Elsevier

Solid-State Electronics

Volume 52, Issue 9, September 2008, Pages 1291-1296
Solid-State Electronics

Multi-gate devices for the 32 nm technology node and beyond

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2008.04.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Due to the limited control of the short channel effects, the high junction leakage caused by band-to-band tunneling and the dramatically increased VT statistical fluctuations, the scaling of planar bulk MOSFETs becomes more and more problematic with every technology node. The ITRS roadmap predicts that from the 32 nm technology node on, planar bulk devices will not be able to meet the stringent leakage requirements anymore and that multi-gate devices will be required. In this paper, the suitability of FinFET-based multi-gate devices for the 32 nm technology and beyond will be discussed. Apart from the benefits, some technological challenges will be addressed.

Introduction

FinFET-based multi-gate (MuGFET) devices have been the topic of many publications over the last decade [1], [2], [3]. The benefits of these devices are very clear: reduced short channel effects, leakage currents, VT dopant fluctuations and possible higher mobility due to the undoped channels. Recently [4] it has also been demonstrated that these devices can be used for large-scale integration and that digital MuGFET circuits can show superior performance over planar bulk devices. In the first section of this paper, we will briefly discuss the benefits of using MuGFET from the intrinsic transistor performance point of view. The main part of the paper will describe the technological challenges. The last part will briefly give an overview of the performance of circuits fabricated in MuGFET technology.

Section snippets

Benefits of MuGFET devices

Fig. 1 shows a SEM view of a typical MuGFET transistor. The device consists of a channel formed in a Si fin and a self-aligned gate wrapped around the thin Si fin. In this device, the current flow is still horizontal while the sidewalls of the dry-etched Si fin are used as conducting channels. Due to the fact that the gate is wrapped around a tiny fin, the electrostatic control of the gate on the channel is enhanced leading to better immunity against short channel effects (SCE).

The fin width is

Technological challenges

MuGFET fabrication follows a quite conventional Si processing. However, specific process steps will require additional restrictions, e.g. fin critical dimension (CD) control. Next to that, new process modules such as selective epitaxial growth of Si (SEG) will be needed.

In the next part of this section we will present the technological challenges related to the processing of MuGFET devices. Topics like device scaling, work function tuning, access resistance and strain engineering will be

Circuit performance

The Shallow Trench Isolation (STI) free isolation process for MuGFET devices on SOI allows fabricating high density SRAMs (Fig. 11). SRAM cells with dimensions down to 0.314 μm2[22] and even 0.274 μm2[23] have been demonstrated. The latter cell, having a TaN based gate stack, showed a high static noise margin of 216 mV at 1 V with devices having a LGATE = 37 nm. At the same time, improved OPC for CD control and integration of SRAM and logic circuits was studied.

In [4] a MuGFET inverter delay of 13.9 ps

Conclusions

The MuGFET transistor is the most widely studied and known multi-gate architecture that has the potential to be scaled beyond the 32 nm technology node. In this paper we have addressed the benefits of these devices and a number of integration challenges. Next to that, we have briefly discussed the potential of these devices for large-scale integration.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the people working in the litho, etch and SEG development groups, the material characterization group, the IMEC pilot line and measurements labs.

This research is supported by the IMEC EMERALD IIAP program and the European Commission’s Information Society Technologies Program under PULLNANO project Contract No. IST-026828.

References (25)

  • D. Hisamoto

    FinFet – a self-aligned double-gate MOSFET scalable to 20 nm

    IEEE Trans Electron Dev

    (2000)
  • J. Kavalieros et al.

    Tri-gate transistor architecture with high-k gate dielectrics, metal gates and strain engineering

    VLSI Technol Symp

    (2006)
  • J.-T. Park et al.

    Pi-gate SOI MOSFET

    IEEE Electron Dev Lett

    (2001)
  • K. von Arnim

    A low-power multi-gate FET CMOS technology with 13.9 ps inverter delay large-scale integrated high performance digital circuits and SRAM

    VLSI Technol Symp

    (2007)
  • G. Pei

    FinFET design considerations based on 3-D simulation and analytical modeling

    IEEE Trans Electron Dev

    (2002)
  • M.J.H. Van Dal

    Highly manufacturable FinFETs with sub-10 nm fin width and high aspect ratio fabricated with immersion lithography

    VLSI Technol Symp

    (2007)
  • Ercken M, Delvaux C, Baerts C, Locorotondo S, Degroote B, Wiaux V, et al. Challenges in patterning 45nm node...
  • R. Rooyackers

    Doubling or quadrupling MuGFET fin integration scheme with higher pattern fidelity, lower CD variation and higher layout efficienty

    IEDM Tech Digest

    (2006)
  • Lorusso GF et al. Comprehensive approach to MuGFET metrology. In: Metrology, inspection, and process control for...
  • N. Collaert et al.

    Tall triple-gate devices with TiN/HfO2 gate stack

    VLSI Technol Symp

    (2005)
  • R. Singanamalla

    Jpn J Appl Phys

    (2007)
  • L. Witters et al.

    Threshold voltage modulation in FinFET devices through arsenic ion implantation into TiN/HfSiON gate stack

    SOI Conference

    (2007)
  • Cited by (38)

    • Temperature analysis of underlap GAA-SNWTs for analog/RF applications

      2019, Microelectronics Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      To abolish these SCEs, multi-gate devices has been introduced. They have better gate control over channel charge carriers [5–8]. Gate-all-around silicon nanowire FETs (GAA-SNWTs) are one of such novel multigate device which additionally facilitates the scaling without hampering the device performance [9].

    • 2D analytical model for surface potential based electric field and impact of wok function in DMG SB MOSFET

      2017, Superlattices and Microstructures
      Citation Excerpt :

      To overcome this limitation, several device design, such as multiple gate and gate all around FETs [6,7], have been proposed that improve gate controllability and reduce SCEs. However, the fabrication of sharp junctions in source/drain (S/D) and semiconductor becomes difficult at the lower dimensions [8–10]. When the length of the channel for conventional multiple gate transistors is scaled down to extremely small lengths, the series resistance of source and drain enhances considerately in nanometer devices.

    • Improved physical models for advanced silicon device processing

      2017, Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing
      Citation Excerpt :

      A schematic of a FinFET device is shown in Fig. 18. To achieve a good control of short channel effects (SCE) and off-state leakage currents, the fin width of FinFET devices must be narrow [155,156], but the parasitic S/D resistance increases as the fin width is scaled down [88,157]. This challenge to optimize FinFET performance is complicated by the difficulties to dope the fin due to its vertical structure.

    • Investigating the performance of SiGe embedded dual source p-FinFET architecture

      2016, Superlattices and Microstructures
      Citation Excerpt :

      As the Field Effect Transistor (FET) channel length scaling enters sub-20 nm regime, the improved gate electrostatic control of multi-gate FET structures make them an attractive choice for advanced technology nodes device architectures [1,2]. The FinFET-based multi-gate (MuGFET) devices, has the advantage of reduced short channel effects (SCEs), leakage currents (Ioff), threshold voltage (VT) dopant fluctuations and possible higher mobility due to the un-doped channels [3–5]. Also, the main challenge for maintaining the performance improvement of Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) circuits is the power consumption and to overcome it, the supply voltage scaling has been extensively used for the last 20 years [6–8].

    • Impact of pattern dependency of SiGe layers grown selectively in source/drain on the performance of 14 nm node FinFETs

      2016, Solid-State Electronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The more Moore technological roadmap has achieved to new generations of FinFETs where the height and width of the fin, doping level, geometry of fin sidewalls and strain in channel have been tailored to boost performance of transistors [1–7].

    • A comprehensive review on microwave FinFET modeling for progressing beyond the state of art

      2013, Solid-State Electronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nevertheless, in the case of the multiple independent gate FETs (MIGFETs) the multiple-gate transistors are controlled by separate gate electrodes, which may be independently biased with different voltages. An outstanding example of MuGFET is represented by the FinFET [6–69], originally referred to as folded-channel FET [8]. The name FinFET derives from its shape resembling a fish’s dorsal fin in three dimensions [9].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text