The building blocks and motifs of RNA architecture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2006.05.009Get rights and content

RNA motifs can be defined broadly as recurrent structural elements containing multiple intramolecular RNA–RNA interactions, as observed in atomic-resolution RNA structures. They constitute the modular building blocks of RNA architecture, which is organized hierarchically. Recent work has focused on analyzing RNA backbone conformations to identify, define and search for new instances of recurrent motifs in X-ray structures. One current view asserts that recurrent RNA strand segments with characteristic backbone configurations qualify as independent motifs. Other considerations indicate that, to characterize modular motifs, one must take into account the larger structural context of such strand segments. This follows the biologically relevant motivation, which is to identify RNA structural characteristics that are subject to sequence constraints and that thus relate RNA architectures to sequences.

Introduction

No single definition exists for RNA motifs, as they can be proposed and analyzed at different levels of RNA structure. As discussed in a previous review, RNA motifs can be broadly defined as recurrent structural elements, subject to constraints [1]. This review is complementary to a recent review of new high-resolution RNA structures that exhaustively catalogued new and recurrent motifs [2••]. Therefore, we do not attempt to comprehensively discuss each newly reported motif, but rather aim to critically review evolving notions of recurrent RNA motifs in the context of RNA function and evolution, and how to identify, find and classify them.

Section snippets

Types of RNA motifs

We can distinguish two main classes of motifs — those that operate at the level of RNA sequence and those that entail a specific three-dimensional (3D) structure, characterized by a set of 3D coordinates. An example of a sequence motif is the Shine–Dalgarno sequence of bacterial mRNAs or the Sm-binding sites of some eukaryotic non-coding RNAs [3]. At an intermediate level of analysis, the secondary structure (2D) of an RNA is prominent because it can be calculated quite accurately from sequence

Secondary structure motifs

How much information can we retrieve from analysis of secondary (2D) structures? Zorn et al. [5] calculate and compare frequency distributions of Watson–Crick (WC) paired nucleotides in helical stems and of nominally unpaired nucleotides in hairpin, internal and junction loops, as they appear in the secondary structures of the 16S and 23S rRNAs. Thus, they treat all bases in ‘loops’ as unpaired, even though a large fraction of them form non-WC base pairs, as is evident from high-resolution 3D

Representations of RNA three-dimensional structure

Different representations can be used to describe molecular structure information [29]. The most basic representation, used by the 3D structure databases, is the Cartesian coordinates of individual atoms, from which other representations can be derived. However, the large number of variables makes the Cartesian representation awkward when comparing structures or searching for recurrent motifs. Internal coordinates (torsion angles) significantly reduce the number of variables and remove the need

Conclusions

Biological data are fundamentally sequence data. Given the ease of obtaining sequence data and the difficulty of determining 3D structures at high resolution, there will always be more sequence data than structural data. The key challenge for RNA structural and computational biologists and bioinformaticians is to fully integrate these two types of data with a common ontology [63]. The fact that structured RNA molecules are mosaics of recurrent modular motifs means that high-resolution 3D

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

NBL acknowledges grant support from the National Institutes of Health (2 R15 GM055898-03) and the American Chemical Society (PRF# 42357 -AC 4).

References (63)

  • N.B. Leontis et al.

    Analysis of RNA motifs

    Curr Opin Struct Biol

    (2003)
  • S.R. Holbrook

    RNA structure: the long and the short of it

    Curr Opin Struct Biol

    (2005)
  • P. Khusial et al.

    LSm proteins form heptameric rings that bind to RNA via repeating motifs

    Trends Biochem Sci

    (2005)
  • D.M. Mathews et al.

    Predictive methods using RNA sequences

  • J. Zorn et al.

    Structural motifs in ribosomal RNAs: implications for RNA design and genomics

    Biopolymers

    (2004)
  • N. Ban et al.

    The complete atomic structure of the large ribosomal subunit at 2.4 Å resolution

    Science

    (2000)
  • B.S. Schuwirth et al.

    Structures of the bacterial ribosome at 3.5 Å resolution

    Science

    (2005)
  • B.T. Wimberly et al.

    Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit

    Nature

    (2000)
  • D.M. Lilley

    Structures of helical junctions in nucleic acids

    Q Rev Biophys

    (2000)
  • A. Lescoute et al.

    Topology of three-way junctions in folded RNAs

    RNA

    (2006)
  • T.J. Macke et al.

    RNAMotif, an RNA secondary structure definition and search algorithm

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2001)
  • U. Laserson et al.

    Predicting candidate genomic sequences that correspond to synthetic functional RNA motifs

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2005)
  • R. Knight et al.

    Abundance of correctly folded RNA motifs in sequence space, calculated on computational grids

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2005)
  • M. Legiewicz et al.

    Size, constant sequences, and optimal selection

    RNA

    (2005)
  • R. Knight et al.

    Finding specific RNA motifs: function in a zeptomole world?

    RNA

    (2003)
  • G. Benedetti et al.

    A graph-topological approach to recognition of pattern and similarity in RNA secondary structures

    Biophys Chem

    (1996)
  • S.Y. Le et al.

    Tree graphs of RNA secondary structures and their comparisons

    Comput Biomed Res

    (1989)
  • N. Kim et al.

    Candidates for novel RNA topologies

    J Mol Biol

    (2004)
  • D. Fera et al.

    RAG: RNA-as-graphs web resource

    BMC Bioinformatics

    (2004)
  • H.H. Gan et al.

    RAG: RNA-as-graphs database--concepts, analysis, and features

    Bioinformatics

    (2004)
  • H.H. Gan et al.

    Exploring the repertoire of RNA secondary motifs using graph theory; implications for RNA design

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2003)
  • Y. Karklin et al.

    Classification of non-coding RNA using graph representations of secondary structure

    Pac Symp Biocomput

    (2005)
  • A.S. Krasilnikov et al.

    Basis for structural diversity in homologous RNAs

    Science

    (2004)
  • A.S. Krasilnikov et al.

    Crystal structure of the specificity domain of ribonuclease P

    Nature

    (2003)
  • A. Torres-Larios et al.

    Crystal structure of the RNA component of bacterial ribonuclease P

    Nature

    (2005)
  • E. Westhof et al.

    Structural biology. Evolution of RNA architecture

    Science

    (2004)
  • U. Nagaswamy et al.

    Frequent occurrence of the T-loop RNA folding motif in ribosomal RNAs

    RNA

    (2002)
  • N.B. Leontis et al.

    Motif prediction in ribosomal RNAs lessons and prospects for automated motif prediction in homologous RNA molecules

    Biochimie

    (2002)
  • T.H. Reijmers et al.

    The influence of different structure representations on the clustering of an RNA nucleotides data set

    J Chem Inf Comput Sci

    (2001)
  • W.K. Olson

    Configurational statistics of polynucleotide chains

    Macromolecules

    (1980)
  • N.B. Leontis et al.

    Geometric nomenclature and classification of RNA base pairs

    RNA

    (2001)
  • Cited by (297)

    • Nucleic acid nanoassembly-enhanced RNA therapeutics and diagnosis

      2023, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
      Citation Excerpt :

      Then in the early 2000s, Jaeger, Westhof, and Leontis70 focused on studying nanoscaled RNA objects by tectoRNAs and artificial modular RNA units. With the development of RNA nanotechnology, RNA nanoassemblies can be constructed using hand–hand interactions69,71–73, foot-to-foot interactions71–73, stable natural RNA motifs70,74–77, tectonics67,72,76,78–87, and computational design88–94. The popularity of DNA origami has inspired researchers to study RNA origami.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text