Elsevier

Telecommunications Policy

Volume 36, Issues 10–11, November–December 2012, Pages 966-976
Telecommunications Policy

The evolution of alliance structure in China’s mobile telecommunication industry and implications for international standardization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2012.07.017Get rights and content

Abstract

China has become a significant player in the international standardization regime of telecommunications. It is currently attempting international standardization of its indigenous technologies. This paper examines how China’s approach for standardization has evolved in the cases of locally developed 3G and 4G mobile standards: TD-SCDMA and TD-LTE. The authors address the question in terms of alliance formation. They apply network analysis, which visualizes the formation and transformation of alliances. They argue that China’s approach to standardization has evolved from techno-nationalism to techno-globalism. In building, developing, and maintaining alliances, relatively more weight is placed on links with foreign firms over time than on those with local firms, and China is increasingly open to foreign firms to gain their support and cooperation, which is required for international standardization and commercialization of locally-developed standards. This study makes a contribution in that it applies a quantitative method of network analysis and thereby visualizes the formation of alliances in 3G and 4G mobile communication industries.

Introduction

As its economy grows at a fast rate and its telecommunication markets get bigger, China is expanding its role in the global telecommunication arena. Attracted by China’s large domestic market, an increasing number of foreign firms that provide service technology or manufacture relevant equipment have entered China for technical or commercial cooperation. Chinese telecommunication firms such as Huawei and ZTE are aggressively expanding their influence in overseas markets such as in African countries (IDE-JETRO, 2009). Taking advantage of the gravitating power of its domestic market and its strengthening influence in developing countries’ markets, the Chinese government has expressed its desire to become a global standard leader in ICT (information and communication technology) sectors (Lee et al., 2009, Suttmeier et al., 2006).

International standardization of indigenous technology can generate high demands for the technology in both domestic and international markets (Blind, 2004). It also provides an opportunity for participating in designing a new technological paradigm. Once a national technology becomes a global standard, it helps the country that developed it to attain multiple goals: financial gains (for example, reduction of outbound royalties and possible inbound royalties); growth of national firms; or sometimes political power to influence the development of future standards (Blind, 2004).

For these reasons, China recently began a drive for international standardization of indigenous technologies. Many attempts for national and international standardization of locally developed technologies have been made and are being made, such as WAPI (WLAN [wireless local area network] authentication and privacy infrastructure; Gao, 2007), AVS (audio video coding standard; Fomin, Su, & Gao, 2011), to name a few. Some have succeeded while others have been less successful (Kwak, Lee, & Fomin, 2011). Among them, its self-developed technology, TD-SCDMA (time division synchronous code division multiple access), won global recognition by ITU as one of the 3G international standards in 2000. Also, TD-LTE (time division long term evolution), an upgraded version of TD-SCDMA, was also adopted as one of the two 4G mobile communication standards in early 2012. In these circumstances, Chinese firms that are involved in the development, commercialization, and standardization of local technologies compete against, and collaborate with, foreign companies by forming alliances or networking.

Although there are many studies on China’s attempts for international standardization (Cromer, 2005, Fomin et al., 2011, Gao, 2007, Kwak et al., 2011, Lee and Oh, 2008, Lee et al., 2009, Suttmeier and Yao, 2004, Suttmeier et al., 2006, Zhan and Tan, 2010), there is little research on the formation and shape of those alliances or networks. Some studies (Kwak et al., 2011) state that international standardization involves complicated networks of domestic and global stakeholders. But they do not show how complex those networks are and how they evolve, if they do, through the life cycle of each technology and/or in generational transition of a technology (e.g., 2G, 3G or 4G mobile communication).

This study aims to investigate how alliances or networks are formed, shaped, and evolved in China’s attempts to set standards. For this purpose, the authors use network analysis through which they will visualize the formation and transformation of alliances in international standardization. The network analysis is applied to the cases of China’s locally developed 3G and 4G mobile communication standards: TD-SCDMA and TD-LTE. As the two standards follow a similar path (i.e., international standardization via ITU) with an interval of about a decade, they provide a good ground for comparison. Specifically, the following questions are asked: are there any changes in China’s approaches to standardization in terms of alliance formation in mobile telecommunication service industry as technology has evolved from 3G to 4G? If there are any changes, what are their implications for China’s approaches and strategies for standardization of indigenous technology? To answer these questions, this paper draws on notions from the study of national innovation systems: techno-nationalism vs. techno-globalism. The two notions address the orientation of national technological innovation systems. Issues regarding knowledge transfer and coordination in China’s mobile service industry are examined by employing the concepts from network analysis and implications for China’s efforts for international standardization are to be discussed.

This study makes a contribution in that it applies a quantitative method of network analysis and thereby visualizes the formation of alliances in 3G and 4G mobile communication industries. While the mobile telecommunication industry in China has attracted attention from researchers and practitioners, particularly since the successful institutionalization of TD-SCDMA as a global standard, most research focuses on the regulatory framework (Xia, 2011, Xia, 2012, Xia and Lu, 2008, Yan, 2001, Yan and Pitt, 1999), the institutional aspects (Kshetri, Palvia, & Dai, 2011), the stakeholder perspectives (Gao & Liu, 2012) and theoretical conjectures like actor-network theory (Gao, 2007) by use of archival and media data, and at best, interviews. While most previous research on standardization in China examines regulation, which is an important dimension, it will be meaningful and interesting to approach and understand the alliances behind other structures. This study is, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the first attempt to quantify and visualize the alliances in China’s 3G and 4G mobile industries by using network analysis.

This paper is organized as follows. In the next section of literature review, the authors introduce their theoretical resources; they are techno-nationalism vs. techno-globalism, and network analysis. Then background information on China’s mobile telecommunication industry is presented. Subsequently, they describe the methodology including the dataset, variables and measurements, and the analytical approach applied. Presentation of statistical findings follows with visualized networks. Then they discuss meanings of those findings and conclude with implications for international standardization.

Section snippets

Techno-nationalism and techno-globalism

The terms techno-nationalism and techno-globalism (TN and TG, hereafter) are used to describe the orientation of national innovation systems. They originate from the changed attitude of the U.S. government and firms regarding national technological innovations (Kohno, 1995, Reich, 1987). By the mid 1980s, TN and TG did not distinguish America’s technological advances from those of other countries (e.g., Japan and West Germany), which is the principal tenet of techno-globalism. Threatened by

Mobile telecommunication industry in China

Many interest groups are involved in the telecommunication industry. Interest groups compete to establish a new equilibrium or oppose it. Tensions vary across countries, depending on history, demographics, property rights, legal systems, and cultural norms (Yan & Pitt, 1999). In the case of China, the government itself is a key interest group. China Telecom under the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunication (MPT) enjoyed monopoly until 1993. In 1994, the Ministry of Electronic Industry (MEI),

Data collection

This study focuses on the mobile telecommunication industry in China. Particularly, the authors examine the networks among telecommunication service providers and their international partners operating in China. This study investigates alliance structure, defined as a transaction-based (formal) network among relevant firms. Transaction-based alliances take several forms, including joint venture, licensing, co-development, or memorandum of understanding (MOU). In the authors' analysis, the main

Results

First, the authors configured the entire layout for China’s 3G and 4G alliances. Fig. 1a presents the graphic image of the 3G alliance structure with the current alliance only, and Fig. 1b includes both the current and the upcoming alliances. Fig. 2 is for the 4G. The 4G alliance takes a simpler shape because the 4G technology started recently and is still less diffused.

Table 5 provides the statistical results about alliance density. While the current 3G alliance has more ties (372) than the 4G

Discussion

This paper is motivated by the question of how alliances are formed and changed in China’s attempts for standardization in 3G and 4G mobile services for which indigenous technologies TD-SCDMA and TD-LTE, respectively, have been developed. What, if anything, can be learnt from these changes about China’s approaches and strategies for standardization? To address these questions, the authors have adopted network analysis. This approach is different from that of previous papers that are mainly

Conclusion

In ICT industries, China has emerged as a strong initiator for international standardization of its indigenous technologies. Accordingly, the manner in which China manages its standardization projects has received increasing attention from business and academia. This study has investigated how the alliances for standardization of local technologies in 3G and 4G mobile communication have evolved, and what implications those changes have for China’s current and future standardization approaches

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2011-330- H00002). The authors appreciate two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

References (44)

  • N. Argyres

    Technology strategy, governance structure, and interdivisional coordination

    Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization

    (1995)
  • C.M. Beckman et al.

    Network learning: The effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions

    Administrative Science Quarterly

    (2002)
  • K. Blind

    The economics of standards: Theory, evidence, policy

    (2004)
  • S.P. Borgatti et al.

    Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis

    (2002)
  • R. Burt

    Structural holes: The social structure of competition

    (1992)
  • China Economic Net. (2012). China’s 4G standard targeting 30% global market share in 10 years. 2nd May. Retrieved from...
  • N. Colombier et al.

    An empirical analysis of Internet providers’ interconnection strategies

    European Review of Industrial Economics and Policy

    (2011)
  • Cromer, Z. (2005). China’s WAPI policy: Security measure or trade protectionism. Duke Law & Technology Review, 18....
  • V. Fomin et al.

    Indigenous standard development in the presence of dominant international standards: The case of the AVS standard in China

    Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

    (2011)
  • P. Gao

    Counter-networks in standardization: A perspective of developing countries

    Information Systems Journal

    (2007)
  • P. Gao et al.

    Catching up through the development of technology standard: The case of TD-SCDMA in China

    Telecommunications Policy

    (2012)
  • V. Gilsing et al.

    Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density

    Research Policy

    (2008)
  • D.R. Gnyawali et al.

    Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective

    Academy of Management Review

    (2001)
  • A. Goerzen et al.

    The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance

    Strategic Management Journal

    (2005)
  • J. Hagedoorn

    Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences

    Strategic Management Journal

    (1993)
  • IDE-JETRO. (2009). China’s telecommunications footprint in Africa, China in Africa. Retrieved from...
  • Journal of Chinese Economic Weekly. (2012). 4G era is coming: TD-LTE is one of the international standards. 24th April....
  • W. Keller et al.

    Innovation and the Asian economies

  • M. Kohno

    Ideas and foreign policy: The emergence of techno-nationalism in U.S. policies toward Japan

  • N. Kshetri et al.

    Chinese institutions and standardization: The case of government support to domestic third generation cellular standard

    Telecommunications Policy

    (2011)
  • J. Kwak et al.

    Government coordination of conflicting interests in standardisation: Case studies of indigenous ICT standards in China and South Korea

    Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

    (2011)
  • H. Lee et al.

    China’s ICT standards policy after the WTO accession: Techno-national vs. techno-globalism

    Information

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text