Elsevier

Science of The Total Environment

Volumes 412–413, 15 December 2011, Pages 203-213
Science of The Total Environment

Sediment-adsorbed total mercury flux through Yolo Bypass, the primary floodway and wetland in the Sacramento Valley, California

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The fate and transport of mercury are of critical concern in lowland floodplains and wetlands worldwide, especially those with a history of upstream mining that increases the mobility of both dissolved and sediment-bound Hg in watersheds. A mass budget of total mercury (THg) quantifies sources and storage for particular areas — knowledge that is required for understanding of management options in lowland floodplains. In order to assess contaminant risk in the largest flood-control bypass, prime wetland, and restoration target in the Sacramento River basin, we estimated empirical relationships between THg, suspended sediment concentration (SSC), and streamflow (Q) for each of the major inputs and outputs using data from various publicly available sources. These relationships were improved by incorporating statistical representations of the dynamics of seasonal and intra-flood exhaustion (hysteresis) of sediment and mercury. Using continuous records of Q to estimate SSC suspended sediment flux and SSC to estimate THg flux, we computed the net transfer of sediment-adsorbed mercury through the Yolo Bypass over a decade, 1993–2003. Flood control weirs spilling Sacramento River floodwaters into the bypass deliver ~ 75% of the water and ~ 50% of the river's suspended sediment load, while one Coast Range tributary of the bypass, Cache Creek, contributes twice the THg load of the mainstem Sacramento. Although estimated sediment flux entering Yolo Bypass is balanced by efflux to the Sacramento/San Francisco Bay-Delta, there is much evidence of deposition and remobilization of sediment in Yolo Bypass during flooding. These factors point to the importance of the bypass as sedimentary reservoir and as an evolving substrate for biogeochemical processing of heavy metals. The estimates of mercury flux suggest net deposition of ~ 500 kg in the 24,000 ha floodway over a decade, dominated by two large floods, representing a storage reservoir for this important contaminant.

Highlights

►A decadal mass balance for Hg was evaluated for a large lowland wetland/floodplain. ►Hg delivery is dominated by one relatively small tributary. ►Individual floods play a disproportionate role in Hg delivery. ►Net Hg deposition over the last decade is ~ 500 kg, but there is much evidence of annual deposition and erosion from Yolo Bypass.

Introduction

Much attention has been paid to mercury sources and sinks in the Sacramento River basin of California, due to the legacy of hydraulic gold mining in the Sierra Nevada and Hg mining in the Coast Ranges, which has created persistent contamination of lowland sediments and food webs (Bouse et al., 2010, Conaway et al., 2007, David et al., 2009, Davis et al., 2008, Domagalski, 2001, Eagles-Smith et al., 2009, Gehrke et al., 2011a, Gehrke et al., 2009, Greenfield et al., 2005, Greenfield and Jahn, 2010, Marvin-DiPasquale et al., 2009, Marvin-DiPasquale et al., 2003, Roth et al., 2001, Rytuba, 2000). However, there is still great uncertainty in the mass balance of total mercury (THg) delivered to and stored in lowland floodplain environments from different source areas. Such estimates are particularly important given that lowland floodplains integrate basinwide delivery of chemical constituents and engender conditions favorable for mercury methylation (Compeau and Bartha, 1985, Gilmour et al., 1992, Marvin-DiPasquale et al., 2003). In this paper, we develop empirical relationships from hydrology, sediment, and mercury data collected by various regional and state programs to evaluate the delivery of THg to a large, engineered floodplain in the Lower Sacramento River basin and its storage over a decade. The work is relevant to contamination of food webs within a biologically productive lowland floodplain ecosystem (Sommer et al., 2001b), as well as to past and future data collection efforts in this region. These will enable better understanding of prevailing and potential contamination risks to Yolo Bypass and Sacramento/San Francisco Bay-Delta food webs. We intend the results of this analysis to augment current understanding of sediment and mercury storage in the Bypass, to clarify the relative importance of the contributing watercourses, and to inform the targeting of efforts to stabilize mercury sources.

Although the Sacramento River watershed contributes an estimated 80% of the THg moving through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay-Delta (Foe, 2003), a region now classified as impaired under the Clean Water Act for excessive levels of mercury and other contaminants (Larry Walker & Associates, 2002), Hg concentrations in water and suspended sediments have been assessed inconsistently in space and time. Data collection campaigns have generally been conducted within particular regions of the basin over short periods. Consequently, generalizations from such data to broader spatial and time scales are ill-defined.

Most previous studies report on a single set of event and/or annual sample data from a particular monitoring program. Estimates from Larry Walker & Associates (LWA) (2002) took advantage of several monitoring programs spanning the years 1992–2000. Mercury concentration estimates from that study were derived from univariate regressions with discharge data, where available. Where no discharge data were available, they used daily values or monthly means from the nearest discharge gauging stations to estimate regressions. There are several potential problems with such an approach. First, THg concentrations can vary significantly for a given flow rate (see LWA (2002), Fig. 2-2b). Second, since the majority of mercury tends to be adsorbed to fine sediment particles (e.g. (Domagalski, 2001, Maurice-Bourgoin et al., 2002)), a direct relationship between flow and mercury would tend to overestimate concentrations in water of the falling limb of the hydrograph if sediment hysteresis occurs (illustrated in Fig. 2-2a from LWA (2002)). Third, monthly mean discharge data dampen flood peaks that are generally responsible for the majority of the sediment/mercury flux (Singer and Aalto, 2009, Singer and Dunne, 2001).

The LWA study (and other shorter term studies) did not estimate Hg concentrations in flow overtopping Fremont Weir. This is an important omission because it is the largest source of flow, sediment, and THg derived Sacramento Basin (Domagalski, 2001, Singer and Aalto, 2009). Overall, there is a lack of long-term analyses on mercury mass balance within the Yolo Bypass, where higher rates of methylation are expected because of the organic carbon-rich, stagnant wetland environments that occur there (Rudd, 1995, Zilloux et al., 1993).

Here we will quantify the relative contributions of each major THg source to the bypass and flux out to the Bay-Delta. The study is intended to build on existing analyses that have assessed mercury in and around Yolo Bypass by providing a longer view based on mass fluxes of water, sediment and THg.

Section snippets

Study area

The Yolo Bypass, 66 km long, is a 24,000 ha conduit for flood flow from Sacramento River, Feather River, Sutter Bypass, Knights Landing Ridge Cut (KLRC), Cache Creek, and Putah Creek before reconnecting with the Sacramento River upstream of the Sacramento/San Francisco Bay-Delta head at Rio Vista (Fig. 1). It has a flow capacity of 14,160 m3 s 1, or 4.5 times that of the lower Sacramento River channel; this capacity has been approximately reached twice in its ~ 80-year history, in February of 1986

Methodology and statistical model

Our estimation approach involved a two-stage regression procedure for estimating SSC and THg at each site. In the first stage, we utilized daily Q records and event-based samples of SSC to estimate a Q-SSC relationship. In the second stage, we modeled THg levels as a function of both Q and SSC. In both stages, estimates at some gauges were improved by using additional hydrologic variables intended to capture hysteresis effects. Using the relationships characterized in both stages, we translated

Results

While our central goal is quantifying the supply or mobilization of Hg within the Bypass over the ten-year period, our approach allows for the estimation of the mass flux of water, sediment and mercury from each of the five sources and through the single outlet over any time scale at or greater than one day. For each water year and for the period as a whole we present mass flux estimates of sediment and mercury flux and their 90% confidence intervals. Mass fluxes for the Sacramento River at

Discussion

Mass flux results from previous studies at our sampled locations are presented in Table 6. For five different previous studies, Table 6 presents the location and time frame of the existing result and compares each reported value to our own. The final column describes how the time frame and location of the original study differs from our own. Various approaches, as described in the introduction, were used in these calculations. In each case, our estimate is at least 16% larger. This result is

Conclusions

We estimate a mass balance of Hg for Yolo Bypass that suggests this lowland floodway is an important compartment for the storage and processing of Hg. Since it is inundated for up to several months a year, Hg stored in this zone may be methylated during anoxic conditions generated by long floods or wet seasons when soil drainage is slow. Mass balance estimates presented here and substantial reworking of deposited sediment-adsorbed Hg identified in prior work (Singer and Aalto, 2009), indicate a

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to many of the individuals at the agencies listed for providing access to their data. We also acknowledge support from the CALFED Bay-Delta Program (Grant 4600002659 to Dunne and Singer) and the National Science Foundation (Grant BCS-0521663 to Singer and Dunne). Part of this research was performed while Singer held a National Research Council Research Associateship Award at USGS Menlo Park.

References (57)

  • C.N. Alpers et al.

    Mercury contamination from historic gold mining in California

    US Geological Survey, Fact Sheet FS-061-00

    (2000)
  • C.N. Alpers et al.

    Mercury contamination from historic gold mining in California

    US Geological Survey, Fact Sheet FS2005-3014

    (2005)
  • R.P. Ashley et al.

    Preliminary report on mercury geochemistry of placer gold dredge tailings, sediments, bedrock, and waters in the Clear Creek Restoration Area, Shasta County, California

  • N.S. Bloom

    On the chemical form of mercury in edible fish and marine invertebrate tissue

    Can J Fish Aquat Sci

    (1992)
  • N.S. Bloom

    Consideration in the analysis of water and fish for mercury

  • R.M. Bouse et al.

    Mercury-contaminated hydraulic mining debris in San Francisco Bay

    San Franc Estuary Watershed Sci J

    (2010)
  • A.J. Bowie

    A Practical Treatise on Hydraulic Mining in California

    (1905)
  • K.Y. Choe et al.

    Distribution of particulate, colloidal, and dissolved mercury in San Francisco Bay estuary. 1. Total mercury

    Limnol Oceanogr

    (2003)
  • K.Y. Choe et al.

    Sediment-water exchange of total mercury and monomethyl mercury in the San Francisco Bay-Delta

    Limnol Oceanogr

    (2004)
  • R. Churchill

    Contributions of mercury to California's environment from mercury and gold mining activities-insights from the historical record

  • G.C. Compeau et al.

    Sulfate-reducing bacteria: Principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment

    Appl Environ Microbiol

    (1985)
  • J. Cooke et al.

    Cache Creek, Bear Creek, and Harley Gulch TMDL for Mercury

    (2004)
  • N. David et al.

    Mercury concentrations and loads in a large river system tributary to San Francisco Bay, California, USA

    Environ Toxicol Chem

    (2009)
  • N. Duan

    Smearing estimate: A nonparametric retransformation method

    J Am Stat Assoc

    (1983)
  • C. Foe

    Mercury mass balance for the freshwater Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay-Delta Estuary

  • C. Foe et al.

    Mercury concentrations and loads from the Sacramento River and from Cache Creek to the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta Estuary

    (1998)
  • G.E. Gehrke et al.

    Mercury isotopic composition of young-of-year fish in San Francisco Bay

  • G.E. Gehrke et al.

    Mercury Isotopes Link Mercury in San Francisco Bay Forage Fish to Surface Sediments

    Environ Sci Technol

    (2011)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Bayhead deltas and shorelines: Insights from modern and ancient examples

      2018, Sedimentary Geology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Bayhead deltas are an important component of estuarine systems. They host expansive wetlands (Nichols et al., 1986; Pasternack and Brush, 2002) and mangroves (do Amaral et al., 2006), link watersheds with estuaries, and provide storage of nutrients, sediments, and pollutants (Abu-Saba and Flegal, 1995; Knight and Pasternack, 2000; Nikanorov et al., 2010; Springborn et al., 2011). They are also host to a number of important cities and industrial centers across the globe including Tokyo, Japan; Melbourne, Australia; Saint Petersberg, Russia; the Port of Houston, Texas; Tampa, Florida; and San Jose, California.

    • Methylmercury degradation and exposure pathways in streams and wetlands impacted by historical mining

      2016, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      MMHg is thought to be produced in situ in Yolo Bypass wetlands (Marvin-DiPasquale et al., 2014), and MMHg bioaccumulation has been documented throughout Yolo Bypass in invertebrates, forage fish and salmonids (Ackerman and Eagles-Smith, 2010; Ackerman et al., 2010; Henery et al., 2010). During floods Yolo Bypass receives water and suspended sediment from Cache Creek and overflow from the Sacramento River (via the Fremont weir) and the Feather River (via Sutter Bypass) (Singer and Aalto, 2009; Springborn et al., 2011), the latter of which drains multiple gold (Au) mining districts in the Sierra Nevada (e.g., Yuba and Bear Rivers; SI Figures 1, 3) (Alpers et al., 2005; James and Singer, 2008; Singer et al., 2016). Consequently, there are multiple potential upstream Hg sources (Coast Range Hg mining and Sierra Nevada Au mining) that might provide a labile source of IHg to Yolo Bypass (Marvin-DiPasquale et al., 2009a; Springborn et al., 2011).

    • The impact of the streamflow hydrograph on sediment supply from terrace erosion

      2015, Geomorphology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Documented concentrations of total Hg in legacy terraces along the Yuba River vary over two orders of magnitude above background values (Singer et al., 2013). Exceedingly high Hg concentrations have also been documented within lowland Sacramento Valley sediments (Hornberger et al., 1999; Springborn et al., 2011) and even in lowland biota and food chains (Greenfield et al., 2005; Eagles-Smith et al., 2009; Greenfield and Jahn, 2010). Much of this Hg appears to emerge from legacy hydraulic mining sediment along the Yuba and other Sierran streams (Bouse et al., 2010; Gehrke et al., 2011; Donovan et al., 2013).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text