Stepping Stones Triple P: A pilot study to evaluate acceptability of the program by parents of a child diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder
Section snippets
Epidemiology
Fombonne and Chakrabarti (2001) report the prevalence of ASD in a population of preschool children to be 62.6 per 10,000 children. In the same study, the prevalence of Autism was found to be 16.8 per 10,000 and the prevalence of other ASDs, including Asperger syndrome, 45.8 per 10,000. The higher prevalence of ASD in males was noted by both Kanner (1971) and Asperger (1991) and has since been supported by epidemiological studies. Kanner (1971) states that boys outnumber girls at a ratio of 4:1,
Parent training and Autistic Spectrum Disorders
The treatment of children with ASD has long incorporated the use of specific training programs, involving the training of parents and others as co-therapists in behavioural interventions (Koegel, Schreibman, Britten, Burke, & O’Neill, 1982). These programs have been developed to treat specific problems of children with ASD, aiming to improve social behaviour and language, as well as to decrease inappropriate behaviours. Lovaas, Koegel, Simmons, and Long (1973) demonstrated that training parents
Stepping Stones Triple P
Stepping Stones is a modified version of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program that specifically targets families of children with disabilities (Sanders, Mazzucchelli, & Studman, 2003). Triple P is a behavioural family intervention with social learning principles as the theoretical basis (Sanders, 1999). The Triple P approach to parenting focuses on providing children with positive attention and managing children's behaviour in a constructive way that does not hurt the child (Sanders et al.,
Barriers to acceptability of standard parenting programs
It is known from clinical experience with parents of children with ASD that there is often a belief that standard parenting programs will not work with their children (Sofronoff, 2003). Parental attributions and lack of perceived control are explored as two possible barriers to the acceptability of standard parenting programs by parents of children with ASD.
Research questions
The central aim of this study was to evaluate how parents of children with ASD rate the Stepping Stones parenting strategies in terms of acceptability, usability and behavioural intention (i.e., intention to try the strategy) and to explore in more depth, using a focus group, the reactions of parents to the Stepping Stones program. In addition, we were interested in evaluating whether the parent's ratings of Stepping Stones would predict attempts by parents to use the Stepping Stones strategies
Participants
Forty-two parents participated in the study and four parents participated in the focus group. Inclusion criteria for the study were a child with a paediatrician's diagnosis of ASD and an age range of 3–13 years. Participants were recruited through a general press release and a press release in the newsletters of Autism Association Queensland, Asperger Syndrome Support Network, and Autism Behavioural Intervention Queensland. In addition, posters were put on community noticeboards and notices on
Preliminary analyses
A missing value analysis was conducted which revealed that less than 5% of the data were missing and the pattern of missing data was random. However, there was a high amount of missing data for the third scenario of the Attribution and Control Questionnaire of which 9.5% was missing for item 1 and 14.3% was missing for items 2–9. The mean substitution method was used to deal with missing data. All necessary assumptions for regression analysis were met.
Comparison of pre-DVD and post-DVD ratings
Two-paired samples t-tests were performed.
Discussion
The central aim of this project was to evaluate the initial reactions of a cohort of parents of children with ASD to the Stepping Stones DVD. This involved firstly evaluating the ratings by the parents of the Stepping Stones parenting strategies in terms of acceptability, usability and behavioural intention. Overall, the parents rated Stepping Stones Triple P highly on acceptability, usability and behavioural intention. In addition, considering the parents were not trained in the use of
References (23)
Autistic psychopathy
Asperger's syndrome: A guide for parents and professionals
(1998)- et al.
Predicting mother's intentions to limit frequency of infants’ sugar intake: Testing the theory of planned behavior
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
(1991) - et al.
Parent attribution processes in the socialization of children
- et al.
Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
(1975) - et al.
Pervasive developmental disorders in preschool children
Journal of the American Medical Association
(2001) A guide to Asperger syndrome
(2002)Social stories and comic strip conversations with students with Asperger syndrome and high functioning autism
Children with autism and Asperger syndrome: Guide for practitioners and carers
(1998)- et al.
Treatment of autistic children
(1987)
Follow-up study of eleven autistic children originally reported in 1943
Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia
Cited by (50)
Experience and outcomes of stepping stones triple P for families of children with autism
2013, Research in Developmental DisabilitiesCitation Excerpt :This finding and the need for future research in this area is significant because parents of children with autism, as a group, differ from parents of children with other disabilities: they more often attribute disruptive behaviour to their child's diagnosis rather than typical childhood behavioural problems (Dunn, Burbine, Bowers, & Tantleff-Dunn, 2001; Howlin & Rutter, 1987). Therefore, they often report that standard parenting programmes will not work for their child and family because the behaviours are internal to the child, and are not under their control (Whittingham, Sofronoff, & Sheffield, 2006). Sofronoff, Jahnel, and Sanders (2011) used a randomized, controlled trial (n = 53; 45% parents of children with autism) to investigate the effects of an adapted, 2 sessions, group-seminar SSTP format.
Do maternal attributions play a role in the acceptability of behavioural interventions for problem behaviour in children with autism spectrum disorders?
2013, Research in Autism Spectrum DisordersCitation Excerpt :The findings revealed no significant relationship between parents’ ratings of treatment acceptability and their child-referent attributions of internality, controllability, and stability. However, it should be noted that Whittingham, Sofronoff, & Sheffield (2006) assessed treatment acceptability only with a single-item scale in their study. Given the high prevalence of problem behaviour in children with ASD and the increasing availability of parent-focused behavioural interventions, an understanding of the relationship between parental attributions and treatment acceptability of behavioural interventions is particularly relevant for the ASD population.
Optimizing Parent Training to Improve Oral Health Behavior and Outcomes in Underserved Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
2023, Journal of Autism and Developmental DisordersEducators apply new teaching strategies despite initial attributions of autistic students’ controllability of their behaviors
2023, International Journal of Developmental DisabilitiesUsefulness of Implementation Outcome Scales for Digital Mental Health (iOSDMH): Experiences from Six Randomized Controlled Trials
2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health