ReviewNear-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectroscopic techniques for assessing the amount of carbon stock in soils – Critical review and research perspectives
Highlights
► Near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) spectrometry were reviewed for C stock measurement. ► We present a comprehensive table comparing NIR and MIR technical and economic performances. ► Performances of NIR calibration models depend on the origin of calibration and validation samples. ► Mass concentration of C could be measured on fresh soil samples by NIR but accuracy is still an issue. ► In-field C stock estimation for Kyoto Protocol requires that bulk density also is measurable by NIR.
Introduction
In order to mitigate climate change due to emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), the Kyoto Protocol proposed targets for GHG reductions and set up trading credits that corresponded to verified removal of greenhouse gas from the atmosphere (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change2). One of the main options for C mitigation identified by the IPCC is the sequestration of organic C in soils (Metz et al., 2007). Not only can soil C sequestration help to offset GHG emissions, but storing C in soil also provides environmental benefits (Lal et al., 1997). There are two ways to design contracts to purchase C-credits, either practice-based contracts or credit-based contracts, and studies have shown that credit-based contracts are more efficient than practice-based contracts (Mooney et al., 2007). But the same authors stated that (i) the biggest difference between transaction costs under credit-based and practice-based contracts was the cost associated with measuring the amount of C-credit sequestered, and (ii) another factor influencing transaction costs is uncertainty related to the quantity of credits produced, which could affect the payments received by the producers.
This converges with Smith’s view (2002) who also warns: “without quantified knowledge of the precision of the measurement, one runs the risk that sampling designs installed now will fail to detect much of the changes between now and re-measurement in 5 or 10 years. At the same time, measurement cost must be less than the market price of the amount of sequestration detected by the measurement.” This author and others (McCarty and Reeves, 2006, Morgan et al., 2009, Reeves, 2009) converge with unanimity on the fact that the issue of C sequestration assessment is two-fold, i.e., it has to be accurate and low-cost. Reeves (2009) outlined the trade-off of accuracy versus speed and quantity of samples to be analyzed, “the question exists as to whether better overall estimate of C can be made by using large amounts of fair quality data versus much smaller amounts of highly accurate data”. He outlined that this question was related to the inherent heterogeneity of soils. Finally, he suggested that “for large-scale studies, large amounts of more easily acquired surface data be integrated with little amounts of harder to get core/subsurface data to provide an accurate estimate of the total C content within a given area-volume of soil”.
Among the low-cost and easy-to-use alternative techniques, spectroscopic techniques such as Near-Infrared (NIR) and Mid-Infrared (MIR) spectroscopy are very attractive for C content measurement in soil. These techniques have been extensively developed in agriculture in the last 40 years, with a boom starting in the late 80’s, measuring composition of cereals, fruit and vegetables, meat, etc. In some cases, such as cereals, they have replaced classical laboratory analysis in inspection programs carried out by GIPSA (Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration)3 or CGC (Canadian Grain Commission) in US and Canada (Williams et al., 1998), respectively. The main difference between both ranges is that absorption in mid-infrared spectroscopy corresponds to fundamental bands of molecular vibrations, whereas absorptions in NIR correspond to overtones and combinations of these fundamental bands (Williams and Norris, 1987). The consequence is that (i) absorption coefficients (also called extinction coefficients) are much smaller in the NIR range, which allows light to better penetrate into the matter, but on the other hand (ii) the NIR spectrum is much more encumbered because of the abundance or combination and overtone bands. Therefore, the specificity of bands is less in the NIR range compared with MIR. Another point is that diffusion of light is much greater in the NIR than in the MIR range. Therefore, NIR spectra will be much more affected by factors which affect the diffusion of light such as: the physical structure (size of aggregates, porosity), but also the presence of water which changes the refractive index and therefore the diffusion of light (Williams and Norris, 1987).
The practical consequence is that NIR requires less sample preparation than MIR and is best fitted for in-field analysis, with lesser specificity requirements, whereas MIR generally shows a better specificity and reproducibility, but requires more sample preparation in order to optimize the sample/light interaction. The two classical modes of MIR analysis of soils are diffuse reflectance on dried/ground soils, as shown in several articles cited by Viscarra Rossel et al. (2006) or Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) applied to soil pastes especially when ions, like nitrate, ammonium etc., are assayed (Jahn et al., 2006, Du and Zhou, 2009). Therefore, up to now, MIR has been restricted to laboratory analysis, although its use in the field has been reported (Reeves, 2009).
Although research on NIR/MIR spectroscopy for soil analysis started later than for agricultural products, this research area has been experiencing a boom over the last 10 years, with a current apparent exponential growth (see Fig. 1). More than 210 publications have been produced in the last 15 years, with almost 50% of them in the last 3 years. Numerous investigations have been carried out measuring the properties of soil, in different configurations (i.e., in laboratory, in the field by sampling, or on-the-go with sensors embedded on a tractor). But up to now, bibliographic studies and reviews on this subject have been very scarce, may be because the rapid growth of NIR/MIR studies dedicated to soil is only recent. Viscarra Rossel et al. (2006) compiled a very complete table of the various soil attributes measured by NIR/MIR. Recently, as the result of a first NIR conference dedicated to soil in France, Cécillon et al. (2009) made an extensive review of all the available NIR technologies (proximal sensing-, laboratory analysis, remote sensing) for assessing soil quality and concluded that the most urgent need was for international databases. Kusumo et al. (2008) focused on C issues. Reeves (2009) recently wrote a review emphasizing laboratory versus on-site NIR and MIR analysis of C and pointing out the various advances and bottlenecks of this technique. He ended up with a list of nine questions which are deemed important for the future large-scale implementation of calibration for C content assessment either for C sequestration needs or for improving farming techniques in general. These key points are: 1. The calibration extent (local, regional etc.); 2. The spectrum acquisition procedure (in laboratory, in the field etc.); 3. The calibration transfer issue; 4. The reference measurement accuracy; 5. The trade-off between accuracy versus speed and number of sample analyzed; 6. The need for additional measurements (for instance bulk density) to provide relevant information (for instance Mg C ha−1); 7. Which C form is to be measured with regard to its stability; 8. Can NIR predict sequesterable C from source material? and finally 9. Which is the best chemometric method for calibration development?
His analysis investigates the state of the art to determine “where we are and what needs to be done”. Here we shall be much more focused on a critical analysis of the procedures carried out and results obtained so far for C measurement in soil, in order to address some of these questions.
Soils raise very interesting scientific issues for NIR/MIR spectroscopy. Soil is a very diffusive and absorptive medium. So, soil spectra must be acquired in diffuse reflectance, not in transmission (except of samples diluted in non-absorbing materials like KBr). The incident light is diffusely reflected back when reflecting, diffusing and diffracting on the macro- and micro-optical interfaces of soil particles to create a reflectance spectrum R. The transmitted and reflectance flux can be modelled by the Kubelka–Munk’s (K–M) law which describes light transfer in an absorbing and diffusing medium. But more classically, to get a spectrum in which the intensities are linearly linked to the concentrations of interest, the reflectance spectrum is turned into an absorbance spectrum, by applying a Log(Ro/R) function, where Ro is the reflectance of a diffusing and non-absorbing medium. Reflectance – and consequently absorbance – spectra contain both chemical and physical information linked to scattering and specular reflectance. In soil, this last effect, i.e., the physical effect, mainly related to soil structure, is particularly important because soil structure and particle size can vary greatly and therefore can affect the spectrum (Boonmung and Riley, 2003, Richter et al., 2009, Wu et al., 2009b) and should be removed (Bogrekci and Lee, 2005). In MIR spectroscopy, which has higher absorption coefficients, strong specular reflection effects can be observed, which is another cause of noise. Drying and finely grinding samples or working in ATR mode are two ways to avoid this effect, but this requires sample preparation and makes in-field use of MIR difficult.
In addition to these effects due to soil structure, other physical effects can be encountered when one has to carry out NIR measurements in-field, such as soil temperature variations (Wu et al., 2009a) and soil moisture variations (Boonmung and Riley, 2003, Wu et al., 2009b). These additional external factors alter the spectrum and cause discrepancy in predictions.
Our aim was to investigate the research work on NIR/MIR analysis of soil C content, whatever its form (total C, inorganic C, organic C). This review is based on a very detailed analysis of the methodologies carried out in order to enable us to correctly compare their performance strengths. In particular, factors such as the size and exhaustiveness of the calibration database, the closeness of calibration/validation samples, sample preparation (dry/moist, ground/non ground etc.), the type of instrument, the mathematical process for calibration (Partial Least Squares Regression or PLS, Principal Component Regression or PCR, Multiple Linear Regression or MLR etc.), the spectra pre-treatment etc. have been thoroughly studied to reveal common approaches to the NIR/MIR analysis of soil C. This will help one who reads a publication on NIR/MIR for soil analysis to develop a critical assessment of the performance values presented in this publication.
This analysis will lead us to analyze how far we are from using NIR/MIR techniques as routine measurement techniques, based on a metrological approach and to propose research paths for reaching this goal of having NIR/MIR spectroscopy as a recognized method for assessing C content in soil.
Section snippets
How do we deal with the diversity of methods when comparing spectroscopy-based models?
Measuring C or organic matter in soil has been carried out by numbers of researchers, mainly in laboratory conditions but also in the field. Therefore, it is always very confusing to analyze such studies because they are very diverse with regard to (i) the technique used (MIR/NIR) and the way it is applied i.e., in the laboratory on dried/ground samples or on fresh/moist samples, or in the field on extracted cores or top-soils, in drilled holes (using fibre optics) or on-the-go with sensors
Discussion and conclusions
The aim of this bibliographic study was to make a critical review of the various studies using either NIR or MIR to measure C content in soil, with a future objective of applying it in the context of Kyoto Protocol requirements. The objective of the review was to draw trends and conclusions about the best appropriate technique (including spectral range choice, sample preparation requirement, influence of calibration/validation sample sets etc…) for a low-cost and reliable assessment of soil C
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out as part of a travelling scholarship supported by the European Commission (IRSES program, IRSES project nr 235108) and the Languedoc Roussillon Council (Regional Plat-form GEPETOS – ECOTECH-LR).
Alex McBratney is supported by the Australian Research Council through its Linkage program.
Acknowledgements to Carole Giansily, librarian at Cemagref Montpellier, who carried out the bibliometric survey.
We thank sincerely the multiple reviewers for their very thorough analysis of
References (67)
- et al.
Prediction of soil attributes by NIR/MIR spectroscopy. Coming back to statistics fundamentals to improving prediction accuracy
TrAC – Trends in Analytical Chemistry
(2010) - et al.
Global soil characterization with VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy
Geoderma
(2006) - et al.
Comparison between predictions of C and N contents in tropical soils using a Vis-NIR spectrometer including a fibre-optic probe versus a NIR spectrometer including a sample transport module
Biosystems Engineering
(2008) Real-time measurement of soil attributes using on-the-go near infrared reflectance spectroscopy
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
(2008)- et al.
Soil organic carbon prediction by hyperspectral remote sensing and field vis-NIR spectroscopy: an Australian case study
Geoderma
(2008) - et al.
Soil moisture and organic matter prediction of surface and subsurface soils using an NIR soil sensor
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
(2001) - et al.
Mid-infrared spectroscopic determination of soil nitrate content
Biosystems Engineering
(2006) - et al.
Estimation of soil clay and calcium carbonate using laboratory, field and airborne hyperspectral measurements
Remote Sensing of Environment
(2008) - et al.
Near infrared spectroscopy of forest soils to determine chemical and biological properties related to soil sustainability
Forest Ecology and Management
(2002) - et al.
Mid- and near-infrared spectroscopic assessment of soil compositional parameters and structural indices in two Ferralsols
Geoderma
(2006)
Simulated in situ characterization of soil organic and inorganic carbon with visible near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy
Geoderma
On-line measurement of some selected soil properties using a VIS-NIR sensor
Soil and Tillage Research
Assessment of soil physical degradation in Eastern Kenya by use of a sequential soil testing protocol
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor
Geoderma
The potential of mid- and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for determining major- and trace-element concentrations in soils from a geochemical survey of North America
Applied Geochemistry
Application of near infrared reflectance (NIR) and fluorescence spectroscopy to analysis of microbiological and chemical properties of arctic soil
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
The parsimony principle applied to multivariate calibration
Analytica Chimica Acta
Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science
Advances in Agronomy
Laboratory, field and airborne spectroscopy for monitoring organic carbon content in agricultural soils
Geoderma
Usefulness of near-infrared spectroscopy to determine biological and chemical soil properties: Importance of sample pre-treatment
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties
Geoderma
Accounting for surface roughness effects in the near-infrared reflectance sensing of soils
Geoderma
Near infrared spectroscopy for determination of various physical, chemical and biochemical properties in Mediterranean soils
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
Quality assessment of mushroom casing soil using visible and near infrared spectroscopy
Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy
A novel method of classifying soil profiles in the field using optical means
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Improving phosphorus sensing by eliminating soil particle size effect in spectral measurement
Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers
Quantitative analysis of added ammonium and nitrate in silica sand and soil using diffuse reflectance infrared spectroscopy
Spectroscopy Letters
Assessment and monitoring of soil quality using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)
European Journal of Soil Science
Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopic analysis of soil C and N
Soil Science
The potential of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy as a tool for the chemical characterisation of agricultural soils
Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy
Simultaneous determination of moisture, organic carbon, and total nitrogen by near infrared reflectance spectrophotometry
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Back to basics: calibration statistics
Spectroscopy Europe
Applied Regression Analysis
Cited by (385)
Assessing the magnitude of soil carbon enhancement under canopy in an arboretum environment
2024, Urban Forestry and Urban GreeningImproving the estimation accuracy of soil organic matter based on the fusion of near-infrared and Raman spectroscopy using the outer-product analysis
2024, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
- 1
Fax: +61 2 9351 3706.