Efficiency of conventional drinking-water-treatment processes in removal of pharmaceuticals and other organic compounds

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.095Get rights and content

Abstract

Samples of water and sediment from a conventional drinking-water-treatment (DWT) plant were analyzed for 113 organic compounds (OCs) that included pharmaceuticals, detergent degradates, flame retardants and plasticizers, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), fragrances and flavorants, pesticides and an insect repellent, and plant and animal steroids. 45 of these compounds were detected in samples of source water and 34 were detected in samples of settled sludge and (or) filter-backwash sediments. The average percent removal of these compounds was calculated from their average concentration in time-composited water samples collected after clarification, disinfection (chlorination), and granular-activated-carbon (GAC) filtration. In general, GAC filtration accounted for 53% of the removal of these compounds from the aqueous phase; disinfection accounted for 32%, and clarification accounted for 15%. The effectiveness of these treatments varied widely within and among classes of compounds; some hydrophobic compounds were strongly oxidized by free chlorine, and some hydrophilic compounds were partly removed through adsorption processes. The detection of 21 of the compounds in 1 or more samples of finished water, and of 3 to 13 compounds in every finished-water sample, indicates substantial but incomplete degradation or removal of OCs through the conventional DWT process used at this plant.

Introduction

More than 100,000 synthetic chemicals are used in a variety of domestic, industrial, and agricultural applications (Jørgensen, 2004). Numerous studies have documented that many of these compounds, including pharmaceuticals, fragrances and flavorants, flame retardants and plasticizers, detergent metabolites, components of personal care products, and products of petroleum use and combustion are incompletely degraded or removed during wastewater treatment and are persistent in the aquatic environment. Reviews of the occurrence and fate of organic compounds (OCs) in wastewaters and the aquatic environment are available (Metcalfe et al., 2004, Focazio et al., 2004, Daughton, 2001, Halling-Sørensen et al., 1998, Daughton and Ternes, 1999). Fewer studies have documented the occurrence of these OCs in drinking-water supplies. Exceptions include documentation of low-level concentrations of OCs in plant-scale studies of drinking-water supplies (Loraine and Pettigrove, 2006, Petrovic et al., 2003, Adams et al., 2002, Ternes et al., 2002, Reddersen et al., 2002, Heberer and Stan, 1997) and evaluation of their fate in laboratory-scale simulations of drinking-water-treatment (DWT) processes (Westerhoff et al., 2005, Huber et al., 2005, Pinkston and Sedlak, 2004, Zwiener and Frimmel, 2000).

In 2001, the potential for 106 OCs to survive a conventional DWT process and persist in finished, potable water was investigated (Stackelberg et al., 2004). The results provided the first documentation that a wide variety of OCs, most of which are currently unregulated in drinking-water supplies, can survive conventional DWT, but limitations in the study design precluded quantitative comparison of the degradation or removal of OCs by individual water treatments. Subsequent sampling at the same DWT plant in 2003 by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection addressed these limitations by including (1) collection of multiple time-composited water samples at each treatment step to account for retention time through the DWT plant and diurnal variations in source-water quality, and (2) collection of solids samples for evaluation of the effectiveness of adsorptive processes in removing OCs. This paper uses data from the 2003 sampling to evaluate the average percent removal (concentration decreases) and fate of OCs that were detected in the DWT plant's source waters.

Section snippets

Description of DWT plant and sample collection

The DWT plant is in a heavily populated, highly urbanized drainage basin in which more than 50 STPs discharge effluent to the two streams (or their tributaries) that provide source water for the DWT plant. The DWT plant treats and provides an average of 235 million L/day to about 850,000 people. Supernatant water that is decanted from settled sludge and filter backwash sediments is recycled to the head of the plant (Fig. 1). This recycled water represents about 9% of water entering the

Analytical methods

The water samples were analyzed for 113 compounds, and the sediment samples were analyzed for 71 of these compounds, using methods developed by the USGS (Table 1A, Table 1B). Eighteen pharmaceuticals and selected degradates in water samples were measured by solid-phase extraction (SPE) and high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry positive-ion electrospray ionization [HPLC/MS–ESI(+)] (Table 1A, Table 1B) as described in Cahill et al. (2004), and 17 pharmaceuticals and selected

Quality assurance

Six field blanks and 86 laboratory blanks were analyzed for target compounds. Blank samples were derived from laboratory-grade organic-free water. Field blanks were used to indicate whether sampling procedures, sampling equipment, field conditions, or sample-shipment procedures introduced target compounds into environmental samples, and laboratory blanks were used to assess the potential for sample contamination in the laboratory. Field blanks were collected at each of the six water-sampling

Data analysis

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranked concentrations was used to evaluate the null hypothesis that mean ranked concentrations were statistically similar among the six sampling points. If the null hypothesis was rejected, Tukey's multiple comparison test was used to indicate which mean ranked concentrations were similar to or significantly different from others (Helsel and Hirsch, 1992). Significance was set at the 95% confidence level for all statistical tests.

Average percent removal by each

Results

The effectiveness of a DWT plant in degrading or removing OCs depends on several factors (some of which may change through time), including the quality of the source water, the type and mode of operation of each treatment process, and physiochemical characteristics of the compounds themselves (Volk et al., 2005, Coupe and Blomquist, 2004). The flow of one of the two source streams ranged from about 6 to more than 81 m3/s during the sample collection period and the concentrations of some

Discussion

Results of this study indicate that the combined water treatments (clarification, disinfection, and GAC filtration) were effective at degrading or removing many OCs from source-water supplies to concentrations below analytical detection. Of the 32 compounds that were detected in at least 25% of the source-water samples (Fig. 2), 16 were not detected in samples of finished water (100% degradation or removal), and seven (carbamazepine, caffeine, acetaminophen, bisphenol A, triethyl citrate, TDIP,

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted cooperatively between the U.S. Geological Survey and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The authors thank the operators and staff of the drinking-water-treatment plant for allowing access to their facility and assisting our needs. We also thank Richard Coupe and Gregory Delzer of the U.S. Geological Survey and a anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References (51)

  • K. Reddersen et al.

    Identification and significance of phenazone drugs and their metabolites in ground- and drinking water

    Chemosphere

    (2002)
  • B. Schwab et al.

    Human pharmaceuticals in US surface waters: A human health risk assessment

    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol

    (2005)
  • P. Stackelberg et al.

    Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a conventional drinking-water-treatment plant

    Sci Total Environ

    (2004)
  • P. Stackelberg et al.

    Response to comment on “Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a conventional drinking-water-treatment plant”

    Sci Total Environ

    (2006)
  • C. Zwiener et al.

    Oxidative treatment of pharmaceuticals in water

    Water Res

    (2000)
  • C. Adams et al.

    Removal of antibiotics from surface and distilled water in conventional water treatment processes

    J Environ Eng

    (2002)
  • T. Aizawa et al.

    Chlorination by-products of pesticides in drinking water

    Water Supply

    (1994)
  • M. Bedner et al.

    Transformation of acetaminophen by chlorination produces the toxicants 1,4-benzoquinone and N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine

    ES&T

    (2006)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Third national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals

  • R. Coupe et al.

    Water-soluble pesticides in finished water of community water supplies

    JAWWA

    (2004)
  • C. Daughton

    Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: overarching issues and overview

  • C. Daughton et al.

    Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change?

    Environ Health Perspect

    (1999)
  • M. Deborde et al.

    Aqueous chlorination kinetics of some endocrine disruptors

    ES&T

    (2004)
  • A. Difrancesco et al.

    Dissipation of fragrance materials in sludge-amended soils

    ES&T

    (2004)
  • M. Dodd et al.

    Transformation of the antibacterial agent sulfamethoxazole in reactions with chlorine: kinetics, mechanisms, and pathways

    ES&T

    (2004)
  • Cited by (610)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text