Critical success factors for managing purchasing groups
Introduction
Purchasing in relatively small and intensive groups is becoming increasingly popular in both the private and public sector (Essig, 2000; Nollet and Beaulieu, 2003, Nollet and Beaulieu, 2005; Polychronakis and Syntetos, 2007; Tella and Virolainen, 2005). More and more organisations pool and/or share their purchasing volumes, information, and/or resources in purchasing groups in which the members share the workload between themselves. By doing so, these organisations combined in a group aim to obtain, among other things, lower purchase prices and reduced duplications of efforts and activities due to economies of scale, process, and information (based on Faes et al., 2000). In the literature, terms such as horizontal cooperative purchasing, pooled purchasing, alliance purchasing, and purchasing groups are used to refer to the concept of purchasing in a group. In the remainder of this article, we use the terms cooperative purchasing and purchasing group.
In a large number of cases, the advantages of cooperative purchasing can outweigh the costs of cooperation and disadvantages such as anti-trust (legal) issues and disclosure of sensitive information. Thus, at least in theory, cooperative purchasing can be a beneficial concept for organisations. However, in practice, small and intensive purchasing groups do not always flourish and premature endings of such groups occur (Schotanus, 2007). A better understanding of factors that play an important role in the success or failure of a purchasing group could help such groups to flourish and could prevent premature endings.
Unfortunately, current research offers little guidance in finding factors that play an important role in managing a purchasing group successfully (Essig, 2000). On a general level, there is an extensive amount of literature dealing with interorganisational cooperation, but a widely accepted comprehensive theory for successful interorganisational cooperation does not exist (Das and Teng, 2000). On a more specific level, some studies on success factors for interorganisational cooperation have been carried out (e.g., Hendrick, 1997; Gottschalk and Solli-Sæther, 2005; Kogut, 1988; Park and Ungson, 1997). However, only a very limited number of studies provide a broad investigation of success factors for interorganisational cooperation (Hoffmann and Schlosser, 2001). Most previous studies focus on one or a limited number of success factors.
Even more specifically, to the best of our knowledge, the only previous empirical study that explicitly deals with success factors for managing purchasing groups is a study carried out by Hendrick (1997) among 28 organisations that participate in purchasing groups. However, as we discuss later on in this paper, the results of Hendrick are not fully consistent with the results of existing studies on success factors for interorganisational cooperation (e.g., Hoffmann and Schlosser, 2001). It is unclear what causes these discrepancies. It could be due to the specific context of cooperative purchasing, but it could also be due to the sample or the methods used in the different studies.
Summarising, we observe many struggling purchasing groups and conclude that the literature seems unable to provide a comprehensive and consistent explanation for this. Therefore, we argue that it is both practically and academically relevant to investigate what makes purchasing groups successful. Our main objective is to consider a broad set of possible success factors specifically for managing a purchasing group. By doing this, we aim to find one or more critical success factors for managing purchasing groups. Our study, which follows the methodology used in Hoffmann and Schlosser (2001), can also shed light on discrepancies found between that study and the single existing broad study by Hendrick on success factors for managing purchasing groups.
This article is organised in the following way. First, we discuss methods to identify success factors, define success in the context of purchasing groups, and discuss the literature regarding potential success factors. Next, we describe the methodology used. Using our methodology, we test whether or not the potential success factors we derive from the literature are actual success factors in practice. In the analysis and discussion section, we describe and discuss the success factors for cooperative purchasing found in the present study. In the final section, we draw the main conclusions.
Section snippets
Methods to identify success factors
In this article, we distinguish between two methods for survey research that can be used to identify success factors. The first method is used in studies such as Hendrick (1997) and Schotanus (2005). In these studies, the respondents were asked directly about the perceived importance of several factors. Using this method, it is not necessary to ask the respondents about the perceived success of the purchasing group. It is assumed that the respondents implicitly take this into account.
The second
Method
In this section, we discuss the methodology used to identify the most important success factors from the broad list of potential success factors. First, we discuss the data collection and research procedure. Next, we discuss the response, data set, and data analysis.
Main findings
In this section, we present our analyses of success factors for managing purchasing groups. We first tested whether there are differences between successful and unsuccessful groups concerning the potential success factors. We conducted independent samples 1-tailed t-tests and found several significant differences as shown in Table 5. Later in this section (below Table 6) we discuss the success factors found in more detail.
The analyses of the mean differences between the groups do not allow a
Conclusions and implications
This article set out to identify success factors for managing purchasing groups using transaction cost economics, social exchange theory, and equity theory as theoretical frameworks. The study is based upon empirical observations of success and contributing factors to this success: the relation between these two is analysed in the context of cooperative purchasing. Earlier studies on these relations analysed the direct view of respondents on the relations themselves. As such, this study
Acknowledgements
We thank Chris Snijders from the Technical University of Eindhoven, Elmer Bakker, Erik van Raaij from Erasmus University Rotterdam, Frank Rozemeijer from Maastricht University, Henk Jan van Mossel and Marc Reunis from the University of Delft, Mark van de Vijver from Tilburg University, and Merijn Linthorst from the University of Twente for their valuable contributions to the development of the questionnaire. We acknowledge support for this article from the Dutch purchasing management
References (58)
Toward an understanding of inequity
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
(1963)Inequity in social exchange
- et al.
A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firmworking partnerships
Journal of Marketing
(1990) - et al.
Choosing an organizational form: the case of collaborative procurement initiatives
International Journal of Procurement Management
(2008) - et al.
Enterprise and Human Resource Development. Local Capacity Building
(1993) Exchange and Power in Social Life
(1964)Problems in the analysis of growth and wear curves
Biometrics
(1950)A theory of efficient cooperation and competition
Public Choice
(1989)R&D cooperation between firms: a perceived transaction cost perspective
Management Science
(1992)- et al.
Integrating variable risk preferences, trust, and transaction cost economics
Academy of Management Review
(1996)
A life-cycle model of organizational federations: the case of hospitals
Academy of Management Review
A resource-based theory of strategic alliances
Journal of Management
A risk perception model of alliance structuring
Journal of International Management
Influences on member commitment to group purchasing organizations
Journal of Business Research
Collaborative Advantage, Winning Through Extended Enterprise Supplier Networks
Exchange theory, part II: exchange relations and networks
On the ideal market structure for third-party purchasing of health care
Social Science and Medicine
Purchasing consortia as symbiotic relationships: developing the concept of “consortium sourcing”
European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management
The pursuit of global purchasing synergy
Industrial Marketing Management
Discovering statistics using SPSS
Control and performance of international joint ventures
Journal of International Business Studies
Critical success factors from IT outsourcing theories: an empirical study
Industrial Management & Data Systems
The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance
Strategic Management Journal
Purchasing Consortiums: Horizontal Alliances Among Firms Buying Common Goods and Services: What? Who? Why? How?
A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures
Strategic Management Journal
The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States
Management Science
Buyer–supplier collaboration in product development projects
Journal of Management
Success factors of strategic alliances in small and medium-sized enterprises, an empirical study
Long Range Planning
Cited by (70)
Multi-level decision making for chain stores including GPOs (group purchasing organizations)
2021, Computers and Operations ResearchAltruistic profit allocation rules for joint replenishment with carbon cap-and-trade policy
2021, European Journal of Operational ResearchCitation Excerpt :Joint replenishment may be the stone to kill the two birds. Schotanus, Telgen, and Boer (2010) show, however, through an empirical study that fair allocation of savings is one of the key success factors for joint replenishment. If a participant perceives being under-rewarded, it will try to restore equity, which may lead to conflicts, lower commitment of members and have a negative effect on the performance of the group.
Strategic decisions to join group purchasing organizations
2020, Computers and Industrial EngineeringService specification in pre-tender phase of public procurement - A triadic model of meaningful involvement
2020, Journal of Purchasing and Supply ManagementCitation Excerpt :The PU did not act as a team in the co-creation process; instead, information remained with individuals (cf. Zheng and Caldwell, 2008), which caused problems with continuity and learning. Schotanus et al. (2010, p. 58) also noted that if members of a purchasing group have no internal support and if representatives change frequently, the learning curve of the group will be hampered. In this section, we answer our research question “How could an SSP be designed in a public procurement context in order to enhance the development of services?”
The promulgation of group purchasing organizations into the healthcare sector in India
2024, International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare MarketingStrength in numbers: collaborative procurement and competitiveness of craft breweries
2024, International Journal of Operations and Production Management