Behavioral intention towards mobile learning in Taiwan, China, Indonesia, and Vietnam
Introduction
Many scholars have studied mobile learning (ML), which utilizes mobile technologies for educational purposes as a result of its drastic expansion in recent years [1]. Researchers must continue to improve the development of ML by investigating related issues, such as what ML issues have been studied throughout various grade levels [2], student behavioral patterns in ML [3], and factors influencing students' acceptance of ML. Further studies exploring these factors have the potential to increase overall acceptance and willingness to adopt mobile devices in learning environments [[4], [5], [6]]. In support of learners and educators in the ML process, existing reviews of serious ML investigations have examined ways to assist educators and learning institutions to better embrace ML by exploring the subject norms (SN) and perceived behavior control (PBC) that impact students' behavioral intention (BI) to adopt ML approaches in schools where a deep connection between technology and pedagogy exists [7]. Slotta & Linn [8] considered a web-based collaborative probe to promote and maintain positive attitudes toward instruction in science. Additional studies have examined the motivations that influence students’ BI to adopt ML as the factors of evaluation [9].
Despite the abundance of research in the general subject area of ML, few studies have focused on cross-cultural ML problems in Asia. In line with increasing globalization, the field of multinational education development has become an important issue and valuable opportunity for many higher education institutions [10]. As a result of the growing number of international students, educators often incorporate teaching environment features into learning activities by providing ML and knowledge sharing platforms. ML offers educational benefits because its effectiveness is based on mobile technology practices that support pedagogy, which include avoiding inefficient learning activities or unwillingness to adopt ML, maintaining teaching and learning quality, and promoting international academic exchange activities [11]. It is interesting to explore the need to develop country-specific educational strategies and examine cross-cultural differences in the domain of ML. Therefore, examining students from distinct cultural groups with similarities and differences in their BI towards ML is very important for societies and countries. To provide a reference for international education institutions, students from different countries can quickly be integrated into different education systems and environments, thus increasing learning effectiveness and promoting deep cultural and social exchange. These steps will enhance the development of higher education.
Mobile devices have brought about a learning revolution that facilitates changes in the conditions for creative learning. Zahrani and Laxman [12] assert that even if mobile devices provide a wide range of advantages for educators, learners, and institutions, few studies have explored learning readiness and willingness. Some learners were found to regard ML with ambiguity and reluctance in higher education. Common obstacles to ML adoption by students are related to the technologies' perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) [13]. Determining the factors affecting ML adoption is a crucial part of improving ML penetration rates and combating students’ intangible resistance. While observing different groups, we found that cultural difference is a decisive factor for the acceptance of ML learning. The learning cultures in the East and West are completely different. The East is characterized by cynicism, hierarchy, and collectivism that is founded upon a conservative community. On the contrary, Western culture exhibits optimism, non-hierarchy, individualism, a progressive community, as well as confidence in facing indistinct conditions.
First and foremost, Fig. 1 distinguishes the differences between this study and the traditional Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) while highlighting significant contributions of the study.
The elements of this study are denoted as, “The study = TAM TPB” (Fig. 1). Davis (1989) proposed the TAM [11], which includes the main four facets of PU, PEOU, attitude, and intention. Theory of planning behavior (TPB) was proposed by Ajzen [14]. It is claimed that personal behavior comes from BI, and BI is mainly affected by the three variables of the individual's ATT towards behavior, SN, and PBC. The main factors affecting BI are PU and PEOU in TAM. In contrast, the main factors affecting BI are ATT, SN, and PBC in TPB. However, the PEOU and PU proposed by TAM are similar to the concept of ATT in TPB; it is possible to investigate the impact of PEOU and PU on individuals through the exploration of ATT. This study explores how initial willingness affects BI. However, using only ATT to investigate BI cannot fully express BI because it is difficult to completely comprehend the initial willingness by simply discussing PEOU and PU. Therefore, this study uses SN and PBC from a multi-faceted perspective to investigate the factors that affect initial willingness and its subsequent effect on BI. Although various external variables such as service quality, technical system quality, content quality, and social influence are taken into consideration, there is still room for improvement. Since these factors are specific, simple, and easy to understand, they can be harnessed through the system, design, service, and implementation to increase adoption of new technologies.
Previous studies have focused on issues arising after ML has been adopted (e.g., when students have ML experience), and have rarely paid attention to the issues occurring before the use of ML (e.g., when students do not have prior ML experience).
Of the different ways to improve student learning, technology offers a flexible and impactful solution. However, it is difficult to design appropriate technologies based on optimism and equality. This study first explores the initial thoughts students have towards ML by providing a starting point for students to consider using ML as it is very important to stimulate the initial learning readiness and willingness to use ML in order to improve their knowledge [[15], [16], [17], [18], [19]].
This study's contributions to the education literature are listed as follows: 1. As no empirical ML studies have been conducted for Taiwan (TW), Vietnam (VN), China (CN), and Indonesia (IN) using TPB, this is the first time a study uses TPB to investigate higher education students' ML issues in TW, VN, CN, and IN. 2. This study shows the relative importance of PBC in Taiwan and Vietnam as students in these regions are more confident in themselves and more likely to accept new pedagogical methods. Moreover, the importance of SN is shown in China and Indonesia given that students' decisions are significantly influenced by third parties which include parents, spouses, friends, and teachers. 3. In the field of cross-cultural education, accessible academics can provide more interesting courses for cross-cultural students, thus improving students' initial willingness to approach ML to support educational purposes. For practitioners, this study provides diversified and rich learning functions for DMs to design various training methods for presenting learning diversity for cross-cultural students. From student perspectives, the possibilities of tailoring different approaches and ML plans are provided based on students' needs.
ML relies heavily on digital media that delivers learning materials to students. Therefore, unhandy and substandard designs will lead to learners being unwilling to adopt ML. To adapt to the increasing interests and benefits that gear learners toward ML, we address these issues by assuring an adequate plan and design prior to implementation [14]. Therefore, the following questions are proposed:
RQ1. On different campuses and across-cultures, what factors affect students’ BI towards ML?
RQ2. In higher education, what is the relationship among those factors across campuses in different countries?
RQ3. Before offering an appropriate ML system, can the TPB model be applied for the purpose of ML?
When considering students' perceptions of accepting ML, have any cross-cultural differences been found in the past, and to what extent could such findings be applied to students in different countries? Asian students have unique attributes that differ from students in Western countries. Eastern education has developed a pedagogical method that is centrally organized, teacher-dominated, and group-based [15]. Thus, the adoption rate of ML has not been high in the East. Further, cross-cultural research is required to improve its prospects. In particular, we investigated the factors influencing ML adoption in TW, CN, IN, and VN. From a theoretical perspective, many ML studies have been based on extended technology adoption [16]. So far, no research has been done to investigate constructs such as ATT, SN, PBC, PEOU, PU, instructor's readiness (IR) student's readiness (SR), self-efficacy (SE), and learning autonomy (LA) for cross-cultural students in higher education. The present study aims to determine the accessibility and applicability of TPB in an understudied context. The objective of this study is to investigate the key factors that may hinder or facilitate the adoption of ML through TPB with attitudinal constructs, i.e., ATT, SN, and PBC, and external variables, including PEOU, PU, IR, SR, SE, and LA. We examined four different cultural settings to explore the differences that may exist between the cultures involved.
Section snippets
Literature review
According to a 2018 report forecasting the E-learning market size in 2019–2023, the global revenue is expected to reach $65.41 billion by 2023, growing at an average rate of 7.07%; among these, TW, VN, IN, and CN are the countries with the highest growth rates in Asia [17].
Conceptual model
TPB assumes that an individual's BI is a direct antecedent of actual behavior, while BI follows the individual's ATT, SN, and PBC. Regarding attitudinal constructs, ATT is an individual's positive or negative feelings about performing a certain behavior. Previous studies have found that attitude is a strong predictor of intention [14,35]. SN refers to an individual's perception of performing a certain behavior under social pressure or a certain social environment. PBC refers to an individual's
Participants and procedures
This research was mainly carried out within liberal arts, science, engineering, and management departments at SooChow University, CN (n = 259), University of Indonesia, IN (n = 223), HsingWu University, TW (n = 219), and Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology, VN (n = 246). These departments deliver a commonly studied computing course dealing with subjects’ diversity in EL and personal development. The students are encouraged to use mobile devices to bolster their learning experience during
Measurement model
For measurement, all the constructs were initially tested for reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Discussion and implications
This study is one of few ML studies that investigates multiple countries in the Asian region and validates the TPB for students' attitudes and BI to adopt ML with Eastern education features. In fact, ATT, SN, and PBC are positively related to BI, among which SN appears to have a higher positive effect on CN and IN than comparative countries in the study. This result has confirmed previous results showing that SN is a significant factor affecting BI to perform E-Learning [55,56]. However, the
Conclusions
ML facilitates the pedagogical process by using mobile devices and allowing students to engage with learning content anytime, everywhere. Therefore, incorporating key factors can promote students' BI toward ML and enhance learning efficiency. Thus, examining ML as one monolithic entity may only provide limited information. In order to better achieve educational purposes, this study set out to observe the determinants of BI towards ML by considering cross-cultural, higher educational settings
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was not funded by any organization.
Author Shu Hsu Lin declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Author Hsing-Chen Lee declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Author Ching-Ter Chang declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
References (66)
- et al.
Investigating teachers' adoption of signature mobile pedagogies
Comput. Educ.
(2015) - et al.
The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: a systematic review
Comput. Educ.
(2017) - et al.
Taiwanese high school teachers' conceptions of mobile learning
Comput. Educ.
(2017) - et al.
Mobile-based assessment: investigating the factors that influence behavioral intention to use
Comput. Educ.
(2017) Faculty of medicine students' attitudes towards electronic learning and their opinion for an example of distance learning application
Comput. Hum. Behav.
(2016)- et al.
Where learners' and teachers' perceptions on mobile learning meet: a case of Namibian secondary schools in the Khomas region
Technol. Soc.
(2017) - et al.
A cross-cultural study of the intention to use mobile banking between Lebanese and British consumers: extending UTAUT2 with security, privacy and trust
Technol. Soc.
(2019) The theory of planned behavior
Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process.
(1991)- et al.
Examining the students' behavioral intention to use e-learning in Azerbaijan? The General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-learning approach
Comput. Educ.
(2017) - et al.
Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: a systematic review
Comput. Educ.
(2018)
MLearning and pre-service teachers: an assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model
Comput. Hum. Behav.
Investigating attitudes towards the use of mobile learning in higher education
Comput. Hum. Behav.
Learning with mobile technologies – students' behavior
Comput. Hum. Behav.
Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to green hotel choice: testing the effect of environmental friendly activities
Tourism Manag.
An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior
Comput. Educ.
Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: a study of consumer adoption intentions
Int. J. Res. Market.
Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: a structural equation model
Applied Computing and Informatics
Social and individual antecedents of m-learning adoption in Iran
Comput. Hum. Behav.
Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students' Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios
Comput. Hum. Behav.
An activity-theoretical approach to investigate learners' factors toward e-learning systems
Comput. Hum. Behav.
An empirical examination of factors influencing the intention to use mobile payment
Comput. Hum. Behav.
Student acceptance of tablet devices in secondary education: a three-wave longitudinal cross-lagged case study
Comput. Hum. Behav.
Individual and social factors affectingstudent's usage intention in using Learning Management System
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture
Comput. Hum. Behav.
A unified perspective on the factors influencing usage intention toward mobile financial services
J. Bus. Res.
The roles of social factor and internet self-efficacy in nurses' web-based continuing learning
Nurse Educ. Today
The influence of computer self-efficacy, metacognitive self-regulation and self-esteem on student engagement in online learning programs: evidence from the virtual world of Second Life
Comput. Hum. Behav.
Exploring students' purposes of usage and educational usage of Facebook
Comput. Hum. Behav.
Factors that influence acceptance of web-based e-learning systems for the in-service education of junior high school teachers in Taiwan
Eval. Progr. Plann.
Factors influencing student acceptance of mobile learning in higher education
Comput. Sch.
A case of study of investigating users' acceptance toward mobile learning
A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games
J. Educ. Psychol.
Cited by (38)
Consumers’ Green smartphone practices concerned with power consumption optimisation
2023, Cleaner and Responsible ConsumptionMachine autonomy for rehabilitation of elderly people: A trade-off between machine intelligence and consumer trust
2023, Journal of Business ResearchIntentions to use ride-sourcing services in Vietnam: What happens after three months without COVID-19 infections?
2022, CitiesCitation Excerpt :Subjective norms were found to influence ride-sourcing travellers' behavioural intention significantly. In Vietnam, many aspects of daily life are relatively dominated by collectivism, and social pressure plays a critical role in road users' behaviour (Lin et al., 2020). Relatives' or friends' assessments of ride-sourcing usage during the COVID-19 pandemic have significantly affected the ride-sourcing users' intentions.
Determinants of intention to use e-government services: An integrated marketing relation view
2022, Telematics and InformaticsThe emergence of recreational cycling in Hanoi during the Covid-19 pandemic
2022, Journal of Transport and HealthAn empirical analysis of mobile learning app usage experience
2022, Technology in Society