Elsevier

Surface Science

Volume 600, Issue 3, 1 February 2006, Pages 755-761
Surface Science

Atomic structure of thin dysprosium-silicide layers on Si(1 1 1)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2005.11.029Get rights and content

Abstract

We report on scanning tunneling microscopy results of thin dysprosium-silicide layers formed on Si(1 1 1). In the submonolayer regime, both a 23×23R30° and a 5 × 2 superstructure were found. Based on images taken at different tunneling conditions, a structure model could be developed for the 23×23R30° superstructure. For one monolayer, a 1 × 1 superstructure based on hexagonal DySi2 was observed, while several monolayers thick films are characterized by a 3×3R30° superstructure from Dy3Si5.

Introduction

Silicides of the trivalent rare earth metals grown as thin films on silicon surfaces are currently of high interest because of their low Schottky-barrier heights on n-type substrates [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], their epitaxial growth on Si(1 1 1) [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] and the self-organized formation of nanowires on Si(0 0 1) [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. These silicide films can be prepared by rare-earth deposition and subsequent annealing. In several publications, the atomic structure of films on Si(1 1 1) has been studied using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), showing a variety of structures mainly depending on the rare-earth element and its coverage. Most of these studies were related to erbium silicides. The detailed atomic structure of the different structures occurring for dysprosium-silicide films on Si(1 1 1), however, is not completely understood up to now.

Here we present detailed scanning tunneling microscopy results on the growth of dysprosium-silicide films in the range from submonolayer coverages up to a few monolayers. Submonolayer silicide layers are characterized by domains of 23×23R30° and 5 × 2 superstructures. At one monolayer, a 1 × 1 structure is found, and several monolayers thick films form a 3×3R30° superstructure. Using a variety of tunneling conditions, we were able to derive the atomic structure of the 23×23R30° submonolayer and the 3×3R30° multilayer films.

Section snippets

Experimental

Si(1 1 1)7 × 7 substrates were prepared by repeated flashing of n-type Si(1 1 1) wafers followed by slow cooling down in order to enable the formation of a defect-free reconstruction. The silicide films were grown in situ by depositing dysprosium on the clean Si(1 1 1)7 × 7 surface held at room temperature, and afterwards annealing at 500 °C for 1 min to form the silicide. The base pressure was lower than 5 × 10−11 mbar and did not exceed 2 × 10−10 mbar during preparation. Such vacuum conditions are prerequisite

The general growth behavior

Representative overview images of the typical silicide structures are presented in Fig. 1. At submonolayer coverages (Fig. 1(a)), the surface is covered by domains of the bare Si(1 1 1)7 × 7 and occasionally also the Si(1 1 1)5 × 5 surface [25] as well as by thin silicide films with 23×23R30° and 5 × 2 superstructures. The 23×23R30° superstructure is characterized by triangular domains separated by linear dislocations. At sufficiently high coverages, also the rather flat monolayer structure becomes

Summary

Using high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy, we were able to observe different atomic structures during growth of dysprosium silicides on Si(1 1 1). At submonolayer coverages, structures with 23×23R30° and 5 × 2 periodicity were found. A detailed structure model could be derived for the 23×23R30° superstructure as well as for the dislocation network separating the single-crystalline domains. The monolayer is formed from hexagonal DySi2 with a 1 × 1 periodicity, and both silicon layers in the

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Projects Da408/5 and Da408/11 for financial support.

References (25)

  • T.P. Roge et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • P. Wetzel et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • T.P. Roge et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1997)
  • J.A. Martín-Gago et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • M. Lohmeier et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • K.N. Tu et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1981)
  • S. Vandré et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1999)
  • S. Vandré et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (2001)
  • S. Vandré et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (1999)
  • M. Dähne et al.

    Adv. Solid State Phys.

    (2001)
  • J.A. Knapp et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1986)
  • F. Arnaud d’Avitaya et al.

    Appl. Phys. Lett.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Lanthanum-induced quasi-one-dimensional reconstructions on Si(111)

      2018, Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      With the coverage increased, (2j + 1) × 1 (j > 1, integer) intermediate reconstruction is formed consisting of proportional HCCs and SCs, and the surface evolves to 2 × 1 reconstruction with SCs at 1/2 ML [26]. Trivalent Ln, such as Ce, Tb, Ho, Dy, and Er induce Si(111)−5 × 2 reconstruction at a coverage of 0.2 ML [24,25,28–32]. The Ln chains are separated by HCC and SC chains alternatively [Fig. 1(a) and (b)].

    • Terbium induced nanostructures on Si(111)

      2015, Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      An analogous superstructure has also been observed to form for submonolayer coverages of other rare earth metals like Er [6,9], Dy [10], and Ho [11]. However, the domains observed in the present study seem to be smaller than for the other rare earth metal induced 2√3 × 2√3 R30° superstructures, where larger domains or even complete islands without any domain boundaries were found [6,9-11]. This might be related to strain effects due to the lanthanide contraction: Tb has the largest ionic radius of those rare earth metals, for which a 2√3 × 2√3 R30° superstructure is observed.

    • Surface and interface study of U/Si (1 1 1)

      2014, Applied Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, recently a lot of works have been devoted to the rare-earth silicides (RE—Y, Er, Gd, Dy, Lu, Ho) epitaxially grown on Si (1 1 1) substrates because of the low value of Schottky barrier height and low lattice mismatch [3–8]. The surface morphology and electronic structure of RE on Si (1 1 1) with different annealing temperatures have been extensively studied, and new reconstructions and 2D rare earth silicides have been reported [9–14]. Meanwhile, the discovery of the superconductor MgB2 with the highest Tc among intermetallic compounds (Tc = 39 K) [15] has stimulated the search for new superconductors in the AlB2-type (space group P6/mmm, no. 191, Z = 1) compounds, such as the binary silicides ThSi2 [16] and USi2 [17,18].

    • Formation and atomic structure of self-assembled Dy silicide clusters on the Si(111)7 × 7 surface

      2013, Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, rare earth silicide clusters are practically unknown up to now. For the case of Dy, only submonolayer coverages exceeding 0.5 ML as well as much thicker layers were studied on the planar Si(111) surface [26,27], and on vicinal Si(111) surfaces, the growth of different types of Dy silicide nanowires was reported [28,29]. The initial stages of Dy adsorption on the Si(111)7 × 7 surface remained unexplored.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text