Elsevier

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Volume 67, December 2013, Pages 192-211
Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Review paper
Active microorganisms in soil: Critical review of estimation criteria and approaches

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.024Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We critically evaluated literature on active soil microorganisms and revealed.

  • Microorganisms in active and potentially active state: tiny versus large pool.

  • Threshold parameters for microbial activity state in soil.

  • Relevance of active microbial fraction in calculations of process rates.

  • Combinations of dynamic approaches enable to evaluate active microbial biomass.

Abstract

Microbial functioning refers to microbial activity because only the active microorganisms drive biogeochemical processes. Despite the importance of active microorganisms, most methods focus on estimating total microbial biomass and fail to evaluate its active fraction. At first, we have described the differences among the active, potentially active, and dormant microbial states in soil and suggested threshold values of parameters for their identification. Secondly, we critically reviewed the ability of a broad range of approaches to estimate and characterize the active and the potentially active microorganisms in soil. Following approaches were evaluated: plate count and microbial cultures; direct microscopy combined with cell staining; ATP, PLFA, DNA and RNA content; microarray analyses; PCR-based approaches; stable isotope probing; soil proteomics, enzymes activity; and various approaches based on respiration and substrate utilization. The “static” approaches, mainly based on the single-stage determination of cell components (ATP, DNA, RNA, and molecular biomarkers), detect well the presence of microorganisms and total biomass, but they fail to evaluate the active part and consequently the functions. In contrast, the dynamic approaches, estimating the changes of these parameters during microbial growth and based on process rates: substrate utilization and product formation, e.g., respiration, help to evaluate active microbial biomass and relate it to specific process rates. Based on a comparison of all approaches for their universality (possibility to analyze active, potentially active and dormant microorganisms), we concluded that 1) direct microscopy with complementary stains, 2) a combination of RNA-based FISH with staining of total microbial biomass, and 3) approaches based on microbial growth were the most advantageous and allowed simultaneous quantitative estimation of active, potentially active, and dormant microorganisms in soil.

The active microorganisms compose only about 0.1–2% of the total microbial biomass and very seldom exceed 5% in soils without input of easily available substrates. Nonetheless, the fraction of potentially active microorganisms (ready to start utilization of available substrates within few hours) is much higher, contributing between 10 and 40% (up to 60%) of the total microbial biomass. Therefore, we emphasize the role of potentially active microorganisms with quick response to fluctuating substrate input in soil microhabitats and hotspots.

The transition from the potentially active to the active state occurs in minutes to hours, but the shift from dormant to active state takes anywhere from hours to days. Despite very fast activation, the reverse process – fading to the potentially active and dormant stage – requires a much longer period and is very different for individual criteria: ATP, DNA, RNA, enzyme production, respiration rates. This leads to further difficulties in the estimation of the active part of microbial community by methods based on these parameters. Consequently, the standardization, further elaboration, and broad application of approaches focused on the portion of active microorganisms in soil and their functions are urgently needed. We conclude that because active microorganisms are the solely microbial drivers of main biogeochemical processes, analyses of the active and potentially active fractions are necessary in studies focused on soil functions.

Section snippets

Introduction: why consider active microorganisms?

Studies that refer to microbial biomass are central not only in soil science but also in all biogeochemistry-related disciplines. Microbial biomass is studied not as end in itself but as a driver of biogeochemical cycles. This requires knowing which microorganisms are responsible for specific processes and, more generally, which portion of the microbial biomass is responsible for the turnover of elements.

Microbial communities in soils consist of a very broad range of organisms in different

Definitions: total, dead, dormant, and active microorganisms

The total microbial biomass includes all living and nonliving soil organisms smaller than 150–200 μm (Swift et al., 1979, Coleman and Wall, 2007). The total amount of microbial biomass is relatively small (50–2000 μg C g−1 soil). It averages at 2–3% (Anderson and Domsch, 2010) and usually does not exceed 4.5% of organic C content (Anderson, 2003). The dead microorganisms are in an irreversible state in which no growth, cell elongation, or protein synthesis can take place (Villarino et al., 2000

Approaches to estimate active microorganisms in soil

We refer to the reviews of Breeuwer and Abee, 2000, Nannipieri et al., 2003, Hartmann et al., 2004, Bölter et al., 2006, Joergensen and Emmerling, 2006, Joergensen and Wichern, 2008, Musat et al., 2012 for detailed descriptions of estimation methods for microbial biomass and activity as well as their advantages and shortcomings. The present review focuses on the methods' potentials to distinguish physiological states of soil microorganisms. Several indirect criteria are often used to evaluate

Dynamics of parameters indicating changes in the physiological activity stage and microbial growth

Most of the approaches presented above showed that the portion of active microorganisms in soil is very small and is strongly dependent on the amount of easily available substrates (Fig. 3). Because the amount of available substrates in soil varies temporally and spatially by orders of magnitude, the changes of the physiological state of microorganisms are common for soil conditions. The transition of potentially active and dormant microorganisms to active state is accompanied by the sequence

Conclusions on method comparison and outlook

The importance of active microorganisms for all biogeochemical processes motivated us to prepare this review of approaches to estimate the active and potentially active parts of microbial communities. We show that despite the broad range of approaches developed to estimate the content of microbial biomass in soil, only a few have focused on its active fraction. Some of the approaches initially based on flux- or growth-related measurements (and not the content-related analyses of specific cell

Acknowledgments

We are very thankful to Prof. J.S. Waid for the invitation to prepare this review. We acknowledge long and fruitful discussions about this topic with Sergey Blagodatsky. The review was prepared because of its necessity, not because of funding. Nonetheless, the financial support of EB by DAAD, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No 12-04-01170) is strongly appreciated.

References (215)

  • A. Barra Caracciolo et al.

    In situ analysis of native microbial communities in complex samples with high particulate loads

    FEMS Microbiol. Lett.

    (2005)
  • B.A. Bastias et al.

    RNA- and DNA-based profiling of soil fungal communities in a native Australian eucalypt forest and adjacent Pinus elliotti plantation

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2007)
  • F. Bastida et al.

    Application of fresh and composted organic wastes modifies structure, size and activity of soil microbial community under semiarid climate

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2008)
  • T. Beck et al.

    An interlaboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1997)
  • J. Bertaux et al.

    Routine fluorescence in situ hybridization in soil

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (2007)
  • V.K. Bhupathiraju et al.

    A new direct microscopy based method for evaluating in-situ bioremediation

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (1999)
  • E.V. Blagodatskaya et al.

    Adaptive responses of soil microbial communities under experimental acid stress in controlled laboratory studies

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (1999)
  • E.V. Blagodatskaya et al.

    Priming effects in Chernozem induced by glucose and N in relation to microbial growth strategies

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2007)
  • S. Blagodatsky et al.

    Model of apparent and real priming effects: linking microbial activity with soil organic matter decomposition

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2010)
  • J. Bloem et al.

    Microscopic counting and calculation of species abundances and statistics in real time with an MS-DOS personal computer, applied to bacteria in soil smears

    J. Microbiol. Methods

    (1992)
  • J. Bloem et al.

    Microbial numbers and activity in gried and rewetted arable soil under integrated and conventional management

    Biol. Biochem.

    (1992)
  • P. Breeuwer et al.

    Assessment of viability of microorganisms employing fluorescence techniques

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2000)
  • P.C. Brookes et al.

    The adenylate energy charge of the soil microbial biomass

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1983)
  • R.G. Burns

    Enzyme activity in soil: location and a possible role in microbial ecology

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1982)
  • R.G. Burns et al.

    Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2013)
  • M.D. Busse et al.

    Soil carbon sequestration and changes in fungal and bacterial biomass following incorporation of forest residues

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2009)
  • C.D. Campbell et al.

    Long term repeated burning in a wet sclerophyll forest reduces fungal and bacterial biomass and responses to carbon substrates

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2008)
  • S. Chandra et al.

    Dynamic SIMS ion microscopy imaging of individual bacterial cells for studies of isotopically labeled molecules

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2008)
  • W. Cheng

    Rhizosphere priming effect: Its functional relationships with microbial turnover, evapotranspiration, and C–N budgets

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2009)
  • K.J. Chin et al.

    Structure and function of the methanogenic archaeal community in stable cellulose-degrading enrichment cultures at two different temperatures (15 and 30 °C)

    FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.

    (1999)
  • H. Christensen et al.

    Bacterial production determined by [3H]thymidine incorporation in field rhizospheres as evaluated by comparison to rhizodeposition

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1995)
  • M. Chodak et al.

    Development of microbial properties in a chronosequence of sandy mine soils

    Appl. Soil Ecol.

    (2009)
  • C. Ciardi et al.

    A comparison of methods for measuring ATP in soil

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1990)
  • C. Ciardi et al.

    Effect of various treatments on contents of adenine nucleotides and RNA of Mediterranean soils

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1993)
  • M. Contin et al.

    The ATP concentration of the soil microbial biomass

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2001)
  • M. Contin et al.

    Measurement of ATP in soil: correcting for incomplete recovery

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2002)
  • C. Crecchio et al.

    Soil microbial dynamics and genetic diversity in soil under monoculture wheat grown in different long-term management systems

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2007)
  • K.L. De Fede et al.

    Differential response of size-fractionated soil bacteria in BIOLOG microtitre plates

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2001)
  • B.P. Degens et al.

    Development of a physiological approach to measuring the catabolic diversity of soil microbial communities

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1997)
  • B.P. Degens et al.

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2001)
  • K. Denef et al.

    Microbial community composition and rhizodeposit-carbon assimilation in differently managed temperate grassland soils

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2009)
  • M. De Nobili et al.

    Adenosine 5'-triphosphate measurements in soils containing recently added glucose

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1996)
  • M. De Nobili et al.

    Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2001)
  • D. Djigal et al.

    Shifts in size, genetic structure and activity of the soil denitrifier community by nematode grazing

    Eur. J. Soil Biol.

    (2010)
  • J. Dyckmans et al.

    Adenylates as an estimate of microbial biomass C in different soil groups

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2003)
  • K. Ehlers et al.

    Phosphorus limitation in a Ferralsol: impact on microbial activity and cell internal P pools

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2010)
  • E.T. Elliott et al.

    Short-term bacterial growth, nutrient uptake, and ATP turnover in sterilized, inoculated and C-amended soil: the influence of N availability

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1983)
  • K. Enwall et al.

    Long-term impact of fertilization on activity and composition of bacterial communities and metabolic guilds in agricultural soil

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2007)
  • G. Forlani et al.

    Degradation of the phosphonate herbicide glyphosate in soil: evidence for a possible involvement of unculturable microorganisms

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1999)
  • J. Garcia-Pausas et al.

    Microbial community abundance and structure are determinants of soil organic matter mineralisation in the presence of labile carbon

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (638)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text