Global trends in nitrate leaching research in the 1960–2017 period
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Nitrogen (N) is an essential element for all life process in plants (Hester et al., 1996); it is a structural component of all proteins, including enzymes involved in photosynthesis, growth and development, and is an important component of nucleic acids and chlorophyll (Gianquinto et al., 2013; Lawlor et al., 2001). At the same time, N is one of the major limiting nutrients in most ecosystems and agricultural soils (Vitousek et al., 1997), which commonly contain between 0.1% and 0.6% N in the top 15 cm, depending on the soil type (Cameron et al., 2013). Soil N is present in four major forms: (a) organic matter, such as plant material, fungi and humus; (b) soil organisms and microorganisms; (c) ammonium ions (NH4+) held by clay minerals and organic matter, and (d) mineral N forms in soil solution, including NH4+, nitrate (NO3−) and low concentrations of nitrite (NO2−) (Cameron et al., 2013; Hester et al., 1996). However, any N in the soil that is available to plants is likely to be present as NO3−, or as NH4+, which microbes of the soil soon convert to NO3− (Hester et al., 1996). Mineral N forms are mainly prone to losses through: (a) ammonia (NH3) volatilization (i.e., the loss of gaseous NH3 from the soil surface), (b) denitrification and gaseous losses of nitrogen (mainly as dinitrogen gas (N2) and nitrous oxide (N2O)), and (c) leaching (i.e. removal in drainage water) (Cameron et al., 2013; Gillette et al., 2018). Nitrogen losses by leaching occur mainly in the NO3− form but some leaching of NH4+ may occur in sandy soils (Moreno et al., 1996). It is leaching of the NO3− anion that is analyzed in this article.
Fig. 1 summarizes the nitrogen cycle and the nitrate leaching process, whereby the NO3− anion moves downwards in the soil profile with soil water (Gianquinto et al., 2013; Hester et al., 1996). Nitrate is completely soluble in water and is prone to be leached, because the negatively-charged NO3− anion is repelled by negatively charged surfaces of clay minerals and soil organic matter. This keeps nitrate dissolved in the soil solution and moves freely in the soil by percolating rainfall or irrigation (Gianquinto et al., 2013; Hester et al., 1996).
Nitrate leaching is commonly associated with chemical fertilizers used in agricultural crops (Cameron et al., 2013; Fowler et al., 2013; Lemaire and Gastal, 1997; Pratt, 1984), but some of the soil nitrate that is vulnerable to leaching is produced by microbes that break down plant residues and other nitrogen-containing residues in the soil (Hester et al., 1996). Localized sources of nitrate leaching can be animal organic waste effluents; some of these being dairy shed effluent, dairy pond sludge, pig slurry or sewage sludge (Di and Cameron, 2002; Power and Schepers, 1989). Published data indicate that nitrate leaching losses typically would follow the order: forests < cut grassland < grazed pastures < arable cropping < ploughing of pastures < horticultural and vegetable crops (Cameron et al., 2013; Di and Cameron, 2002). Nitrate leaching losses are generally lowest from forest systems because there is usually zero or only low rates of N fertilizer applied, and the N is cycled efficiently through the forest ecosystem (Di and Cameron, 2002). However, logging and burning of forests can release large amounts of N that can be leached or washed off slopes through soil erosion (Cameron et al., 2013). In grassland systems, NO3− comes from fertilizers (i.e., mineral or urea-based fertilizers) or from mineralization of soil organic N. Grasslands that are mown or cut for hay or silage have very low nitrate leaching losses, because grass and pasture plants are usually very efficient at taking up the N applied in fertilizer or N fixed by legumes such as clovers that are grown in the pasture sward (Cameron et al., 2013). The nitrate leaching potential increases when grassland is grazed rather than harvested. This is because a large proportion of the N ingested by the grazing animals is excreted back to the soil in the small concentrated areas of urine and dung patches (Minet et al., 2018). However, the low animal stocking density of extensive systems means that the whole of the grazed field is not covered by urine patches (Cichota et al., 2018). The overall nitrate leaching loss is thus somewhat diluted by the lower leaching loss from the inter-urine patch areas (Cameron et al., 2013). Nitrate leaching losses are generally greatest from horticultural crops because of the higher rates of N fertilizer that are used in these crops, the shallow root systems of horticultural plants and the low nutrient use efficiency (Fereres and Goldhamer, 2003; Goulding, 2006; Meisinger et al., 2008; Pratt, 1984; Thompson et al., 2007b). Indeed, intensive vegetable production systems are commonly associated with significant nitrate leaching loss worldwide (Goulding, 2006; Min et al., 2011; Ramos et al., 2002; Thompson et al., 2017; Zotarelli et al., 2007).
Nitrate leaching losses from soil into water not only represent a loss of soil fertility but also represent a threat to the environment and to human health (Cameron et al., 2013; Hester et al., 1996; Watanabe et al., 2018). Nitrate leaching from different sources and contamination of surface and ground water is a global phenomenon (Ju et al., 2006; Prakasa Rao and Puttanna, 2006; Pulido-Bosch et al., 2000). Nitrate that enters rivers or lakes can contribute to eutrophication, which may result in algae blooms and loss of fish (Cameron et al., 2013). A critical factor related to nitrate leaching from irrigated lands is the subsequent use of drainage waters or waters composed significantly of drainage waters. The problem of nitrate leaching to groundwaters is naturally more crucial in areas where high-value crops with high water and high N demands are grown and where municipalities and irrigation districts are both using the underground supplies (Pratt, 1984). In addition, there is a public concern about nitrate as a health hazard (Hester et al., 1996). This arises from two medical conditions that have been linked to nitrate: methaemoglobinaemia (or the ‘blue-baby syndrome’) in infants, and stomach cancer in adults. Both are serious conditions that are not caused by NO3− itself, but by the reduction of NO3− to NO2−; nitrate itself seems to be harmless (Hester et al., 1996).
Methaemoglobinaernia or the ‘blue-baby syndrome’ can occur when an infant ingests too much NO3− in drinking water. Microbes in the stomach convert NO3− to NO2−and when this reaches the blood-stream it reacts with the haemoglobin. Normal oxyhaemoglobin becomes methaemoglobin, greatly lessening the capacity of the blood to carry oxygen (Hester et al., 1996). A link between stomach cancer and NO3− consumption in drinking water has been suggested (Hester et al., 1996). Nitrite produced from reduction of NO3− could react in the stomach with a secondary amine coming from the breakdown of meat or other protein, to produce an N-nitroso compound. The N-nitroso compounds are carcinogenic, so the reaction could result in stomach cancer (Hester et al., 1996).
Nitrogen fertilizers are commonly required in large amounts in modern agriculture to guarantee high crop yields (Fowler et al., 2013; Lemaire and Gastal, 1997). However, only part of the N applied is recovered by crops (Ter Steege et al., 2001; Vitousek et al., 2009), and much of the excess is lost as nitrate leaching beyond the rooting zone. Traditionally, a secure fertilization strategy, based on application of N quantities larger than those strictly required for maximum yield, was used to ensure profit (Thompson et al., 2007b). However, this secure fertilization strategy cannot be longer used (Lawlor et al., 2001). Protection of the environment and improved N management become a necessary constraint for sustainable agriculture (Ter Steege et al., 2001). Solving the problem of nitrate leaching starts with the optimization of N fertilization with respect to the plant demand and the soil supply capacity (Agostini et al., 2010; Ju et al., 2009; Neeteson et al., 1999; Ter Steege et al., 2001). The surest way of avoiding nitrate leaching is to ensure that as little NO3− as possible is in the soil at any time (Hester et al., 1996). However, nitrate leaching is not only related to N inputs but also to the interaction between N processes and the water balance in the soil (Moreno et al., 1996; Pratt, 1984; Ter Steege et al., 2001). In fact, nitrate leaching is mainly determined by NO3− concentration in the soil during the drainage period (Cameron et al., 2013; Ter Steege et al., 2001) and the amount of water that moves through the soil (Cameron et al., 2013; Pratt, 1984). With the exception of a few areas where irrigation waters are almost salt-free, irrigated lands must be leached periodically to maintain the rooting zone free of excessive soluble salts (Moreno et al., 1996; Pratt, 1984). In many areas leaching takes place as a result of rains; in some areas the rainfall is so small or so erratic that management must provide sufficient irrigation water to leach the soil profile. In irrigated lands, the leaching process is a result of the combination of relatively large inputs of N and ample irrigation that move drainage waters beyond the root zone (Pratt, 1984).
In addition to soil NO3− concentration and drainage volume, many other factors such as the nature of the crops, the type of soils or the cropping techniques are also responsible for the nitrate leaching potential (Di and Cameron, 2002; Pratt, 1984; Ter Steege et al., 2001). Soil properties have an influence on the nitrate leaching because they affect how the water is moved. The nitrate leaching losses are usually less from fine-textured soils than from coarse-textured soils, because of slower drainage and greater potential for denitrification (Di and Cameron, 2002). The depth of the vadose zone, i.e. the part of the soil that comprises the unsaturated zone beyond the roots and above the groundwater or zone of saturation, is also an important factor, with nitrate reaching the groundwater quicker in shallow soils than in deep soils (Di and Cameron, 2002).
Concerns over human health and environmental impact associated with nitrate leaching have prompted social and political pressure to reduce contamination of water bodies with nitrate originating from agriculture. For example, in the European Union (EU), two pieces of legislation, the Nitrate Directive 91/676/EEC (EEC, 1991) and the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC (Council of the European Communities, 2000), require all farmers in areas sensitive to nitrate leaching, to adopt improved N management practices. Several organizations have set NO3− concentration limits for drinkable water: the World Health Organization and the EU imposes a limit of 50 mg L−1 (EEC, 1991; World Health Organization, 2011), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 2007) and the Water and Air Quality Bureau of Canada (Health Canada, 2013) set the limit at 45 mg L−1.
Scientific publication is the end product of research activity. The scientific productivity of researchers can be assessed by a quantitative and qualitative description of their production. This in turn can be extended to the institutions and countries to which they belong. For bibliometric analysis, extensive bibliographic information is required (Hood and Wilson, 2001; King, 1987). A bibliographic database is usually used for this purpose (Rojas-Sola and Aguilera-García, 2015). These databases are made up of a set of records with bibliographic information (author, title, name of the source, date of publication, keywords, citations). Bibliometric studies consists of the use of tools and methodologies aiming at analyzing scientific production and trends in a research area (Cobo et al., 2015). Thanks to these tools it is possible to identify trending topics since the development of the research field and assess the current state of research, as well as the contributions of institutions and countries in the given field.
The present bibliometric study aims to analyze global perspectives in nitrate leaching research in the 1960–2017 period using the Scopus database. The existence of two major databases, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and Scopus (Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands), poses the important question of the comparison and stability of statistics compiled from different data sources (Salmerón-Manzano and Manzano-Agugliaro, 2017). The overlap between databases and the impact of using different data sources for specific fields of research on bibliometric indicators has been measured by several research studies, revealing a greater number of journals indexed by Scopus when compared to Web of Science (Mongeon and Paul-Hus, 2016). With respect to the overlap, 84% of Web of Science titles are also indexed in Scopus, while only 54% of Scopus titles are indexed in Web of Science (Gavel and Iselid, 2008).
Section snippets
Material and methods
Because of its wider coverage (Gavel and Iselid, 2008; Mongeon and Paul-Hus, 2016), the Scopus database was selected in the present work. A complete search of Scopus was performed using the key to search the subfields of: Title, abstract and keywords, to identify publications that address the issue of nitrate leaching. The search was made to the whole data series available, that is, in the last 57 years, from 1960 to 2017. For a complete search of nitrate leaching terms, the exact query was:
Temporal evolution of scientific output
A total of 8798 documents with “nitrate leaching” term in the title, abstract or keywords were found in the Scopus database in the 1960–2017 period. The number of documents on this topic has grown since 1960 until nowadays, following a quadratic function in the form y = 0.172x2 – 1.676x + 3.075 (R2 = 0.98; Fig. 2). In the first ten years of the period, 1960–1969, an average of four documents on nitrate leaching were published per year, but the number of documents published per year nearly
Concluding remarks
Nitrate leaching is the process whereby the nitrate anion moves downwards in the soil profile with soil water. It is commonly associated with chemical fertilizers used in agriculture and by emission in localized sources. Nitrate leaching losses from soil into water not only represent a loss of soil fertility but also a threat to the environment and to human health. Nitrate leaching is a global phenomenon that has prompted social and political pressure to reduce nitrate leaching and
Acknowledgments
FMP was supported by a Ramón y Cajal grant (RYC-2014-15815) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.
References (58)
- et al.
A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model
J. Hydrol.
(2015) - et al.
Nitrate leaching in intensive agriculture in Northern France: effect of farming practices, soils and crop rotations
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2005) - et al.
An improved water footprint methodology linking global consumption to local water resources: a case of Spanish tomatoes
J. Environ. Manag.
(2009) - et al.
Analysis of keyword networks in MIS research and implications for predicting knowledge evolution
Inf. Manag.
(2011) - et al.
Lateral spread affects nitrogen leaching from urine patches
Sci. Total Environ.
(2018) - et al.
25 years at knowledge-based systems: a bibliometric analysis
Knowl.-Based Syst.
(2015) - et al.
Simulation of transpiration, drainage, N uptake, nitrate leaching, and N uptake concentration in tomato grown in open substrate
Agric. Water Manag.
(2009) - et al.
N loss to drain flow and N2O emissions from a corn-soybean rotation with winter rye
Sci. Total Environ.
(2018) - et al.
Nitrogen balance and groundwater nitrate contamination: comparison among three intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain
Environ. Pollut.
(2006) - et al.
Changes in the soil environment from excessive application of fertilizers and manures to two contrasting intensive cropping systems on the North China Plain
Environ. Pollut.
(2007)
Nitrogen balance and loss in a greenhouse vegetable system in Southeastern China
Pedosphere
Feeding dicyandiamide (DCD) to cattle: an effective method to reduce N2O emissions from urine patches in a heavy-textured soil under temperate climatic conditions
Sci. Total Environ.
A fast method for identifying worldwide scientific collaborations using the Scopus database
Telematics Inform.
Nitrate contamination of groundwater in North America
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
Nitrate leaching in important horticultural crops of the Valencian Community region (Spain)
Environ. Pollut.
No-till in northern, western and south-western Europe: a review of problems and opportunities for crop production and the environment
Soil Tillage Res.
Identification of irrigation and N management practices that contribute to nitrate leaching loss from an intensive vegetable production system by use of a comprehensive survey
Agric. Water Manag.
Coniferous coverage as well as catchment steepness influences local stream nitrate concentrations within a nitrogen-saturated forest in central Japan
Sci. Total Environ.
Decreasing nitrate leaching in vegetable crops with better N management
Nitrate-nitrogen in tile drainage as affected by fertilization
J. Environ. Qual.
Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review
Ann. Appl. Biol.
Council directive 2000/60/EC establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy
Off. J. Eur. Union
Nitrogen balance in and export from an agricultural watershed
J. Environ. Qual.
Worldwide research on energy efficiency and sustainability in public buildings
Sustainability
Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies
Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst.
Concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources
Off. J. Eur. Commun. L
Nitrates and Nitrites
Irrigation water management of horticultural crops
Hortscience
The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first century
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.
Cited by (164)
Deep-learning architecture for PM<inf>2.5</inf> concentration prediction: A review
2024, Environmental Science and EcotechnologyDeciphering the research of Micro(nano)plastics: An in-depth bibliometric expedition into ecotoxicological impacts and research trends
2024, TrAC - Trends in Analytical ChemistrySimultaneous remediation of diesel-polluted soil and promoted ryegrass growth by non-thermal plasma pretreatment
2024, Science of the Total EnvironmentThe environmental and socioeconomic benefits of optimized fertilization for greenhouse vegetables
2024, Science of the Total EnvironmentWhen graphene meets circular agriculture: Insights into agricultural sustainable development
2024, Biosystems Engineering