Elsevier

Scripta Materialia

Volume 62, Issue 12, June 2010, Pages 889-893
Scripta Materialia

Viewpoint Paper
Triple lines in materials science and engineering

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.02.020Get rights and content

Abstract

We assess the impact of triple lines in materials preparation and use by considering several examples of materials behavior in which they have identifiable effects. The microstructural roles of triple lines are also considered and some persistent scientific questions are raised.

Introduction

Research on surfaces and interfaces in materials emerged throughout the twentieth century as an extension of the study of uniform solid and liquid phases. The study of triple lines is a natural extension of the study of surfaces and interfaces.

Condensed phases have often been studied using theoretical formulations that assume specimens that have infinite extent. Crystallographic analysis is only one simple case in point: a crystal lattice, by definition, is infinite in all directions. Real crystals, however, have surfaces and interfaces, and the properties of these crystallographic “defects” can have profound influences on the properties and behavior of the materials. The electronic and optical properties, chemical homogeneity, mechanical behavior, kinetics and even the shape of a piece of material are all affected by its surfaces and internal interfaces. Research on surfaces and interfaces has been driven by the need to understand their behavior, in order to understand real materials.

In many cases, particularly for internal grain boundaries, early theoretical treatments were also based upon structures that extend infinitely in two dimensions. The classic Read–Shockley model for grain boundary energy, for example, produces simple results only if the periodic grain boundary structure is infinite [1]. Computer simulation algorithms are almost always constructed to mimic infinitely extended interfaces by means of computational cells with periodic boundary conditions. Finite boundaries are rather more complicated to deal with [2], but just as a crystal must be bounded by surfaces or grain boundaries, a surface or an interface must either close upon itself or be bounded by triple lines. If those triple lines have anything more than trivial properties, then they can affect the behavior of the interfaces that they bound.

One view of the “materials science” approach to understanding the properties of condensed matter is that it starts with infinite continuum theoretical treatments, then adds the effects of surfaces, interfaces and other imperfections. In this paper, and this colloquium, we will explore cases in which triple lines exert influence upon the interfaces to which they are connected, and thus affect the properties of their host materials.

Section snippets

Practical effects and uses of triple lines

Triple junctions have direct impacts on the uses and applications of certain engineering materials. Some of these are described here, to set the stage for a description of their effects on materials processing, eventually leading to the basic science of triple lines.

The most familiar effects associated with triple lines relate to wetting and dewetting, where the contact angles between three phases are related to the effective interfacial energies, according to the Herring equation:i=13γiτi+i=1

Impacts of triple lines on materials behavior

Triple lines have a number of impacts on materials behaviors that are of greater interest to materials scientists than to the engineers who need to use the materials. In the following aspects of triple line behavior, their impacts on the internal processes of polycrystalline materials are the particular focus.

One of the earliest studies of triple junctions in materials was the analysis of the groove formed at the intersection of a grain boundary with a surface [12]. The shape of the surface

Understanding triple lines

Materials with nanoscaled microstructures tend to magnify the importance of triple lines, which represent an increasing fraction of the volume of the material as size decreases, as indicated in Figure 5 [28], [29]. It is probably misleading, however, to assign importance based upon the volume fraction: grain boundaries represent a very small volume fraction at conventional grain sizes, but their influence is still unmistakable. Similarly, Gottstein and Shvindlerman [30] have shown that, even

Summarizing remarks

Despite their evident impact upon the science and engineering of materials – especially of polycrystalline materials – the specific behaviors of triple lines remain relatively poorly studied. Several basic properties remain unknown, and research directed specifically at understanding triple lines is still very much in its infancy.

Acknowledgement

The author acknowledges the support of the Ames Laboratory, which is operated by Iowa State University of Science and Technology for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11358.

References (39)

  • K. Landry et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (1997)
  • H. Kim et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2009)
  • F.Y. Genin

    Acta Metall. Mater.

    (1995)
  • W.W. Mullins

    Acta Metall.

    (1958)
  • G. Gottstein et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2000)
  • B. Bokstein et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2001)
  • T.P. Swiler et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (1997)
  • K. Owusu-Boahen et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2001)
  • F. Lefevre-Schlick et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (2009)
  • G. Palumbo et al.

    Scr. Metall. Materialia

    (1990)
  • G. Gottstein et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2002)
  • S. Shekhar et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2008)
  • S.G. Srinivasan et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (1999)
  • W.T. Read et al.

    Phys. Rev.

    (1950)
  • A.H. King et al.

    Mater. Sci. Forum

    (1995)
  • C. Herring
  • J.A. Howarter et al.

    Macromol. Rapid Commun.

    (2008)
  • J. Xu et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2006)
  • C.W. Extrand

    Langmuir

    (2002)
  • Cited by (37)

    • Effects of coherency strain on structure and migration of a coherent grain boundary in Cu

      2019, Materials Characterization
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is tacitly accepted that these driving forces apply whether a GB is incoherent or coherent. In a polycrystal, GBs are connected to each other through triple lines and quadruple points and thus the migration of a GB will influence that of others [4–7]. A polycrystal is thus regarded as a network of GBs, either incoherent or coherent.

    • Study the grain boundary triple junction segregation of phosphorus in a nickel-base alloy using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy on a transmission electron microscope

      2019, Materials Characterization
      Citation Excerpt :

      Compared with GB segregation, segregation of P to GB triple junctions (TJs) has rarely been reported [8]. TJs, as line defects in their own right with specific kinetic and thermodynamic properties, have received some attentions recently [9,10]. They can act as fast diffusion path due to the larger free volume compared with grain boundary, which has been confirmed by diffusion experiments and molecular dynamics modeling [10–14].

    • Embedded-atom study of grain boundary segregation and grain boundary free energy in nanosized iron–chromium tricrystals

      2018, Acta Materialia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since the GBs terminate with a disproportionately high density of segregation sites at the TJ (red structural units in Fig. 4(b)), these additional sites of iron now translate into a negative value for the TJ excess, as can be seen for the lower temperatures from 600 K to 800 K on the chromium-rich side in Fig. 11. We want to mention that this effect is a unique feature of this particular TJ [34]. Certainly, it does depend on the actual structure of the considered TJ and joining GBs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text