Supply management and family business: A review and call for research

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2016.12.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Family businesses behave and perform differently than non-family businesses.

  • Extant literature studying family influences on supply management is mostly void.

  • We introduce supply management scholars to family business.

  • We develop research propositions of family business influences on supply management.

Abstract

Family-owned enterprises dominate global business, generating 70–90% of the world's gross domestic product. Existing management research has validated that family businesses often behave differently than non-family businesses, primarily by focusing on idiosyncratic non-economic goals that are not typically assessed in traditional business research. Extant supply management literature has yet to investigate the influences of family business, thus overlooking a potential significant source of variation in our research as well as limiting our managerial relevance. The objective of this paper is to introduce supply management scholars to family business, including its prominence and unique characteristics. Applying socioemotional wealth as a theoretical lens, we develop a research agenda from existing supply management and family business literature by offering propositions for future research where family business influences may permeate contemporary supply management topics including strategic supply management, sourcing strategy, supplier relationships, sustainability, risk, and e-procurement. In doing so, we provide an initial foundation for supply management scholars to both incorporate family business effects into research and launch new research streams. This is one of the first papers to our knowledge that introduces the field of family business to supply management scholars.

Introduction

The quantity, breadth, and rigor of research in supply management has greatly expanded in recent decades (Spina et al., 2013, Wynstra, 2010). Yet consider the possibly that despite such a voluminous research effort and literature base, the supply chain academic field has overlooked a key variable that could potentially increase the explanatory power and managerial relevance of our work. We contend herein that such is the case with family business.

For this paper, we follow the widely-accepted European Family Businesses (2016) definition of a family business as “an organization with decision-making control (direct or indirect) held within a family and at least one family member actively involved in governance of the organization.” This definition is effective regardless of firm size and age (longevity). Family enterprises dominate business by creating an estimated 70–90% of annual global gross domestic product (GDP) and 50–80% of job growth in a majority of countries worldwide (International Family Enterprise Research Academy, 2003). Despite its global ubiquity and prominence, family business represents a relatively new, maturing field in academia (Litz et al., 2012). Although highly-regarded family business publications have emerged in recent decades and other important business journals are publishing family business work, the field remains relatively under-researched (Astrachan, 2010). Nevertheless, existing literature consistently demonstrates that family firms behave and perform differently than non-family firms (Astrachan, 2010, Benavides-Velasco et al., 2013, Chrisman et al., 2010). Their objectives, capabilities, and business practices frequently differ from traditional expectations.

Such differences between family and non-family enterprises likely extend to supply management in profound ways, potentially impacting practices such as sourcing strategy and supplier integration as well as risk and sustainability (Jayaram et al., 2014). To initially investigate this contention, we conducted a comprehensive, systematic literature review (Tranfield et al., 2003), which we detail later herein, and found extremely few papers focusing on either family business effects on supply management or supply management practices in family firms. This includes no papers in supply chain journals and just a handful in management journals. The limited research that does exists suggests that supply chains for family firms behave and perform differently than those of non-family firms to some extent (Smith et al., 2014, Stanley and McDowell, 2014). Yet, the general paucity of literature greatly urges more research.

A parallel can be made with supply chain in small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which went unexplored until recently (Ellegaard, 2006, Zheng et al., 2007). Since then, research has found not only many SME distinctions from larger firms but also overall SME supply chain performance gaps (Arend and Wisner, 2005, Thakkar et al., 2008). We contend that scholars will also find supply chain distinctions with family firms.

Given the lack of supply chain research in family business, our literature has largely ignored an important variable that could significantly advance the explanatory power of our research and perhaps yield insight for more effective supply management practice. Stated differently, family business may represent a missing link in supply management research. To address this gap, this paper develops a research agenda for family business supply management. Applying socioemotional wealth (SEW) as a theoretical lens (Berrone et al., 2012, Gómez-Mejía et al., 2007), we pursue two research objectives to provide an initial foundation for supply management scholars to incorporate family business effects into new avenues of research in the field:

  • Introduce supply management scholars to family business, including those differentiating characteristics that make family businesses distinct from non-family businesses.

  • Integrate existing supply management and family business literature to develop propositions for future research wherein family business effects might permeate contemporary supply management research topics.

Below, we first introduce the field of family business, highlighting differences from non-family businesses as well as providing an overview of socioemotional wealth used as theoretical support for the research propositions. We next describe our systematic review of supply management and family business literature that yielded a small number of articles. Given the absence of such research, we then identify prominent supply management research topics, relating family business influences to these topics to build research propositions. The propositions synthesize supply management and family business research while providing critical thought and specific starting points for scholars to pursue future research. We close with thoughts on how to proceed with such research. Ultimately, we hope that this paper launches new interdisciplinary research and strengthens the explanatory power of supply management research.

Section snippets

Family business

Given the definition of family business relating to decision-making control and governance (European Family Businesses, 2016), family businesses come in all sizes. Fiat, Wal-Mart, Volkswagen, Ford, BMW, ArcelorMittal, and Anheuser-Busch InBev represent a few of the many family businesses with individual annual revenues of more than 25 billion Euros. At the opposite end of the continuum, tens of millions of family businesses, either because of their own interest or as a result of market

Approach

The above family business distinctions and SEW theory could cause family firms to not only plan and execute supply management differently than non-family firms but also retain distinct supply management advantages and disadvantages. In the attempt to summarize family business-related supply management literature to date, we sought to collect papers directly assessing family business effects on the practice of supply management by executing a systematic literature review (Quarshie et al., 2016,

Family business and supply management

Focusing on the topics in Table 4, we next formulate research propositions of family business effects on supply management, following a similar approach to Sharma et al. (2014) who considered family business and organizational behavior. Starting with strategic supply management, we first introduce each supply management topic. We then discuss findings from the limited family business supply management literature from Table 2 where possible and relate available family business literature under

Conclusions and challenges

The majority of businesses worldwide are family-owned. While existing management literature emphasizes the idiosyncratic behavior and performance of family firms relative to non-family firms, family effects relative to supply management have only been scarcely researched. In fact, many supply management researchers are likely largely unaware of the distinctions of family business. While supply management scholars have certainly unintentionally collected data from family businesses and perhaps

References (193)

  • H. Frank et al.

    The concept of 'familiness': literature review and systems theory-based reflections

    J. Fam. Bus. Strategy

    (2010)
  • D. Grudinschi et al.

    Relationship risk perception and determinants of the collaboration fluency of buyer–supplier relationships in public service procurement

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2014)
  • E. Hartmann et al.

    Top and bottom line relevance of purchasing and supply management

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2012)
  • S.U. Hoejmose et al.

    The effect of institutional pressure on cooperative and coercive ‘green’ supply chain practices

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2014)
  • P. Hoffmann et al.

    Uncertainty, supply risk management and their impact on performance

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2013)
  • P. Horn et al.

    The “ugly twins”: failed low-wage-country sourcing projects and their expensive replacements

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2013)
  • M. Igarashi et al.

    What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2013)
  • J. Jayaram et al.

    Supply chain management capability of small and medium sized family businesses in India: a multiple case study approach

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2014)
  • T.E. Johnsen et al.

    The character and significance of Nordic purchasing and supply management research: a systematic review of the literature

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2016)
  • P.F. Johnson et al.

    A longitudinal study of supply organizational change

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2006)
  • M. Kang et al.

    The role of organizational control in outsourcing practices: an empirical study

    J. Purch. Supply Manag.

    (2014)
  • M.K. Allio

    Family businesses: their virtues, vices, and strategic path

    Strategy Leadersh.

    (2004)
  • M.G. Anderson et al.

    Strategic sourcing

    Int. J. Logist. Manag.

    (1998)
  • R. Anderson et al.

    Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from S&P 500

    J. Financ.

    (2003)
  • R.C. Anderson et al.

    Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage

    J. Law Econ.

    (2003)
  • R.C. Anderson et al.

    Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage

    J. Law Econ.

    (2003)
  • J.H. Astrachan et al.

    Emotional returns and emotional costs in privately held family businesses: advancing traditional business valuation

    Fam. Bus. Rev.

    (2008)
  • J.H. Astrachan et al.

    The F-PEC scale of family influence: a proposal for solving the family business definition problem

    Fam. Bus. Rev.

    (2002)
  • J.H. Astrachan et al.

    Family businesses' contribution to the U.S. economy: a closer look

    Fam. Bus. Rev.

    (2003)
  • R.A. Baron

    The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process

    Acad. Manag. Rev.

    (2008)
  • C.A. Benavides-Velasco et al.

    Trends in family business research

    Small Bus. Econ.

    (2013)
  • E. Bendoly et al.

    Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations

    Prod. Oper. Manag.

    (2010)
  • P. Berrone et al.

    Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research

    Fam. Bus. Rev.

    (2012)
  • P. Berrone et al.

    Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: do family-controlled firms pollute less?

    Adm. Sci. Q.

    (2010)
  • J.H. Block et al.

    The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: evidence from large US firms

    Bus. Strategy Environ.

    (2014)
  • M.S. Blodgett et al.

    Emerging trends in global ethics: a comparative study of U.S. and international family business values

    J. Bus. Ethics

    (2011)
  • K.H. Brigham et al.

    Researching long-term orientation: a validation study and recommendations for future research

    Fam. Bus. Rev.

    (2014)
  • K.E. Bullington et al.

    Stronger supply chain relationships: learning from research on strong families

    Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J.

    (2005)
  • G. Campopiano et al.

    The relationship between motivations and actions in corporate social responsibility: an exploratory study

    Int. J. Bus. Soc.

    (2012)
  • K. Cappuyns

    Internationalization of family business through strategic alliances: an exploratory study

  • J.W. Carland III et al.

    Risk taking propensity among entrepreneurs, small business owners and managers

    J. Bus. Entrep.

    (1995)
  • M. Carrigan et al.

    'What's so special about family business?' An exploratory study of UK and Irish consumer experiences of family businesses. International

    J. Consum. Stud.

    (2008)
  • A.B. Carroll et al.

    The business case for corporate social responsibility: a review of concepts, research and practice

    Int. J. Manag. Rev.

    (2010)
  • C.R. Carter et al.

    Thirty-five years of the Journal of supply chain management: where have we been and where are we going?

    J. Supply Chain Manag.

    (2003)
  • L. Cassia et al.

    Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms

    Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res.

    (2012)
  • C. Cennamo et al.

    Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders

    Entrep. Theory Pract.

    (2012)
  • M.S. Chalhoub

    Culture, management practices, and the entrepreneurial performance of small and medium enterprises: applications and empirical study in the Middle East

    J. Small Bus. Entrep.

    (2011)
  • I.J. Chena et al.

    Strategic purchasing, supply management, and firm performance

    J. Oper. Manag.

    (2004)
  • J.J. Chrisman et al.

    The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation

    J. Prod. Innov. Manag.

    (2015)
  • J.J. Chrisman et al.

    Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and nonfamily firms

    Entrep. Theory Pract.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Postponement and logistics flexibility in retailing: The moderating role of logistics integration and demand uncertainty

      2022, International Journal of Production Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to Simangunsong et al. (2016) family ownership is a key determinant for smaller retailers to the level that their success could impact the social and economic sustainability of their respective stakeholders in supply chains. In fact, “familiness” has been recently emphasized to be considered in OSCM research due to its significance in affecting firm performance and SCM capability (Maloni et al., 2017; Jayaram et al., 2014). Family firms are associated with higher levels of trust in their relationship commitments with their partners, which could have significant implications for fostering or hindering their supply chain capabilities, as well as performance (Smith et al., 2014; Panayides and Venus Lun, 2009).

    • Sustainability management in supply chains: the role of familiness

      2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
      Citation Excerpt :

      Still, thus far, no research has undertaken such an investigation. The power of these familiness resources inspired Maloni et al. (2017) to call for empirical research on the role of FBs in SCs and identified sourcing, procurement, supplier management, sustainability performance, and risk management as promising topics for this endeavor. On the question of sustainability performance, these authors posit that FBs and their ubiquitous familiness could be beneficial to the sustainability of SCs due to, for example, the importance of local communities to them and their long-term commitment to these communities.

    • Picking on the new kid: Firm newness and deception in buyer–supplier negotiations

      2020, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, in family-owned firms, the damage caused by deceitful behavior is borne by only a few individuals and thus becomes more salient to the deceiver. Moreover, family-owned firms are associated with a greater concern for quality and values (Aronoff, 2004; Maloni et al., 2017; Wowak and Boone, 2015), which might impede the process of moral disengagement. Hence, we expect that deceiving family-owned firms might be harder for the potential deceiver to justify than deceiving publicly owned firms.

    • Family firms' international make-or-buy decisions: Captive offshoring, offshore outsourcing, and the role of home region focus

      2019, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Consistent with our expectations, our results showed that family firms are more likely to choose captive offshoring (i.e., make strategy) than offshore outsourcing (i.e., buy strategy) in international markets. This finding supports our contention that the need to preserve SEW (manifested through the need to keep family control and influence over the foreign investment, safeguard the family's identification with the firm, and foster the renewal of family bonds through dynastic succession (Berrone et al., 2012)) causes family firms—in comparison to non-family firms—to source internationally through an FDI instead of cooperating with independent suppliers (Gu et al., 2016; Maloni et al., 2017). Second, while we did not find empirical support for our hypothesis that family firms are less successful in captive offshoring compared to non-family firms, our analyses revealed that when family firms opt for offshore outsourcing instead, they are more successful than non-family firms.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Article Classification: Literature Review.

    View full text