A modified kinetic analysis method of cellulose pyrolysis based on TG–FTIR technique
Introduction
Energy shortage and global warming have paved the way for increased utilization of biomass as a feedstock for thermochemical degradation processes. Cellulose is the most essential element in biomass due to its large proportion [1,2]. Its pyrolysis is a complex process that involves multiphase reactions, complex chemical pathways, and heat and mass transfer effects. In order to control product distributions by manipulating reaction conditions, such as heating rates, particle size, and product retention time, understanding the pyrolytic behavior of cellulose is fundamental and essential to biomass thermochemical conversions [3].
An evident variation exists in the magnitude of cellulose pyrolysis kinetics and in the measurement approaches used in previous studies. Broido and Nelson firstly proposed a global cellulose pyrolysis reaction model based on TGA, which involved two competitive reactions occurring directly from the cellulose, that is, one that yielded char with low molecular weight at low temperatures and another resulted in tar at high temperatures [4,5]. Bradbury and Shafizadeh proposed a modified model that cellulose first undergoes depolymerization to produce an intermediate, called “active cellulose.” This empirical Bradbury–Shafizadeh (B–S) model had been widely accepted by many researchers, except in few arguments about the existence of active cellulose [[6], [7], [8]]. However, the B–S model does not describe the decomposition mechanism in detail. Piskorz proposed a modified version, namely, the Waterloo scheme in consideration of a large amount of hydroxyacetaldehyde (HAA). The initial stage considered the competitive formation of char and active cellulose, followed by ring fragmentation (high activation energy), which led to HAA and depolymerization (low activation energy) to yield levoglucosan (LG) [9]. Banyasz proposed a similar scheme, except the char was initiated from an intermediate called dehydrocellulose [10]. Shen et al. discussed the secondary reactions and formation pathways of typical products by using TGA–FTIR and Py–GC–MS analytical techniques and interpreted that the sequential and competitive mechanisms occurred between the LG and other products, such as HAA, hydroxyacetone (HA), and 5-hydroxymethyl-furfural (5-HMF) [11]. Lu et al. intensively investigated the formation mechanism of HAA. They claimed that the HAA and LG mainly formed via competing parallel pyrolytic pathways and that only a small amount of HAA would be derived from the secondary cracking of the LG [12].
Furthermore, product distribution and thermal transfer resistance are significantly influenced by heating rates. Milosavljevic and Suuberg reported the diverse kinetic parameters derived by various groups based on different heating rates [13]. Generally, the higher the heating rates, the lower the active energy was found [14]. Antal et al. proposed the secondary reactions of primary tar, which produces char and gas, and claimed that a universal rate law had not been observed due to the thermal lag that interfered with kinetic measurement [15]. More recently, Lin et al. confirmed the conclusion of Antal et al. (that is, the shift in pyrolytic temperature under different heating rates is due to the effect of thermal lag), coupled the first-order reaction model with two thermal lag estimations, and obtained the intrinsic kinetic parameter at [16].
In the present work, a modified reaction model was proposed for cellulose pyrolysis, which was applicable for describing cellulose pyrolytic pathway. In order to obtain the kinetic parameters and to validate the model, TGA experiments were performed under different heating rates and retention temperatures. The volatile products under different retention temperatures was tested by real time TG–FTIR.
Section snippets
TGA experiment
Microcrystalline cellulose (CAS: 9004-34-6) with an average diameter of 60 μm was selected as the cellulose sample for the following pyrolysis process and kinetic modeling. A thermogravimetric analyser (TGA/DSC1, METTLER TOLEDO, Switzerland) was used for these experiments. The sample mass of 1 mg, 2.5 mg, and 5 mg with 10 °C/min were performed. For linear heating rates of 10, 30, 60 and 100 °C/min, the pyrolysis temperature range were chosen from 30 °C to 700 °C, with consideration to reduce
TGA
The TG and DTG results of cellulose pyrolysis in the TGA are shown in Fig. 1. From Fig. 1(a), the curves of different sample mass are found almost overlapped, so the pyrolysis were almost kinetically controlled with such low heating rate and low sample mass. For linear heating rates of 10, 30, 60 and 100 °C/min, similar to other studies [[18], [19], [20]], the temperatures of the maximum mass loss rate were 350 °C, 368 °C, 380 °C and 392 °C. Apparent activation energy is sensitive to small
Conclusions
The TGA and TG–FTIR experiments were employed to investigate the mass loss value as well as the distribution of the gaseous products and functional groups. A reasonable mechanistic and kinetic interpretation was obtained. The modified model for cellulose pyrolysis was proposed in this study based on the reaction models reported in previous studies. The first step involves decreasing the crystallinity and degree of polymerization, which leads to the formation of active cellulose ()
Acknowledgements
This study was supported financially by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21376140 and No. 21376136) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (NO. 3122026).
References (34)
- et al.
Fast pyrolysis for biomass
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2000) - et al.
Product distribution from fast pyrolysis of glucose-based carbohydrates
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(2009) Cellulose pyrolysis kinetics: an historical review on the existence and role of intermediate active cellulose
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(2012)- et al.
Pretreatment of wood and cellulose for production of sugars by fast pyrolysis
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(1989) - et al.
Gas evolution and the mechanism of cellulose pyrolysis
Fuel
(2001) - et al.
The mechanism for thermal decomposition of cellulose and its main products
Bioresour. Technol.
(2009) - et al.
Pyrolysis mechanism of holocellulose-based monosaccharides: the formation of hydroxyacetaldehyde
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(2016) - et al.
CFD based reactivity parameter determination for biomass particles of multiple size ranges in high heating rate devolatilization
Energy
(2017) - et al.
Model-free rate expression for thermal decomposition processes: the case of microcrystalline cellulose pyrolysis
Fuel
(2015) - et al.
Thermal characterization and kinetic analysis of microfibrillated cellulose/lignosulfonate blends
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
(2017)
Pyrolysis, a promising route for biomass utilization
Bioresour. Technol.
Modelling heat of reaction in biomass pyrolysis with detailed reaction schemes
Fuel
Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis
Fuel
TGA–FTIR analysis of co-pyrolysis characteristics of hydrochar and paper sludge
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
Effect of reducing ends on the pyrolysis characteristics and product distribution of cellulose
J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis
Determination of pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of palm kernel shell using TGA–FTIR and model-free integral methods
Energy Convers. Manag.
Model-free method for evaluation of activation energies in modulated thermogravimetry and analysis of cellulose decomposition
Chem. Eng. Sci.
Cited by (81)
Layer-by-layer assembly induced strong, hydrophobic and anti-bacterial TEMPO oxidized cellulose nanofibrils films for highly efficient UV-shielding and oil-water separation
2023, International Journal of Biological MacromoleculesSynergistic interaction for catalytic co-pyrolysis of municipal paper and polyethylene terephthalate wastes coupling with deep learning methodology
2023, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis