Uniform cooling of photovoltaic panels: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.064Get rights and content

Abstract

Cooling of PV panels is a critical issue in the design and operation of concentrated photovoltaic (CPV) technology. Due to high cell temperature and non-uniform temperature distribution, current mismatching problem and hot spot occurs on the cell resulting in either reduction of efficiency or permanent structural damage due to thermal stresses. Temperature non-uniformity on the surface of PV panel has a major impact on the performance of CPV systems and directly increases cell temperature and series resistance. This review paper highlights the importance of uniform PV cooling by exploring the possible causes and effects of non-uniformity. Cooling techniques with low average cell temperature and uniform temperature distribution are analyzed. Economic and environmental impact on the importance of cooling of PV systems are discussed and an experimental case study is presented for comparison between uniform and non-uniform cooling methods. Immersion cooling is a promising solution for uniform cooling and has been reported to reduce the cell temperature to 20–45 °C for CPV systems. Heat pipes reduced the temperature down to 32 °C with the best case temperature non-uniformity of 3 °C. Passive cooling by heat sinks was found to reduce the cell temperature as low as 37 °C for high concentrations but with an expense of large heat sink area. Active cooling by microchannels, impingement cooling and hybrid microchannel-impingement cooling were found to be most effective in dissipating high heat flux from PV surface. Cell temperature was reported to decrease to 30 °C for 200× CPV using impingement cooling. For hybrid cooling, deviation of 0.46 °C surface temperature was obtained. Using PCM materials temperature of panel was controlled within 28–65 °C whereas optimization of heat exchanger designs also showed low and uniform temperature across surface. The impact of non-uniformity was found to be significant for all PV systems however the effect is more pronounced in CPV systems.

Introduction

Thermal management of photovoltaic (PV) systems plays a key role for low and high concentration systems. The overall performance of solar panels is strongly dependant by the affect of PV cells׳ operating temperature. Typically the efficiency of solar cells is around 15%. The remaining component of radiation absorbed in the cell transforms into thermal energy which causes the temperature of the cell to be increased. This further causes the panel efficiency to decrease as the open circuit voltage and fill factor is reduced with rising temperature [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. The drop in efficiency due to these reasons decreases the global system performance and leads to an increase in cost per unit power. To achieve optimum and better solar cell performance, innovative cooling techniques for maintaining the solar cell temperature at operating conditions are required.

In addition to cell temperature, non-uniform temperature and non-uniform illumination across the cells have been found to affect the cell efficiency and overall system performance in a negative way [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Series connected PV cells faces greater damage as current directly varies with light, so the current in an array of series of identical PV cells will be restricted by the solar cell with the minimum irradiation. This failure is called as the ‘current matching problem’. This issue can be solved by using bypass diodes or by keeping a uniform temperature across each series connection [13], [18]. The uniform temperature across PV can be achieved by using conventional and non-conventional cooling mechanisms with novel designs for high heat dissipation. Low solar cell temperature and high temperature uniformity are one of the most important characteristics affecting the overall performance of PV systems [13]. Non-uniformity in temperature distribution affects the PV system performance in two ways: (1) cells may experience efficiency loss due to loss in power output; (2) temperature variation induces thermal fatigue because of large amount of thermal cycles and stresses. This further cause the irreversible damage to solar cell due to excess localized heating across the region and reduces the reliability of the system [13]. The cooling method should be such that it keeps the average cell temperature at its minimum with a uniform distribution. This will help in the appropriate design of CPV systems and for proper calculation of the global PV performance. Fig. 1 shows typical behavior of solar cell with increasing temperature. As the cell temperature increases, electrical efficiency of the solar cell decreases [19].

The aim of this paper is to highlight the need for uniform cooling of PV panels for low and high concentrated systems by exploring the possible causes and effects of non-uniformity in PV systems. The review on uniform cooling mechanism for PV panels is currently not available in the literature. To address the above issue, cooling methods which can cater the requirement for high heat flux and uniform cooling has been reviewed from literature and discussed. Economic and environmental impact of cooling systems for PV panels is also studied. An experimental case study is presented for the validation of uniform and non-uniform cooling techniques. Finally potential cooling techniques that could be utilized for decreasing temperature non-uniformity has been compared and analyzed for improvement in the overall performance of the PV systems.

Section snippets

The need for uniform cooling

This section highlights the importance of uniform cooling of PV panels by discussing the most notable causes and effects of non-uniformity on the solar cell. The solar cell under concentration undergoes a series of losses based on the concentrator geometry, optical losses, reflection losses, tracking losses and non-uniform illumination [17]. All these losses occurring in the system tends to increase the temperature of the cell and series resistance which lowers the overall efficiency. In the

Cooling techniques

Cooling of PV panels is a vital factor in the design and operation of solar cell. The cooling method should be such that it keeps the cell temperature at its minimum with a uniform distribution [13].The simple design should keep pumping power to minimum while working at optimum conditions. As the idea of uniform cooling is novel, little literature is available in this area. However based on high heat transfer coefficient and heat extraction capability, uniform cooling techniques reported in the

Comparison between cooling techniques reviewed

Table 1 shows the summary of uniform cooling techniques reviewed in this paper. The literature shows various types of uniform cooling mechanisms based on the application of solar PV panels. Immersion cooling, heat pipes, microchannels, impingements jet, phase change material cooling, heat sinks and improved heat exchanger designs were found to yield uniform temperature in most of the PV installations. Essentially they are formed by active and passive cooling system build on the basis of

Economic and environmental impact

Cost effectiveness and environmental issues are the major challenges for the installation of PV based energy systems [105]. For effective dissipation of heat from concentrated and non-concentrated PV, cooling technologies are employed to reduce cell temperature which in turn increases electrical efficiency. The additional advantage is the collection of hot fluid which can be used for other purposes. This combination of solar PV with other devices is the key to reduce costs incurred and decrease

Conclusion

This paper highlighted the need for uniform cooling of PV panels by discussing the causes and effect of non-uniformity in PV systems. Non-uniform temperature, non-uniform irradiance, effect of non-uniformity on cell parameters and shading were found to be main reasons for inducing temperature gradients in PV systems. This temperature increase was found to affect electrical and thermal performance consequently reducing the reliability of PV solar systems. Based on literature survey, cooling

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge King Abdul-Aziz city for Science and Technology (KACST), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for providing the financial support through the Project no. 0667-11-A-L and King Fahd University of petroleum and minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran, Saudi Arabia for providing the facilities.

References (115)

  • A. Luque et al.

    Electric and thermal model for non-uniformly illuminated concentration cells

    Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells

    (1998)
  • A. Royne et al.

    Cooling of photovoltaic cells under concentrated illumination: a critical review

    Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells

    (2005)
  • R.K. Mathur et al.

    Thermal non-uniformities in concentrator solar cells

    Sol Cells

    (1984)
  • F. Chenlo et al.

    A linear concentrator photovoltaic module: analysis of non-uniform illumination and temperature effects on efficiency

    Sol Cells

    (1987)
  • H. Baig et al.

    Non-uniform illumination in concentrating solar cells

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2012)
  • G.N.N. Tiwari et al.

    Photovoltaic modules and their applications: a review on thermal modelling

    Appl Energy

    (2011)
  • J.S. Coventry

    Performance of a concentrating photovoltaic/thermal solar collector

    Sol Energy

    (2005)
  • R.D. Nasby et al.

    Performance measurement techniques for concentrator photovoltaic cells

    Sol Cells

    (1982)
  • H. Pfeiffer et al.

    The effects of non-uniform illumination of solar cells with concentrated light

    Sol Cells

    (1982)
  • A. Cuevas et al.

    The combined effect of non-uniform illumination and series resistance on the open-circuit voltage of solar cells

    Sol Cells

    (1984)
  • K. Nishioka et al.

    Annual output estimation of concentrator photovoltaic systems using high-efficiency InGaP/InGaAs/Ge triple-junction solar cells based on experimental solar cell’s characteristics and field-test meteorological data

    Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells

    (2006)
  • D. Meneses-Rodrı́guez et al.

    Photovoltaic solar cells performance at elevated temperatures

    Sol Energy

    (2005)
  • M.C. Di Vincenzo et al.

    Detailed PV array model for non-uniform irradiance and its validation against experimental data

    Sol Energy

    (2013)
  • Y.-J. Wang et al.

    Analytical modelling of partial shading and different orientation of photovoltaic modules

    IET Renew Power Gener

    (2010)
  • K. Ishaque et al.

    Modeling and simulation of photovoltaic (PV) system during partial shading based on a two-diode model

    Simul Model Pract Theory

    (2011)
  • S.V. Garimella et al.

    Recent advances in the modeling and applications of nonconventional heat pipes

    Adv Heat Transf

    (2001)
  • R. Boukhanouf et al.

    Experimental investigation of a flat plate heat pipe performance using IR thermal imaging camera

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2006)
  • P. Naphon et al.

    Experimental investigation of titanium nanofluids on the heat pipe thermal efficiency

    Int Commun Heat Mass Transf

    (2008)
  • Y. Xuan et al.

    Investigation on transient behaviors of flat plate heat pipes

    Exp Therm Fluid Sci

    (2004)
  • X.Y. Huang et al.

    The pressure and velocity fields in the wick structure of a localized heated flat plate heat pipe

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1996)
  • B. Xiao et al.

    A three-dimensional thermal-fluid analysis of flat heat pipes

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2008)
  • A. Akbarzadeh et al.

    Heat pipe-based cooling systems for photovoltaic cells under concentrated solar radiation

    Appl Therm Eng

    (1996)
  • B.H.H. Salman et al.

    Characteristics of heat transfer and fluid flow in microtube and microchannel using conventional fluids and nanofluids: a review

    Renew Sustain Energy Rev

    (2013)
  • J.L.L. Xu et al.

    Microscale heat transfer enhancement using thermal boundary layer redeveloping concept

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2005)
  • K. Vafai et al.

    Analysis of two-layered micro-channel heat sink concept in electronic cooling

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1999)
  • J.H. Ryu et al.

    Three-dimensional numerical optimization of a manifold microchannel heat sink

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2003)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Heat dissipation performance of silicon solar cells by direct dielectric liquid immersion under intensified illuminations

    Sol Energy

    (2011)
  • L. Zhu et al.

    Water immersion cooling of PV cells in a high concentration system

    Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells

    (2011)
  • X. Han et al.

    The performance and long-term stability of silicon concentrator solar cells immersed in dielectric liquids

    Energy Convers Manag

    (2013)
  • X. Han et al.

    Electrical and thermal performance of silicon concentrator solar cells immersed in dielectric liquids

    Appl Energy

    (2011)
  • H. Xiang et al.

    3D numerical simulation on heat transfer performance of a cylindrical liquid immersion solar receiver

    Energy Convers Manag

    (2012)
  • Y. Sun et al.

    Direct liquid-immersion cooling of concentrator silicon solar cells in a linear concentrating photovoltaic receiver

    Energy

    (2014)
  • Y. Abrahamyan et al.

    The efficiency of solar cells immersed in liquid dielectrics

    Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells

    (2002)
  • A.A.B. Baloch et al.

    Experimental and numerical performance analysis of a converging channel heat exchanger for PV cooling

    Energy Convers Manag

    (2015)
  • S.M. Baek et al.

    A numerical study on uniform cooling of large-scale PEMFCs with different coolant flow field designs

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2011)
  • G. Hetsroni

    A uniform temperature heat sink for cooling of electronic devices

    Int J Heat Transf

    (2002)
  • D.Y. Lee et al.

    Comparative analysis of jet impingement and microchannel cooling for high heat flux applications

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1999)
  • B.W. Webb et al.

    Single-phase liquid jet impingement heat transfer

    Adv heat Transf

    (1995)
  • A. Royne et al.

    Effect of nozzle geometry on pressure drop and heat transfer in submerged jet arrays

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2006)
  • H. Martin

    Heat and mass transfer between impinging gas jets and solid surfaces

    Adv heat Transf

    (1977)
  • Cited by (252)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text