Efficiency of chitosan–algal biomass composite microbeads at heavy metal removal

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2015.11.007Get rights and content

Abstract

A new chitosan/algal (Cladophora sp.) composite microbead was produced and used in removal of heavy metal ions. Bleached algal biomass was incorporated into the chitosan matrix through cross-linking with glutaraldehyde. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis demonstrated that bleached algal biomass consisted of mainly cellulosic residues. Scanning electron microscopy images exhibited that algal particles were immobilised in the polymeric matrix. Sorption capacity of the microbeads was determined; Cd(II): 0.240, Cr(III): 1.128, Cu(II): 1.059, Ni(II): 0.239 and Zn(II): 0.310 mmol g 1. The microbeads with bleached algal biomass exhibited higher sorption capacity for Cd(II) and Zn(II) ions than the plain glutaraldehyde cross-linked chitosan microbeads, demonstrating that the contribution of the algal biomass to the sorption. Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic evaluation of the experimental data was performed. The findings revealed that chitosan–algal composite microbeads can be used in heavy metal removal.

Introduction

Composite material production from renewable sources is a promising area for heavy metal removal thanks to eco-friendly nature of biological waste materials [1]. Chitosan, the by-product of food processing industry, is a functional biopolymer which is desired in heavy metal removal due to its metal ion interacting groups; –OH and –NH2. Also through these functional groups, chitosan polymer can be easily cross-linked, which makes it an effective matrix for composite material production [2], [3], [4].

Cladophora is genus of filamentous green algae usually found in shallow fresh and saline waters around the world [5]. In case of excessive input of nutrients into an aquatic system, which is called eutrophication, these organisms thrive in large numbers. In a eutrophic aquatic ecosystem, excessive growth and reproduction of algae (macro algal bloom) are usually observed. When left in the water, the algal biomass is consumed by the bacteria. This bacterial decomposition causes further eutrophication in the system by disrupting the mainly dissolved oxygen level. Accumulation of floating algal mats on the surface prevents sun rays from reaching the deeper, which further deteriorates the conditions for photosynthesis organisms [6], [7]. All these concerns stipulate that macroalgal biomass should be removed from the medium following a bloom of macroalgae, and the utility of algal biomass should be addressed for a wide range of applications. Cladophora biomass can be preferred in heavy metal removal studies for a couple of reasons: (1) It is available in huge amounts worldwide, (2) it is low-cost, (3) earlier studies have established that cell wall of green algae consists of mainly cellulose, and their cell wall structure also has proteins bound to polysaccharides [8]. Therefore, cell wall composition of green algae provides binding sites such as carboxyl hydroxyl amino and sulphate for metal ions [9], [10], [11], and (4) its collection from coastal regions can solve possible eutrophication problem.

Many studies have been conducted for heavy metal removal by using chitosan as a main composite material. In some studies, chitosan composites were produced by blending chitosan solution with inorganic materials such as clay [12], sand [13] and magnetite [14] etc. Chitosan composite materials with biological origin such as alginate [15], cellulose [16] and cotton [17] have also been synthesised and tested for heavy metal removal. On the other hand, algal-based biosorbents are known to be effective at treatment of wastewater with heavy metal contaminants [1]. However, few studies have been conducted on heavy metal removal by chitosan–algal biomass (Sargassum sp.) composite [18], [19].

Production of adsorbents by exploiting biological materials is advantageous. Bio-based adsorbents are superior to the conventional synthetic adsorbents in certain aspects; they are biodegradable and nontoxic. They are also considered as low-cost thanks to their abundance in the biosphere. The functional moieties on their surfaces often eliminate chemical modification treatments for functionalisation [1], [20]. Biomass from many organisms including bacteria, fungi and algae has been extensively studied as an alternative adsorbent in removal of heavy metal ions [21], [22], [23]. Compared to other support materials used in adsorption studies, chitosan has excellent properties; it can be cross-linked with agents such as glutaraldehyde, epichlorohydrin and β-cyclodextrin polyaldehyde, and it exhibits a high affinity for heavy metal ions [2], [24]. In the present study, macroalgal bloom biomass from a cosmopolitan algal genus (Cladophora sp.) was used to produce chitosan composite microbeads for heavy metal removal; Cd(II), Cr(III), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II). Powdered algal biomass was easily incorporated into the chitosan matrix via cross-linking of chitosan with glutaraldehyde. The composite microbeads were characterised by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD).

Section snippets

Materials

In the production of the chitosan–algal composite microbeads, medium molecular weight chitosan (Sigma-Aldrich 448877-250G medium molecular weight chitosan; CAS Number: 9012-76-4, MDL: MFCD00161512, Lot# SLBG428V, PCode: 1001567693, deacetylation: 75–85%) was used. Viscosity-average molecular weight of chitosan was determined by dilute solution viscometry in a solvent system of acetic acid (0.1 M) and NaCl (0.2 M) (1:1, v/v) using an Ubbelohde — type capillary viscometer immersed in a water bath

Surface characteristics

Surface morphologies of chitosan–algal biomass composite microbeads and plain chitosan microbeads were presented in Fig. 1. Surface of plain chitosan beads was smooth while rough surface was observed on chitosan–algal composite beads. The images exhibited that incorporation of algal biomass into the chitosan beads was achieved successfully. The algal particles did not disperse homogenously but almost covered the surface of the microbead (Fig. 1c).

Pyrolysis of the chitosan–algal composite microbeads and plain chitosan beads

In the pyrolysis of the chitosan–algal composite

Conclusions

A new composite microbead sorbent from renewable sources (chitosan and Cladophora) was produced and characterised via FT-IR, SEM, TGA and XRD. The composite microbeads were used in removal of Cd(II), Cr(III), Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) ions. When compared to plain chitosan beads, chitosan–algal biomass microbeads were more effective at the removal of Cd(II) (0.240 mmol g 1) and Zn(II) (0.310 mmol g 1) ions. Incorporation of sodium hypochlorite-treated algal biomass (from Cladophora sp.) into

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study presented was supported by Selcuk University Research Foundation (project number: BAP-14201082).

References (54)

  • M.-W. Wan et al.

    Adsorption of copper (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous solution on chitosan-coated sand

    Carbohydr. Polym.

    (2010)
  • W.S.W. Ngah et al.

    Adsorption of Cu(II) ions in aqueous solution using chitosan beads, chitosan–GLA beads and chitosan–alginate beads

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2008)
  • F. Yang et al.

    Preparation and characterization of chitosan encapsulated Sargassum sp. biosorbent for nickel ions sorption

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • H. Liu et al.

    Improvement of metal adsorption onto chitosan/Sargassum sp. composite sorbent by an innovative ion-imprint technology

    Water Res.

    (2011)
  • S. Cataldo et al.

    Mercury(II) removal from aqueous solution by sorption onto alginate, pectate and polygalacturonate calcium gel beads. A kinetic and speciation based equilibrium study

    React. Funct. Polym.

    (2013)
  • S.W. Won et al.

    Biosorbents for recovery of precious metals

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2014)
  • L. Zhou et al.

    Adsorption of platinum(IV) and palladium(II) from aqueous solution by magnetic cross-linking chitosan nanoparticles modified with ethylenediamine

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2010)
  • J. Jung et al.

    Comparison in antioxidant action between α-chitosan and β-chitosan at a wide range of molecular weight and chitosan concentration

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2012)
  • İ. Sargın et al.

    Chitosan/sporopollenin microcapsules: preparation, characterisation and application in heavy metal removal

    Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

    (2015)
  • Y. Cao et al.

    Study on crystal structures of enzyme-hydrolyzed cellulosic materials by X-ray diffraction

    Enzym. Microb. Technol.

    (2005)
  • M. Kaya et al.

    Chitin extraction and characterization from Daphnia magna resting eggs

    Int. J. Biol. Macromol.

    (2013)
  • Y. Xiong et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of cross-linked quaternized poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan composite anion exchange membranes for fuel cells

    J. Power Sources

    (2008)
  • K. Srividya et al.

    Biosorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by Catla catla scales: equilibrium and kinetics studies

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2009)
  • R.S. Vieira et al.

    Interaction of natural and crosslinked chitosan membranes with Hg(II) ions

    Colloids Surf. A

    (2006)
  • M.M. Beppu et al.

    Crosslinking of chitosan membranes using glutaraldehyde: effect on ion permeability and water absorption

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • İ. Sargın et al.

    Preparation and characterisation of biodegradable pollen–chitosan microcapsules and its application in heavy metal removal

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • Y. Wen et al.

    Adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using chitosan-coated fly ash composite as biosorbent

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Lignocellulosic derivative-chitosan biocomposite adsorbents for the removal of soluble contaminants in aqueous solutions – Preparation, characterization and applications

      2022, Journal of Water Process Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      In general, synthetic composites are resilient to ordinary degradation, and that can pose threat to ecological environment. Therefore, it is important to improve or find alternative composite, which are less toxic, biodegradable, cost-effective, sustainable, and economical [1,2]. Where a composite is made up of at least one constituent that originates from a biological source (plant, microbial or animal) or is biodegradable by microorganisms, the composite is categorized as a biocomposite [3].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text