Interactions between China׳s economy, energy and the air emissions and their policy implications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.002Get rights and content

Abstract

How to coordinate the relationships between economy, energy and environment is a complex issue for China. This paper presented an indicator system based on energy, emergy and monetary units to explore the interactions between China׳s economic growth, its energy production and consumption, and the related air emissions during 1995–2011. The results show that (1) China׳s energy utilization efficiency is continuously raised whilst the total production efficiency is just slightly improved; (2) petroleum import has surpassed international warning line (50%) since 2007, and it is further challenging China׳s energy security; (3) basic energy mix is still mainly composed of coal and petroleum; (4) air emissions׳ impact from energy production has climbed rapidly whilst that from energy consumption has declined slowly. Air emissions׳ impact from energy consumption still has main contribution to the total emissions׳ impact whilst that from energy production has an increasing share. Therein, air emissions׳ impact mainly comes from the impact on human health. While air emission intensity from energy consumption decreases obviously, that from energy production generally increases; (5) generally, the relationships between the structures of economy and energy and air emissions have become more coordinated. Compared with structure coordination degree, the improvement of scale harmony degree between the three aspects is much slower due to rebound effect, which will seriously challenge the presented targets in 12th Five-Year-Plan (FYP). Promoting the synergistic effect should become the underlying strategy for future economic sustainable development.

Introduction

China׳s economy has been growing by 11.25% of GDP or 10.11% of per capita GDP during 1978–2011 (Fig. 1). And even the world financial crisis began in 2008 has not stopped the pace of China׳s economic growth. The country׳s economic miracle has induced huge energy consumption and serious air environmental pollution. China is a dominant energy consumer in global context [1], and its primary energy consumption has exceeded domestic energy production since 1994, leading to a substantial expansion in energy imports, particularly of oil. China׳s energy demand has an increasingly significant impact on global energy markets [2]. At present, China has the greatest contribution to SO2 and CO2 emissions in the world [3]. With the continuing growth of economy in the next 10–15 years, China will face a more severe situation of energy consumption and the related increasing multiple pollutant emissions. Regional air pollution especially fine particles and ozone from fossil fuel consumption has not been well solved for the country [4], which contributes greatly to the burden of disease [5]. Meanwhile, the increasingly serious global climate change issue has and will become another challenge for China׳s future energy development [6], and emissions of greenhouse gases from energy use will inevitably intensify China׳s environmental health troubles. Therefore, the Chinese government has to take measures to improve the environmental efficiency and restructure the economic growth pattern [7].

China׳s economic growth needs lots of energy to support, but how to obtain a sufficient energy supply is now a problem. Meanwhile, environmental pollution caused by energy production and consumption is a problem that urgently needs to be solved [7] because ambient air pollution had diverse negative effects on human health [8]. And these issues have inspired many related researches, such as energy and environment [1], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], energy and economy [17], [18], [19], energy and exports [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. But those existing researches only focused on one or two aspects of China׳s economy–energy–environment related issues and could not give full perspectives to decision-makers. Recently, some researches also began to address economy and energy and environment related issues of China [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]; however, air emissions׳ impact from energy production and/or other air emissions besides CO2 have not been fully considered in those researches. The relationships between economy, energy and environment are very complicated, and exploring these complex issues needs a systematic tool in order to consider the related issues from different angles as well as an integrated level. Maybe integration of different measurement tools is one of the solutions.

Therein, emergy can act as one of the measurement tools. Emergy is defined by Odum as the sum of the available energy (exergy) of one kind previously required directly and indirectly to make a product or service [33]. This method has been widely accepted as an effective ecological evaluation tool to assess comprehensive performances of all kinds of systems with different scales and functions [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78]. Recently, emergy approach has been also improved by some scholars, including improving its accounting [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], quantifying impact of emissions in terms of emergy [86], [87], measuring environmental carrying capacity in terms of emergy [88], updating some of the unit emergy values [65], [89], [90], joint use of emergy approach and other methods [68], [82], [85], [91], [92], etc. However, it is still necessary to further extend the research fields of emergy approach in order to fully explore its potential, such as emergy analysis of the performance of national energy production and consumption, emergy evaluation of the relationships between one country׳s economy and energy and emissions, etc. Of course, more other measurement tools and methods, such as economic measurement, energy measurement, etc., could be combined with emergy to set up the corresponding indicator system so as to assess this complex system from different angles and holistic levels simultaneously.

China has attracted worldwide attention due to its global economic and environmental effects derived from its rapid economic growth over the last 30 years, with particularly concerning about its accelerating energy consumption and resulting air emissions. China is facing severe energy-related challenges that conflict resource shortages with the planned rapid economic growth, energy use with the related air pollution, and new technology with the old production/consumption patterns. It is recognized that energy development must follow a sustainable path to coordinate economy growth, social development, and environmental protection [93], such as a more comprehensive, supply chain perspective on energy–export linkages [20], a comprehensive sustainability policy for overcoming the problems associated with production and consumption patterns and their impact on the environment [94], etc. China aims at quadrupling per-capita GDP by 2020 compared to the year 2000. Without any energy and environmental policy measures, this tremendous economic growth would be accompanied with a quadrupling of primary energy consumption up to 6.3 billion ton of standard coal equivalents (sce) and energy-related CO2-emissions of 13.9 billion ton against this background. Therefore, China needs to implement its sustainable development strategy into the quantitative context of the country׳s economic development and subsequent economic growth-related environmental problems. The country is urgently searching for a way to ease the negative implications of economic growth and has committed itself to achieve a level of 3.0 billion ton sce primary energy consumption in 2020 [95]. However, how about the contribution of China׳s energy production to the total air emissions׳ impact? How about the different kinds of air emissions׳ contributions to the total air emissions׳ impact in the country? How about the interactions between China׳s economy, energy production and consumption and the related air emissions? Which factors will affect the realization of binding targets for energy conservation and emission reduction in the 12th Five-Year Plans (FYP)? How to deal with these issues in the 12th FYP? Therefore, it still needs to further explore the following issues so as to provide policy-makers with more comprehensive perspectives, including efficiency of energy production and use, energy security, energy mix, air emissions׳ impact from energy production and consumption, and the relationships between structures and scales of economy and energy and environment. These issues should be investigated through a systematic method so as to reveal the potential conflicts during China׳s fast economic growth against historical background. This paper aims to applying the emergy analysis method and several proposed indicators to investigate the relationships between China׳s rapid economic growth, energy production and consumption and the related impact of air emissions from 1995 to 2011 so as to provide a new perspective and some beneficial suggestions for policy-makers. Emissions׳ impact is quantified in terms of emergy; the corresponding indicators based on emergy and energy and money units are adopted to depict the interrelationships between GDP growth, energy production and consumption, and air emissions׳ impact. Detailed systematic indicators are examined from time serials, and temporal variation of indicators is explored to illustrate some characteristics of the Chinese economy. Finally, this paper discusses the corresponding issues and puts some related suggestions.

Section snippets

The interactions between economy, energy, environment and human being

As described in Fig. 2, energy production provides society with energy consumption so as to satisfy human׳s direct energy needs and drive economic growth. Economic development can satisfy human׳s material and psychological needs through paid service. Energy production and energy consumption can cause all kinds of air emissions to environment, which could have adverse impact on human health and economy. Consequently, economy and environment can influence each other. They can promote each other

GDP and per capita GDP

As shown in Fig. 3, China׳s economy grew by 9.06 times by GDP or 8.02 times by per capita GDP from 1995 to 2011, with an annual growth rate of 15.52% by its GDP or 14.74% by its per capita GDP. The Chinese government has worked out a “Three Stage” development strategy to accomplish the modernization and establishment of a well-off society by 2050, and proposed to raise the GDP to the level of the middle-developed countries, with the per capita GDP reaching US$ 14,000–28,000 [131]. Therefore,

EPE

As shown in Fig. 13(a), production efficiency of electricity generation and heating by power stations grew by 13.64%, with an annual average efficiency of 39.03%, which is close to the research of Zhang and Wang [132]; production efficiency of coking rose by 4.79%, with an average efficiency of 96.18%; production efficiency of petroleum refining decreased by 0.69%, with an annual average efficiency of 97.07% during this study period. The total energy production efficiency was enhanced by 1.76%

Discussion

Several indicators based on energy, emergy and monetary units were put forward to depict the relationships between China׳s economic growth, energy production and consumption, and the corresponding air emissions׳ impact during 1995–2011. Uncertainty analyses show that our results basically represent the trends of overall energy production and consumption and related air emissions׳ impact of the country during the study period (see SI-1), and can provide the related policy implications for

Policy implications for the 12th FYP

As shown in Table 4, the structure coordination degree and scale harmony degree in 11th FYP is obviously superior to those in the other two FYPs. Compared with the general levels of 11th FYP, the two indices in the first year of 12th FYP was inferior although the economy still kept fast growth. Therefore, energy utilization efficiency and emissions from energy production should be further emphasized so as to optimize industrial structure. Therein, the exploitation and utilization of RE sources

Concluding remarks

  • (1)

    China׳s basic energy mix is still mainly composed of coal and petroleum during 1995–2011; therein, increasing petroleum import will continue to threat China׳s energy security in future.

  • (2)

    The total air emissions׳ impact has been controlled to some degree in the study period. Therein, energy consumption has the greatest contribution to the total air emissions׳ impact whilst energy production has an increasing share. In terms of energy category, coal contributes the largest to emissions׳ impact from

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Dual Support Plan of Sichuan Agricultural University (03570312) and the Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT13083).

References (159)

  • L. Li et al.

    Energy conservation and emission reduction policies for the electric power industry in China

    Energy Policy

    (2011)
  • J.-H. Xu et al.

    Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China׳s cement industry: a perspective from LMDI decomposition analysis

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • P.A. Steenhof et al.

    Scenario development in China׳s electricity sector

    Technol Forecast Soc Change

    (2007)
  • D. Guan et al.

    The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030

    Glob Environ Change

    (2008)
  • J. You

    China׳s energy consumption and sustainable development: comparative evidence from GDP and genuine savings

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2011)
  • N.M. Michieka et al.

    An investigation of the role of China׳s urban population on coal consumption

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • Z. Tao

    Scenarios of China׳s oil consumption per capita (OCPC) using a hybrid factor decomposition–system dynamics (SD) simulation

    Energy

    (2010)
  • F. Kahrl et al.

    Energy and exports in China

    China Econ Rev

    (2008)
  • Y. Wu

    Energy intensity and its determinants in China׳s regional economies

    Energy Policy

    (2012)
  • G. Zou et al.

    Short- and long-run effects between oil consumption and economic growth in China

    Energy Policy

    (2006)
  • M. Song et al.

    To reduce energy consumption and to maintain rapid economic growth: analysis of the condition in China based on expended IPAT model

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2011)
  • S.S. Wang et al.

    CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: a panel data analysis

    Energy Policy

    (2011)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Evaluating the interplays among economic growth and energy consumption and CO2 emission of China during 1990–2007

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2012)
  • M. Shealy et al.

    Growing Chinese coal use: dramatic resource and environmental implications

    Energy Policy

    (2010)
  • P. Rafaj et al.

    Internalisation of external cost in the power generation sector: analysis with Global Multi-regional MARKAL model

    Energy Policy

    (2007)
  • Z. Hu et al.

    Study on China׳s low carbon development in an economy–energy–electricity–environment framework

    Energy Policy

    (2011)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Evaluating the relationships among economic growth, energy consumption, air emissions and air environmental protection investment in China

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2013)
  • X.-H. Zhang et al.

    Several novel indicators being applied to analyze the relationships between Chinese economic growth, energy consumption and its impact of emissions

    Ecol Indic

    (2012)
  • S. Ulgiati et al.

    Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability: an emergy analysis of Italy

    Ecol. Model.

    (1994)
  • M.T. Brown et al.

    Energy quality, emergy and transformity: H.T. Odum׳s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems

    Ecol Model

    (2004)
  • J.B. Higgins

    Emergy analysis of the oak openings region

    Ecol Eng

    (2003)
  • A. Gasparatos et al.

    Environmental support, energy security and economic growth in Japan

    Energy Policy

    (2009)
  • G.Q. Chen et al.

    Greenhouse gas emissions and natural resources use by the world economy: ecological input–output modeling

    Ecol Model

    (2011)
  • R.M. Pulselli et al.

    Emergy accounting of the province of Siena: towards a thermodynamic geography for regional studies

    J Environ Manag

    (2008)
  • Z.F. Cai et al.

    Emergy-based analysis of Beijing– Tianjin–Tangshan region in China

    Commun Nonlinear Sci Num Simul

    (2009)
  • X. Dang et al.

    Emergy measures of carrying capacity and sustainability of a target region for an ecological restoration programme: a case study in Loess Hilly Region, China

    J Environ Manag

    (2012)
  • D.E. Campbell et al.

    An energy systems view of sustainability: emergy evaluation of the San Luis Basin, Colorado

    J Environ Manag

    (2012)
  • S.L. Huang

    Urban ecosystems, energetic hierarchies, and ecological economics of Taipei metropolis

    J Environ Manag

    (1998)
  • S.L. Huang et al.

    Materials flow analysis and emergy evaluation of Taipei׳s urban construction

    Landsc Urban Plan

    (2003)
  • S.L. Huang et al.

    Socioeconomic metabolism in Taiwan: emergy synthesis versus material flow analysis

    Resour Conserv Recycl

    (2006)
  • H.F. Lu et al.

    Emergy synthesis of an agro-forest restoration system in lower subtropical China

    Ecol Eng

    (2006)
  • E. Walsh et al.

    Quantitative guidelines for urban sustainability

    Technol Soc

    (2006)
  • S.L. Huang et al.

    Emergy-based evaluation of periurban ecosystem services

    Ecol Complex

    (2011)
  • K. Lei et al.

    Emergy analysis for tourism systems: principles and a case study for Macao

    Ecol Complex

    (2011)
  • M.T. Brown et al.

    Emergy analysis perspectives of Thailand and Mekong River dam proposals

    Ecol Model

    (1996)
  • D. Kang et al.

    Emergy evaluation perspectives of a multipurpose dam proposal in Korea

    J Environ Manag

    (2002)
  • J.F. Martin

    Emergy evaluation of diversions of river water to marshes in the Mississippi River Delta

    Ecol Eng

    (2002)
  • F.M. Pulselli et al.

    Calculation of the unit emergy value of water in an Italian watershed

    Ecol Model

    (2011)
  • S. Bastianoni et al.

    Ethanol production from biomass: analysis of process efficiency and sustainability

    Biomass Bioenergy

    (1996)
  • L.P. Ju et al.

    Embodied energy and emergy evaluation of a typical biodiesel production chain in China

    Ecol Model

    (2011)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Performance comparison of urea production using one set of integrated indicators considering energy use, economic cost and emissions’ impacts: A case from China

      2022, Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the following two aspects are needed to be further investigated. On one hand, it is necessary to comprehensively assess performance of urea production from energy use, economic cost and environmental performance because of close interrelationships among the three aspects [35]. Therein, energy sources (especially fossil energy sources) drive industrial economic growth while promoting environmental emissions due to their mining and processing as well as consumption.

    • Investigating the interactions between Chinese economic growth, energy consumption and its air environmental cost during 1989–2016 and forecasting their future trends

      2021, Ecological Modelling
      Citation Excerpt :

      Environmental cost per unit of energy use (ECPE, sej/kg standard coal): After industrial revolution, energy sources (especially fossil energy sources) are both driving force of economic growth and derivation of environmental impacts. Here ECPE was proposed to describe environmental cost caused by energy use, and it is defined as the total environmental cost divided by the total energy use in a year (X. Zhang et al., 2014). This indicator reflects the impact of energy consumption on the environment; meanwhile, it also indirectly reflects the efficiency of energy use.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text