The underpricing of IPOs on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2012.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper investigates the underpricing of IPOs on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius (SEM). Taking into account the whole population of firms which went public since the inception of the SEM until 2010, the results show an average degree of underpricing within the range 10–20%. Using a regression approach, we demonstrate that the aftermarket risk level and auditor's reputation both have a significant positive impact on initial returns. We propose the use of the Z-score as a composite measure of a firm's ex ante financial strength, and find that it has a significant negative effect on the degree of short-run underpricing.

Introduction

Undoubtedly, initial public offerings (IPOs) have generated an enormous amount of public interest and are one of the most researched areas in finance. Common empiricisms have shown that IPOs are subject to three well documented anomalies, namely, the short-run underpricing of IPOs, the hot issue market phenomenon and the long-run performance of IPOs. With regard to short-run underpricing, issuers offer shares to investors at prices considerably below the subsequently revealed market value. The underpricing of IPOs is anomalous in the sense that it appears to contradict the efficient markets hypothesis. In particular, one would expect the underpricing of IPOs to disappear over time as the overwhelming majority of investors will recognise the implied profit opportunities and make good use of them. However, the underpricing of IPOs seems to be persistent in most markets. Also, it would be difficult to rationally justify the behaviour of existing owners to sell shares to outsiders at discounted prices. The fact that these anomalies exist in numerous developed and developing markets makes them even more difficult to explain.

There are a number of theoretical explanations and models underpinning this IPO underpricing. The popular justifications for this observed phenomenon rest upon the possible existence of information asymmetries, mainly in the form of ex ante uncertainties about share prices.1 Also, according to Welch (1989), Grinblatt and Hwang (1989), and other similar studies,2 there exists a signalling mechanism where firms send signals to the market by underpricing their IPOs. Moreover, there are other possible explanations such as underwriter reputation theories, investor sentiment theories and prospect theories to explain the degree of underpricing in the IPO market.

However, there are still gaps in the literature as most studies have focused on the developed and well known developing markets. Essentially, the newness of the Mauritian market, the relative lack of investor sophistication and the distinct institutional features make the Stock Exchange of Mauritius (SEM) a unique environment in which to conduct research. Additionally, very little research has conducted with regard to IPOs in African markets and the literature is not abundant relative to that on developed markets such as the US and the UK. This may be explained by the fact that most stock exchanges3 in Africa are relatively young and indeed, most were set up in the early 1990s. In particular, there are only two previous studies that have been undertaken on Mauritian IPOs by Gasbarro et al. (2003) and Bundoo (2007), focusing on the aftermarket performance and underpricing of IPOs. However, both studies are subject to some caveats. First, the sample periods of those studies are limited. In fact, the first study only contains firms which are listed from 1989 until 1996, while the second study takes into account firms listed until 2004. Also, for both studies, some firms are not included in the sample. Second, the studies do not consider the significance of the signalling and underwriter reputation hypotheses in explaining the degree of underpricing. Third, the studies do not examine the issuing activity of seasoned equity offerings on the SEM. Fourth, the studies do not consider the motives for going public on the SEM. Given these limitations, a reassessment of the market conditions of Mauritian IPOs seems warranted. Therefore, this paper aims to fill the research gap by addressing all the limitations present in both studies. In effect, the focus of the research is to take into account all firms listed on the SEM from 1989 until 2010.

Moreover, the methodological contribution of this research is to develop a good proxy for the ex ante uncertainty of the firm in explaining the underpricing of IPOs based on the Altman Z-score model. Indeed, prior studies have focused on various proxies for ex ante uncertainty based on different accounting ratios. However, most of these accounting ratios reflect a single aspect of the firm at one time. For example, the financial leverage ratio will reflect the ex ante uncertainty of the firm by capturing only the gearing level of the company. On the other hand, the Z-score takes into account several characteristics of the firm simultaneously, namely liquidity, profitability, productivity of assets, gearing and income generating ability. To the knowledge of the authors, application of the Z-score as a proxy for ex ante uncertainty to explain the short-run underpricing of IPOs has not been considered so far in the literature.

The remainder of the paper is organised as follows. Section 2 reviews the key contributions in the literature on the underpricing of initial public offerings. Section 3 briefly describes the Stock Exchange of Mauritius and the institutional framework. Section 4 outlines the methodology employed, while the results are presented and analysed in Section 5, with Section 6 offering concluding remarks.

Section snippets

Prior research

Though many studies have been conducted in different markets, the IPO market in the United States remains the most extensively examined. Overall, with a few exceptions, most studies claim an average initial return in the 10–20% range in the US IPO markets.4 With regards to the European markets, the studies show that the average level of

An overview of the Stock Exchange of Mauritius (SEM)

The Stock Exchange Act was enacted in 1988 to provide for the setting up of a Stock Exchange Commission (SEC), a regulatory body, as well as the Stock Exchange of Mauritius Ltd (SEM), a private company, established to operate and maintain the stock exchange. On 5 July 1989, the first trading session took place with five companies listed on the official market. Also, the SEMDEX,25

Sample and data collection methods

The sample used in this study consists of all Mauritian firms which went public on the official market of the Stock Exchange of Mauritius for the period 1989 until 2010. Given the limited number of firms, we have included those which delisted during the sample period.26 However, Gasbarro et al. (2003) argue that the sample size is also

Aggregate underpricing

The section examines whether an investor who bought all IPOs from when the SEM was set up until 2005 at the offer price and sold them on the first day, first week or first month of their listing, earned a significant abnormal return. In particular, a fixed amount of money is assumed to be invested in every IPO. As such, the null hypothesis entails that the average raw or abnormal returns are not significantly different from zero. Table 2 reports the average first day, first week and first month

Conclusions

Taking into account all firms which have gone public on the official market of the Stock Exchange of Mauritius for the period 1989 until 2010, this study examines the evidence on the short-run underpricing of IPOs. In particular, an average underpricing level within the range 10–20% is found based on first day, first week and first month returns. When considering the short-run aftermarket performance and average underpricing, the investor earns an average initial return of 13.14%. However,

Acknowledgements

We thank the Editor, Brian Lucey, and the anonymous referee for useful comments that helped to improve the paper.

References (108)

  • J.A. Chorruk et al.

    New evidence on the pricing and performance of initial public offerings in Thailand: 1997–2008

    Emerging Markets Review

    (2010)
  • L.E. Deangelo

    Auditor size and audit quality

    Journal of Accounting and Economics

    (1981)
  • K. Hanley

    The underpricing of initial public offerings and the partial adjustment phenomenon

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1993)
  • R.G. Ibbotson

    Price performance of common stock new issues

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1975)
  • R. Jelic et al.

    Performance of Malaysian IPOs: underwriters reputation and earnings forecasts

    Pacific-Basin Finance Journal

    (2001)
  • M. Keloharju

    The Winner's curse, legal liability, and the long-run price performance of initial public offerings in Finland

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1993)
  • J. Kim et al.

    The aftermarket performance of initial public offerings in Korea

    Pacific-Basin Finance Journal

    (1995)
  • L. Ljungqvist

    Economic underdevelopment. The case of missing market for human capital

    Journal of Development Economics

    (1993)
  • A. Ljungqvist

    Pricing initial public offerings: further evidence from Germany

    European Economic Review

    (1997)
  • H.M.K. Mok et al.

    Underpricing and the aftermarket performance of IPOs in Shanghai, China

    Pacific-Basin Finance Journal

    (1998)
  • F. Moshirian et al.

    Model specification and IPO performance: new insights from Asia

    Research in International Business and Finance

    (2010)
  • K. Paudyal et al.

    Privatisation initial public offerings in Malaysia: initial premium and long-term performance

    Pacific-Basin Finance Journal

    (1998)
  • J. Affleck-Graves et al.

    Conditional price trends in the aftermarket for initial public offerings

    Financial Management

    (1996)
  • R. Aggarwal et al.

    The aftermarket performance of initial public offerings in Latin America

    Financial Management

    (1993)
  • K. Alli et al.

    Short and long run performance of IPOs in Post-apartheid South Africa

    Journal of African Business

    (2010)
  • E.I. Altman

    Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy

    Journal of Finance

    (1968)
  • E.I. Altman

    Predicting Financial Distress Of Companies: Revisiting the Z-Score and Zeta Models

    (2000)
  • W. Aussenegg

    Privatization versus private sector: initial public offerings in Poland

    Multinational Finance Journal

    (2003)
  • D.P. Baron

    A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues

    Journal of Finance

    (1982)
  • C.B. Barry et al.

    The role of venture capital in the creation of public companies: evidence from the going-public process

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1991)
  • R.P. Beatty

    Auditor reputation and the pricing of initial public offerings

    The Accounting Review

    (1989)
  • R. Beatty et al.

    Issuer expenses and legal liability in initial public offerings

    Journal of Law and Economics

    (1996)
  • C.L. Becker et al.

    The effect of audit quality on earnings management

    Contemporary Accounting Research

    (1998)
  • L.M. Benveniste et al.

    Evidence of information spillovers in the production of investment banking services

    Journal of Finance

    (2003)
  • Bommel, J.V., Dahya, J., Shi, Z., 2006. An empirical inquiry into the speed of information acquisition: a study of...
  • Boulton, T.J., Smart, S.B., Zutter, C.J., 2007. IPO underpricing and international corporate governance. Working paper,...
  • H.I. Bulut et al.

    Auditing firm reputation and the post-issue operating performance in an emerging market: evidence from Turkish IPO firms

    Investment Management and Financial Innovations

    (2009)
  • S.K. Bundoo

    An analysis of IPOs underpricing in Mauritius

    African Journal of Accounting, Economics, Finance and Banking Research

    (2007)
  • R.B. Carter et al.

    Underwriter reputation, initial returns, and the long-run performance of IPO stocks

    Journal of Finance

    (1998)
  • R.B. Carter et al.

    Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation

    Journal of Finance

    (1990)
  • S. Chahine et al.

    Shareholders’ rights and the effect of the origin of venture capital firms on the underpricing of US IPOs

    Corporate Governance: An International Review

    (2011)
  • Chen, Z., Choi, J.J., Jiang, C., 2007. Corruption in state owned firms: evidence from China's IPOs. Working paper,...
  • P.M. Clarkson et al.

    Ex ante uncertainty and the underpricing of initial public offering: further Canadian evidence

    Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences

    (1994)
  • F. Cornelli et al.

    Bookbuilding: how informative is the order book?

    Journal of Finance

    (2003)
  • S. Corwin et al.

    The role of underwriting syndicates: pricing, information production and underwriter competition

    Journal of Finance

    (2005)
  • S.M. Dawson

    Secondary stock market performance of initial public offers: Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia

    Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

    (1987)
  • F. Derrien

    IPO pricing in hot market conditions: who leaves money on the table?

    Journal of Finance

    (2005)
  • S. Dongwei et al.

    An empirical investigation of underpricing in Chinese IPOs

    Pacific-Basin Finance Journal

    (1999)
  • S. Espenlaub et al.

    Post-IPO directors’ sales and reissuing activity: an empirical test of IPO signalling models

    Journal of Business Finance and Accounting

    (1998)
  • B. Francis et al.

    The underpricing of venture and non-venture capital IPOs: an empirical investigation

    Journal of Financial Services Research

    (2001)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Are IPOs underpriced or overpriced? Evidence from an emerging market

      2019, Research in International Business and Finance
      Citation Excerpt :

      Stakeholders are looking to obtain benefits in a competitive market during a concise period before the window will close. Additionally, to gain the advantage of abnormal initial returns, better quality firms will strategically wait and issue IPOs during hot-issue periods (Agathee et al., 2012; Loughran and Ritter, 2004). It is important to examine in the broader framework the theoretical contributory factors to IPO underpricing and overpricing.

    • Value versus growth in IPOs: New evidence from Finland

      2014, Research in International Business and Finance
      Citation Excerpt :

      Initial public offerings (IPOs) have received considerable attention in the finance literature over the past few decades. Numerous studies have documented that IPOs are underpriced and typically sold at an offer price that is substantially below the price prevailing in the immediate aftermarket (see e.g., Ibbotson, 1975; Ritter, 1984; Ibbotson et al., 1994; Michaely and Shaw, 1994; Rajan and Servaes, 1997; Ritter and Welch, 2002; Loughran and Ritter, 2004; Purnanandam and Swaminathan, 2004; Chi and Padgett, 2005; Ljungqvist, 2007; Mazouz et al., 2009; Al-Hassan et al., 2010; Boreiko and Lombardo, 2011; Agathee et al., 2012).1 Moreover, it is now well-documented that IPO stocks are poor long-run investments and significantly underperform relative to other stocks during three- to five-year periods following the initial offering (see e.g., Aggarwal and Rivoli, 1990; Ritter, 1991; Keloharju, 1993; Levis, 1993; Loughran and Ritter, 1995; Affleck-Graves et al., 1996; Brav et al., 2000; Espenlaub et al., 2000; Yi, 2001; Alvarez and Gonzalez, 2005; Agarwal et al., 2008; Chen et al., 2013).2

    • Short run underpricing of initial public offerings (IPOs) in the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE)

      2012, Review of Development Finance
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, during this period an investor would ideally have preferred to have held onto his IPO for 15 days. This result is similar to what Agathee et al. (2012) reported on their study on Mauritian IPOs, where the investor saw the best return on their IPO after a month holding period. Taking a more specific look at the results one can take a year-on-year analysis.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text