Toward prescription: Testing the rhetoric of atonement's applicability in the athletic arena☆
Section snippets
Case background and rhetorical situation
On August 4, 2002, NASCAR driver Tony Stewart committed an act that had the ability to tarnish his public image as well at the public image of NASCAR, Joe Gibbs Racing (his team), and Home Depot (his primary sponsor). Following a disappointing finish in the Brickyard 400 at Indianapolis Motor Speedway, Stewart exited his car and allegedly struck Indianapolis Star photographer Gary Mook in the chest as Mook was trying to take a picture of him (Gould, 2002, Montgomery, 2002a, Montgomery, 2002b).
Literature review
As noted above, a plethora of research regarding apologia exists. In the interest of brevity, I will use the summaries of Coombs (2006) and Hearit (2001) to illuminate where and how the current study fits within the realm of apologia studies.
Coombs (2006) argued that studies of crisis response may be divided into two categories: form and content. He defines form as “what should be done” (p. 171), noting that three form elements have risen to the top as necessities for effective crisis response:
Stewart's campaign
Stewart faced a number of audiences. To avoid possible litigation, Stewart had to satisfy Mook with his response. The way NASCAR is structured, any of the following enabling publics/stakeholders/audiences (Grunig & Hunt, 1984; Hopwood, 2007; Koesten & Rowland, 2004) had the potential to effect Stewart's employment: NASCAR (the sanctioning body), Home Depot (his primary sponsor), and Joe Gibbs Racing (his car owner).5
Discussion
As indicated above, Stewart's campaign was successful among all of his key audiences. Stewart repeatedly used messages that met the second and third requirements of the rhetoric of atonement and most of his statements were made as public confessionals (criterion five). Further, the high level of support received from his key audiences indicates they perceived Stewart as offering adequate evidence of mortification (criterion four).
However, his apologetic campaign offers insight into the criteria
Limitations
Studies such as this are continually plagued by three limitations. First, as Coombs (2006) noted, case studies are limited in the amount of generalizability they offer and the amount of prescription that can be argued from them. Consequently, this study supports a great deal of the findings reported by Koesten and Rowland (2004) and expanded the testing of their typology from the political realm to the sports realm, offering rigor for their prescriptions through multiple case study testing.
Areas for future research
It is clear from this and other studies that prescriptive typologies offer added value to the study of apologia. Furthermore, the development of prescriptive typologies undoubtedly provides invaluable resources for public relations practitioners. Thus, it is imperative that scholars continue to develop and refine such typologies. However, with typologies in their infancy, such as the rhetoric of atonement, more case studies and empirical tests should be done to test their utility and validity.
Conclusion
The apologetic campaign offered by Tony Stewart undoubtedly supported the assertions of Koesten and Rowland (2004) concerning the prescriptive nature of the rhetoric of atonement. This case also offered insights into the ways in which the unique ethical and rhetorical intricacies of the sports arena impact an apologetic campaign. Given that this is only the third study to apply principles of apologia to sports rhetoric, this area is clearly ripe for further study.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thanks Drs. Jeffrey L. Courtright and William R. Cupach, Illinois State University and Dr. Robert C. Rowland, University of Kansas for comments on earlier drafts of this paper. The author would also like to thanks the editor and reviewers of this special issue for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.
References (64)
Image repair discourse and crisis communication
Public Relations Review
(1997)Apologies and public relations crises at Chrysler, Toshiba, and Volvo
Public Relations Review
(1994)The use of counter-attack in apologetic public relations crises: The case of General Motors vs. Dateline NBC
Public Relations Review
(1996)On the use of transcendence as an apologia strategy: The case of Johnson controls and its fetal protection policy
Public Relations Review
(1997)Newsgroups, activist publics, and corporate apologia: The case of Intel and its Pentium chip
Public Relations Review
(1999)- et al.
Korean practitioners and journalists: Relational influences in news selection
Public Relations Review
(2006) - et al.
Post-crisis communication and renewal: Expanding the parameters of post-crisis discourse
Public Relations Review
(2007) - et al.
Legitimation endeavors: Impression management strategies used by an organization in crisis
Communication Monographs
(1994) Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration strategies
(1995)- et al.
The Tonya Harding controversy: An analysis of image restoration strategies
Communication Quarterly
(1994)
Repentance and forgiveness
Cross Currents
Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the “appropriate” crisis response strategies
Management Communication Quarterly
Crisis management: A communicative approach
An extended examination of the crisis situation: A fusion of the relational management and symbolic approaches
Journal of Public Relations Research
Helping Crisis Managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory
Management Communication Quarterly
Matching crisis response strategies to crisis situations: An attribution theory-based approach to crisis management
An empirical analysis of image restoration: Texaco's racism crisis
Journal of Public Relations Research
Crisis communication: A review of some best practices
Managing public relations
“Mistakes were made”: Organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy
Communication Studies
Corporate apologia: When and organization speaks in defense of itself
Sports public relations
Forward
The rhetoric of atonement
Communication Studies
Cited by (26)
Analysis of the image repair discourse in the Michael Phelps controversy
2011, Public Relations ReviewCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, Owens never once suggested that he would change his ways (p. 149). Jerome (2008) found that NASCAR driver Tony Stewart used the rhetoric of atonement, a prescriptive sub-genre of apologia which is necessary when a rhetor is faced with a situation for which the rhetor must atone for sins that cannot be denied, justified or transcended (Jerome, 2008, p. 126). While closely related to mortification, Koesten and Rowland (2004) distinguish atonement by arguing, “Where traditional apologia is used to defend one's character…the rhetoric of atonement functions as a purgative-redemptive device for an individual or an entire organization” (p. 69).
Fans not Customers! Kategoria in the Rise and Demise of the European Super League
2023, Communication and SportStrategic communication in crisis: Winning may (Not) be everything
2022, Research Anthology on Managing Crisis and Risk CommunicationsMethodist Hospital’s Rhetoric of Atonement: Examining an Organization’s Response to NICU Overdoses
2020, Communication Studies
- ☆
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 2003 Central States Communication Association Convention in Omaha, Nebraska.