The global reproductive health market: U.S. media framings and public discourses about transnational surrogacy
Highlights
► First empirical study of recent U.S. media coverage of surrogacy. ► Analyzes competing frames of “exploitation” versus “opportunity” about the global surrogacy industry. ► Exposes contrasting discourses of “gendered altruism” and “gendered empowerment” depending on surrogate’s location.
Introduction
In the 1980s, the U.S. public and the world-at-large were introduced to a new reproductive health practice – surrogacy – via a deluge of media coverage of the Baby M custody case. The novelty of the issue produced unparalleled attention to the topic during this custody trial. Since then there’s been a waxing and waning of news coverage over the years, with no one news outlet ever spending too much time on the issue, nor any one specific storyline receiving the widespread coverage that the Baby M case did (see Markens, 2007). Meanwhile, the use of surrogate mothers in the U.S. has seemingly become “normalized” in the mass media as witnessed by news reports of celebrities, from Ricky Martin to Sarah Jessica Parker, hiring surrogates to have children, as well as the visibility of entertainment storylines about surrogacy from the hit television sitcom Friends in the late 1990s to the mainstream Hollywood feature film Baby Mama in 2008.
However, in the beginning of the 21st century a new “dramatic story” about surrogacy emerged that brought renewed attention to the topic as a social problem and a public/health policy issue. Between 2006 and 2010 reports of a growing global surrogacy industry in India appeared in most mainstream U.S. media outlets from the Los Angeles Times, Washington Post, USA Today, New York Times, Boston Globe, Wall Street Journal and Huffington Post to MSNBC, CBS News, CNN, ABC News, and The Oprah Winfrey show (CBSNews.com, 2007, Chu, 2006, CNN.com, 2008, Cohen, 2009, Dolnick, 2007, Gentleman, 2008, Goodman, 2008, Kohl, 2007, MSNBC.com, 2007, Mukhergee, 2007, The Oprah Winfrey Show, 2006, Ward, 2010). Concurrently, several mainstream media outlets published stories on surrogacy with a focus on U.S. military wives who were surrogates (e.g., Hennessy-Fiske, 2009, James, 2008, Nosheen and Schellmann, 2010, Rodrigues and Meyersohn, 2010). Thus, as the first decade of the 21st century came to a close, the topic of surrogate motherhood seemed once again prevalent in the American press. For instance, one Wall Street Journal online columnist wrote: “The last time surrogate motherhood made these kinds of headlines was during the famous ‘Baby M’ case of the late 1980s” (Miller, 2008), while a Hartford Courant article focused on why “the practice of surrogacy has emerged again as a media preoccupation” (Klimkiewicz, 2008). Given this ostensibly renewed media fascination with surrogacy, and in particular the new storylines about the Indian surrogacy industry as well as surrogates who are military wives, this paper asks: What cultural assumptions about gender, family and the global reproductive health market are revealed in current U.S. media coverage of and public discourses about surrogacy?
Why focus on the media in order to understand contemporary manifestations and understandings of surrogacy arrangements? As an extensive body of research has shown, the media is an important claims-maker to the extent that they choose what events to report, and the amount of coverage given to any specific issue (e.g., Gans, 1979, McCombs and Shaw, 1972, Tuchman, 1978). Research has also found that the lay public receives much of its information about health issues from the news (Brodie et al., 2003, Gollust and Lantz, 2009). This should be particularly so for surrogacy, a reproductive practice with which very few have direct experience. The public is thus only aware of the issue of surrogate parenting as a “social problem” because the media reports on it; at the same time, the public’s views of surrogacy are shaped by the “dramatic stories” and frames used to tell stories about it (Markens, 2007).
This study draws on constructivist approaches to social problems (Best, 1991, Hilgartner and Bosk, 1988, Spector and Kitsuse, 1977), and in particular framing analysis (e.g., Entman, 1993, Gamson, 1988, Gamson, 1992, Hilgartner and Bosk, 1988) in order to analyze the discursive contests over the meaning of the global surrogacy industry as “different ways of framing the situation may compete to be accepted as an authoritative version of reality” (Hilgartner & Bosk, 1988, p. 58). Framing involves the rhetorical tools and definitional activities that tell a particular story about an issue by emphasizing certain aspects over others (Entman, 1993, Gamson, 1992). As Gamson (1988) writes: “The frame suggests what the issue is about. It answers the question, ‘what is the basic source of controversy or concern on this issue’?”(p. 165). A focus on the media frames used to tell stories about this relatively rare type of reproductive/medical tourism is therefore important in as much as it could influence public perceptions and political reactions, if any, to the global reproductive surrogacy industry. As Sarah Franklin (1993) writes, “dominant cultural representations…have become key sites of struggle over the meanings through which reproductive politics are defined” (p. 524). At the same time, an analysis of media frames also reveals what ideas resonate in the public sphere (Ferree, 2003), and thus provides a useful window to the larger cultural assumptions that shape debates about surrogacy.
Section snippets
Feminist perspectives on surrogacy, assisted reproductive technologies and the media
The topic of surrogate motherhood garnered the attention of feminists when the issue entered the public arena in the 1980s. Early feminist critiques of surrogacy ranged from concern about the further medical/male control of women’s bodies, the creation of reproductive prostitution, and the exaltation/reinforcement of genetic kinship ties to the commodification of reproduction/motherhood and the exploitation of poor women and women of color (Arditti et al., 1984, Corea, 1985, Corea et al., 1987,
Data and methods
The data for this study consists of recent U.S. media coverage of surrogacy. This paper focuses on three prominent media accounts published in 2008. Two of these media stories are from the New York Times (hereafter NYT). In 2008 the NYT book-ended the year with two pieces on the topic. On January 3rd, Judith Warner, in her online weekly column, wrote a blog titled “Outsourced Wombs” about the surrogacy industry in India. On November 30th, the NYT Sunday magazine front page feature story by Alex
The globalization of (reproductive) labor: exploitation or opportunity?
As noted, a lot of the recent American media attention to surrogacy has focused on the growing surrogacy industry in India. In the NYT alone, between 2006 and 2010, this includes a Nicholas Kristof op-ed in 2007, Judith Warner’s 2008 blog, a news feature in March 2008, and in 2010 a substantive review of an HBO2 documentary as well as a Freakonomics blog (Bellafante, 2010, Freakonomics, 2010, Gentleman, 2008, Kristof, 2007, Warner, 2008). As with reactions to the globalization of labor more
Discussion
The findings presented here contribute an often-lacking intersectional analysis to studies not only of surrogacy, but to studies of ARTs and women’s health/bodies/gametes more broadly. By examining the contradictions around who constitutes a “good (surrogate) mother,” and in particular whose bodies and reproductive capacities can and cannot be commodified, this study shows that mothering/reproductive work is judged differently depending on the social/physical location of the woman concerned.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Kristen Springer for originally encouraging me to participate in this Special Issue on Gender & Health, as well as the editors of the Special Issue, particularly Olena Hankivsky, for comments and support on earlier versions of the paper. Additionally, I acknowledge the support of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholars Program Working Group on Gender and Health at Columbia University. I would also like to thank the Special Issue workshop participants
References (113)
- et al.
Communicating population health: print news media coverage of type 2 diabetes
Social Science & Medicine
(2009) Do muslim women really need saving? Anthropological reflections on cultural relativism and its others
American Anthropologist
(2002)- et al.
The curious lives of surrogates
Newsweek
(April 7, 2008) Selling genes, selling gender: egg agencies, sperm banks, and the medical market in genetic material
American Sociological Review
(2007)Surrogacy wars
California Lawyer
(1992)Surrogacy: for love but not money?
Gender & Society
(1992)The elusive embryo: How women and men approach new reproductive technologies
(2000)- et al.
Abortion, race, and gender in nineteenth century America
American Sociological Review
(2004) Surrogate pregnancy goes global
New York Times
(July 15, 2010)
Surrogate losses: understandings of pregnancy loss and assisted reproduction among surrogate mothers
Medical Anthropology Quarterly
“Road Warriors” on “Hair-Trigger Highways”: cultural resources and the media’s construction of the 1987 freeway shooting problem
Sociological Inquiry
Interactivity and online newspapers: a case study of discussion boards
Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies
Contested surrogacy and the gender order: an Israeli case study
Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies
Discourses of “Forced Sterilization” in Puerto Rico: the problem with the speaking subaltern differences
A Journal of Feminist Culture Studies
Mother, child, race, nation: the visual iconography of rescue and the politics of transnational and transracial adoption
Gender & History
Health news and the American public, 1996–2002
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Much has changed in surrogate pregnancies
New York Times
Obama, W.H. woo the Gray Lady
Politco
Wombs for rent, cheap
Los Angeles Times
A legal puzzle: can a baby have three biological parents?
New York Times
A search for a surrogate leads to India
The Wall Street Journal
“Like a Mother to Them”: stratified reproduction and West Indian childcare workers and employers in New York
Black feminist thought
Hegemony in mass-mediated society: concordance about reproductive technologies
Critical Studies in Mass Communication
The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs
Man-made women: How new reproductive technologies affect women
Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique on antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics
University of Chicago Legal Forum
Pregnancy without borders: reproductive tourism’s global reach
Biopolitical Times
Patients without borders. The emergence of medial tourism
International Journal of Health Services
Pregnancy becomes latest job outsourced to India
USA Today
Right-wing women
Not the handmaid’s tale
Forbes.com
Framing: toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm
Journal of Communication
Resonance and radicalism: feminist framing in the abortion debates of the United States and Germany
American Journal of Sociology
Sarah Jessica Parker, Matthew Broderick jump on hollywood’s surrogate trend
ABC News
The discourse of globalization: framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept
American Sociological Review
Rent-a-womb is where market logic leads
The Wall Street Journal
Postmodern procreation: representing reproductive practice
Science as Culture
Embodied progress: A cultural account of assisted conception
Renting wombs in India
New York Times
The 1987 distinguished lecture: a constructionist approach to mass media and public opinion
Symbolic Interaction
Talking politics
Deciding what’s news
India nurtures business of surrogate motherhood
New York Times
The discovery of grounded theory
Cited by (61)
The ART clock: Temporal limits to assisted reproduction
2022, Reproductive Biomedicine and Society OnlineCitation Excerpt :By extending their reproductive time via third-party pregnancy, these women provide a service that is understood by intended parents, many of whom have struggled to have a child, as life-changing and is deeply appreciated, which is sometimes demonstrated through compliments, attention and gifts in addition to monetary compensation. Research has explored how the US surrogacy industry itself encourages these particular framings of surrogates’ motivations and skills while downplaying the commodification of reproduction and compensation that surrogates receive (Jacobson, 2016; Markens, 2012; Smietana et al., 2021). In addition to wanting to extend their time in reproduction via surrogacy, examining the time that women spend as surrogates highlights several other temporal dimensions specific to the ART clock.
Bioethical issues and legal frameworks of surrogacy: A global perspective about the right to health and dignity
2021, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyCitation Excerpt :Unfortunately, the signing of a convention would leave the bioethical discrepancies unresolved, favouring only agreements between permissive nations. For this reason, a principle of “soft law” is considered inapplicable as it is inadequate to solve the specific problems of the matter [117–123]. Therefore, national and international law should guarantee global regulatory coverage ensuring the freedom of each individual country to decide whether to ban or allow surrogacy.
Troublesome reproduction: surrogacy under scrutiny
2018, Reproductive Biomedicine and Society OnlineCitation Excerpt :In my own case, it was transnational surrogacy – involving Norwegian desiring-to-be parents and surrogate mothers from other countries – that first brought this reproductive phenomenon referred to as ‘surrogacy’ to my attention. Transnational surrogacy is, it should be noted, a phenomenon that emerged only recently; one that has caught the attention of the media and the academic field only within the last decade, from approximately 2006 (Markens, 2012: 1745; Pande, 2014: 1). Surrogacy as a phenomenon, however, has a longer history, both culturally and within the scholarly literature.
Media coverage of the Zika crisis in Brazil: The construction of a ‘war’ frame that masked social and gender inequalities
2018, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :To the best of our knowledge, the content of the printed versions will reflect that of the online ones, which is consistent with our objective of mapping out the different frames of Zika in the Brazilian media. Our data sampling strategy therefore follows that of previous studies on media framings (Markens, 2012). We used LexisNexis to search for articles in OG and the newspaper's own database in the case of FSP.
Who Will Safeguard Transnational Surrogates' Interests? Lessons from the Israeli Case Study
2019, Law and Social InquiryThe Representation of Cross-Border Surrogacy in Australian Surrogacy Events
2023, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics