Elsevier

Solar Energy

Volume 97, November 2013, Pages 517-528
Solar Energy

Heat extraction from Non-Convective and Lower Convective Zones of the solar pond: A transient study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Proposed transient thermal performance model for heat extraction from NCZ and LCZ.

  • Estimated instantaneous efficiency and average annual efficiency of the solar pond.

  • Predicted optimum mass flux for limiting heat extraction condition.

  • Transient analysis showed 47% improvement in the efficiency of solar pond.

Abstract

Heat extraction from the Non-Convective Zone (NCZ) or gradient layer and Lower Convective Zone (LCZ) of the solar pond has been investigated through one-dimensional finite difference transient model. Instantaneous efficiency of the solar pond is introduced and defined in this paper. The solar pond considered in the present study is assumed to have an in-pond heat exchanger for heat extraction. The rate of heat transfer is controlled by the mass flux of heat transfer fluid in this model. As in reality mass flux of heat transfer fluid is the simplest and most practical way to control the rate of heat extraction. In this model for an ideal situation it is assumed that the heat transfer fluid is initially at the local daily average ambient temperature and the in-pond heat exchanger has heat transfer effectiveness equal to unity. With these assumptions the model can predict the thermal performance of the solar pond with maximum heat extraction for a desired mass flux of the heat transfer fluid. This paper presents the comparison of the transient thermal performance of solar pond with heat extraction from LCZ alone and that with combined heat extraction from LCZ and NCZ. It is shown how the efficiency of the solar pond increases when heat is extracted from both NCZ and LCZ. The main objective of this study is to offer a simple method to predict transient thermal performance of a solar pond with heat extraction from NCZ and to estimate the mass flux of heat transfer fluid used in an in-pond heat exchanger for heat extraction from different layers of solar pond.

Introduction

A solar pond is a large body of saline water whose salinity increases with depth. These ponds are used as solar thermal energy collectors that can simultaneously store heat for long period, so they are suitable for sessional solar thermal energy storage. In case of fresh water ponds almost all the solar radiation that falls on the surface is absorbed by top 3 m of fresh water and this thermal energy is rapidly lost to the atmosphere through natural convection heat transfer. So the temperature of a fresh water pond never rises and is almost constant throughout the fresh water pond depth.

Practical heat extraction from Lower Convective Zone (LCZ) for different applications is very common. In past heat has been extracted from LCZ using two methods, in the first method hot saline water is extracted from the LCZ and passed through an external heat exchanger as used at Kutch in India (Kumar and Kishore, 1999) and Beith Ha’arava in Israel (Tabor and Doron, 1990). In the second method an in-pond heat exchanger is used for heat extraction from the LCZ as used at Pyramid Hill, Victoria (Leblanc et al., 2011) and Marshad in Iran (Jaefarzadeh, 2006). Tabor (Tabor, 1981) has discussed both of these methods in his review of solar pond technology, and stressed that both method have convenient practical merit. The main limitation to the full scale application of solar ponds in industry has been the low solar thermal efficiency and in many cases lowers temperature heat available (below 60 °C) as discussed by Leblanc et al., 2011, Andrews and Akbarzadeh, 2005. Researchers have proposed many different ways of improving the thermal performance of solar ponds, which include improving the water clarity (Gasulla et al., 2011, Wang and Seyed-Yagoobi, 1995, Malik et al., 2011), increasing the thickness of LCZ and reducing the thickness of Upper Convective Zone (UCZ) Wang and Akbarzadeh, 1982a, introducing an additional upper Non-Convective Zone (NCZ) Husain et al., 2012, putting an external reflector to reflect additional solar radiation into solar pond (Aboul-Enein et al., 2004), by integrating a solar pond with flat plate solar collectors (Bozkurt and Karakilcik, 2012), etc.

Researchers have proposed of extracting/utilizing the heat stored in the NCZ to improve the overall thermal performance of the solar ponds and have claimed to improve the solar pond efficiency by up to 50% using a steady state theoretical model (Leblanc et al., 2011, Andrews and Akbarzadeh, 2005, Yaakob et al., 2011).

To date all the studies have used steady state theoretical model and its unknown if similar improvement in the solar pond efficiency is achievable for real solar pond using a transient model. Present paper investigates the transient thermal performance of the solar pond with heat extraction from both NCZ and LCZ. Through this paper efforts have been made to further develop the one-dimensional finite difference model of the solar pond for predicting the mass flux of heat transfer fluid flowing through an in-pond heat exchanger in a solar pond. This new model can predict transient behaviour of such solar pond while neglecting the shading and wall effects. Effects on the temperature profile of the solar pond for different heat extraction rates from NCZ and LCZ have been discussed and the best mix of heat extraction has been presented.

Section snippets

Solar pond

Fig. 1 shows the schematic of salinity gradient solar pond, which consists of three regions. The cold upper layer or Upper Convective Zone (UCZ) is a homogeneous thin layer of low salinity brine or fresh water. The middle gradient layer or Non-Convective Zone (NCZ) has salinity gradient with salinity increasing from top of NCZ to the bottom of NCZ, this helps suppress the heat loss by natural convection. The bottom layer or Lower Convective Zone (LCZ) has high salinity (some cases close to

Theoretical modelling

To predict thermal performance of large solar ponds, the thermal process in these solar ponds can be treated as one-dimensional unsteady conduction loss, with heat generation from incoming solar radiation as used by many researchers in the past (Wang and Akbarzadeh, 1982a, Aboul-Enein et al., 2004, Bansal and Kaushik, 1981). Here efforts are made to develop a transient thermal performance model of a solar pond with heat extraction from NCZ and LCZ following the steady state model developed by

Simulation boundary conditions and assumptions

For the present study a reference solar pond in Melbourne with large enough surface area to neglect heat loss through wall is used and the salt is sodium chloride. The temperature development is predicted for a three year period. The solar pond starts operation on 1st October (i.e. early spring in southern hemisphere), and the heat removal operation starts after 60 days.

This solar pond is assumed to have 0.3 m thick UCZ and for the purpose solving the finite difference model the UCZ is considered

Results and discussion

Fig. 5 shows the temperature development of the solar pond under investigation without heat extraction over a period of 3 years. The boiling of the water in LCZ in the second and third year is ignored in Fig. 5 to simplify the heat transfer model used for temperature development. It should be noted that in reality the LCZ temperature will never go beyond the local boiling temperature of the saline water.

It can be seen that the LCZ temperature increases significantly in the first year. It is

Summary/conclusion

This study has found that the temperature of LCZ and the average annual solar pond efficiency is very sensitive to the mass flux of the heat transfer fluid that flows through the in-pond heat exchangers. This investigation shows that there is a sharp decrease in the LCZ temperature if the rate of heat extracted from LCZ is higher than that from NCZ. Hence the mass flux of heat transfer fluid that flows through the NCZ heat exchanger should always be greater than or equal that mass flux that

Cited by (0)

View full text