Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy
Highlights
► Public demand as an engine for the development and diffusion of innovations. ► PPI is an instrument for meeting human needs and mitigating societal problems. ► PPI is divided into four categories: direct, catalytic, adaptive and developmental. ► Case study descriptions aim to clarify the characteristics of PPI. ► The methodological approach followed is exploratory.
Introduction
Public organizations may place an order for something (normally a product or a system) that does not exist; hence, this “something” has to be developed by the supplier before it can be delivered. In other words, innovations are needed before delivery can take place. Until about 10 years ago this phenomenon was called “public technology procurement” (Edquist et al., 2000a). Since then, this vocabulary of the 1990s and earlier has changed. The concept of “technology” has been replaced by the concept of “innovation”, reflecting a widening of the content of the notion. It is a matter of using public demand (or similar) to trigger innovation. We will use the term “Public Procurement for Innovation” (PPI) to denote this phenomenon.
However, the (non-existing) product ordered in the process of PPI is not the beginning of the process or its objective. Instead, the rationale for PPI is:
- •
To satisfy human needs, and/or
- •
To solve societal problems.
This is why PPI is so relevant in the context of grand challenges, the idea being to mitigate these challenges through the kind of innovation policy instrument that we call PPI. However, the nature of grand challenges such as global warming, tightening supplies of energy, water and food, ageing societies, public health, pandemics or security (Lund declaration, 2009) does not allow defining policies to target them as a whole, at the same time and with only one policy instrument. As it is simply not possible to work at such levels of aggregation, policies need to address narrower targets and partial problems linked to those grand challenges. This is in fact reflected in the use of PPI for meeting human needs and mitigating societal problems, where more limited goals are set for those programs (e.g. energy saving of a certain kind, improving mobility with regard to passenger transport, increasing security in a specific field). We would argue that most mission-oriented policy mitigation of grand challenges has – and must have – a narrower focus as compared to the grand challenges as such, simply because they are so “grand”. It should be added that PPI certainly includes innovations intended to meet needs (‘missions’) of public agencies themselves, if they are related to general human needs or societal problems (see direct PPI in Section 3 and four of the cases in Section 5).
Needless to say, grand challenges can also be mitigated through other means and instruments, for example R&D funding, tax credits, environmentally motivated regulations and standards (e.g. mileage standards for automobiles), creation of markets for innovative ideas, support for education and training or enhancing capacities for knowledge exchange (OECD, 2011). Nonetheless, instruments other than PPI will not be addressed here, except for brief references in cases when they are closely combined with PPI in the “policy-mix” (Flanagan et al., 2011).
A new interest, at the European level, has recently emerged with regard to demand-side approaches to innovation policy (Edquist and Hommen, 1999) and, more specifically, the use of public demand as an engine for the development and diffusion of innovations. In early 2004 three governments issued a position paper to the European Council calling for the use of public procurement across Europe to spur innovation (Edler and Georghiou, 2007, French German UK Governments, 2004). This development continued and was manifested in various reports, including the Aho Group Report (Aho et al., 2006). The Aho Group identified several application areas – or grand challenges – where demand-side policies could be used to a larger extent: e-Health, Pharmaceuticals, Energy, Environment, Transport and Logistics, Security and Digital Content (Edler and Georghiou, 2007, p. 951). There seems to be much less talk about innovation procurement in the US than in Europe (Vonortas et al., 2011). We suspect, however, that other fields of US government policy involving “mission agencies”, such as defense or energy, incorporate elements of PPI. Discussion of the differences between European and US practices regarding PPI seems to conflate the use of procurement to meet societal challenges with the use of procurement to meet mission-agency needs. PPI in the US has often been used for the latter and less frequently for the former (Thai, 2001). It has also been used for mission-agency needs in Europe and elsewhere.
The aim of this article is to contribute to clarifying the characteristics of (different kinds of) PPI, how PPI has been used, as well as, briefly, its relationship to other public innovation policy instruments. We have therefore decided to base this article firmly on empirical experiences by using a number of examples of PPI. Section 5 contains six case descriptions of PPI. Before that, the context for PPI is presented in Section 2. A few definitions that are necessary to structure and characterize the cases are introduced in Section 3. The methodology and the dimensions of the cases are found in Section 4, as is a detailed summary of the case descriptions (Table 2). The conclusions and policy implications are addressed in Section 6.
Section snippets
Interaction in innovation systems
Innovation processes occur over time and are influenced by many factors. Because of this complexity, firms almost never innovate in isolation, but interact with other organizations to gain, develop, and exchange various kinds of knowledge, information and other resources.
These interactions among organizations (players) operating in different institutional contexts are important for innovation processes (Edquist, 2011). What we call ‘activities’ in the Systems of Innovation (SI) are the
Defining and classifying innovation procurement
Innovations are new creations of economic or societal significance mainly carried out by firms (but not in isolation). They may be new products or new processes. New products may be material goods or intangible services; it is a matter of what is produced. New processes may be technological or organizational; it is a matter of how the products are produced.
Non-firm public organizations do not normally take part directly in the innovation processes, although they certainly are important
Summary of case descriptions
The cases emanate from three countries, although Sweden dominates with four well-documented cases. The other two cases represent Norway and the USA, and are of more recent origin. The bias towards Sweden is explained by its long history with regard to innovation procurement (Edquist et al., 2000a). However, the Swedish extensive tradition does not imply that many new PPI initiatives have been undertaken since the end of the 1990s. The lack of examples thus represents the momentum that PPI
X2000 high speed train
The first case deals with the procurement of the X2000 high-speed train in Sweden (Edquist et al., 2000b), one where the only existing user, the Swedish State Railway Company (SJ), represented the final demand for the trains. Hence, it constitutes a case of direct procurement which faced human mobility as a major social need. The entire process of bidding was open to foreign firms, through several rounds occurring between the first tender request in 1982 and the final contract negotiation in
Conclusions and policy implications
Using Public Procurement for Innovation (PPI) is to a large extent a matter of identifying human needs and societal problems that are not solved at the present time. These problems are often related to “grand challenges” where costs are very large. Addressing a “whole” grand challenge by a single instrument is normally impossible. Therefore, making the mitigation of those grand challenges manageable requires them to be reflected in more delimited policies. The cases included here are just a few
References (46)
Effects of government procurement on industrial innovation
Technology in Society
(1994)- et al.
Public procurement and innovation – resurrecting the demand side
Research Policy
(2007) - et al.
Systems of innovation: theory and policy from the demand side
Technology in Society
(1999) - et al.
Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation
Research Policy
(2011) - et al.
Security analysis of the ADS-B implementation in the next generation air transportation system
International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection
(2011) Methods of evaluating market transformation programmes: experience in Sweden
Energy Policy
(2001)Innovative procurement mechanisms for the commercialization of energy-efficient lighting and ventilation products
Energy
(1993)- Aho, E., Cornu, J., Georghiou, L., Subira, A., 2006. Creating an Innovative Europe. Report of the Independent Expert...
- COM, 2011. 896. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on public procurement. Brussels,...
- Directorate for Emergency Communication, 2004. Proposition No. 1 to the Storting. Supplement No. 3 (2004–2005) for the...
Innovation and Public Procurement. Review of Issues at Stake. Study for the European Commission (No ENTR/03/24)
Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures)
Industrial and Corporate Change
Public technology procurement in Sweden: The X2000 high speed train
Pre-commercial Procurement: Driving Innovation to Ensure High Quality Public Services in Europe
Switching relations and trajectories: the development procurement of the AXE Swedish switching technology
Procurement as an Innovation Instrument
Innovation, technological opportunity, and market structure
Oxford Economic Papers
Cited by (324)
The heterogeneous impact of green public procurement on corporate green innovation
2024, Resources, Conservation and RecyclingDirectionality in transformative policy missions: The case of reaching net zero emissions in the Swedish process industry
2024, Journal of Cleaner ProductionRedefining procurement paradigms: A critical review of buyer-supplier dynamics in the global petroleum and natural gas industry
2023, Extractive Industries and SocietyNew-buy situations and emerging public buying centers
2023, Industrial Marketing Management