Gender, religion and happiness

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.07.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Using an infrequently used sample of 60 countries this paper attempts to gauge the importance of religion and gender on the levels of happiness across countries, after controlling for a set of quality of life variables. The results suggest that both religion which is represented by the degree of religious fractionalization, and gender as represented by the percentage of women in parliament, have important effects on the degree of happiness. Specifically the paper finds that higher levels of religious fractionalization reduce happiness, but greater representation of women in parliament robustly increase happiness levels.

Introduction

The recent recognition among economists about the important potential linkages between the degree of happiness exhibited by a country's population and economic outcomes has resulted in a growing stream of research that has been usefully summarized in Frey and Stutzer (2002). These studies broadly confirm the important ways happiness is intertwined with labor market outcomes (Clark et al., 2001), inflation and unemployment (Di Tella et al., 2001), mental health (Murphy and Athanasou, 1999), productivity (Veenhoven, 1988), marriage and divorce and therefore poverty levels (Veenhoven, 1988), suicide rates and resulting lost output (Koivumaa-Honkanen et al., 2001), crime and social unrest (Myers, 2000), income (Easterlin, 1995, Easterlin, 2001a), income inequality (Alesina et al., 2001) and overall economic performance (Oswald, 1997), to name a few. Thus raising levels of societal happiness has come to be viewed as an important goal of policymakers.1 But raising levels of happiness in turn require an understanding of the factors that significantly impact the levels of happiness. This paper is an attempt to contribute to this growing body of literature. Specifically the paper uses happiness survey data for a group of 60 countries, and assesses the important role that quality of life variables play in determining the level of happiness. In addition and uniquely the paper goes a step further by attempting to gauge the contribution of religion and gender to levels of happiness. To the best of our knowledge no other paper has attempted to do this.

The exploration of the nexus between happiness levels and religion is motivated by recent research which point to important ways in which religion impacts economic growth and development and thereby income and presumably has the potential to impact happiness levels (Guiso et al., 2003, Barro and McCleary, 2001). In addition the role of gender has been highlighted in recent literature because gender has been found to improve service delivery and governance infrastructure across countries which has the potential to raise happiness levels (Mookerjee, 2002).

Our results confirm that both religion and gender have important effects on the level of happiness across countries in our sample. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we discuss the variables used to proxy for quality of life, religion and gender. In Section 3 we present the model to be estimated with a discussion of the happiness data. In Section 4 we discuss the empirical results with an eye towards distinguishing between statistical significance and economic significance as noted by (McCloskey and Ziliak, 1996). Section 5 contains some concluding remarks.

Section snippets

Variable selection

Several variables are used as a proxy for the quality of life across countries. The quality of life factors chosen include the human development index (HDI), the Gastil Index of Civil Liberty (Gastil Index), and Index of Economic Freedom (Economic Freedom), the Gini Coefficient of Income Inequality (Gini), the Corruption Perceptions Index (Corruption). To explore the relationship between religion and happiness we use an index of religious fragmentation (Religious Fragmentation). Gender is

The model

To test our hypothesis that the level of happiness across countries is influenced by a set of quality of life variables together with religion and gender as discussed in the previous section, we employ cross sectional analysis. Specifically, the degree of happiness in each country is regressed on our measure of religion and gender and the set of quality of life variables. The equation estimated takes the following form:degreeofhappinessi=α0+α1qualityoflifei+α2religioni+α3genderi+εi

where,

Empirical results

Equations 1–6 in Table 2 present the empirical results. All the equations are run with a dummy variable to represent different continents and capture any systematic differences in happiness levels due to location specific factors. However, the continental dummy was found to be always insignificant so we do not report the coefficients in Table 2.6

Conclusion

Using a sample of 60 countries – industrialized and developing – we document several interesting findings. First we show that indeed both religion and gender have important linkages to the level of happiness in a country. Specifically we document that greater levels of religious diversity, as measured by an index of religious fragmentation, reduces the level of happiness. Second our results strongly support a finding that greater participation by women in politics is justified. Third our

Acknowledgement

We wish to thank an anonymous referee for comments that have substantially improved the paper.

References (36)

  • R.A. Easterlin

    Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?

    Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

    (1995)
  • R.A. Easterlin

    Subjective well being and economic analysis: a brief introduction

    Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

    (2001)
  • J.G. Montalvo et al.

    Religious polarization and economic development

    Economic Letters

    (2003)
  • Alesina, A., Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R., 2001. Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different?...
  • Anckar, C., Eriksson, M., 1998. Measuring Ethnic and Religious Diversity. Abo Akademi University, Occasional Paper...
  • Barro, R.J., McCleary, R.M., 2001. Religion, Economy, and Society in an International Panel. Prepared for...
  • T. Beasley et al.

    Political institutions and policy choices: evidence from the United States

    Journal of Economic Literature

    (2003)
  • Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., 2001. Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from an India wide Randomized Policy Experiment,...
  • A.E. Clark et al.

    Scarring: the psychological impact of past unemployment

    Economica

    (2001)
  • R.A. Cummins

    On the trail of the gold standard for life satisfaction

    Social Indicators Research

    (1995)
  • R.A. Cummins

    The second approximation to an international standard for life satisfaction

    Social Indicators Research

    (1998)
  • R. Di Tella et al.

    Preferences over inflation and unemployment: evidence from surveys of happiness

    American Economic Review

    (2001)
  • R.A. Easterlin

    Income and happiness: towards a unified theory

    The Economic Journal

    (2001)
  • Fraser Institute, 2000. Economic Freedom Data,...
  • Freedom House, 2000. Gastil Index,...
  • B.S. Frey et al.

    What can economists learn from happiness research?

    Journal of Economic Literature

    (2002)
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., 2003. People's opium? Religion and economic attitudes. Journal of Monetary...
  • L.R. Iannaccone et al.

    Deregulating religion: The economics of church and state

    Economic Inquiry

    (1997)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text