Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship
Introduction
Universities in developed countries have become increasingly entrepreneurial (Mowery and Sampat, 2005; Siegel, 2006). In the early 1980s, the entrepreneurial university become an accepted concept, and the literature debating the role of higher education institutions in economic growth and social development raised the attention of prominent scholars (Clark, 1998; Etzkowitz, 1983; Gibb and Hannon, 2006; Guerrero et al., 2016; Klofsten and Jones-Evans, 2000; Röpke, 1998). Studies have shown that, over time, the regional impact of universities on new business creation, knowledge transfer, and influx of well-educated people is considerable (Etzkowitz and Klofsten, 2005). Various activities, such as research collaborations with industry, patent applications, idea spinoffs into new firms, entrepreneurial education of highly skilled individuals and business incubators, are the tools universities use to achieve their entrepreneurial configuration (Shane, 2004; Siegel and Wright, 2015; Somsuk and Laosirihongthong, 2014). These activities are known as academic entrepreneurship (Grimaldi et al., 2011; O'Shea et al., 2004; Rasmussen, 2011; Rothaermel et al., 2007; Shane, 2004; Wright, 2007).
Academic entrepreneurship has attracted major attention both within the academic literature and in the policy community where it is considered to be an important element in the movement to become a knowledge society (Audretsch and Kayalar-Erdem, 2005; Davey et al., 2016; Rothaermel et al., 2007). An increase in university licensing, patenting and start-up creation has also been observed in many countries, starting in the USA with the Bayh-Dole Act and moving to Europe and Asia as well as Australia, Canada and Israel (Grimaldi et al., 2011), where the study of academic entrepreneurship has received increasing attention (e.g., Chrisman et al., 1995; Zucker et al., 2002).
Moreover in parallel to the evolution of academic entrepreneurship, another interesting phenomenon is the rapid acceleration of digital technologies that in the past 10 years are reshaping the markets and society globally (Nambisan et al., 2017). The digital technologies of today, such as social media, mobile, business analytics, the Internet of Things, big data, advanced manufacturing, 3D printing, cloud and cyber-solutions, MOOCs, artificial intelligence, permeate every organization, manufacturer and service as well as private and public organizations (Fischer and Reuber, 2011; Fitzgerald et al., 2014; Greenstein et al., 2013). This wave of digital technology enables the departure from established systems of production and opens new channels and connections to markets, users and other stakeholders (Abernathy and Clark, 1985). Digital technologies are opening up fascinating innovation opportunities for entrepreneurs (Cohen et al., 2017; Yoo et al., 2010) and could also become the dominant source for innovation in academic entrepreneurship. Today, Joseph Schumpeter's (1912) ideas about how innovative entrepreneurs provoke creative destruction are more relevant than ever.
However, while this phenomenon has been analyzed for organizations in general, we suggest the rise of a new category of entrepreneurship, Digital Entrepreneurship, which is defined as a relevant socio-economic and technological phenomenon that can be considered as the leveraging of digital technologies to shift the traditional mode of creating and doing business in the digital era (Cohen et al., 2017; Giones and Brem, 2017; Nambisan, 2017; Nambisan et al., 2017). To the best of our knowledge, the existing research has largely neglected the potential of digital technologies in the academic entrepreneurship process. The underlying assumption behind our research is that digital technologies could leverage the way academia in which pursues the entrepreneurship process with a pervasive effect on the rationale, processes and forms of academic entrepreneurship as well as on the stakeholders involved in the achievement of university entrepreneurship goals.
Specifically, moving from a deductive research approach (Bryman and Bell, 2015, p. 23), this research aims to analyze the potential intersection of academic entrepreneurship with digital technologies to highlight a novel conceptualization of Digital Academic Entrepreneurship. The deduction starts with the definition of general assumptions and is then based on broadly accepted theories and concepts, which are presented in the qualitative literature review with a focus on academic entrepreneurship and digital technologies, and more specific conclusions (Ketoviki and Mantere, 2010, p. 316) are developed with regard to the potential impact of emerging digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship. This represents the background for the achievement of new findings by means of deduction (Bryman and Bell, 2015). A framework of the novel conceptualization of Digital Academic Entrepreneurship is provided and discussed, organized as follows: the rationale for the adoption of digital technologies for academic entrepreneurship (why), the support of digital technologies for new forms of digital academic entrepreneurship (what), the stakeholders involved through the adoption of digital technologies to achieve the goal of academic entrepreneurship (who), and, finally, the processes activated by digital technologies for academic entrepreneurship (how).
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 will review the potential of the digital technologies that have emerged in the last 10 years, followed by an excursus about the perspectives of the academic entrepreneurship literature in Section 3. Section 4 describes and discusses the potential intersection between Digital Technologies and Academic Entrepreneurship. Section 5 proposes an interpretative framework for the conceptualization of Digital Academic Entrepreneurship. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper by presenting a future research agenda for this promising field.
Section snippets
The emerging potential of digital technologies
It is almost impossible to miss the impact of digital technologies in our day-to-day activities. Digital technologies are drastically reshaping markets and society, and several authors have analyzed the impact and future challenges deriving from digitization: the impact of digitization on innovation (Nambisan et al., 2017; Yoo et al., 2012), on entrepreneurship (Cohen et al., 2017; Nambisan, 2017), on technology entrepreneurship (Giones and Brem, 2017) and on new venture creation processes (von
Different interpretations of academic entrepreneurship
Recognizing that present day entrepreneurial universities with the help of their state and private sector partners are key enablers in the areas of technology, innovation and economic development, it is crucial to understand their roles as change agents for todays´ competitive society and as entrepreneurial organizations (Gibb et al., 2009). The idea that the knowledge spawned by university research programs can be used for commercial applications and revenue generation led Etzkowitz (1998) and
Digital technologies and academic entrepreneurship: The missing link
Moving from the holistic conceptualization of Academic Entrepreneurship as proposed by prominent scholars in the field (Siegel and Wright, 2015), we discuss the potential impact of digital technologies on Academic Entrepreneurship, investigating the following aspects (Fig. 1): the rationale for adopting digital technologies for academic entrepreneurship (why), the stakeholders involved through the digital technologies to achieve the academic entrepreneurship goal (who), the processes activated
Digital academic entrepreneurship: an interpretative framework
As discussed in the sections above, digital technologies are changing the way people conduct business and start new ventures (Nambisan, 2017) as well as the initiatives being undertaken by universities to realize new forms of academic entrepreneurship. The debate around academic entrepreneurship should encompass a holistic perspective of this emerging phenomenon according to the dimensions of why, what, who and how digital technologies will change the academic entrepreneurship processes.
Digital
Conclusion and research agenda
The rapid acceleration of digital technologies in the past 10 years has had a global impact on markets and society (Nambisan et al., 2017). Digital technologies, such as social media, mobile, business analytics, the Internet of Things, big data, advanced manufacturing, 3D printing, cloud and cyber-solutions, MOOCs, and artificial intelligence, are creating further opportunities for researchers, entrepreneurs and policy makers. Digital technologies are making more flexible the activities,
Pierluigi Rippa is Assistant Professor in the School of Managerial Engineering at Federico II University of Naples, Italy. He received his PhD in Business Management at the Engineering Faculty of the Federico II. He spent a period as Visiting Researcher at California State University, Chico, USA and at Wayne State University, Michigan. His research interests include innovation and entrepreneurship, knowledge management and information systems. He received three awards for best paper in two
References (95)
- et al.
Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction
Res. Policy
(1985) - et al.
Teaching entrepreneurship using massive open online course (MOOC)
Technovation
(2014) - et al.
User innovation and entrepreneurship in the virtual world: a study of Second Life residents
Technovation
(2012) The technology networks and development trends of university-industry collaborative patents
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
(2017)- et al.
Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: the case of the University of Calgary
J. Bus. Ventur.
(1995) - et al.
The generative potential of emerging technology to support startups and new ecosystems
Bus. Horiz.
(2017) The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages
Res. Policy
(1998)Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university
Res. Policy
(2003)- et al.
The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and ‘mode 2′ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations
Res. Policy
(2000) - et al.
Social interaction via new social media: (how) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior?
J. Bus. Ventur.
(2011)
30 years after Bayh–Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship
Res. Policy
The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study
J. Bus. Ventur.
University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship
J. Bus. Ventur.
Co-creation and user innovation: the role of online 3D printing platforms
J. Eng. Technol. Manag.
Encouraging university entrepreneurship? The effect of the Bayh-Dole act on university patenting in the United States
J. Bus. Ventur.
A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: resource-based view
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
A process model of academic entrepreneurship
Bus. Horiz.
Impact of students' learning preferences in an entrepreneurial university
The Democratization of Entrepreneurship? Hackers, Makerspaces, and Crowdfunding
From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society
J. Technol. Transfer.
Determinants of scientist entrepreneurship: an integrative research agenda
Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Strateg. Entrep. J.
Entrepreneurial Ability Training of the Economics Management Students Under the Condition of Virtual Simulation
3D printing and the third mission: the university in the materialization of intellectual capital
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector
Enterp. Theory Pract.
Business Research Methods
The process of theory-building
A critical review of the literature on the management of corporate information infrastructure
The use of MOOCs to support personalized learning: an application in the technology entrepreneurship field
Knowl. Manag. E-learning
Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation
The elements of platform leadership
MIT Sloan Manag. Rev.
Does context matter in academic entrepreneurship? The role of barriers and drivers in the regional and national context
J. Technol. Transfer.
3D virtual worlds enriching innovation and collaboration in information systems research, development, and commercialisation
Needs and constraints analysis of the three dimensions of third mission activities. E3M: European Indicators and Ranking Methodology for University Third Mission
Digital artifacts as quasi-objects: qualification, mediation, and materiality
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.
Pathways towards the entrepreneurial university for creating entrepreneurial engineers: an Italian case
Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag.
Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science
Minerva
Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks
Sci. Public Policy
Innovation lodestar: the entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament
Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.
The innovating region: toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development
R&D Manag.
Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University
Embracing digital technology: a new strategic imperative
MIT Sloan Manag. Rev.
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter?
J. Technol. Transf.
Introducing some gamification features in an undergraduate entrepreneurship course
Towards the entrepreneurial university?
Int. J. Entrep. Educ.
Leading the Entrepreneurial University
Cited by (211)
Peer innovation as an open innovation strategy for balancing competition and collaboration among technology start-ups in an innovation ecosystem
2024, Journal of Innovation and KnowledgeInstitutional investor ESG activism and corporate green innovation against climate change: Exploring differences between digital and non-digital firms
2024, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Pierluigi Rippa is Assistant Professor in the School of Managerial Engineering at Federico II University of Naples, Italy. He received his PhD in Business Management at the Engineering Faculty of the Federico II. He spent a period as Visiting Researcher at California State University, Chico, USA and at Wayne State University, Michigan. His research interests include innovation and entrepreneurship, knowledge management and information systems. He received three awards for best paper in two different international conferences. He has been president 2014 of the Global Information and Technology Management Association.
Giustina Secundo is Assistant Professor at Department of Innovation for Engineering, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy. She is a Senior Researcher in Management Engineering at University of Salento (Italy). Her research is characterized by a cross-disciplinary focus, with a major interest toward knowledge assets management, innovation management and knowledge intensive entrepreneurship. She has been scientific responsible of several education and research projects held in partnership with leading academic and industrial partners. Her research activities have been documented in about 100 international papers. Her research appeared in Journal of Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management Research & Practices, Measuring Business Excellence, Journal of Management Development, Journal of Knowledge Management. She is a Lecturer of project management at the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Salento since 2001. She is a Member of the Project Management Institute. Across 2014 and 2015, she has been visiting researcher at the Innovation Insights Hub, University of the Arts London (UK).