Occurrence and persistence of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its main metabolite in the coastal waters of Southern England

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.07.049Get rights and content

Abstract

The toxicity and persistence of antifouling booster biocides are of major concern. This study reports the occurrence of Irgarol 1051 and its degradation product M1, in coastal waters of Southern England, during 2004–2005. The highest concentrations of Irgarol 1051 were 89 ng/L in water and 45 ng/g dry weight in sediments, with an overall mean (n = 108) of 13 ng/L and 16 ng/g in water and sediments, respectively. As the degradation product of Irgarol 1051, M1 was less widespread, with the highest concentration of 30 ng/L in water and 14 ng/g in sediments, with an overall mean (n = 108) of 5 ng/L and 4 ng/g in water and sediments, respectively. Overall, the concentration of Irgarol 1051 and M1 decreased significantly during the sampling period and in comparison to earlier studies during 2000 to early 2004, indicating that control measures by restricting the use of Irgarol 1051 are effective in reducing its concentrations in coastal waters. The distribution of Irgarol 1051 between sediments and water was significantly related to sediment organic carbon content. In addition, significantly higher concentrations of Irgarol 1051 were detected in paint particles than in sediment. The rate of release of Irgarol 1051 from paint residues is very slow, with a half life of approximately 1 y. Two important findings are emerging, first the importance of organic rich sediments and paint residues as major sites of storage for Irgarol 1051, and secondly Irgarol 1051 may be classified as a persistent organic pollutant due to its long half life.

Introduction

Antifouling paints have long been used in modern shipping industry as they are an effective method of controlling invasive species, from microbes such as algae and bacteria to barnacles and shellfish that may attach themselves to the hull of vessels, thus reducing the speed of the vessels and increasing fuel consumption (Omae, 2003). However, the serious environmental problems caused by the extensive use of tributyltin in antifouling paints, e.g. imposex in dogwhelks, resulted in the introduction of alternative compounds for the protection of ship hulls. Irgarol 1051 (2-methylthio-4-tert-butylamino-6-cyclopropylamino-s-triazine) is one of such substances, which has been used worldwide as an active ingredient for this purpose (Readman et al., 1993, Gough et al., 1994, Tolosa et al., 1996, Zhou et al., 1996, Thomas, 2001). Prior to September 2000, eight organic compounds including Irgarol 1051 were allowed for use in antifouling paints in the UK (Thomas et al., 2002). Since September 2000, as a result of 98/8/ΕΕ directive implementation, restrictions concerning the use of such substances in antifoulants were introduced. According to these restrictions, antifouling paints for use in small vessels are allowed to contain only the substances dichlofluanid, zineb and zinc pyrithione. Irgarol 1051 was approved for use on larger (> 25 m) vessels up to July 2003 (Thomas et al., 2002, Bowman et al., 2003, Cresswell et al., 2006, Gatidou et al., 2007).

Due to the nature and intended purpose of antifouling biocides, they were designed to be highly stable and long lasting in alkaline waters, to ensure they are effective in inhibiting biofouling for months to years. By using a box model, Ranke (2002) estimated that the overall residence time for Irgarol 1051 in the marine systems is over 10 y. If so, Irgarol 1051 can be considered as a persistent organic pollutant (POP). It is therefore not surprising that after Irgarol 1051 has been banned, it can still be detected in marine waters (Bowman et al., 2003, Gardinali et al., 2004, Gatidou et al., 2005, Cresswell et al., 2006, Gatidou et al., 2007) and sediments (Gatidou et al., 2004, Gatidou et al., 2007). Although Irgarol 1051 is not considered to be easily degraded in seawater with a half life of 100–350 d (Thomas et al., 2002, Omae, 2003), several studies (Liu et al., 1997, Okamura, 2002) show that it can be degraded to form its main metabolite M1 (2-methylthio-4-tert-butylamino-s-triazine) through N-dealkylation. Furthermore, M1 has been detected in coastal waters and sediments as a result of natural transformation processes such as photodegradation and biodegradation (Thomas et al., 2000, Thomas et al., 2002, Martinez and Barceló, 2001, Ferrer and Barceló, 2001, Lam et al., 2005, Gatidou et al., 2007). Concentrations of Irgarol 1051 in seawater worldwide vary between non-detectable and low μg/L (Sargent et al., 2000, Biselli et al., 2000, Sakkas et al., 2002, Okamura et al., 2003). Concentrations up to 4.2 μg/L have been detected in coastal areas (Basheer et al., 2002), whereas in the UK the highest concentration observed is 1.4 μg/L (Thomas et al., 2001). In sediment samples concentrations are typically in ng/g range (Albanis et al., 2002, Gatidou et al., 2007) but as high as 1 μg/g have been detected in marinas (Boxall et al., 2000). The levels of M1 are up to 1.9 μg/L (Okamura et al., 2000) and 0.023 μg/g (Gatidou et al., 2007) for seawater and marine sediment respectively, which are generally lower than those of Irgarol 1051 indicating slow degradation rates of the parent compound.

The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence and persistence of Irgarol 1051 and its main degradation product (M1) in coastal waters of Southern England following the restrictions of its use in antifouling paints, by comparing their concentrations against threshold values; assessing their spatial and temporal variations in seawater and sediment; determining the relationship between the physicochemical properties of marine sediment and the concentrations of the target compounds in sediments; and assessing the impacts of paint matrix for affecting the persistence of Irgarol and M1 in marine systems.

Section snippets

Chemicals

Analytical standard of Irgarol 1051 was supplied by Dr. Ehrenstorfer (Germany). M1 was a gift of Ciba-Geigy (NY, USA). Atrazine-d5 from QMX Laboratories (UK) was used as the internal standard. Ultrapure water was prepared in the laboratory with a Maxima HPLC/LS system supplied by ELGA (UK). Stock solutions in methanol were prepared at 1000 mg/L for Irgarol 1051 and M1, and at 500 mg/L for atrazine-d5. The organic solvents dichloromethane, methanol, ethyl acetate and acetone were of

Concentrations of Irgarol 1051 and M1 in seawater

Concentrations of Irgarol 1051 in seawater samples ranged from < 3.1 to 89 ng/L for all sampling sites (Table 1), which are in accordance with those detected in similar environments in the UK and worldwide. The observed mean concentrations of Irgarol 1051 were comparable between harbours such as Shoreham and Newhaven harbours and marina sites such as Brighton Marina (about 10 ng/L), probably due to the fact that the use of Irgarol 1051 in small vessels (< 25 m), likely to be dominating in the

Conclusions

Regular sampling in Southern England has shown the presence of Irgarol 1051 and its metabolite in seawater and marine sediments even after its restricted use in the UK. Some interesting features start to emerge, first the concentrations of both Irgarol 1051 and M1 were decreasing with time, consistent with the banning of Irgarol 1051 since 2000. Such control measures did show a significant effect in reducing the concentration of such biocide in coastal marine waters. Secondly, the

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the Leverhulme Trust (Grant No. F/00230/H) and EU Interreg (Grant No. 162/039/096). The author would like to thank R. Balcomb (Ciba-Geigy) for the gift of M1 standard, and L. Brooks, K. Dauth, A. Wilding and A. Hibberd for help with sampling.

References (36)

Cited by (35)

  • Unusual male size vs sperm count relationships in a coastal marine amphipod indicate reproductive impairment by unknown toxicants

    2021, Aquatic Toxicology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Egg numbers from females collected in Langstone Harbour were also low compared to reference locations and similar to those previously recorded at the polluted site, Inverkeithing (Ford et al., 2003b). Organisms from Tipner in Southern England also had low sperm counts, which are possibly related to a variety of legacy pollutants, since this location has a history of contamination due to boating activity (Zhou, 2008). Interestingly, Inverkeithing and Tipner are both boat breakers yards.

  • Are antifouling residues a matter of concern in the largest South American port?

    2020, Journal of Hazardous Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although not very often, the occurrence of booster biocides associated to APPs has already been reported. Irgarol has been found in APPs (up to 60 ng g−1) obtained in a marina from southern England (Zhou, 2008), while dichlofluanid (<0.01 and 22.1 × 106 ng g−1), Irgarol (<0.01 and 1.15 × 106 ng g−1) and chlorothalonil (<0.01 and 1.17 × 106 ng g−1) were found in APPs from marinas and boatyards from southwest England and Channel Islands (Parks et al., 2010). Recently, Soroldoni et al. (2018) found diuron (<0.1 – 25.3 ng g−1), Irgarol (<0.1 – 3.2 ng g−1) and, specially, DCOIT (<1.5 – 67,100 ng g−1) in APPs from an estuary in Southern Brazil.

  • Antifouling paint particles cause toxicity to benthic organisms: Effects on two species with different feeding modes

    2020, Chemosphere
    Citation Excerpt :

    Studies have reported the occurrence of APPs in water sediments collected near boat maintenance areas and they are associated with increases in biocide and booster biocide concentrations in these samples (Eklund et al., 2014; Soroldoni et al., 2018a; Takahashi et al., 2012; Thomas et al., 2002). High concentrations of metallic elements (e.g. often 1–17% Zn and 1–46% of Cu) (Costa and Wallner-Kersanach, 2013; Jones, 2007; Rees et al., 2014; Simpson et al., 2012a, 2013; Singh and Turner, 2009; Soroldoni et al., 2018a; Takahashi et al., 2012; Turner et al., 2008; Turner, 2013; Turner and Hambling, 2012) and organic biocides (Soroldoni et al., 2018a; Thomas et al., 2003; Zhou, 2008) have been detected in surface sediment samples contaminated by APPs. These findings make this topic extremely important in areas where there are no specific regulations for the disposal of this waste.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text