intersections of form and content

    Poetics

    (2004)
  • Florencia Torche

    Social status and cultural consumption: the case of reading in Chile

    Poetics

    (2007)
  • Kees van Rees et al.

    Media repertoires of selective audiences: the impact of status, gender, and age on media use

    Poetics

    (2003)
  • Kees van Rees et al.

    Cultural classifications under discussion: latent class analysis of highbrow and lowbrow reading

    Poetics

    (1999)
  • Theodor Adorno

    The Culture Industry

    (2001 [1944])
  • Ien Ang

    Dallas and the ideology of mass culture

  • Tony Bennett

    Distinction on the box: cultural capital and the social space of broadcasting

    Cultural Trends

    (2006)
  • Tony Bennett et al.

    Accounting for Tastes: Australian Everyday Cultures

    (1999)
  • Rodney Benson

    Field theory in comparative context: a new paradigm for media studies

    Theory and Society

    (1999)
  • John Blewitt

    Film, ideology and Bourdieu's critique of public taste

    British Journal of Aesthetics

    (1993)
  • Jay G. Blumler et al.

    New roles for public television in Western Europe: challenges and prospects

    Journal of Communication

    (1992)
  • Pierre Bourdieu

    Distinction

    (1984)
  • Pierre Bourdieu

    The historical genesis of a pure aesthetic

    Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism

    (1987)
  • Pierre Bourdieu

    On Television

    (1999)
  • Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, Golder, Matt, 2007. Multiplicative interaction models....
  • Bethany Bryson

    ‘Anything but heavy metal’: symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes

    American Sociological Review

    (1996)
  • Tak Wing Chan et al.

    The social stratification of theatre, dance and cinema attendance

    Cultural Trends

    (2005)
  • Christensen, Thomas, 2003. “Eurobarometer 56.0: information and communication technologies, financial services, and...
  • Diana Crane

    Reward systems in art, science, and religion

    American Behavioral Scientist

    (1976)
  • Diana Crane

    The Production of Culture: Media and the Urban Arts

    (1992)
  • Diana Crane

    High culture versus popular culture revisited: toward a reconceptualization of recorded cultures

  • N.D. DeGraaf

    Distinction by consumption in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and the Netherlands

    European Sociological Review

    (1991)
  • Tia DeNora

    Musical patronage and social change in Beethoven's Vienna

    American Journal of Sociology

    (1991)
  • Paul DiMaggio

    Market structure, the creative process, and popular culture: toward an organizational reinterpretation of mass-culture theory

    Journal of Popular Culture

    (1977)
  • Cited by (42)

    • Something besides monotheism: Sociotheological boundary work among the spiritual, but not religious

      2017, Poetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, though the democratization of Thai and French cuisines may initially suggest the obliteration of social boundaries, most scholars in this camp agree that omnivorousness represents “an alternative strategy to snobbery for generating status” (Johnston & Baumann, 2007, p. 168). Further, while the omnivorous strategy may be more habitual and less conscious than is usually recognized, it is still “a transposable disposition” (Lizardo & Skiles, 2012, p. 269) in a Bourdieusian sense, and therefore may be applied to other cultural spheres including art (DiMaggio, 1987), music (Bryson, 1996; van Eijck & Lievens, 2008), food (Johnston & Baumann, 2014), film and television (Lizardo & Skiles, 2009) and though no study has ventured into this territory, perhaps religion and spirituality too. Applied to the SBNR phenomenon, the beliefs of SBNRs may likewise signal an opposition to monotheists because of the latter’s exclusive commitments to a singular religious tradition.

    • Why “cultural matters” matter: Culture talk as the mobilization of cultural capital in interaction

      2016, Poetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      One basic finding is now well-established: members of the educated, salaried professional elite are more likely to actively appropriate a wider variety of aesthetic offerings, within and across industry-defined genre categories and institutional contexts of dissemination and reception (Lizardo, 2008; Peterson, 2005; Prieur and Savage, 2011). In essence, what it means to be high-status in many contemporary societies is to be an equal opportunity connoisseur of diverse cultural offerings and aesthetic experiences across domains (e.g. literature versus film, and within domains across substyles), forms of delivery (e.g. non-profit versus commercial systems) and external legitimation (e.g. “prescribed” or “authorized” culture versus “pop culture”, “folk culture” or “kitsch”) (Lizardo & Skiles, 2008, 2009; Peterson & Kern, 1996). The persistent focus of the cultural stratification literature on the question of whether lifestyle practices continue to be unevenly segmented according to class and status markers has resulted in a relative lack of attention to an equally important question: what is the role of aesthetic consumption in everyday life?

    • Culture, Production of: Prospects for the Twenty-First Century

      2015, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition
    • Cultural consumption across countries: A multi-level analysis of social inequality in highbrow culture in Europe

      2013, Poetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although many studies from various countries firmly confirm the link between an individual's socio-economic position and highbrow cultural behavior, adequate comparisons of cultural inequality between countries are still scarce (Katz-Gerro, 2011). For television viewing, Lizardo and Skiles (2009) do show that country specific circumstances matter in the formation of people's cultural preferences, and Notten et al. (2009) report on country-differences in media usage among 15-year-olds. With respect to highbrow cultural consumption, studies of social inequality across counties often compare only small numbers of countries and employ separate regression models instead of more appropriate multi-level models (Chan and Goldthorpe, 2010; Katz-Gerro, 2002, 2006; Kraaykamp and Nieuwbeerta, 2000).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Omar Lizardo is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at University of Notre Dame. His primary research interests are cultural sociology, the sociology of media and the arts and cultural globalization. He is currently working on research that deals with the relationship between cultural capital and the instrumental use of social ties and with Stephen Vaisey, research that examines the effect of cultural worldviews on the composition of social networks of American adolescents.

    Sara Skiles is a doctoral student in sociology at the University of Notre Dame. Her research interests include consumption of cultural and material culture, cultural capital theory and statistics and methods. She is currently working on projects examining the cultural logic of extracurricular participation in high schools, attitudinal predictors of consumer debt, moral decision making, and the role of the student as presented in popular media.

    View full text