Influences of plasma nitriding edge effect on properties of 316 L stainless steel
Introduction
Austenitic stainless steels offer good resistance to general corrosion due to the formation of a passive surface film. For this reason, they are widely used in many industrial fields. However, the low hardness and poor tribological properties of these materials can shorten the life of components subject to wear. Some techniques, such as plasma nitriding [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], form a surface coating which improves the characteristics of stainless steel components.
Plasma nitriding improves various physical properties of metallic surfaces, such as hardness, wear and corrosion resistance, promoting the use of nitrided samples. This process also has advantages when compared with conventional nitriding processes, for example: non-emission of pollutants, energy saving, and shorter treatment time, despite some inconvenience when components with complex geometry are treated. For instance, plasma nitriding has an associated phenomenon known as the edge effect, which produces a non-uniform surface on cylindrical samples with different colors in the central and peripheral regions. The edge effect occurs because treated samples are submitted to a high cathodic potential to produce plasma directly on their surface. As a result of distortions in the electric field around the corners and edges, the shape of the plasma sheath, which is associated to the shape of samples, determines ion flux distribution, creating erosion rings characterized by different colors and discontinuous hardness. This effect occurs mainly in the treatment of materials containing a high percentage of alloy elements, such as chromium, which produces nitrides, as in the case of AISI 316 L [6], [7].
The aim of this research is to investigate the following characteristics of the rings formed in nitrided AISI 316 L austenitic stainless steel: dimension, microhardness, composition, and corrosion resistance.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
In this study, we used the AISI 316 L stainless steel produced by Villares Metals. Its chemical composition (in wt.%) is: Cr (17.03), Ni (10.16), Mo (2.16), C (0.03), and Fe balance. Three disks, named here samples A, B, and C, and a ring, named sample D, were prepared. Their dimensions are reported in Table 1.
All samples were ground using sandpaper from 220 to 1200 mesh, polished with alumina (0.3 and 1 μm), cleaned ultrasonically in an acetone bath, and finally air-dried. Next, they were plasma
Results and discussion
Fig. 1 shows pictures of the nitrided samples. An initial visual analysis suggests that regions can be classified according to their color. Thus, the borders of samples B and D, named here as rings, are light gray, and were labeled 1 and 4, respectively. Towards the center, there is a region in shades of blue and brown, labeled 2 (sample B) and 5 (sample D). The central region of sample B is dark yellow, labeled as number 3. Sample C, which was nitrided inside ring D shows the same yellow shade
Conclusion
This paper presents a study of some of the characteristics of the rings formed in nitrided AISI 316 L samples, which were prepared with two different diameters. The following conclusions were reached:
- (1)
Both samples showed the same ring characteristics regarding dimensions and hardness.
- (2)
XRD results showed the γN phase. In the ring, the N concentration is less than in the central region. Besides this phase, GAXRD also showed the presence of Cr2N in the ring.
- (3)
CEMS results showed γN and ε phases,
Acknowledgment
We thank Dr. J.M.D.A.Rollo, for support in the hardness measurements. We are also grateful to the technical collaborator Natália A. Zanardi. This work was partly supported by the Brazilian research funding agencies CAPES, CNPq and FAPESP.
References (30)
- et al.
Surf. Coat. Technol.
(1995) Appl. Surf. Sci.
(2008)- et al.
Surf. Coat.Technol.
(2006) - et al.
Surf. Coat.Technol.
(2001) - et al.
Surf. Coat. Technol.
(1999) - et al.
Surf. Coat. Technol.
(2006) - et al.
Surf. Coat. Technol.
(2005) - et al.
Surf. Coat.Technol.
(2006) - et al.
Surf. Coat. Technol.
(2001) - et al.
Surf. Coat. Technol.
(2008)
Surf. Coat. Technol.
Surf. Coat. Technol.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Surf. Coat. Technol.
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms
Cited by (46)
Sliding wear behaviour of salt bath nitrided 316LN austenitic stainless steel
2023, Applied Surface Science AdvancesDynamic equilibrium of the surface oxide film during plasma oxynitrocarburising and its effect on performances
2022, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologySolid carbon active screen plasma nitrocarburizing of AISI 316L stainless steel in cold wall reactor: influence of plasma conditions
2020, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyCitation Excerpt :Additionally, hot wall reactors require less time to reach the target temperature and a more homogeneous temperature distribution can be obtained compared to cold wall reactors [14]. Furthermore, modern hot wall PNC reactors apply a pulsed dc voltage to reduce or even avoid common problems such as the edge and the hollow cathode effect or a non-homogeneous temperature distribution, all associated with complex geometries [19,20]. However, even for hot wall PNC reactor, the applied plasma voltage at the surface of the components is still high and the previously mentioned issues in cold wall PNC can arise too.
Surface mechanics and wear resistance of supermartensitic stainless steel nitrided by plasma immersion ion implantation
2018, Surface and Coatings TechnologyCitation Excerpt :For cross section analyses, samples were etched with Vilella's or Murakami's reagents [34] after cutting and polishing. Under visual inspection, the surfaces were uniformly modified by PI3, i.e., presenting no evident discontinuities as the edge effect, typical of the conventional plasma nitriding [35]. Fig. 1 shows diffractograms of the reference sample and those nitrided by PI3 in the temperature range 300 °C–400 °C.