Stability of fault plane solutions for the major N-Italy seismic events in 2012
Introduction
In the critical analysis of the moment tensor solutions of the recent seismic sequence in Emilia–Romagna, retrieved by the non-linear method named INPAR (Šílený et al., 1992), the reliability of each solution is discussed in terms of accuracy of source time function (STF), percentage of Compensated Linear Vector Dipole (CLVD) component and statistical significance of the retrieved mechanism. The theoretical and practical limits of linear moment tensor retrieval from both body waves (Dufumier, 1996) and surface wave spectra (Dufumier and Cara, 1995) have been widely discussed, in particular for very shallow earthquakes, suggesting to use full waveforms at regional distance for moment tensor inversion. Reduction to zero of the isotropic component does not ensure stable solutions, since it does not affect off-diagonal elements Mzx and Mzy. The poor resolution of these elements, which excite Green functions vanishing at the free surface, causes instability in moment tensor solutions for crustal earthquakes whose source depth is significantly exceeded by the dominant wavelengths of data used in the inversion. As a consequence spurious large CLVD components arise and pairs of solutions with nodal planes showing a 180° rotation around the vertical axis (i.e. ϕ = ϕ + 180°, where ϕ is strike angle) are possible, as shown analytically by Henry et al. (2002). The less well determined the Mzx and Mzy components are, the more likely is the existence of a pair of well-fitting solutions. The conditions for the existence of such a pair are more likely satisfied when dealing with earthquakes close to vertical strike–slip or near-dip–slip mechanism, whose nodal plane dips ~ 45°. Similar conclusions are reached by Bukchin (2006) and Bukchin et al. (2010), who prove that the focal mechanism of a seismic source can be uniquely determined from records of surface waves with lengths significantly exceeding the source depth only if the dip angle of one of its nodal planes is sufficiently small.
The real meaning of the retrieved CLVD component is still debated, since it can be even an artifact of the inversion arising from both sparse distribution of stations and inaccurate Earth models (Henry et al., 2002, Panza and Saraò, 2000). The occurrence of sub events with different pure double-couple mechanisms very close in time may lead to the retrieval of a relatively large CLVD component (Guidarelli and Panza, 2007). In this case, different intervals of the source time function can be separately investigated in order to assess how the rupture mechanism changes in time.
Section snippets
Methodology
The INPAR non-linear method for the inversion of moment tensor, developed at the Department of Mathematics and Geosciences of the University of Trieste, adopts a point-source approximation. It uses only the part of complete waveforms from events at regional distances (up to 2500 km) which is dominant in amplitude, thus it maximizes the signal-to-noise ratio. It is particularly suitable in determining shallow event's solutions, due to the possible use of relatively short periods (as short as 10
Comparison of the solutions
The major events (MW ≥ 4.8) that affected northern Italy since 25 January 2012 are relocated and their fault plane solution are retrieved, using broadband stations from MEDNET, French, Swiss and Italian Seismic Networks.
The events are chronologically numbered and their source parameters are listed in Table 1. The fault plane solutions retrieved by INPAR, reduced to best double couple, are shown in Fig. 1a, compared to TDMT solutions (Fig. 1b, Dreger and Helmberger, 1993), RCMT (Fig. 1c, Pondrelli
Conclusions
This paper points out the differences in moment tensor solutions retrieved using signals with different period contents. In particular, for shallow crustal earthquakes, instability in the determination of moment tensor solutions arises when signals with a cutoff period longer than 20 s are inverted. Such instability is mainly due to the poor resolution of tensor components Mzx and Mzy, which excite Green functions vanishing at free surface, and it affects both source depth and fault plane
Acknowledgments
This research has benefited of the grant “Studio della struttura della crosta e del mantello superiore dell'area mediterranea mediante metodologie sismologiche di inversione non lineare” by the Department of Mathematics and Geosciences, University of Trieste. Figures have been plotted using GMT (Generic Mapping Tools; Wessel and Smith, 1995).
References (21)
- et al.
Reverse migration of seismicity on thrusts and normal faults
Earth Sci. Rev.
(2004) - et al.
Stability of earthquake moment tensor inversions: effect of the double-couple constraint
Tectonophysics
(2002) - et al.
The Italian CMT dataset from 1977 to the present
Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.
(2006) - et al.
Quantitative Seismology
(1980) Specific features of surface radiation by shallow source
Izv. Phys. Solid Earth
(2006)- et al.
Uncertainty of moment tensor determination from surface wave analysis for shallow earthquakes
J. Seismol.
(2010) - et al.
On the geodynamics of the northern Adriatic plate
Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei
(2010) - et al.
Determination of source parameters at regional distances with single station or sparse network data
J. Geophys. Res.
(1993) On the limits of linear moment-tensor inversion of teleseismic body wave spectra
Pure Appl. Geophys.
(1996)- et al.
On the limits of linear moment tensor inversions of surface wave spectra
Pure Appl. Geophys.
(1995)
Cited by (4)
The integration between seismology and geodesy for intermediate-term narrow-range earthquake prediction according to NDSHA
2022, Earthquakes and Sustainable Infrastructure: Neodeterministic (NDSHA) Approach Guarantees Prevention Rather than CureWhy are the Standard Probabilistic Methods ofEstimating Seismic Hazard and Risks Too Often Wrong
2014, Earthquake Hazard, Risk and DisastersSpace-Time Precursory Features within Ground Velocities and Seismicity in North-Central Italy
2020, Pure and Applied GeophysicsStrong motion recorded during the Emilia 2012 thrust earthquakes (Northern Italy): A comprehensive analysis
2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering